Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Amateur Status Rule Proposal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Amateur Status Rule Proposal

    OK I have a proposal for a new and simple amateur rule. The one and only rule to being considered a professional would be that you are a pro if you show other peoples horses. You may show leased horses and there may have to be a number set as to the number of horses one may lease since there are always those that will try to abuse rules anyway. But this just seems like a very easy way to handle it.
    Why should the up-down teachers who give a few lessons to supplement thier income be penalized when the want to show thier own horses...
    why should the exercise riders at the track with limited experience on h/j's be penalized when the try to retrain a OTTB for another job...
    why should judges, who evaluate all of us and tell us if our training is good enough or not still be considered as amateurs...
    who really cares, since we can not police it anyway, what horses someone rides at home when the main responsibility of thier job is grooming, etc....

    This sounds too simple, what am I missing her?

    #2
    By your definition, a trainer with a huge teaching business who doesn't usually show could show in the amateurs.
    Missy Clark, Bill Cooney, Frank Madden...they're all amateurs by your definition.

    Comment

      Original Poster

      #3
      OK - but why don't they show now? Surely not because they can't compete in the AAs.

      Comment


        #4
        Are exercise riders considered pros for the purpose of horse showing? I don't think so.

        Comment

          Original Poster

          #5
          Yes - exercise riders are considered pros - they are paid to ride.

          and to add - how do you think it would go over with the clients of BNTs when those same trainers who are charging them big bucks for lessons, etc. say " You just wait here while I show in your division and I'll be back to get you ready" I don't think that they would have a huge following for very long.

          Again - it just seems to simple but on the other hand the current rule seems to hurt the "little people" more than it excludes those that really take advantage. JMHO!

          Comment


            #6
            The rules didn't just get dreamed up out of thin air. The rules were made them modified as situations arose that made it obvious people were cheating.
            *****
            You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Spotted Pony View Post
              OK I have a proposal for a new and simple amateur rule. The one and only rule to being considered a professional would be that you are a pro if you show other peoples horses. You may show leased horses and there may have to be a number set as to the number of horses one may lease since there are always those that will try to abuse rules anyway. But this just seems like a very easy way to handle it.
              Why should the up-down teachers who give a few lessons to supplement thier income be penalized when the want to show thier own horses...
              why should the exercise riders at the track with limited experience on h/j's be penalized when the try to retrain a OTTB for another job...
              why should judges, who evaluate all of us and tell us if our training is good enough or not still be considered as amateurs...
              who really cares, since we can not police it anyway, what horses someone rides at home when the main responsibility of thier job is grooming, etc....

              This sounds too simple, what am I missing her?
              Because you are missing folks like me who work a regular 9 to 5 job but ride other people's horses (and pay to show a few of them) because I can't (for financial and DH reasons) have my own horse right now. I would be really ticked if I had to show as a pro for that kind of rule. I might as well go back to teaching lessons if that kind of rule was implemented.

              If you really wanted to be friendly towards the people who are technically pros but might not ride like pros is to let "pros" show with the ammies until they win a certain number of classes. That would cover the up down teacher with her own horse who teaches to cover some board. Or the exercise rider who shows a hunter for fun. Maybe have an "apprentice" status that lets those kind of people right in a division they might be more competitive in and enjoy more. Just an idea....

              Comment


                #8
                by that reasoning, I'm a pro since I show my friend's horse in the hack...and she's a pro since she's shown mine when I couldn't. And we're totally legal adult amateurs. Not gonna work...

                Comment


                  #9
                  and those trainers who largely rider their own horses to get ready to sell could compete them in the amateur classes until they get sold. Think about how many of Scott Stewart's horses Scott owns.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I don't think that showing other people's horses should decide weather you are pro or not but I see your point of view.
                    I was offered a job with a dressage trainer around here to teach some "up down lessons" (I don't even do dressage but this would be the most basic riding there is, so it didn't really matter) but I would lose my amature status. I could REALLY, REALLY use the extra money but there is no way me or my green horse would stack up against the pros. So I decided that I would rather keep my status than make a couple bucks off the 3 lessons a week I'd be teaching. I wish there was some way USEF could distiguish between making a couple hundered bucks a month and making a living.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I didn't think judges were considered professionals because they were not taking money for riding or training. They do just evaluate. Nothing more.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        But wouldn't a judge HAVE to be a professional...obviously they do something with horses for a living, and have been doing it long and well enough to be esteemed in their disicipline.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by HyperCat View Post
                          I wish there was some way USEF could distiguish between making a couple hundered bucks a month and making a living.

                          im with you on that one!! theres gotta be a way to change the rule for the 18 year olds who are trying to make some money by riding other peoples horses for them when they are out of town, or working for your trainer, etc...its so much different then making a living off of it
                          "If you are nervous you arent focused-if you are focused, there is no room for nerves!"

                          Comment


                            #14
                            If you are a member of the AQHA you cannot be an amateur and judge. By virtue of the fact you are an "amateur" you are not competant to judge others. Not so with the USEF.
                            The amateur rules are hard enough to interpret and enforce. Lets not try to re-invent the wheel...again and again and again...
                            The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Amateur status/judging

                              According to the USEF rule book- GRR 808- a judge, steward, writer, course designer etc can still be amateurs- I do think the rules are hazy on the so called "working student" issue, but one cannot have so many exceptions that it would be impossible to monitor. Giving lessons and riding horses for money have been no-no's for a long time- I am sure all of us would love to have some extra income to help with horse expenses, but that is the way it is- All should read and re-read the rule book!!!! We all know of cases where this rule has been ignored- from not owning the horse in an a/o class to so called working students who ride 10 horses a day, and then ride in an a/a class-- all requires documentation!

                              Comment


                                #16
                                Spotted Pony: I would hate this rule. I am too poor to own or lease a horse, but I ride well enough to get some catch rides now and then in amateur classes. This rule would mean that I don't get to show.

                                Comment


                                  #17
                                  No ma'am.

                                  I ride for someone else. I do a lot of the grunt work - whatever she asks me to do - but I work 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and this is the only way I can feasibly ride and show right now, and I'm damn lucky to have it. I may get some benefits out of it - but benefits to me are the chance to ride and show, and get hauled all over creation because I want to do something fun on whatever given weekend. Sanity of riding - Not cash.

                                  It would be silly at this point in my life to claim myself as a professional rider. I've already got another professional career and my entry fees are my entertainment dollars. Riding does not contribute to paying my room and board in any way shape or form. Therefore, I am not a pro.
                                  ---
                                  They're small hearts.

                                  Comment


                                    #18
                                    In my opinion, the best way to keep the amateur/pro status fair and separate would be to require pros to become certified by USEF. Not only would it raise the standard of training in this country (from grass roots all the way up to the highest levels) but it would also allow amatuers to make extra cash by exercising horses and the like.
                                    Just my two cents

                                    Comment


                                      #19
                                      I find the amateur rule to be unfair at times, but I really don't have any great ideas to 'fix' it -- However, I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing that the rule discourages people from teaching a few beginner lessons to make a few bucks -- I think it's already too easy for people to hang up a shingle, call themselves a pro, and teach riding lessons --
                                      "I never mind if an adult uses safety stirrups." GM

                                      Comment


                                        #20
                                        No matter how you rewrite the rule, there are always going to be a small percentage of people who try to dance around it. Some of those people try to skirt around it with good intent, and some just want to win. The rule works for 98% of the people, and no matter what you do, it'll never be 100%.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X