• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

OUTRAGE!!!!!!!!!!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OUTRAGE!!!!!!!!!!

    I READ WITH DISMAY THE VICIOUS ATTACK BY MS.MEAGHER UPON THE WINNER OF THE STATE LINE TACK NATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEDAL FINALS AT THE CAPITAL CHALLENGE.IT IS CLEAR THAT MS. MEAGER DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONCEPT OF THE CHILDREN'S EQUITATION DIVISION AS A DEVELOPING
    PROGRAM-DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE YOUNGSTERS TO ASPIRE TO THE LEVEL OF THE INDUSTRIES '

    MORE FINISHED PRODUCTS
    SUCH AS JENNY JONES,SARA WYTRES,EVA GONDA
    AND CATHLEEN CALVERT WHOSE PICTURES HAPPEN TO BE IN THE SAME ISSUE.I WOULD SUGGEST THAT MS.MEAGHER TURN TO PG.48 AND SHARE WITH US HER CRITIQUE OF BILL STEINKRAUS WHO ALONG WITH HIS OLYMPIC GOLD MEDAL HAS BEEN HAILED AS THE CONSUMATE AMERICAN STYLIST--PERHAPS ONE COULD SAY THAT IN THIS PHOTO HIS KNEES ARE PINCHED AND HIS LEG HAS SLIPPED BACK.I HAD THE HONOR OF BEING PART OF THE WINNING TEAM OF THE MACLAY 2000 SO I CAN SPEAK FIRST HAND WITH EXPERIENCE AND CREDIBILITY OF THE EFFORT ,DESIRE AND DEDICATION ON THE PART OF THE RIDER ,TRAINER AND PARENTS .WHAT A SHAME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HAD AVERY DIMMIG BEEN DISCOURAGED AT A TENDER AGE BY A SIMILAR ATTACK IN A NATIONAL MAGAZINE.I SUGGEST MS.MEAGER REDIRECT HER ENERGIES TO
    WHAT,IN MY OPINION IS REPREHINSIBLE AND IS FEATURED ON PAGE 90, THE FACT THAT THE AHSA/USET TASK FORCE FINDS IT NECESSARY TO HIRE A FACILITATOR AT THE COST OF $100,000.
    TO QUELL THE BICKERING.
    I AM HOPING TO BE THE FIRST OF MANY TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER.

    MICHAEL D'AMBROSIO

  • #2
    I READ WITH DISMAY THE VICIOUS ATTACK BY MS.MEAGHER UPON THE WINNER OF THE STATE LINE TACK NATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEDAL FINALS AT THE CAPITAL CHALLENGE.IT IS CLEAR THAT MS. MEAGER DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONCEPT OF THE CHILDREN'S EQUITATION DIVISION AS A DEVELOPING
    PROGRAM-DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE YOUNGSTERS TO ASPIRE TO THE LEVEL OF THE INDUSTRIES '

    MORE FINISHED PRODUCTS
    SUCH AS JENNY JONES,SARA WYTRES,EVA GONDA
    AND CATHLEEN CALVERT WHOSE PICTURES HAPPEN TO BE IN THE SAME ISSUE.I WOULD SUGGEST THAT MS.MEAGHER TURN TO PG.48 AND SHARE WITH US HER CRITIQUE OF BILL STEINKRAUS WHO ALONG WITH HIS OLYMPIC GOLD MEDAL HAS BEEN HAILED AS THE CONSUMATE AMERICAN STYLIST--PERHAPS ONE COULD SAY THAT IN THIS PHOTO HIS KNEES ARE PINCHED AND HIS LEG HAS SLIPPED BACK.I HAD THE HONOR OF BEING PART OF THE WINNING TEAM OF THE MACLAY 2000 SO I CAN SPEAK FIRST HAND WITH EXPERIENCE AND CREDIBILITY OF THE EFFORT ,DESIRE AND DEDICATION ON THE PART OF THE RIDER ,TRAINER AND PARENTS .WHAT A SHAME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HAD AVERY DIMMIG BEEN DISCOURAGED AT A TENDER AGE BY A SIMILAR ATTACK IN A NATIONAL MAGAZINE.I SUGGEST MS.MEAGER REDIRECT HER ENERGIES TO
    WHAT,IN MY OPINION IS REPREHINSIBLE AND IS FEATURED ON PAGE 90, THE FACT THAT THE AHSA/USET TASK FORCE FINDS IT NECESSARY TO HIRE A FACILITATOR AT THE COST OF $100,000.
    TO QUELL THE BICKERING.
    I AM HOPING TO BE THE FIRST OF MANY TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER.

