• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

St. Louis Holiday Horse Show - Live Coverage??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • St. Louis Holiday Horse Show - Live Coverage??

    Is there anywhere to watch it online?
    Oakwood Farm
    Home to Rowntree Welsh & Half Welsh Hunter Ponies!
    Bloodlines includes Llanarth Senator, Rosedale Top Cat, Telynau Elgar & more!

  • #2
    I don't think so.
    ~ Citizens for a Kinder, Gentler COTH...our mantra: Be nice. ~

    Comment


    • #3
      does anyone know if there is a derby there this weekend? If so, whose is competing in it?

      Comment


      • #4
        I believe it is tonight (Friday). I don't know who is riding in it, other than Tammy Provost, who makes the trek to STL only because of this derby. She won it last year, I think. It's on youtube if you'd like to watch.

        Comment


        • #5
          You can see the list of entrants at horseshowtime.com. I believe there are 42 entered.
          My new mantra - \"Life is too short not to eat ice cream.\"
          ReRiders Clique

          Comment


          • #6
            Just got back from watching it, but I didn't stay through the whole thing. Went with my mom, who is not a horse person, and she was such a saint to sit there for 3 hours of hunters. Her observations were hilarious...and very accurate.

            I was surprised at such a simple course, both for the regular round and the handy. There were 3 options, all of which were simply a 4' option to the 3'6 vertical. No gate, no bank built this year, really kind of disappointing. I told my mom it was going to be an exciting hunter class and well, she stared at me after 2 hours and said there was no difference.

            A few super nice horses, some decent rounds. Lots of rails and rubs, a few naughty horses, and a lot of over riding. I wanted to see some fluidity and boldness and I just wasn't impressed.

            Perhaps its the venue (indoor ring) or the competition STL garners, but I'm with my mom - there was nothing about the class - the course, the judging, the riders, the horses - that said hunter derby. More like a hunter classic with a handy round.

            *shrugs*

            Big class, though, 43 I think, which is very impressive for STL. Last year I think had entries in the 20s, though I could be wrong. Curious to see who won, I think Sarah Mechlin was in the lead after the first round.

            Here's the entries:
            http://horseshowtime.com/showclassre...2817&ClassID=3
            Results will be posted at www.horseshowtime.com
            It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. (Aristotle)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mac123 View Post
              Just got back from watching it, but I didn't stay through the whole thing. Went with my mom, who is not a horse person, and she was such a saint to sit there for 3 hours of hunters. Her observations were hilarious...and very accurate.

              I was surprised at such a simple course, both for the regular round and the handy. There were 3 options, all of which were simply a 4' option to the 3'6 vertical. No gate, no bank built this year, really kind of disappointing. I told my mom it was going to be an exciting hunter class and well, she stared at me after 2 hours and said there was no difference.

              A few super nice horses, some decent rounds. Lots of rails and rubs, a few naughty horses, and a lot of over riding. I wanted to see some fluidity and boldness and I just wasn't impressed.

              Perhaps its the venue (indoor ring) or the competition STL garners, but I'm with my mom - there was nothing about the class - the course, the judging, the riders, the horses - that said hunter derby. More like a hunter classic with a handy round.

              *shrugs*

              Big class, though, 43 I think, which is very impressive for STL. Last year I think had entries in the 20s, though I could be wrong. Curious to see who won, I think Sarah Mechlin was in the lead after the first round.

              Here's the entries:
              http://horseshowtime.com/showclassre...2817&ClassID=3
              Results will be posted at www.horseshowtime.com
              Big. Giant. Ditto. it was nothing more than a handy round with jrs, ams, and pros thrown in. Class finally ended at 10:30 and of course few spectators stayed around for prizes at that hour. It was 43 first round trips and 12 second round, and it was loooong. there weren't any trappy inside turns or bold options on the course to spice it up. Lots of bending lines, a two-stride set kind of long, a straight up outside line that seemed to give an unreasonable amount of trouble, three 3'6" vs. 4' vertical options.

