• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Opinions Please: "A" Show Riders at Small County Shows

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Opinions Please: "A" Show Riders at Small County Shows

    The issue: "A" show riders/horses are moving down the levels and competing (not schooling)
    at small, non USEF rated county shows. This puts them in the ring with much less experienced riders (kids and adult amateurs).

    PRO: Show managers say it improves the competition, and brings in more money.
    They speculate that it's the economy; the riders come because the small, non-rated shows are less expensive.

    CON:Trainers who regularly go to the small shows say they want their riders to show against riders of similar skill and on a level playing field as they gain show experience. Their clients (and horse show parents) aren't happy;some trainers are not returning to those shows, and going elsewhere.

    Opinions, please. Thanks.

  • #2
    Personally, I don't have any problem with it, but perhaps they could add some classes or divisions to keep the playing field a bit more level like maiden jumping classes(never won a class or never placed) , same with equitation. Unfortunately when we show, there is always going to be someone better than us or with a nicer horse.


    • #3
      I think the managers are right and the pros outweigh the cons. I learn so much watching more advanced riders. Who wants to win due to a lack of good competition?

      Maybe adding some novice or limit type classes would keep everybody happy.


      • #4
        I dont have a problem with it as long as the rider/trainers are playing fair by putting their riders in the appropriate classes. I showed the last couple of years on the rated circuit in the adult amateurs, but this year I have a young horse so we go to some local shows and do the baby classes.
        Show managers need to make enough money to cover the costs of the show itself, therefore I wuld think that they would welcome as many riders as possible.
        Happy Hour-TB
        Cowboy Casanova - Brandenburg


        • #5
          I agree with tuckaway farm. I usd to go to rated shows just to learn from the pros. Much can be gained if you are open to the possibilities.


          • #6
            Personally, I think it is a GOOD THING.

            One of the most memorable memories of my junior career was coming in second (by a fraction of a second) to Tony d'Ambrosio (who had already made a name for himself on the A circuit) in a jumper class at a little unrecognized show in Armonk.

            Far more memorable than the year I won the class over other "small time" riders.

            Most of the unrecognized shows have plenty of restricted classes (first year of competing at x', etc). If seen as needed, this could be expanded to "USEF Maiden"- "never won a blue ribbon at a USEF show" divisions

            chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).


            • #7
              Originally posted by tuckawayfarm View Post
              I think the managers are right and the pros outweigh the cons. I learn so much watching more advanced riders. Who wants to win due to a lack of good competition?

              Maybe adding some novice or limit type classes would keep everybody happy.
              Totally agree.
              Fun equestrian t-shirts designed by a rider like you:


              • #8
                And look at the expense it saves you showing at the A's to get to measure yourself against class competition. Come on down-a my house, A folk!
                Blog: The Continuing Adventures of an (ahem) Mature Re-Rider without a Trust Fund...but, finally, A Farm of Her Own!!


                • #9
                  I show from the AA shows to the county fair if it fits in my plan for that year. I show in classes that are appropriate for me & my horses and that I meet the class criteria. I show at the shows I like (good footing, good management, good stabling) that fit in my schedule (only so much vacation time) that is within my budget so sometimes that is rated & sometimes it's not.

                  My personal feeling is the only people who seem to complain are the ones who want the classes so limited & so protected that everybody is the winner. Well that's not horse showing! Step it up, bring your best game & let the chips fall where they fall.
                  "I'm not crazy...my mother had me tested"


                  • #10
                    We hear that attitude in our area. We have local shows and "A" rated shows. Some trainers (including myself) have a mix of clients that show where their schedules and budgets will allow. Some of the "Local only" riders grumble about the expensive, "A" show horses attending "their" shows. The funny thing is- some of those "A" show horses cost less than the Local ones! The difference is in the program. Time and time again, we've taken inexpensive, but nice quality horses and developed them into horses that can be competitive at A and AA shows.

                    I was certainly a "Local" rider/trainer at one time. I welcomed the better competition so that I could learn and improve. I like to get beat by horses/riders that are better! You watch them prepare, school, show and you ask questions. When you beat them or even place amongst them, good for you! Now that's something to be proud of.

                    We've lately been doing many AA shows, so I've not been to as many locals. Several weeks ago, we took a group of younger horses and novice kids to a nearby local show. I was absolutely shocked at the dirty, manure stained horses and the grungy, ill fitting tack. Not surprisingly from the quality of the turnout, the performances were very poor. Unbalanced, bad jumping horses running through lead changes and running down lines to "get the numbers". That isn't about money, it's about standards.