    MICHAEL D'AMBROSIO

    Comment


    • #3
      I absolutely agree! However, there is another outrage as well. Clearly, there was NO NEED OR OBLIGATION for the Chronicle to PRINT such a mean-spirited and ill-conceived letter. Shame on them as well.

      Comment


      • #4
        You may need to give a little more information for those who may not subscribe to whatever magazine it is that you are referring to. I haven't gotten my COTH, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. However, I must say, to be fair, that I think everyone has a right to express their opinion and the "look" of riding (equitation) is really just a fad which comes and goes. What was acceptable 30 years ago is hardly favored now. In the end, does it really matter? ONLY if the form effects the function, IMO.
        Sportponies Unlimited
        Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

        Comment


        • #5
          I agree with Michael - reading this letter last night made me feel for the youngster who was being identified as exemplifying what is "wrong" with today's teaching.

          The topic of what is the best - most effective - style, and whether it is identical to the style that is "in" is certainly a worthwhile topic - but didn't, IMHO, need to be raised in this fashion. I do think it was thoughtless of the letter writer, and perhaps the Chronicle could have gently asked if she would consider rephrasing her letter, to get the point across without harm to a child.

          I've seen lots of photos in the Chronicle that are significantly less than models of perfection - or even something that I can identify that I would aspire to emulate. I have wondered about it. Maybe it is just the rider's position at that instant in time, but I think we've all read columns lamenting the disappearance in the show ring of the "classic" American style.

          If we really believe that the classic style is worth retaining, how can we do it?

          (Gee - that's the only photo I've even seen of Steinkraus where his leg isn't perfect - makes me feel that there is hope for me!)

          PS - Michael, you are new here - Uppercase signifies yelling. It actually becomes hard on the eyes!!

          PPS - regards to Carmen and Bill.

          Comment


          • #6
            In general, the Chronicle publishes any letter that meets its guidelines -- i.e., refers to a previously published article or letter, is timely, and is signed with a full name and address. Letters are edited for length and clarity, but otherwise... if that's someone's opinion, we generally print it.

            If you disagree, by all means, write another letter. That's what the Letters to the Editor column is there for. It doesn't do much good for the Chronicle only to publish the opinions they think are "right."

            I haven't seen this particular letter yet, but in general, that's the Chronicle's policy.

            See http://www.chronofhorse.com/submissions.html for our Letters to the Editor policy, and instructions on how to submit a letter.

            Comment


            • #7
              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Michael D'Ambrosio:
              I READ WITH DISMAY THE VICIOUS ATTACK BY MS.MEAGHER UPON THE WINNER OF THE STATE LINE TACK NATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEDAL FINALS AT THE CAPITAL CHALLENGE.

              <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
              Thank you, michael, for starting this thread. I can't imagine what that woman was thinking when she sent that letter to the COTH! I fell sorry for Ms Meagher. She must be a terribly frustrated individual.

              Perhaps she might be kind enough to send us some photos of herself equitating in her latest National Championship win, so we could complete the critical process for her!!!

              What's worse than publicly throwing stones at children (as if that's not enough to be ashamed of), is this currently popular mindset that winners have to pay for that distinction by becoming public targets for any and all criticism: of their performance (apparently now photo frame by photo frame), of the judges' performances, of the qualifying process (i.e. she bought her way in), or of their trainers' status (i.e. she only won because her trainer is important, knows the judge, bought a horse from the judge).