              2nd round included a trot fence and a walk fence. Yipee. And apparently a hand gallop to the out of the bending line which was now a trot fence coming in. I guess the idea was you don't add the step for trotting in? The walk fence was a pile of brush with a pole laying on top of it, probably about 6-8" high. I honestly pondered whether you were supposed to jump it or literally walk over it . . . question was answered as one horse did just "walk" it and the judges clearly did not approve (was sitting behind one set). At best I thought that particular question was unclear, at worst it was pathetic. Make it a 2'6" gate and make it obvious and make it require some actual effort. Most rode it as an elevated canter departure to the left lead.

              Competition was an assortment of working hunters, eq horses and jumpers. I saw very few horses with what I would call a GOOD, traditional hunter jump. In fact, only one comes to mind and he did receive a top call.

              I do not think the "handiest" horses were rewarded, and while I agreed with most of the scores there were a few that completely had me baffled, including the winner. I did not think he was either handy nor a particularly good jumper, though he did move the part. Another horse with a horrific jump (in my head) scored high in the first round, returned for the 2nd trip, neglected to walk the walk fence, and still received an 84 from one side. On the other hand, someone scored in the 70s for "rushing" the trot fence, though he did clearly trot it, and another very handy but not as huntery 2nd round competitor cantered the trot fence and received a score in the 60s. Complete fail of the test, I guess. Not sure why trot steps to the walk fence didn't result in a similar score.

              55 rounds, 3 ring drags and ribbons made for a very long evening, I'm not sure why trainers stand for this when they've got to be right back there at 6 am. Also trying on the parents dragging away tiny children at 9pm because the Short Stirrup ring starts in 10 hours.

              The ring is clearly limiting for this type of event, maybe they should really consider whether this is a location that can truly hold an International Derby. It would be nice to see some consistency in this class from venue to venue.

              I hate to say it but in regards to the new "standards" they speak of setting, a score board would have been REALLY nice. The PA system was barely audible.

              I've really got to study the bonus points system, 55 trips and I still couldn't figure out exactly what they were rewarding. Completely arbitrary it seemed.

              just some notes!! Results are up on horseshowtime.
              EHJ | FB | #140 | watch | #insta

              Comment


              • #8
                Pictures will be posted here, usually within a week of the show.
                http://www.photostockplus.com/home.p...8&album=371682

                I have to really agree with dags. I was sitting next to the judges on the far side of the arena (opposite from the announcers booth) and it was curious to watch their expressions and overhear comments and conversation. I agreed with a lot, even scored some rounds very similarly in my head, but was totally scratching my head on others. And the bonus point thing is very unclear. Sometimes more bonus points were awarded to a rider who didn't take as many of the options, etc. I couldn't quite figure out what they were looking for because what they rewarded wasn't quite what I thought the derby was supposed to produce.

                I was also quite disappointed in the riding...for such an easy course, it was curious that there were so many *gasp* moments.

                The course was odd for a derby...very straightforward. The hardest thing was a two stride that was set long (a bit unfairly so, I thought, for a small indoor) and a five stride line that every other person mysteriously rode wrong but seemed to be a normal 5 stride. I have never seen such serious counting from pros as during that line (was sitting right in the middle of it).

                The walk "jump" was pathetic. If my horse had been in there, I think he would have rolled his eyes. Really. 8 inches does not constitute a jump.

                I was also disappointed to see that they rewarded the current modern hunter ride, which was what I *thought* the derby was supposed to discourage. On particular rider rode uber quiet, holding, deliberately placing them exactly to each fence. While it produced an extravagant effort from the horse by necessity, there was nothing forward or fluid or bold about it. Very over thought and taxing on the horse. He scored quite well.

                Totally a "meh" evening. Not entirely sure it was worth trecking out there for 3 hours with a muscle spasm in my shoulder/neck that had kept me in bed all day.

                Was anyone else there?
                It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. (Aristotle)

                Comment


                • #9
                  I was there too. While I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment to the extent that Mac and Dags did, I agree that it wasn't a very exciting evening. I went shopping and looked at pics/videos after 25 or so horses had gone, then went to feed my guy some carrots. Yeah, it was THAT exciting. Didn't stay for the handy round as I was riding really early the next morning.

                  Had more fun watching the groom's class (where two of our guys finished in the top 6). Yay!
                  ~ Citizens for a Kinder, Gentler COTH...our mantra: Be nice. ~

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X