• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Article in HorsePeople on Barney and McClain Ward entitled "We've Been Wronged"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Article in HorsePeople on Barney and McClain Ward entitled "We've Been Wronged"

    Has anyone else on this BB read the article in the April 2000 issue of Horse People about Barney and McLain Ward entitled "We've Been Wronged?" by Jeff Shields. It is billed as the first time Barney and McClain "tell their side of the story and how it affected their lives".

    I'd be interested in hearing about the reaction of others who have read it. I thought about posting some of the statements by the Wards here, but have decided not to because I don't want to inflame the board by quoting the outrageous parts without people actually reading the entire article.

    Unfortunately, I think Horse People is primarily available only in the NY/NJ/CT area and to my knowledge, doesn't have a web site, so I can't offer any guidance to those who might want to read the article but don't get the magazine. Perhaps others on this Board can, though.
  • Original Poster

    #2
    Has anyone else on this BB read the article in the April 2000 issue of Horse People about Barney and McLain Ward entitled "We've Been Wronged?" by Jeff Shields. It is billed as the first time Barney and McClain "tell their side of the story and how it affected their lives".

    I'd be interested in hearing about the reaction of others who have read it. I thought about posting some of the statements by the Wards here, but have decided not to because I don't want to inflame the board by quoting the outrageous parts without people actually reading the entire article.

    Unfortunately, I think Horse People is primarily available only in the NY/NJ/CT area and to my knowledge, doesn't have a web site, so I can't offer any guidance to those who might want to read the article but don't get the magazine. Perhaps others on this Board can, though.

    Comment


    • #3
      you know I saw That magazine in the tack shoplast week and my comment was...........OH PULLLEEEEZZZZEEEE!!!
      I couldnt believe they woould print that,needless to say i didnt buy the magazine
      Brilyntrip

      Comment


      • #4
        I read the article. I found that it squashed alot of misconseptions that I had. Now I only moderately dislike Ward SR. for his part in the "act".
        As for Ward JR. I am still waiting to hear all the facts.
        I do believe that it is entirely possible to have things happen that is beyond your control. I had a friend get back from Florida, and there was a minor incedent of a couple of horses getting loose and grazing about the ground in the middle of the night, Very well known horses. Some person just opened the doors and let them out. So it is possible for people to have access to an animal that should not, security is not iron clad.
        I also know that when people are winning, and alot that someone may be jealous or stupid enough to do something dumb. My example is the Tanya Harding and Nancy Karrigan incident.
        That is why I am still waiting for all the facts.

        Comment


        • #5
          I read it - in fact I got a copy at the last show I went (at this show my horse pulled up lame so I ended up huddled in the trailer to keep warm - and thats when I read it [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img])

          I was abit annoyed at BArney Ward - I am sorry but I think he deserves everything the AHSA/legal system inflicted upon him. I don't care if he 'reformed' - he still has to serve his punishment. We don't let a murder out of a life prison term if he reforms, do we? For once I agree with the AHSA here!

          As for McClain I can't judge until I have all the facts - but I can say I don't especially like either of their attitudes and alot of what Barney Ward said had me rolling my eyes.....

          It was a very interesting article though

          Sarah
          Sarah ( & Regal)

          what doesn't kill you makes you stronger -
          unless it breaks your heart first

          Comment


          • #6
            I just received my copy of "Horse People". I must say that I was convinced by the article that Barney has no remorse or regret except for the way it affected him. As to the big sympathy bid, many people have come up from hard and poor backgrounds without adopting any short cuts for success.

            Most of us would find it difficult to raise $300,000 to purchase a horse regardless of it's potential. So I guess things are not that bad at Castle Hill.

            I think that if as Barney Ward said,
            "And, he doesn't accept judgment from others on the horse show circuit, he said, knew as much as he did about what Tommy Burns was doing at the time."

            Well then an honorable man would have realized his guilt and turned in all these other people who are now looking at him so unkindly. Why because yes, if this is true they are as guilty as he, and that doesn't make him innocent.

            "He will never moralize over the death of a horse like others in the AHSA, he says. He grew up around stables and farms where horses that were beyond use were put down".

            Here the applicable phrase is "beyond use". By whose determination is this done? That is what makes the difference. If a horse has lost his use at 4'0" but could make a wonderful companion at 3'0", is that beyond use? If it were not insured would the same decision be made? That is the issue.

            "He built himself a code of ethics based on loyalty more than morality, and if he knew his friends were killing horses for money, that was their business."

            In that we have the reason for the problems which Barney Ward has created for himself.

            As to McLain,
            "He says there was no sign of any harm done to Beneton, and he argues that the miniscule amount of cocaine found in Oliver would not even ground a commercial airline pilot."

            Whether or not the was a sign or evidence of harm, is to me irrelevent. What is relevant is the intention of those chips. And, I certainly hope that the airline pilot when I fly has not handled any dollar bills. McLain is not the one to determine how much cocaine is acceptable. It is the drugs and medication committee with the veterinary committee that make those decisions. I trust these decisions are made based on what is in the best interest of the horses and not McLain Ward.

            "Now, I want to go for myself, for the people who have supported me," he said,"not for my country, which hasn't done much for me through my troubles".

            That does not sound like the Olympic Champion and role model we want for all those young people who might aspire to one day be on the team. Nor, those of us who are expected to donate money to pay for the attendance of the team.

            I hardly can visualize that the Wards have not gained from every aspect of the American Dream. And, I think for all the blessings he has had McLain should respect this country.