              By the way, correct me if I'm wrong, you stewards who lurk/post, but slamming the judges' competency a la "rewarding this perversion... is reprehensible", "judges need to have some guts", and "throw them all out... and tell them to try again next year" if said publicly at a horse show would warrant a sanction by the show steward and a nice little write-up in the back of AHSA magazine.

              If someone has a legitimate complaint about a classes' results, shouldn't they approach the steward and lodge a formal complaint? Isn't following the rules for criticism of judges part of the concept of "Sportsmanship"? Didn't they used to give awards for sportsmanship???

              I hope whatever drove Kimberley Meagher to this attack on the StateLine winner and the judges goes away so she can rejoin us all here on planet earth.

              Teri

              PS to Mr Alan Balch: Perhaps now is a good time to run an article in AHSA magazine regarding appropriate treatment of Judges, and how to lodge a complaint. It seems like people have forgotten that there are rules to be followed!

              Comment


              • #8
                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by pwynnnorman:
                You may need to give a little more information for those who may not subscribe to whatever magazine it is that you are referring to. I haven't gotten my COTH, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
                It is a letter to the editor in the newest (Nov 10) Chronicle. For some reason the on-line copy of letters to the editor has not been updated. The letter starts off "Please understand ... that I am not attacking Alison LaJoic or any other children who have had a similar riding style rewarded." She is really trying to slam the TRAINERS, not the kids.

                But I agree that, if I were the child mentioned by name, I would find it hard NOT to take it personally.

                As someone who, many years ago and under different management, had a Chronicle "letter to the editor" rejected, and was told, through a third party that it was considered a "crank letter" (it wasn't), I VERY MUCH SUPPORT the Chronicle's current policy on letters to the editor, even if it results in some hurt feelings. (Sorry for the long sentence.)

                Glad to see a poster from Mt. Kisco, where I grew up.
                Janet

                chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                Comment


                • #9
                  I agree wholeheartedly with your suggestion that Horse Show reprint the course to follow when disagreeing with results, Keri, but what you refer to as the "current popular mindset" may have another interpretation: poor morale due to too many APPEARANCES of impropriety. Whether those problems actually exist is an entirely different matter, of course, but the fact remains that a great many participants in the sport BELIEVE that they do. If you want the littany of the "current popular mindset" to go away, then perhaps you should support efforts to drag horse sports out of the dark ages by opening up the judging system by standardizing and publicizing expectations.
                  Sportponies Unlimited
                  Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Maybe someone could post the letter since it is not on the Internet yet?
                    Man plans. God laughs.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Flash44:
                      Maybe someone could post the letter since it is not on the Internet yet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                      That would be great...I also agree...photos don't give the whole picture..who says the judge only looks at that ONE POINT OVER THE JUMP!! Isn't it the WHOLE course and how you ride it?? Evryone has their own style and I know I have seen som HORRIBLE pictures of myself jumping..but that's not how I look all the time..we all have "not so good" jumps!!

                      THESE KIDS ARE OUR FUTURE IN RIDING and NEED ALL THE ENCOURAGEMENT THEY CAN GET SO THEY CAN GET BETTER, not bashing their equitation over a STILL PHOTO which has no expression!!!!

                      [This message has been edited by barb (edited 11-14-2000).]

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Flash44:
                        Maybe someone could post the letter since it is not on the Internet yet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                        I've asked the Chronicle's new webmaster (be patient with her, she's still learning) to post this week's letters. I guess that file got left out of the batch of stuff for the web this week.

                        We'll get it online soon, but if someone has time to kill and wants to type it in in the meantime, go for it. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Goodmudder:
                          I absolutely agree! However, there is another outrage as well. Clearly, there was NO NEED OR OBLIGATION for the Chronicle to PRINT such a mean-spirited and ill-conceived letter. Shame on them as well.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
                          Goodmudder, that is called journalism -- to print a letter to the editor that is in keeping with its policies which are clearly laid out for all to read.

