• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Kimberwicke question

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kimberwicke question

    I've been wanting to post for a few days, but a but afraid to on this board. Before I get to my question, please let me preface it with several points:

    1. I am neither for nor against a kimberwicke. I am just looking for information.
    2. Currently I don't even ride. I am just looking for information.
    3. I haven't ridden in a kimberwicke since I was a kid doing open shows and didn't know any different (20+ years ago).

    So on to my question-

    I know there are no "illegal" bits in the hunters, but I also know that if you show up at a hunter show in a kimberwicke, you're not taking home any prizes. What I want to know is what is so bad about them? Why are they so frowned upon? I just got the SmartPak supplement catalog this week and noticed that the (incredible) jumper on the cover was wearing one. That made me think. My understanding (and I could be way wrong here...) is that the function is similar to a pelham with converters, which are perfectly fine in the hunter ring. Why are we so anti-kimberwicke?
    "Life is too short to be a slave to the whims of others." -- RugBug, COTH

  • #2
    From what i have seen, converters are not used except for very small children, leadline and walk trot stuff, and even then they are not very common.
    In the hunters a horse is supposed to be easygoing and relaxed like you would want a field hunter to be but using a kinberwick shows that he has a hard mouth and is probably a little stubborn.
    As far as kimberwicks go, your better of learning how to ride with 2 sets of reins and using a pelham without a converter if you absolutely need a bit with leverage.

    Comment


    • #3
      I completely agree with everything BearWithMe said, use the two reins on the pelham if you need the leverage. Also, a pelham is slightly more "traditional" in the hunt field, so that could be a carry-over. I'm also not a fan of the kimberwickes because it is kind of like driving with the parking break on, nothing soft to use, only the stop.
      It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by janedoe726 View Post
        My understanding (and I could be way wrong here...) is that the function is similar to a pelham with converters, which are perfectly fine in the hunter ring. Why are we so anti-kimberwicke?
        Converters are just as frowned on in the Hunter ring as a kimberwicke is. A converter or kimberwicke makes the statement that the rider doesn't have the education to use leverage properly. If you can't handle two reins, you shouldn't be using a bit with curb action. A kimberwicke/converter also implies that the horse NEEDS the constant reminder from the curb and therefore is a bit ranker than you want a Hunter to be.

        A kimberwicke is not a precision tool. It is somewhat like using a butcher's knife to do complicated surgery.
        Whee!

        Comment


        • #5
          I find everyone's freak outs to Kimberwickes a little amusing. I just bought a horse that LOVES to go in a kimberwicke. I have not ridden a horse in one since pony club (actually it was a pony). I laughed when I saw it, but the previous owner and BNT trainer who worked with the horse said "hey, he likes it - so if it ain't broke - don't fix it".

          I am sure I will experiment with bits and see if the horse likes something else - but for the time being I have no issue riding him in it. I have VERY educated hands, I am an advanced rider and I can stay out of my horse's mouth. Hence....no big deal.

          Now....I get the issue when you see a person who is not good with their hands sawing on a poor horse's mouth. I can guarantee you that some of the bits out there can be just as severe as a kimberwicke in the wrong hands! IMO - it's not the bit - it's the skill and precision of the rider using the bit - and the horse's particular taste and "like" for whatever bit. Most horses will let you know very quickly if they don't care for the bit in their mouths.
          http://good-times.webshots.com/album/557433725gtOAuC

          Comment


          • #6
            I think the biggest turn-off of the kimberwicke is that they're unforgiving.

            I am not up on all the different ones, but what comes to mind is a ported mouth, with a curb chain, and one rein. Matched up with quick ponies and little kids. The bit is not flattering to the horses head. The entire bit is "fixed", in such way that if the horse attempts to soften, it can never find relief.

            I wouldn't say you wouldn't get a ribbon if you showed up with a kimberwicke, but I think there are other options; and frankly, I don't fully understand the mechanics behind that bit.

            (and I LOVE bits!!)

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Originally posted by MissIndependence View Post
              I find everyone's freak outs to Kimberwickes a little amusing. I just bought a horse that LOVES to go in a kimberwicke. I have not ridden a horse in one since pony club (actually it was a pony). I laughed when I saw it, but the previous owner and BNT trainer who worked with the horse said "hey, he likes it - so if it ain't broke - don't fix it".

