• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USHJA Emerging Athletes Program: age limit?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USHJA Emerging Athletes Program: age limit?

    What's the age limit for applicants, anyone know?

  • #2
    Last year I think it was 21 or 22 which made me mad because I was 23 and wanted to apply, and I called and complained. Of course they'll probably change the age limit to 23 and now I'm 24 and I'll be equally SOL lol.
    If only horses would use their athletic powers for good instead of evil. ~ MHM


    • #3
      I believe it's 21, but that was for 2009.

      Not sure if that's your "show age" or age at time of application.
      "I'm not crazy...my mother had me tested"


      • #4
        21 for 2009, but I actually heard that they are considering lowering that for 2010. So it may become 17 or 18.


        • #5
          21 USEF.
          friend of bar.ka


          • #6
            The application is now on the USHJA website. Age Limits is 16-21. Last year my daughter did the level 1 at 14, but can't this year as she is 15. They eliminated the 3' section.


            • #7
              Personally, I don't understand...

              Why they do this for kids that haven't even went to college yet... So for the most part, the time is, all but wasted, on kids who won't even be showing or limited showing for the following 3 or 4 years. And then MIGHT NOT even keep showing or turn pro after college.

              Why not make the age for this 25 to 30. That way the people have definitely decided to show more and continue in the horse world...
              " iCOTH " window/bumper stickers. Wood Routed Stall and Farm Signs


              • #8
                The EAP was really designed to give talented youngsters the chance to learn in an environment where qualifying to ride was as fair as possible (obviously it's easier to learn/show on a horse that isn't rank but they opened the playing field to non-big name riders). I like the program. Do I wish they'd extend it to 25-30 year olds? YES! I'm so bummed that they came up with this just now and not five years ago. But I'm glad that USHJA is moving more in the direction of educating riders from the ground, up.

                We need more of these programs for sure, both locally and nationally. I think we're missing a lot of great talent and great heart because riding is so damn expensive. Hopefully with these programs, USHJA will be able to start turning this around. It's definitely a start.


                • #9
                  Originally posted by PonyPenny View Post
                  They eliminated the 3' section.
                  Wow. That's really too bad. Wonder the reasoning...


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by grandprixjump View Post
                    Why they do this for kids that haven't even went to college yet... So for the most part, the time is, all but wasted, on kids who won't even be showing or limited showing for the following 3 or 4 years. And then MIGHT NOT even keep showing or turn pro after college.

                    Why not make the age for this 25 to 30. That way the people have definitely decided to show more and continue in the horse world...
                    Agreed, I have a big chip on my shoulder that there weren't programs like this when I was a Junior and now I feel discriminated against because I'm an Ammie.

                    And I wear my chip proudly thank you!
                    If only horses would use their athletic powers for good instead of evil. ~ MHM


                    • #11
                      Just FYI, it seems like they take show age.

                      "Applicants must be 16-21 years of age according to USEF Rules"


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by sptraining View Post
                        Wow. That's really too bad. Wonder the reasoning...
                        From my experience, the 3' kids were already at a disadvantage when selected for Level 2. None were selected for the National Final. As a participant, I have my belief that this was done [ETA] on purpose [really didn't mean completely before, but I do feel it wasn't done by accident]. (PM me if you want explanation for that). But hey, if they're not gonna consider the 3' kids for the Final, I'm much happier that they took it out.

                        ETA: I like the program, I really do, but I think it needs a LOT of changes to make it really what the industry needs.
                        Last edited by hideyourheart03; Jan. 27, 2010, 08:20 PM.


                        • #13
                          HideYourHeart, could you explain some of the changes you feel would improve the program? I know you participated so I'm interested to hear your views.
                          "I'm not always sarcastic. Sometimes I'm asleep." - Harry Dresden

                          Amy's Stuff - Rustic chic and country linens and decor
                          Support my mom! She's gotta finance her retirement horse somehow.


                          • #14
                            Renn, I will definitely work on a post. I don't know if I'll get it done tonight with school and such, but I'll have it up ASAP.


                            • #15
                              I'm disappointed at hearing they have taken out the 3' section--for several reasons.

                              Reason one is that the lower level kids I watched benefited GREATLY from being able to participate in the Level 1 training session, even if it were a given that they lacked the education or experience to be invited on to the next level.

                              Another reason is that so much of the difference between having the ability to do the upper levels or not rests with the horse. I saw Hideyourheart do a creditable job on a borrowed horse that, though generous in spirit, and obviously worth his weight in gold, was of limited capability.

                              Lastly, if the aim of the program is to identify talent, the earlier in a rider's development it happens, the better, in my opinion. Too many parents of modest or limited means have to discourage even the most talented riders from aspiring to much more than weekly lessons. Access to our sport is limited enough already; sadly it is becoming more so.

                              It was my understanding that the EAP was meant to address this; eliminating the 3' section is a step away from this goal.
                              Inner Bay Equestrian


                              • #16
                                Agree with M. O'Connor. I would think that it would make sense to have the lower level of the program explode and "sponsor" talented kids (get them working student positions at reputable barns, etc).

                                At least USHJA is moving in a direction towards educating the masses. I also see a lot of ways to improve the Trainer Certification program but I guess it's a start. Gotta jump the crossrails before you get to the big fences.


                                • #17
                                  My biggest complaint about the program is that it constantly contradicts itself. It "says" it's a "grassroots" program, but then names winners that are proven on the National level. It "says" horsemanship is incredibly important, but yet rewards mediocre horseman (OVERALL, not a comment about any individuals, just an observation).

