• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

standing vs running martingale

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • standing vs running martingale

    I can't believe that I don't know this but it never really came up. The hunters that I've had went in a standing and my jumper doesn't use a martingale. Sooooo, can someone please tell me when you would use a standing vs a running and the different benefits of each? I need to talk to my trainer about DD's need for a martingale if we switch her pony to jumpers (pony goes in standing now) and would like to try to not appear stupid!

    Thanks.

  • #2
    While standing martingales are more common in jumpers, don't think you *have* to have one if you do jumpers--if you already have a standing martingale, it is just as practical in lower level jumpers, and that is because the standing martingale is more restrictive than the running. the standing martingale is slack and shouldn't be felt by the horse until he lifts his head way too high, in which case it puts pressure on the nose. i wouldn't call it more 'dangerous' than a standing martingale, because truly both are safety devices. but, in emergency situations, a standing martingale is considerably safer (depending upon the situation, of course) because it can be loosened, and because it will not restrict the horse as much. as for how things work: instead of putting pressure on the nose, the running martingale creates leverage (when the horse puts its head too high) the reason this is 'safer' is because the rings of the running martingale can slide around, and in general provides more freedom, which is needed for tricky jumper courses. you rarely see standing martingales in jumpers to begin with, and i don't think ive ever encountered one in higher level jumpers (it would be unsafe and unpractical at that point) but theyre certainly safe and normal in lower-level stuff. you could probably use a running martingale in hunters, technically, but why would you? it'd be considered along the same lines of a kimberwicke. the hunter courses don't require speed, they require elegance and steadiness, and generally that means no turning on a dime no short spurts of running and slowing up like in a jumpoff . so a standing martingale is much more practical in hunterland. you mentioned your daughter had a pony? i think you can keep the standing martingale for now if she's just doing the itty bitty stuff, but if she plans on doing the pony jumpers, i would invest in the running martingale--those courses are tricky, and the fences can get pretty big especially for a pony. hope this helps
    (|--Sarah--|)

    Blitz <3 & Leap of Faith <3

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by superpony123 View Post
      . you rarely see standing martingales in jumpers to begin with, and i don't think ive ever encountered one in higher level jumpers (it would be unsafe and unpractical at that point) but theyre certainly safe and normal in lower-level stuff. you could probably use a running martingale in hunters, technically, but why would you?
      The reason you don't see them in higher level jumpers is because they are not 'legal' in classes with $5K or more in prize money and in young horse classes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
        The reason you don't see them in higher level jumpers is because they are not 'legal' in classes with $5K or more in prize money and in young horse classes.
        Exactly. I would also say running martingales are more common, not standing. perhaps in the lower jumper levels, where all people do anyway is run around over speedbumps, a standing may be used, but I've seen more jumpers with running martingales, rather than standings.

        Also, kimberwickes are fine to be used in the hunters. Yes, they may be more unconvenetional than a plain D, but a judge would rather see a nice round with a kimberwicke than an awkward one with a D. I've ridden a pony that went in a kimberwicke who was one of the top large pony hunters in the country.

        If you are planning on doing the pony jumpers, I would invest in a running martingale.
        www.justworldinternational.org

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
          The reason you don't see them in higher level jumpers is because they are not 'legal' in classes with $5K or more in prize money and in young horse classes.
          Well that makes sense then I don't do jumpers though, so my knowledge on the rules of jumpers is quite limited.
          (|--Sarah--|)

          Blitz <3 & Leap of Faith <3

          Comment


          • #6
            Why is it that runnings are not permitted in hunter classes, exactly?
            "I'm not always sarcastic. Sometimes I'm asleep." - Harry Dresden

            Amy's Stuff - Rustic chic and country linens and decor
            Support my mom! She's gotta finance her retirement horse somehow.

            Comment


            • #7
              My experience with runnings is that they create enough pressure to hold a horses head down. A standing down loosely will not hold a horses head down it will just restrict how high the head can go. And yes you see runnings more in jumpers than standing.
              Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Renn/aissance View Post
                Why is it that runnings are not permitted in hunter classes, exactly?
                They aren't technically illegal, but they are pretty damn unconventional. My jumper went in a running, but we did the A/O hunters for a season after she was coming back from an injury and we didn't want to push her. We wore no martingale rather than the running.

                You'll see the running the the jumper phase of the Washington Eq and the Maclay (I think) and the USEF. Anything jumper-themed you might see a running in the eq.

