• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Riding on the flat... question to the jumper people...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Riding on the flat... question to the jumper people...

    Well glad I copied my original thread as it somehow didnt come through at all but still managed to show up 4 times blank...

    Here it is: :-) sorry for the confusion

    Good morning!!
    Yea it's friday...
    So I have a question: I went and audited the George Morris clinic yesterday (which was wonderfully held at Pinehurst Stables) and really learned a lot! May I just say that I LOVE his emphasis on how the basics need to be in... that you have to have basic flat work (shoulders in, lateral movements, counter-canter, etc..). It was truely refreshing to see that people do still practice that (probably because it my neck of the woods, you don't see it much)!
    So, here is the question, do you ride very forward on the flat... and even approaching fences?
    I grew up riding in Europe and I ride on my "seat bones"... not saying this is more correct in any way... I just thought I'd ask here to see what the norm is... or at the end of the day, does it just matter what your horse goes best in.

    I'm going to look for a pic of me on the flat... I just happen to ride at the vertical (definitely not behind though).
    So please enlighten me (I really am not stuck on the fact that "my" way is the best- just want to see what the advantage of riding that forward are).

    Also, got a new mare.... finally...
    Here are a couple pics of her in pasture:
    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pi...c&id=616012494

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pi...1&id=616012494

    and here are her bloodlines: http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/irish+hills+chyna

    She's been in a field for 3 years though so I plan to re-start her next month (when I will officially be a college graduate).

    Thanks for the insights...
    Proudly living in my "let's save the world bubble"!

  • #2
    By forward I'm guessing you're talking about your upper body inclination right?? From what I remember of the clinic I took with him... We sat in the saddle for flatwork, but when we jumped he wanted us up in more of a two point. Those who sat too much during jumping (myself included ) he called "butt grabbers" and told us to get up out of our tack. I know you should have many seats but it seems like when you watch bigger classes some sit A LOT and others never sit in the saddle.
    scr.ew them hunters

    ~barka.lounger

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Yes I meant in the upper body...
      You are right, it is mostly in the jumping phase... but even at the trot- the riders were pretty forward with their upper body.
      I tend to sit (even though its a light seat- not full seat) a couple strides out before a fence... Just was wondering what the positive aspect of having your upper body that forward at the trot on the flat as well as the constant two point over fences...
      Proudly living in my "let's save the world bubble"!

      Comment


      • #4
        I started riding with a more dressage oriented instructor and always tended to ride primarily on the vertical w/ my butt in the saddle. However, when I purchased my first horse, I had to learn to adapt to how she likes to be ridden. She is a very forward and opinionated mare and goes much better when I stay lighter in the tack. I don't ride with a very forward upper body angle, but I definitely stay off her back while jumping and typically during canter work on the flat. She also has a longish-type back and when I sit too much she tends to hollow out. Now there are always moments on course where I need to sit more, but for the most part I stay in a light seat either with my butt completely out of the tack or just brushing the seat slightly.

        I always find that my position changes from horse to horse, depending on what they respond the most to. For instance, my friend's QH gelding goes better when you remain sitting and upright. He even prefers a sitting trot to the base of a jump as opposed to posting. Just depends on the horse.

        Comment


        • #5
          Upper Body at posting trot should be at an approximate 30 degree angle. Same for galloping and jumping. This keeps your body moving with the motion. Vertical is not correct for HSE and would be considered behind the motion (a useful tool when necessary, but shouldn't be your base position.)
          Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
          Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

          Comment


          • #6
            For me it depends on the horse. Sometimes you need to sit to balance them in the corners, for a tight turn, or a few strides out from the jump. Others flow nicely if you're up out of the tack.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Originally posted by JinxyFish313 View Post
              For me it depends on the horse. Sometimes you need to sit to balance them in the corners, for a tight turn, or a few strides out from the jump. Others flow nicely if you're up out of the tack.
              K... that's what I seem to think...
              I mean when you look at the "big" time show jumpers, not all of them ride out of their saddles....
              examples:
              She rides in a pretty deep seat:
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-bsdEK9_L0

              the "in between:
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvYHkFUYvxY
              same here.. in between but he still sits up before fences...
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2BgHKKPBqU

              So I'm taking it... their is no universal position... ride and adapt to your mount...
              Thank you
              Proudly living in my "let's save the world bubble"!