                                  Here are some ideas that I came up with when brainstorming after Renn asked me too. Honestly, I’ve never put any of this down in writing, so it’s very rough, but these are just some of my ideas.

                                  1. Take away the focus on results.
                                  Take away the focus on horse shows. If you really want grassroots, you shouldn't be taking kids who show regularly at the national level. In BOTH my Level 1 and Level 2 programs there were kids who wintered in Wellington and regularly did all of the above. Not that they didn’t learn, but if you have 2 High JR Jumpers or 2 nice JR Hunters, etc. you shouldn’t be at this program.

                                  One idea: DO NOT allow kids who have competed at Eq Finals or Prix De States or NAJYRC or in a GP to participate. Maybe not fair for the kid who only went to Eq finals once, but kids who ribboned should not be there.

                                  2. More theory and explanation.
                                  Yes, I know they tried to improve this by focusing on horsemanship and, from what I’ve read, they did this more at the National Level, but kids especially need to understand WHY certain things are important. Now, IMO Melanie did an okay job of this in her exercises teaching the horse to go immediately to the rider’s leg, but it could have been done better. Why do Shoulder-In? Why do Haunches-In? How do you adjust an exercise for a nervous horse? Or a sulky one? This is crucial to development as a rider… knowing what to do in unfamiliar situations. This was also done in the course walk for day 2 at Level 2, but I feel like it was very specific to that day, not to riding in general.

                                  One idea: Off horse riding theory discussion. Especially focused on flatwork/dressage.

                                  3. Switch horses.
                                  Maybe it’s a stretch, but I think especially at Level 2 this should be done. It truly shows who can ride well and who can’t. Many kids come on long time partners. Others borrow horses. I know they can’t get donated horses for every level, which would obviously be ideal, especially at L2/3, but you could have the riders switch to see what happens. Obviously it can’t just be done blindly, but I guarantee in a group of 8, there would be something else suitable for everyone to ride.

                                  4. Organization in the barn.
                                  I know the point at the Level 2 session was to see how the kids worked on their own, but it constantly felt chaotic and all over the place. This will be hard to accomplish, I know that, but it could be done. Maybe through assigning of chores? Maybe through a buddy system of people in separate groups – ie the two of us do chores for our two horses and then help each other on the ground? It might just be my L2 section, but I always felt chaos.

                                  5. Team building and group exercises.
                                  The riders should want to hang out together! It’s all about connecting, about meeting new people, making friends. But yet, especially at the first level, there was no interaction between kids who didn’t already know each other. This did improve at the second level, but not through USHJA stuff – mom’s organized dinners (and at ours, trips to the beach!). USHJA should make a Friday night social, Saturday night dinner, and maybe even a “host” hotel (heck, horse shows do it… they could too).

                                  6. Some sort of video or photo option on the application.
                                  Yes, I know it is to support “grassroots”, but this ranges a huge, huge spectrum. I feel like this would increase the quality of the Level 1 participants if there was some way off paper to evaluate the riders. Yes, I know that that makes it more expensive to apply, but in today’s world, everyone has to be able to find someone who can video them and make a DVD cheap. Yes, I know it relies on the quality of horse available, but this would come out at the actual clinic, so why not just get it out there. This would allow the pool to be better from the get go.

                                  7. Connection to the rest of the professional horse world.
                                  This program needs to be more than an end in itself. And until it becomes credible, few big time professionals will probably have even heard of it, let alone take it as legitimate. Heck, even once it becomes big, the VAST majority of positions in the horse world are filled through “knowing” somebody in the right place. We were told at the Level 2 section that the connections we made would help us and serve as our “mentors” but how serious were they? I know I emailed one and never received any response. There has got to be some way to connect these kids at the Level 2 and beyond to potential opportunities.

                                  These are just some ideas. I know they are not perfect, but from what I’ve seen the program needs work. Feel free to give me your feedback (*flame suit is on*). Like I said, my ideas are very, very rough.


                                  • #18
                                    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Hideyourheart. You make a lot of interesting points. I would love to hear even more about the Level 2 sessions,
                                    My daughter rode with you in the Level 1 clinic and I think she embodies what I would call "grassroots." She doesn't show a lot, because it's just too expensive for us. Her horse (which she has to share with one of her younger sisters) is an OTT appendix (had a few starts in the Quarter Horse racing world) that sat in a field for years after coming off the track because he wasn't terribly rideable. She has worked really hard on flatwork, flatwork, flatwork, knowing the importance of a good foundation. I thought it interesting when Melanie asked all the riders where they were headed after the clinic. Most said they were going on to A Circuit shows. My daughter answered "home to do more flatwork."
                                    I think I share many posters' frustrations about what the USHJA really means by grassroots. As you already noted, there were many riders at that Level 1 clinic that had multiple horses, extensive show records at many of the top A venues, and, I am assuming, ample financial resources.
                                    Beyond my questions on defining the term "grassroots," I thought it was a great experience and I have encouraged my daughter to apply again. She was hoping to apply to the 4foot group this year, but with the change in age requirements, she will have to wait until 2011. As disappointed as she is to wait, I reminded her that she will have another year to prepare (flatwork, flatwork, flatwork).
                                    Last edited by maddyh; Jan. 28, 2010, 07:52 PM. Reason: typo