• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

NY Times Article- Hampton Classic

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NY Times Article- Hampton Classic

    Yay! Coverage in mainstream media!

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/sp...tml?ref=sports

  • #2
    Article about Hampton Classic in Times

    My good friend Jill wrote that article. She is an accomplished horsewoman, and really knows her stuff. Its such a pleasure to read an article about show-jumping in the mainstream press that gets it right!

    Comment


    • #3
      Good article, although it doesn't do much for the "elitist" image of the sport, despite mentioning the talent search. I thought that that program was started in hopes of finding talent as opposed to hideous amounts of money?

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by SEFBH87 View Post
        Good article, although it doesn't do much for the "elitist" image of the sport, despite mentioning the talent search. I thought that that program was started in hopes of finding talent as opposed to hideous amounts of money?
        I believe the "talent search" referred to an equitation class Mclain won at that horse show some years ago, not the recent program.

        I was just glad to see coverage in the Times that did not involve any scandal, which is usually the only time they take any notice of this sport.

        Comment


        • #5
          Whoa, Hillary's a pro now. I assume she had to do it for the same sort of reasons as Brianne?

          Comment


          • #6
            Yeah, it was a nice article.
            I too reacted a little to the part about family wealth or a fairy godmother though. It'd be nice to see a piece that either covers a pro that wasn't born rich or at least stuck to the sporting part of it.
            Timothy, stop lurking

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SEFBH87 View Post
              Good article, although it doesn't do much for the "elitist" image of the sport, despite mentioning the talent search. I thought that that program was started in hopes of finding talent as opposed to hideous amounts of money?
              Well, she was talking about the upper echelons of riding which, to be honest, takes money. It may be elitist but it's the truth. Her comments are very accurate.

              Comment


              • #8
                Not nessecarily, I don't know about the US riders but Eric Lamaze for one didn't come from money at all. I'm sure somebody on this forum will be able to put a list of 10+ american riders who did not come from a lot of money and are still veryu sucessful. Todd Minikus comes to mind as someone who might not have come from $$.

                Darragh Kerins for example is not american but came out of nothing and made a name for himself over here by sheer talent and dedication. I knew them way back when Sarah was catch riding to help keep them afloat. Look at where they are now!

                It's bs to say that you need money to succeed. It helps but it's not everything. Acting like you have to come out of money to make it in this sport is only going to discourage young talented riders who dream of making horses their life.

                I'm not saying it's going to happen to everybody but if you have the talent and you want it enough you can make it happen for yourself. This is America. The land where dreams can come true if you work hard enough to make it so!
                Timothy, stop lurking

                Comment


                • #9
                  She was talking about the GP at the Hampton Classic. The article was not about riding on a budget. Or succeeding on a budget. It was about the GP riders at the Hampton Classic. I don't see the issue, I guess.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I thought it was a good article and it's true that to compete at that level you need money. It's nice to see the sport getting some media attention.

                    They also wrote about the show on people.com yesterday:
                    http://www.people.com/people/article...301389,00.html

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SOTB View Post

                      They also wrote about the show on people.com yesterday:
                      http://www.people.com/people/article...301389,00.html
                      Love the pony-mom pic.

                      That was also a cute comment from Kelly Ripa's husband about their kid: "She has a couple of ponies, which means we can never retire."

                      He gets it!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DancingQueen View Post
                        It's bs to say that you need money to succeed.
                        Wrong. You need money to succeed -- if not your own money, then somebody else's.

                        Originally posted by DancingQueen View Post
                        This is America. The land where dreams can come true if you work hard enough to make it so!
                        I don't dispute that this is America but you are incorrect in your thesis. The US ranks well below Canada and many European countries in terms of social mobility -- especially in terms of income mobility, where the US ranks quite low. This is a steady trend that began in the 1980s.

                        In the US, rags-to-riches stories are far outweighed by rags-to-rags stories -- and not due to lack of effort. And as of 2007, income inequality in the US is at an all-time high.

                        Eric Lamaze is Canadian, BTW.



                        (Some reference papers here, here and here.)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MHM View Post
                          That was also a cute comment from Kelly Ripa's husband about their kid: "She has a couple of ponies, which means we can never retire."

                          He gets it!
                          That made me laugh too! It made me think of when my parents bought my sister her first pony. Our last name was Nickle and my parents gave the pony the show name "Dad's Last Nickle".

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SOTB View Post
                            That made me laugh too! It made me think of when my parents bought my sister her first pony. Our last name was Nickle and my parents gave the pony the show name "Dad's Last Nickle".
                            I still remember a girl from 25 years ago who named her horse: Thanks Dad!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Thanks for posting MHM, and whoever linked to the People feature.

                              You know, for those complaining about money? One of the trainers of one of these celebrity kids (who also made the Pony the other rode to fame) had pretty humble beginnings and is still not rolling in dough and knee deep in million dollar horses.

                              There is plenty of opportunity in the sport even if you don't get short listed for the Olympics. Maybe you can go on to train somebody that is. Or breed a horse for them, or break and start a quality prospect that goes on to fame.
                              When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                              The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Good to see the sport getting "good" press.

                                Though reading through, it's hard to say what the piece was actually ABOUT.

                                Hillary? Hillary goes pro? Hillary wins...2 weeks ago? Funny lead.

                                The USEF looking for talent?

                                McLain and Saphire winning a big event for the 4th time? She sort of treated that tidbit as incidental.

                                Guess we should take what we can get, and be glad we got anything.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  JustJump-

                                  I did think that, too. I would have thought if they only put in one picture from the GP, it should have been the winner from this year, not last year.

                                  But, still, at least it's horse show coverage in the Times.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    It's nice of them to run it.

                                    I have a hard time thinking it would fly if handed into a journalism professor, or as an essay assignment.

                                    Though you never know what it looked like when it was turned in--the Times could have chopped it up in editing. You never know.

                                    Still...McClain wins a $250K class, an unprecedented 4th HC Grand Prix, is close to winning a million dollars for the year; Judy Garofolo-Torres is second on her 19 yo partner of 10 years, and last year's winner turning pro is the lead?

                                    That is nuts.
                                    Inner Bay Equestrian
                                    Facebook
                                    KERx

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by M. O'Connor View Post

                                      Still...McClain wins a $250K class, an unprecedented 4th HC Grand Prix, is close to winning a million dollars for the year; Judy Garofolo-Torres is second on her 19 yo partner of 10 years, and last year's winner turning pro is the lead?

                                      That is nuts.
                                      My guess is that the mainstream population is going to "know" Lou Dobbs's (and therefore "recognize" his daughter by association) more than they will recognize McLain Ward...


                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X