              Comment


              • #8
                I worked in Holland last year and I definitely came home with a different riding position. I felt like my position was much stronger, but I did have someone ask me once if I was a dressage rider, after watching me on the flat.

                I think that our traditional American position was heavily influenced by the fact that we were riding Tbs for so long. I think that *most* of them do go better in a lighter frame and ride. I don't think that one style is better than the other, but designed for different types of horses.

                It is difficult to get a heavy German horse to pay attention when cantering in my half seat.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think it really depends on the horse. I have a TB who likes being ridden with a deeper seat- like a stereotypical WB.

                  I get up out of the saddle to gallop and so on, but getting the best jump out of him means that I need to "ride like a German," as my trainer says. I flat him the same way, and for whatever reason it makes him much happier. He has to be different....

                  His BFF, also a TB, hates a deep seat and goes best when the rider does a light hunter seat. Figure out what makes each horse happy and produces the best jump and you'll have your answer!
                  You can take a line and say it isn't straight- but that won't change its shape. Jets to Brazil

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hunter Seat Equitation, by George Morris, details every aspect of his system of riding; he really did 'write THE book.'

                    http://www.amazon.com/Hunter-Seat-Eq.../dp/0385413688
                    Inner Bay Equestrian
                    Facebook
                    KERx

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It all comes down to two different schools of thought: the Forward Riding method, as proposed primarily by Littauer, which dispenses with all collection (and therefore any use of the full seat by all but very advanced horsemen/women, and only then in the case of what he calls semi-collection), and the more classical sytem of equitation proposed by deNemethy and very much adhered to by Steinkraus, which were very adamant in using lateral and collective exercises to straighten and strengthen the horses in order to ride them forward and without resistance.

                      After much study, I conclude Littauer and followers desire to avoid resistance in the horse by not asking it to carry itself in any way other than it's natural carriage under the rider. All training of the horse takes place with the horse in it's natural (forward) balance, as that is where the horse is "happiest." It is interesting to note that Littauer's observation of the abhorrent collected riding in his time was based on the old German school, which was not exactly the "glory days" of horsemanship.

                      DeNemethy and followers of his system (who came slightly on the tail of Littauer) combined the very best influence of classical dressage with the desire for forward freedom of the horse. They were very interested in riding their horses forward and allowing them freedom, but only after intensive work on the flat to eradicate resistance, suppling the horse in both lateral and longitudinal planes so that when they were ridden strongly forward, no natural crookedness remained to work against the rider. It is this school of thought I support. The educated use of the seat is a very strong feature of this system, which is logical, as the seat is the modifier of all energies created by the leg, and therefore the horses haunches. The hand acts only as verifier. Without use of the seat (as in the Forward System) the hand is left to act as modifier, which because of its use forward of the horse's center of gravity, tends to tip the mass of the horse even more forward, much like stepping on the brake of a car. The seat is absent as a means to bridge the leg and hand aids, allowing greater sublety. A good analogy: the forward system is like stepping on the brake to reduce the car's speed. The classical system is like gearing down to reduce the speed of the vehicle.

                      IMHO, no style of riding should completely exclude an entire set of aids, and therein lies the fault of Littauer and his followers. It is like excluding the woodwind section in a symphony! The sound is going to be very impoverished. So it is with riding...when one entirely excludes the use of the full seat, the quality of riding and the quality of work suffers. Proper riding includes the coordinated and educated use of all the aids to allow for the most beautiful performance and lasting soundness of horse and rider.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I guess my general answer is that the joy and greatness of riding horses and being good is that the rider has a huge tool box (riding seat, bits, tack, leg, etc)......and for each horse, not every tool comes out of the box.

                        The rider has to hand-select which tools fit which horse best. Not every combination works on every horse. Its not universal. And it also depends on WHAT you are trying to accomplish (light flat work, dressage type flat work, a jump off round, a hunter round, a xcountry round, etc).


                        I only own TBs and they all 'prefer' the light seat, but they get the full vertical seat when balking at a fence, or when asking for more 'upper' dressage movement while training on the flat.
                        Kelli
                        Horse Drawings!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well, I tried to refrain...but I couldn't.