              I am sure I will experiment with bits and see if the horse likes something else - but for the time being I have no issue riding him in it. I have VERY educated hands, I am an advanced rider and I can stay out of my horse's mouth. Hence....no big deal.

              Now....I get the issue when you see a person who is not good with their hands sawing on a poor horse's mouth. I can guarantee you that some of the bits out there can be just as severe as a kimberwicke in the wrong hands! IMO - it's not the bit - it's the skill and precision of the rider using the bit - and the horse's particular taste and "like" for whatever bit. Most horses will let you know very quickly if they don't care for the bit in their mouths.
              I totally agree- especially with the last part.

              Thanks, everyone for the input. Again, I'm not looking into using one, just curious as to why they're so terrible! And I agree they should not be used in the wrong hands...
              "Life is too short to be a slave to the whims of others." -- RugBug, COTH

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mrsbradbury View Post
                I think the biggest turn-off of the kimberwicke is that they're unforgiving.

                I am not up on all the different ones, but what comes to mind is a ported mouth, with a curb chain, and one rein. Matched up with quick ponies and little kids. The bit is not flattering to the horses head. The entire bit is "fixed", in such way that if the horse attempts to soften, it can never find relief.

                I wouldn't say you wouldn't get a ribbon if you showed up with a kimberwicke, but I think there are other options; and frankly, I don't fully understand the mechanics behind that bit.

                (and I LOVE bits!!)
                disagree and folks its kimblewick there no e afterwards

                bits are as only servere as your hands that use them

                op- please read my sitcky of helpful links and pay perticular attention to the 2 3 and 4th links on 1st page

                http://www.chronicleforums.com/Forum...d.php?t=178116

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think the reason so many horses go well in a kimberwicke is because of the leverage, riders assume the horse likes the bit because he sets his head in it. Setting the head behind the bit is different then carrying the bit and taking contact. Western people use a kimberwicke because it has the curb chain and is closer to the curb bit then a snaffle, and they are relying on the leverage as well. I see lots of ponies matched up in kimberwickes but I don't think most of their riders have the hands that go with it.

                  To most people the kimberwicke says one of two (or perhaps both) things: 1. horse/pony that can't be stopped 2. Winglish people that are pretending to go english.
                  http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by enjoytheride View Post
                    ] Winglish people that are pretending to go english.

                    LOL!!! I see a lot of the QH people doing the versatility and/or the open classes dressed hunt seat using the kimberwick.
                    Save a life...be an organ donor! Visit www.Transplantbuddies.org

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by janedoe726 View Post
                      I know there are no "illegal" bits in the hunters, but I also know that if you show up at a hunter show in a kimberwicke, you're not taking home any prizes. What I want to know is what is so bad about them? Why are they so frowned upon? Why are we so anti-kimberwicke?
                      There's absolutely nothing wrong with a KimbLEwick bit at all. Kimblewicks are traditional English hunting bits originally from the English town of KimbLEwick near Uttoxeter . Seems though they were first taken over to the USA by someone with a speach imediment. What a thilly bunt

                      I use them quite a lot with ponies and hunters.

                      As with all bits, the action of the Kimblewick is dependent upon the position of the riders hands.

                      Kimblewicks act as a mild, short shanked pelham with some leverage which acts on the curb and poll. The slotted ones have more leverage, more like a pelham than the unslotted ones. Mine tend to be all D ring ported and if they are Uttoxeters slotted then I use them with the reins through the D rings.

                      For Mrsbradburty who didn't understand the mechanics: Its action is the same as that of other pelhams, but because its shorter in its cheeks and by its shape it the rein to slip to the bottom of the cheeks and so the rein slides on the d ring. If the hands are lowered prior to pressure being applied to the reins, the rein will slide about an inch and the bit will assume about a 45 degree angle in the mouth, thus giving more poll and curb pressure. This causes the mouthpiece to act in a downward and backward motion on the lower jaw. This is complemented by the downward pressure on the poll, giving the bit a lowering action. And when the rein is used, the curb chain does come into play, but it shouldn't straight away, there should be some give in the rein before the curb chain tightens.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Thomas_1 View Post
                        There's absolutely nothing wrong with a KimbLEwick bit at all. Kimblewicks are traditional English hunting bits originally from the English town of KimbLEwick near Uttoxeter . Seems though they were first taken over to the USA by someone with a speach imediment. What a thilly bunt

                        I use them quite a lot with ponies and hunters.

