• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Derby Scoring System

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Derby Scoring System

    Someone, please tell me the difference between the new degree of difficulty points and bonus points. I thought bonus points were awarde because you rode the more difficult option. Now you get even more points for jumping the higher option? Bizare. Chanda please explain.

  • #2
    Basically, the degree of difficulty points refer to the 4' options, of which there are typically four.

    So, even if you bomb out and have a stop or a rail, but take all of the 4' options, you get four additional points regardless.

    The "bonus" points are at the judge's discretion. If you don't take any of the 4', a judge may still like your horse enough to give you bonus points that even it all out anyway.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      ...what i thought, another crock! another way to slice the bologna a little thinner.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by cantercutie
        In the second round, you get a regular score based on your round and then bonus points for handiness (i.e. jumping the big options, taking the inside turns, etc.) but there is nothing like "for every big option you jump, you get a bonus point." I have seen a horse jump all the big options in the second round and get two and three bonus points.
        Actually, you get bonus points for 4' options now - or that's how it was explained to me. I listened to the show manager talk, in detail, about the new system, but who knows.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          canter on cutie. not how it works or reported how it works in the 9/11 COTH. Annoying how people who don't know, answer like they do and would swear they are right.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            so, ok, what's the difference?

            Comment


            • #7
              Also, there are no 4'3" options in any of the Derbies. Doubt there ever will be, considering that the Regulars only jump 4'.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                i am glad you can cut and paste. it proves you have half a brain. the thread is titled NEW Derby Scoring. It was used for the first time in Chicago. COTH reported on the system in the 9/11 edition. do your homework, oh and fix your lead, you're wrong!

                PS.... don't bark at me about the 4'3" post. it wasn't mine. i know the rules! and jumping the bigger option came under the brilliance part of the old scoring (not rules) methodology.

                so my question remains, put a different way, there are no longer bonus points for jumping the bigger option and the maximum differnce betweeen two equal rounds where one horse jumps the big one and one jumps the smaller one is 1x the number of bigger jumps (4 or 5) ? think about it!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Your last question, Precious, admittedly confused me. Basically, there is a possibility of earning 14 additional points - 10 of those come from the judges and 4 of them from the bigger options. Does that clarify?

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    No, it does not. If there are 10 bonus points and 4 degree of difficulty points and two horses have flawless rounds one at the 3'6" options and one at the 4 ft options, and each earn all 10 bonus points, the only thing seperating the two horses are 4 points. one point for each of the four foot options.

                    I'm trying to understand are there still bonus points awarded for jumping the bigger options or just degree of difficulty points? They have made a distinction between these two types of points and i'm trying to understand that difference. Previously you got binus points for jumping the higher options as wellas the other stuff.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      My deepest apologies o wise one. I am sorry I was unawares. I have not received last Friday's issue in the mail yet and, therefore, have not read it. I wasn't barking at you, just making my case. Maybe if you had been a little more specific, I could have answered better, or not answered at all. You also didn't have to snap at me for being so out of the loop as not knowing they had changed the rules yet again, could have been pointed out and I would have quietly conceded, as I am now, now that I understand what you are talking about.

                      I was wrong, I didn't understand. Feel better now?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by precious View Post
                        No, it does not. If there are 10 bonus points and 4 degree of difficulty points and two horses have flawless rounds one at the 3'6" options and one at the 4 ft options, and each earn all 10 bonus points, the only thing seperating the two horses are 4 points. one point for each of the four foot options.

                        I'm trying to understand are there still bonus points awarded for jumping the bigger options or just degree of difficulty points? They have made a distinction between these two types of points and i'm trying to understand that difference. Previously you got binus points for jumping the higher options as wellas the other stuff.
                        Ah, got it. Sorry.

                        I think bonus points are now awarded solely for style and brilliance and no longer for the bigger options, since degree of difficulty points cover that. Not sure if there's an "official" mandate on that, however.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          thanks, me thinkith it's a crock as stated before. why should a horse that is a career 4 footer week after week get bonus points for jumping 4 foot in a derby? oh that's right. it's the way to be ure the professionals don't get beaten or at least have an edge on their junior and amateur competitors. what a way to highlight the hunters! how about highlighting the politics and whether or not you sit on a committee that makes the rules! Now throw in 4/ 4'6" options and make the regulars jump them and they shoould get bounus points. level the playing field high performance committee. you can fool all of the people sometimes and some of the people all of the time, but.....

                          we're not all ignaramouses

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            feel fabulous canter! again, read the topic title before you respond or respond as the ridge did.

                            Perhaps, oh there are new rules, last i knew......... alot of the Problem on here, a bunch of authority's on stale news. if you're not informed you can't have an opinion. get informed and then formulate your opinion.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              True, I agree, but hopefully the savvy judges can use their bonus points to even that out a bit, not to mention that there are quite a few juniors and amateurs who are very capable of taking the 4' options as well.

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                sure they are capable, but why should the horses and the riders that compete at 4 foot week after wekk have an advantage over their students? I wouldn't compete or let my kids compete under this type of scoring, it's a waste of my money, they'll beat me every time even if we have the same round. And if my fellow competitors feel the same way, how is this benefiting the hunter industry and the traditional hunter if a group is cut out of competing because the cards are stacked? Answer....it won't. It'll pad certain peoples pockets, and in the end leave us where we started. These committee people need to get a clue. people are not as stupid as they think they are. It's just a matter of time!

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by precious View Post
                                  I wouldn't compete or let my kids compete under this type of scoring, it's a waste of my money, they'll beat me every time even if we have the same round.
                                  precious, I don't understand your frustration over the new scoring system? If you and someone else have the EXACT same round, you will get the EXACT same scores. If your round is not as good because you jumped the smaller options, your score will reflect that. And if they jumped the bigger options, but your horse jumped better, the scores will reflect that also. It sounds like sour grapes to me. When was the last ribbon you got in a derby under the old scoring system?

                                  Originally posted by precious View Post
                                  And if my fellow competitors feel the same way, how is this benefiting the hunter industry and the traditional hunter if a group is cut out of competing because the cards are stacked?
                                  How are the cards stacked? Any jr or ammy is welcome to show in the regulars, and they tend to be the owners anyway. Pros are usually on the greenies. Again, sounds like sour grapes.


                                  Derbies are benefitting the hunter industry because riders, owners, and spectators LOVE them. And because BBs like this are full of threads about them.
                                  When the boogeyman goes to sleep, he checks the closet for George Morris. -mpsbarnmanager

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    Well lets all hold hands and sing kum bay yah! This is the response I would expect from the mutual adoration society. The playing field is uneven and the lobbyists are controling the rules. May I quote Mr. Teale from the COTH article " the degree of difficulty points worked just the way they were intended to". Judges and governing bodies are supposed to be neutral and not pre-determine the outcome specific competions. While the overall winners were not predetermined, it seems that outcome Mr. Teal refers to was that out of 35 horses competing all 12 finalists were professionals, not a junior or ammy in the pack. ALso read the last paragraph quote. ANd as for Ms. Serio's quote "for the first time there is a definitive answer" what's that answer, juniors and ammys can't win against professionals? Unfortunately they did beat the pros, buut that was until degree of difficulty points were instituted.

                                    Back to my original thought: let's slice the bologna a little thinner and see if it's still bologna. Guess what, it is!

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      oh and alterrain.......the only stirrups these feet have been in recently go along with the instruction, slide down, not sit up!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by precious View Post
                                        oh and alterrain.......the only stirrups these feet have been in recently go along with the instruction, slide down, not sit up!
                                        That must by why you're acting so nasty.
                                        Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                        Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X