                          I suppose the answer lies in what one is trying to accomplish. If one wants to influence the hindquarters in any significant way, the upper body must come close to or at vertical. This is because when the upper body tips forward, the connection of the seatbones lightens. This connection of the seat is a crucial part in connecting the bridge over the horse's back and establishing roundness and throughness. This is why dressage riders ride in the tack and vertical; it is the position of influence.

                          There is no incorrect upper body position, HSE or otherwise, so long as the upper body angle matches the "frame" of the horse. If the horse is being ridden in a forward frame, the rider's own form should so inclinate. If the horse is being ridden in a medium frame, the rider should adopt a medium angle of the upper body. If the horse is being ridden in a "deep," or collected, frame the rider's body must be at or approaching vertical.

                          "Behind the motion" has to do with the relationship of angles from the rider to the horse. It is not a static angle behind which the rider is automatically "behind." If the horse is very collected, 30 degrees in front of the vertical is in front of the motion. If the horse is being ridden very extended, 30 degress is behind the motion. And so forth.

                          Many textbooks give a simplified point of reference for the beginning rider, but the worst fault a rider can have is to ride the textbook and forget about the horse underneath him.

                          It is important to note that one physically cannot create a correctly engaged and carrying horse using a forwardly inclined body and seat. A horse in this "frame" must be created with a deeper seat and more vertical upper body because this is the position of influence over the hindquarters. Once this carrying power is produced, the rider can then get light and only touch back every so often to maintain the frame.

                          Americans do themselves a disservice to get stuck in a discussion of absolute position. The horse is a dynamic object underneath the horse; it stands to reason, then that position must follow; it cannot be static.

                          So OP, what sort of flatwork do you want to produce? You must first select that and then determine what position of influence to use.

                          If you are of the laizzez faire school, a light seat and forward upper body should be your choice.

                          If you are of the more german system, a deep seat and vertical upper body are appropraite.

                          If you strike a balance between the two (my choice and that of the classical greats I adhere to), you will understand that rider position is a spectrum; every position therein is correct depending on necessity and circumstance, and that full seat vertical work is actually more important than the light seat work because the full seat work is what allows the light seat to be done correctly. Ends cannot equal the means.

                          As an aside, ALL horses, TB or otherwise, must learn to accept the seat. The seat is an aid. Abandoning it because the horse prefers otherwise creates a huge gap in his training, not dissimilar to taking a spur off one who gets sulky to the leg. If one knows how to sit and can do so with finesse (as every rider should), there is no reason a horse should not be able go with a vertical upper body. The rider is the one who trains the horse, not the other way around.
                          It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. (Aristotle)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I audited the same clinic at Pinehurst, it was fabulous but I suspect George Morris does the same thing every time and its all direct from his book.

                            There is a lot of good information in this thread. I would suggest doing exactly what GM said, read books, watch videos and EDUCATE yourself and your horse. I am coming back to hunters after many years of trail riding. I was pleased to see what I was taught 35 years ago is still correct according to GM. He was also appalled at how "heavy in the hands" all the horses were when he got on them. I agree with that. GM wants deep seat for sitting tror and canter but two point for jumping and gallop and forward inclination for posting trot. I have a friend from England who is a Grand Prix rider. She knows her stuff and has been helping me with my TB mare. After she started schooling her I would get on her and she would feel like a ton of brick in my hands. She is much more collected, on the bit and looks beautiful but I couldn't believe how "heavy" she felt.

                            Amazingly she (horse) has learned to transition from my British friend to me. I have noticed however that my horse seems to jump much flatter when my friend rides her. I suspect it is because she sits so deep all the way to the jump. I think her (horse) form is better when ridden up in the two point. She does slow down a bit more when being ridden deep to the fence but I don't like how if effects her jumping.

                            At the Clinic at Pinehurst there was a one rider who was not getting up out of his seat and he would also come down too quickly on the saddle after the jump. The horse was a gorgeous jumper but sped up and bucked after nearly every jump. After GM got him to get up in two point and not come back down that way the horse calmed down. (GM also traded out much too severe spurs for nubs and changed the reins position on his bit)

                            I would say that particular pair came out most improved of his group. It does depend on the horse. However I agree with OP schooling in basics on flat is so important and often overlooked.

                            Have to go back and read GM book again, its been so long.

                            Now I have to get back in shape so I can ride the clinic next time not audit

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X