                        As with all bits, the action of the Kimblewick is dependent upon the position of the riders hands.

                        Kimblewicks act as a mild, short shanked pelham with some leverage which acts on the curb and poll. The slotted ones have more leverage, more like a pelham than the unslotted ones. Mine tend to be all D ring ported and if they are Uttoxeters slotted then I use them with the reins through the D rings.

                        For Mrsbradburty who didn't understand the mechanics: Its action is the same as that of other pelhams, but because its shorter in its cheeks and by its shape it the rein to slip to the bottom of the cheeks and so the rein slides on the d ring. If the hands are lowered prior to pressure being applied to the reins, the rein will slide about an inch and the bit will assume about a 45 degree angle in the mouth, thus giving more poll and curb pressure. This causes the mouthpiece to act in a downward and backward motion on the lower jaw. This is complemented by the downward pressure on the poll, giving the bit a lowering action. And when the rein is used, the curb chain does come into play, but it shouldn't straight away, there should be some give in the rein before the curb chain tightens.
                        The Kimberwick (Kimblewick in the UK) bit is a form of Pelham. Actually either pronunciation/spelling is correct.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Thomas_1 View Post

                          For Mrsbradburty who didn't understand the mechanics: Its action is the same as that of other pelhams, but because its shorter in its cheeks and by its shape it the rein to slip to the bottom of the cheeks and so the rein slides on the d ring. If the hands are lowered prior to pressure being applied to the reins, the rein will slide about an inch and the bit will assume about a 45 degree angle in the mouth, thus giving more poll and curb pressure. This causes the mouthpiece to act in a downward and backward motion on the lower jaw. This is complemented by the downward pressure on the poll, giving the bit a lowering action. And when the rein is used, the curb chain does come into play, but it shouldn't straight away, there should be some give in the rein before the curb chain tightens.
                          Thank you very much for this explantion, I never thought of it as a "pelham variation"; I use a broken pelham quite a bit in my program.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Nikki17 View Post
                            The Kimberwick (Kimblewick in the UK) bit is a form of Pelham. Actually either pronunciation/spelling is correct.
                            Yep that's right in America only.

                            In America it's totally logical that it's correct that it's the Kimberwick bit which is a traditional English Hunting bit named after the village of KimbLEwick in England.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Kimblewick, kimberwicke,

                              which ever, just like any other bit, some horses just go better and prefer a certain bit.

                              I have a hard headed, crafty old former Arabian endurance horse, who can become almost impossibly strong at the gallop. His neck is thick, hard and cresty, even after being on Quiessence and lite feed for over a year. I used to gallop race horses, hundreds of them in my day, and this Arab is every bit as strong as the toughest TBs when in the field racing along side others.

                              I've tried every bit out there - all the snaffles, gag bits, full bridles, pelhams with two reins, long shanks, short shanks, hackamores short and long, leather chin straps, chain. After slamming into the rear end of a field master's horse one day, I was determined to find SOMETHING that would work to slow or stop this otherwise super horse/turned great hunter.

                              Enter the Kimberwicke/Kimblewick! An Uxeter one, with leather chin strap, the rein on the bottom slot. My horse goes fantastic now, comes up to the bit confindently, gives at the slightest touch, and best of all, on those gallops he's remains in the hand, fluidly attentive, neither behind or over the bit. Best of all, I can easily stop him, no fuss, no muss. I don't care if the bit is unfashionable or has a tainted image ~ I want us, and anyone else with us to be safe! That's all that matters. I wouldn't show him in a Kimblewick, what would be the point anyway? Judges won't pin Arabs in hunter regardless; not if we're up against TBs and Warmbloods in the same division.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X