                          I realize that many publications, especially online ones, do not have the same high standards of professional journalism as the COTH does.

                          There IS a clear obligation of the COTH to print the letter, and further, an obligation not to bias the letter in any way.

                          We should all be glad that the COTH recognizes, practices, and promotes unbiased and objective journalism -- and we should support that here on the BB as well. Thank you, Erin, for holding to that very high standard.
                          \"If you feel you had a bad ride, how do you think your horse feels?\"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I still don't understand why Mrs. Meager chose a letters to the editors forum in which to air what sounds like a cranky, argumentative beef. If she has a problem with the system should she not be airing her concerns with the AHSA rather than taking it out on the CMF at the CC??

                            Michael I don't blame you for being upset by this. Regards to Anthony.

                            [This message has been edited by Canter (edited 11-14-2000).]

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I too was struck by the hostility in the letter when I read it yesterday in my Chronicle. To name names like that, when children are involved, is unkind and unnecessary. But I also remember that what the writer was criticizing -- and why the letter was probably printed -- was the CAPTION written by Chronicle staff stating that the position in the picture was "classic." While the letter comes out as an indictment of the child, I think what it was meant to be was an indictment of COTH's characterization of her style. IMHO.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                We all sit around condemning and blaming when it is actually our fault. We all saw this coming we all have many times discussed the lack of consistency in the standards of judging.

                                The critic put in print what most likely a lot of others think! It's the total result of
                                permissively allowing there to be no objective standards. Without vaild and consistent standards this will always be a leaky roof, backyard brawling sport.

                                The child is not guilty, the judge is not guilty, the Chronicle is not guilty of anything. We as the 98% of the members who participate in this sport are the delinquent members who have permitted this child to be criticized at her most victorious moment. We are responsible by not taking a stand and letting the Licensed Officials Committee know that our perception of judging standards, the judge was not guilty the judge followed approved means.

                                Enough of the name calling and blaming and complaining. We have proposed a Rule Change for changing Judging Standards. Has anyone read it? It's posted on the AHSA site. Has anyone attempted to discuss the details of what and how these changes should occur? Have any of you "name callers" and complainers blaming everyone but yourselves given any five minutes of thought to the problem and how to solve it up until this very moment.

                                Will any of you be in Colorado at the Convention to express your ideas to the AHSA and it's Committees? Will you help those very few of us who are trying to make a difference and support change?

                                We have not dogmatically proposed rules carved in stone, we have however tried to open the dialog before it is too late. No child should be disparaged for what THEYare not responsible. No judge deserves to be abused by any exhibitor. No exhibitor should ever have to feel such a separation from the system that cannot be heard in any other way than in an inflamatory protest letter to the Editor.

                                We have made a start, will you join us in a constructive discussion of how to fix it? Check out the website, totally neutral territory belonging to the Members of the AHSA involved in the hunter jumper discipline.
                                http://www.hunterjumper.org
                                http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Call me a whiner, but I really hate being yelled at. I doubt whoever did whatever is even listening, so press your cap lock release key and stop shouting.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    As this is the first time I have written in
                                    online, I was unaware that writing in caps is considered yelling,I stand corrected.
                                    My point remains the same-to single out a thirteen year old rider and hold her winning performance up in a national magazine as'' an absolute perversion of the classic hunter style ''is unnecessarily brutal and somewhat foolish.I feel it would be far more realistic to critique the job that our trainers and judges are doing by examining the mature and more finished riders that our system has produced and that the judges consistently reward. There is ,in our sport,as in any other, an elite group at the top----please don't try to convice me that this group has any less potential than any of the former equitation champions that have come through the American system.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I must agree that regardless of whether the point being made was valid or not, using a young lady who had just won a significant victory as an example was a poor way to get that point across.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Well, Erin , here we go again: Could you or someone else clarify for me whether the Chronicle's letter policy includes an OBLIGATION on the part of the magazine to print each and every letter that meets those criteria? Where does judgment and discretion enter the picture? Or common sense?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X