• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Update to Forum Rules: Criminal Allegations

In our continuing effort to provide an avenue for individuals to voice their opinions and experiences, we have recently reviewed and updated our forum policies. Generally, we have allowed users to share their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, trainers, etc. within the industry, and that is not changing.

When it came to overt criminal allegations, however, those discussions have in the past needed to stem from a report by a reputable news source or action by law enforcement or the legal system.

We are now expanding our policies to allow posters to share their own first-hand experiences involving overt criminal allegations, such as animal abuse or neglect, theft, etc., but only if they publicly provide their full first and last name along with the post. We still will not allow anonymous postings alleging criminal activity.

So, a user may now make a specific claim against a named individual or company, but it must be a FIRST-HAND account, and they have to IDENTIFY THEMSELVES. Users have always been legally responsible for their posts, and nothing has changed there, but we want to loosen the reins a bit and further allow the free flow of discussion and information relevant to the horse community.

We are not providing a free-for-all of anonymous rumor-mongering. As enduring advocates for the welfare of the horse, we want to provide a forum for those willing to sign their name and shine a light on issues of concern to them in the industry.

The full revised rules are posted at the top of each forum for reference.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums’ policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Money Talk- Divorced Parent Edition

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Money Talk- Divorced Parent Edition

    For parents of our next generation of equestrians, how do you deal with paying for the riding expenses of your children? Do you split it? If so how do you navigate new expenses like horses, tack, shows, etc? What kinds of issues have come up and how did you navigate them?

    In my situation, my ex pays the board and I pick up the tab for farrier, lessons, vet, tack, and whatever else. It ends up coming out pretty even. My recent hurdle is trying to explain that it would be cheaper to get a little 2 horse trailer so I could shuttle our kid and her horse to shows, instead of sending her off with the local show barns and paying god only knows what for stuff I can and would actually enjoy doing on my own. Hauling one pony all over creation in the 8 horse polo rig is not only a pain but also causes issues with the tack room and everything getting mixed up. It also scares the bejeezus out of the poor pony to be alone on a giant trailer. How do you explain stuff like this to people who do not understand horses and have no interest in them?

  • #2
    I wouldn't involve the ex in the trailer purchase.
    It doesn't have to be $15k new. You can probably find something older in decent condition for $2-3k.

    It sounds like the deal is ex pays board and you pay everything else anyway, so...
    The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
    Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
    Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
    The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

    Comment


    • #3
      Divorce by Decree or Certificate? Decree would have spousal obligations spelled of in the court order and would be the guideline. Certificate just states you are divorced and would not have any other obligations spelled out

      However, you should have a specific dollar amount in mind when discussing this with former spouse as an open end dollar amount might not be agreeable even a marriage.

      The question needs to posed as for the Good of the Child's Well Being not that I need this

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ecpolo View Post
        For parents of our next generation of equestrians, how do you deal with paying for the riding expenses of your children? Do you split it? If so how do you navigate new expenses like horses, tack, shows, etc? What kinds of issues have come up and how did you navigate them?

        In my situation, my ex pays the board and I pick up the tab for farrier, lessons, vet, tack, and whatever else. It ends up coming out pretty even. My recent hurdle is trying to explain that it would be cheaper to get a little 2 horse trailer so I could shuttle our kid and her horse to shows, instead of sending her off with the local show barns and paying god only knows what for stuff I can and would actually enjoy doing on my own. Hauling one pony all over creation in the 8 horse polo rig is not only a pain but also causes issues with the tack room and everything getting mixed up. It also scares the bejeezus out of the poor pony to be alone on a giant trailer. How do you explain stuff like this to people who do not understand horses and have no interest in them?
        If you want to peacefully co-parent with your ex, you need to lose the mentality that every little thing has to be split evenly, especially something that benefits you and you alone. Send her off with the show barn, or haul her in the rig you already have, but it's not fair to expect your ex to foot half the bill for you to have a 2nd trailer. This is not the hill you want to die on wrt trying to co-parent and make the finances work.
        "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

        Comment


        • #5
          I think you have a nice deal going with your ex splitting costs (I've seen several kids struggle to get the parents to agree just taking lessons and a lease was out of the question because only 1 parent thought it was worthwhile) so i will agree with pp that you should find the price range you are looking at and mention it to your ex. Maybe your ex will be supportive maybe not, but I wouldnt expect to have the cost split 50/50. If you are on good terms just ask what they think and go from there.

          Comment


          • #6
            Count your lucky stars that he pays the board. Anything else is on you.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ecpolo View Post
              In my situation, my ex pays the board and I pick up the tab for farrier, lessons, vet, tack, and whatever else. It ends up coming out pretty even. My recent hurdle is trying to explain that it would be cheaper to get a little 2 horse trailer so I could shuttle our kid and her horse to shows, instead of sending her off with the local show barns and paying god only knows what for stuff I can and would actually enjoy doing on my own. Hauling one pony all over creation in the 8 horse polo rig is not only a pain but also causes issues with the tack room and everything getting mixed up. It also scares the bejeezus out of the poor pony to be alone on a giant trailer. How do you explain stuff like this to people who do not understand horses and have no interest in them?
              Are shows in the 'whatever else' category (that you pay for)?

              If yes then getting a second trailer would be a cost savings for you and only you. Why would the X be part of paying for that?

              To me it sounds like you have a great arrangement now. If you want a second trailer then go buy one.