                But in the hunters it is really never done. Not illegal, just NEVER seen because they are explicitly stated as being unconventional in the rulebook.

                HU125 Tack.
                1. Regulation snaffles, pelhams and full bridles, all with cavesson nose bands, are recommended.
                A judge may penalize for non-conventional types of bits or nosebands.
                2. Competitors may be refused an award unless they return to the ring for conformation or
                soundness with the same complete bridle in which they have performed.
                3. Martingales of any type are prohibited in Under Saddle, hack and tie-breaking classes.
                Standing martingales are allowed for all over fence classes. All other martingales may be
                considered unconventional
                .
                Originally posted by tidy rabbit
                Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by rabicon View Post
                  My experience with runnings is that they create enough pressure to hold a horses head down. A standing down loosely will not hold a horses head down it will just restrict how high the head can go. And yes you see runnings more in jumpers than standing.
                  A PROPERLY ADJUSTED running martingale will "just restrict how high the head can go". It will not come into effect until the head is too high.
                  Janet

                  chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Also, if you don't have a steady hand you shouldn't use a running as the bouncing up & down motion will keep the martingale in play. The reason is a running puts pressure on the bars of the mouth if the head comes up, a standing puts pressure on the nose (this is not affected by how your hands are so that's also why more novice riders use a standing!). In Canada, you can use a standing upto & including 1.10m in the jumpers after that you have to use either nothing or a running martingale. Personally, I found that once you get above 1m the standing started to resrict a good bascule.
                    Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don't Do It!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ExJumper View Post
                      They aren't technically illegal, but they are pretty damn unconventional. My jumper went in a running, but we did the A/O hunters for a season after she was coming back from an injury and we didn't want to push her. We wore no martingale rather than the running.

                      You'll see the running the the jumper phase of the Washington Eq and the Maclay (I think) and the USEF. Anything jumper-themed you might see a running in the eq.

                      But in the hunters it is really never done. Not illegal, just NEVER seen because they are explicitly stated as being unconventional in the rulebook.
                      How to make me feel old. Used to be that in hunter appointments classes ( back with the spare gloves under the billets, the required breastplate, sewn in double bridle, no saddle pad, actual sandwich in the sandwich case, etc. [but before anyone even thought of wearing shadbellies]) a standing martingale was considered incorrect. Has to do with the problem of actual hunters crossing deep water and needing to be able to swim...

                      However, now the usually mis-adjusted standing martingale is the norm.
                      madeline
                      * What you release is what you teach * Don't be distracted by unwanted behavior* Whoever waits the longest is the teacher. Van Hargis

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        These discussions about standing vs. running always remind me of the line from Jane Marshall Dillon that went something like

                        "a standing martingale was proof that the rider had rough hands and didn't know how to school."


                        Though I think these days a standing is more of a fashion accessory than anything else...
                        "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                        ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by rabicon View Post
                          My experience with runnings is that they create enough pressure to hold a horses head down. A standing down loosely will not hold a horses head down it will just restrict how high the head can go. And yes you see runnings more in jumpers than standing.
                          Well, sure. But I really hate the idea of punishing a horse's mouth when he's resisting by moving his head to get away from pressure he's already getting there. And with a running and all but the most sophisticated of hands, the pressure doesn't stop immediatedly when he complies. At least a properly adjusted standing only acts to control the scope of the evasion, and pressure is relieved instantaneously.

                          I hate to see childrens/adult jumpers zooming around with runnings and lacking the skills to use one without abuse.
                          madeline
                          * What you release is what you teach * Don't be distracted by unwanted behavior* Whoever waits the longest is the teacher. Van Hargis

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Madeline View Post
                            How to make me feel old. Used to be that in hunter appointments classes ( back with the spare gloves under the billets, the required breastplate, sewn in double bridle, no saddle pad, actual sandwich in the sandwich case, etc. [but before anyone even thought of wearing shadbellies]) a standing martingale was considered incorrect. Has to do with the problem of actual hunters crossing deep water and needing to be able to swim...

                            However, now the usually mis-adjusted standing martingale is the norm.
                            I agree. My trainer was old-school and she told me to use the running in the hunters if I wanted to. She also remembered when they were the norm.

                            And I do believe that in the right hands a running is a good tool and a much more delicate aid than is a standing.

                            But although my horse went better in it as a jumper, in hunter classes with no turns or tough adjustments, she went fine without anything.
                            Originally posted by tidy rabbit
                            Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X