                    So no, I have no problem with "A" show riders at Small County Shows. Make sure that everyone follows the rules and have a real horse race! Step it up!


                    • #11
                      If you wanted the "A" show riders to stay home, how exactly would that be accomplished? And to what end?

                      I had a competitive A/A horse and we dabbled in the A/O's. Now he is sold and I have two fancy young horses, for whom it is very appropriate to get affordable mileage at the local shows. They are absolutely eligible for the classes I take them in, and they do well because they are quality horses getting good training and I can usually find the jumps. My budget doesn't allow me to get this mileage exclusively at the "A" shows, and I love the convenience of one-day shipping in with post entries and more casual turnout. I'm not there to take anybody's points away but just to get good experience for my greenies. Is that bad?
                      "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu

                      My Blog!


                      • #12
                        Better competition makes better riders all around!


                        • #13
                          Here in Virginia we are blessed to have excellent local circuits that are worth attending. Many, many riders show at both, and many trainers choose to attend both.

                          That being said, I'd never have a problem with so-called "A circuit riders" choosing to show locally. It's a competition, first of all. But secondly, you don't know what the situation is. Local shows are more economical - people who could afford the "A" circuit in previous years can't anymore. People who ride green horses that don't want to spend the money to do a 2'6" class at an "A" show. There are any number of completely valid reason to show at local shows when one primarily competes on the "A" circuit.

                          So, can you really tell a rider who still wants to show but can't afford $1000/show anymore that they can't play in an available sandbox?

                          Or are you going to tell the amateur rider who won in the AA's for ten years, had a fall, and now wants to compete exclusively over 2' to get their confidence back that they can't play either?

                          Are you going to tell a rider that they can't take their spazzing greenie to a local show because they've competed at "A" shows before, and that in order to get him exposure they must spend thousands to compete?

                          Where does it end? And how can you justify discriminating against some people because they've entered higher level competition in the past? Really, most riders that compete on the "A" circuit aren't attending local shows to take ribbons away from children.

                          Really, I think the only people that complain about this sort of thing are complaining because they're bitter.
                          They're small hearts.


                          • #14
                            Just think if you beat the A riders! What a story to be able to tell everyone.


                            • #15
                              Thats what I am doing this summer with a green bean while I showed the other horse at the rated A shows. I personally like showing against the best of the best, so if you beat the best you will feel great about it! When I was young and I had beat some top name A rider at a schooling show I was so proud even though I only ended up with a 4th or something it was better when I was champion against beginner kids.


                              • #16
                                Even big league, big money NASCAR drivers occasionally step down and do some dirt track racing every now and then ... makes big money for the track owner!


                                • #17
                                  Maybe the riders or horses need some confidence building, I don't see anything wrong with it. Especially since everyone is trying to save some money. I am the president of the Boise Saddle and Jump Club and this economy has actually been great for our little non rated shows, our attendance is better than it has been in years.

                                  Besides... more competition is a good thing, I mean, who just wants to be the "best of the bad"... if they're good riders, they'll be good riders regardless of who they're competing against. Money doesn't buy talent and hard work.


                                  • #18
                                    I don't see a problem with it. People should show where they like. And remember, just because someone is/was showing at "A" shows, doesn't necessarily mean that they were winning or even that they are all that much better a rider than anyone else. All it takes to ride in an "A" show is a big enough check book.
                                    Auventera Two:Some women would eat their own offspring if they had some dipping sauce.
                                    Serious Leigh: it sounds like her drama llama should be an old schoolmaster by now.


                                    • #19
                                      Just reminds me of a teenage moment in the UK. My aunt had organized a little neighborhood charity show - there seemed to be lots of these every weekend. My cousin and I spent hours polishing her fat little pony for the turnout and equitation classes and dusting off some mismatched old show clothes. Just as the show started up pulled a fancy horse trailer and out walked a five-star show pony and a rider dressed to the nines. Miles above the quality of the local kids! She, of course, took most of the first place ribbons, and my cousin sulked terribly. In retrospect funny, and certainly "fair" and the charity got her entry fees, too, so... but it put us in our place!!!


                                      • #20
                                        When I was a kid, we ran a Pony Club benefit show. And when I say "we" I mean the kids.

                                        The ONLY adults involved were the judge (one of the graduate Pony Clubbers as I remember, not a fully licensed judge), and some parent with a bank account.

                                        The smallest, most unprestigious show possible.

                                        After the show had been running for about 30 minutes, guess who shows up (hacking, no trailer or van)?

                                        Buddy Brown with one of Mrs Waller's show ponies turned out to the nines.

                                        I don't think anyone complained, and the show was so successful that the next year the grownups took it over.

                                        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).