              Comment


              • #8
                It seems to me that the purchase of a new trailer is 100% for your personal convenience. Why on Earth should your ex care about that or contribute to the purchase?

                If you want a new trailer, go find one within your budget and buy it.

                My ex only ever paid exactly what he was legally obligated to pay, i.e. child support. He never contributed a dime for anything else, and I think that is a fairly typical situation, so I think you're pretty lucky that your ex is willing to share any of the horse expenses at all.
                "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                that's even remotely true."

                Homer Simpson

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post
                  It seems to me that the purchase of a new trailer is 100% for your personal convenience. Why on Earth should your ex care about that or contribute to the purchase?
                  l.
                  I would think if the ex's support is specific to the well being of the child there would be interest to improve the experience for the child .... not every Ex is a cold hearted SOB

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think you'll get him to contribute to what amounts to a vehicle purchase in your name only.

                    For my child, our horses are at home, and they're also here for my use, so there is no even splitting of costs. I pay for all upkeep of the horses, to include farrier and vet (and the new trailer I got last year). XH pays for lessons, entry fees, Pony Club and USEA dues, and that's it. It certainly helps, but it's definitely less than half.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by clanter View Post

                      I would think if the ex's support is specific to the well being of the child there would be interest to improve the experience for the child .... not every Ex is a cold hearted SOB
                      You'd be hard pressed to convinced me that the well being of the child is going to be measurably improved by the purchase of a new trailer compared to the alternative of having the pony loaded up on the trailer with the rest of the horses coming from the show barn or hauled on the big trailer. And if the pony doesn't like being hauled alone on the big 8 horse trailer, then toss another horse on for company.

                      Obviously I'm a cold-hearted witch.
                      "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                      that's even remotely true."

                      Homer Simpson

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post

                        You'd be hard pressed to convinced me that the well being of the child is going to be measurably improved by the purchase of a new trailer compared to the alternative of having the pony loaded up on the trailer with the rest of the horses coming from the show barn or hauled on the big trailer. And if the pony doesn't like being hauled alone on the big 8 horse trailer, then toss another horse on for company.

                        Obviously I'm a cold-hearted witch.
                        Obviously you know more about OP's situation than I but there are some EXs who will drop the coin in a heart beat

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post
                          And if the pony doesn't like being hauled alone on the big 8 horse trailer, then toss another horse on for company.

                          Obviously I'm a cold-hearted witch.
                          And, to remove the issue of things getting confused in the tack room you can put the pony's tack and such into a safe trunk and secure it in one of the unused stalls in the horse part of the trailer.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by clanter View Post

                            Obviously you know more about OP's situation than I but there are some EXs who will drop the coin in a heart beat
                            Sure, and OP knows best whether he can easily spare a few grand. But no matter how much money he has, a second horse trailer still falls firmly in the luxury category.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by clanter View Post

                              Obviously you know more about OP's situation than I but there are some EXs who will drop the coin in a heart beat
                              You're confusing the issue with your emotional reaction to your perception that I am being unfairly critical of non-custodial parents.

                              Even if the ex rolls around in a vault of gold like Scrooge McDuck and would gladly drop some of that coin on a new horse trailer for his/her daughter's pony, the second horse trailer is a luxury item that would be purchased purely for the convenience of the OP. Presenting it as being "for the child" and asking the ex to contribute on that basis is, IMO, a false representation of the situation as described by the OP.
                              "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                              that's even remotely true."

                              Homer Simpson

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post

                                the second horse trailer is a luxury item that would be purchased purely for the convenience of the OP..
                                I am assuming the Eight Horse Polo Pony trailer belongs to the barn, not the OP's trailer.. I could be incorrect but that is the way I read their post

                                So this little two horse would the first and only trailer, not the luxury of being a smaller secondary unit

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by clanter View Post

                                  I am assuming the Eight Horse Polo Pony trailer belongs to the barn, not the OP's trailer.. I could be incorrect but that is the way I read their post

                                  So this little two horse would the first and only trailer, not the luxury of being a smaller secondary unit
                                  You seem to be in the minority on that assumption. If you read the other replies, I and most others have the impression that the 8 horse belongs to the OP.
                                  "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                                  that's even remotely true."

                                  Homer Simpson

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I don't think it matters. Save up, buy small trailer, because pony. Board is a necessity, everything else is a luxury. Many people rely on others to trailer them. Since it sounds like you have a suitable rig to tow (that's the expensive part), so start figuring out the budget for a trailer. Our first trailer cost 500, which arguably is a unicorn, but I see lots of decent smaller trailers for 1500.
                                    Let me apologize in advance.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by clanter View Post

                                      I am assuming the Eight Horse Polo Pony trailer belongs to the barn, not the OP's trailer.. I could be incorrect but that is the way I read their post

                                      So this little two horse would the first and only trailer, not the luxury of being a smaller secondary unit
                                      I thought this too, then noticed OP user name is something Polo, so now im not sure either.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by kiwichick View Post

                                        I thought this too, then noticed OP user name is something Polo, so now im not sure either.
                                        OP uses the phrase " sending her off with the local show barns," which to me, means that a show barn (not polo barn) is taking a load of horses to a show, and that is an option. Or, the OP, who has a string of polo ponies, has her own 8 horse rig with tack room that always has tack in it, and the daughter's horse can be transported in that rig. But, I could be wrong!!
                                        "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X