            Mr.Barney Ward says that he rose from poverty to Castle Hill where his son built him an elaborate private gym, there is a lap pool on the deck. Sounds like the very best of the American Dream to me.

            "What separates Barney Ward from his acusers is that Barney is a businessman and a farmer."

            He is therefore still a busy and successful person with lots of opportunity.

            "And he cannot bow down to the AHSA and others in the horse world whom he considers morally inferior to him."

            If that is so then we are all doomed, and so are the horses.

            [This message has been edited by Snowbird (edited 03-30-2000).]
            http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              I guess the thing I found most pathetic about the article were the statements that because Barney cannot watch McClain ride in person, and because he can no longer compete himself, Barney has a hard time finding a reason to get up in the morning. Carol Molony, a friend of Barney's, is quoted in the article as saying "What does he have left? Horses are his life. He's got a son who's very talented, and he can't watch him. What does he have left?" Seems to me he has quite a bit left.

              Comment


              • #8
                And maybe he should have thought about those things before he took part in what he did. I can't feel sorry for someone like that. That is like feeling sorry for the unibomber!
                Is minic a rinne bromach gioblach capall cumasach
                An awkward colt often becomes a beautiful horse .

                Comment


                • #9
                  M. Scott Peck once wrote in one of his books, a sequel to "A Road Less Travelled" that there were truly evil and amoral people in this world. I do believe we all have found at least one, probably two.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    How come the topic about tom trout not only got deleted but even the topic that talked about it getting deleted got closed, but anything on the Ward's just goes on and on and even george morris himself has to accept being a target of this talking? I don't know Tom Trout, but I guess he has better lawyers than the Wards or Morris. Or does he just have a lot more going on with the magazine? I think it is unfair to subject some people to what is talked about here but not others. It is even more upsetting when no one here defended Trout at all, unlike all the other discussions that have criticized real people, and yet he got protected by the magazine?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, I didn't read the article in horse people--but my boyfriend did. While his answer was PPUUHHLLEEEEAASSSSE!!!!, i didn't read it so i can't say that.

                      But one thing (maybe 2 or three really [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] ) i will say is:
                      I think barney ward got everything he deserved, he should've had more!!! What he did was entirely inexcusable, and i agree that he shouldn't be able to watch his son ride! If he's SO hooked up on watching his son ride , well, he should of thought about that before he did ...well, we know what he did(i can't even say it, i find it so cruel, & disgusting!!!) and if horses ARE his life, then why did he kill some??

                      As for Ward jr. I'm not sure how many facts i've heard that are actually correct, but i believe(right now at least) that he's innocent... but you never can tell....

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I have zero respect for these men. All I can say, Well, boo-hoo, wah wah wah. Quit sniveling - you made your choices, now live with them.

                        My big question/point is this: Why should there have been ANY cocaine in the horse's system? And if you are putting coke up your horses' noses, whose other noses is it going into?

                        As far as Benetton goes, what kind of defense is "Well, he didn't get hurt." What kind of lame-o statement is that?

                        Keep talking, Barney and McClain - you opened your mouths and proved you are fools, now let's make it really definite.
                        "Cats aren't clean; they're covered with cat spit."
                        - John S Nichols (1745-1846,writer/printer)

                        Don't come for me - I didn't send for you.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Jessica:

                          May I point out that the Wards apparently
                          voluntarily submitted to the interview that lead to this article, that they apparently wanted it published, and that therefore I feel justified in discussing it. I agree with everything that Snowbird said in her analysis, except to add that I think it would be difficult, if not impossible, for Barney Ward to FIND many, if any people, who are "morally inferior to him." The arrogance that I read into the comments attributed to him is astounding and I believe he got the minimum that he deserved.
                          What confounds me is that in a forum in which he participated, this article, as in his letter of defense to the Chronicle earlier, he STILL cannot hide that arrogance and even appear to be contrite.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I don't see the distinction in the online treatment of the threads either, but, oh well.

                            Maybe I'm too soft hearted, but I just have a hard time getting too worked up over someone like Barney Ward just because at some point in his life he considered horses to be mere commodities, rather than living, breathing creatures. He's hardly alone in that mindset.

                            In fact, don't human beings think that way all the time, like everytime most of us sit down to dinner? What makes a horse any more deserving of our consideration than a cow? What makes Ward any more a monster than your average farmer?

                            Ah, but he broke a rule and he won't shut up, either. Geezum, folks, murderers are treated better than BW! Can't anyone see how inconsistent that is of us?

                            I haven't read the article yet, but I think I would have to weigh in on the side of the Ward's regardless. The only reason, it seems to me, that they are getting so much bashing is because they, more or less, got caught--and maybe because, for some reason (like just maybe because they didn't come from a line of silver-spoons-in-mouths?) no one will forgive them, unlike, it seems, those many who have forgiven Valliere (to the point of thanking him in an ad in The Chronicle--no one got upset about that, did they?)

                            I guess I even have to admire the Ward's courage, in a way. They DO keep trying, in spite of the fact that the whole industry, it seems, just wants them to go away. It's a bit bizarre to me, really. Why are we so hard on them, but not others? Could it be because of what they remind us of? Something we'd rather not have to acknowledge about certain aspects of our sport?

                            BTW, has there been any research on giving horses cocaine something like a week or so BEFORE testing them--to see how much residue would be left in their system? Didn't someone at some point say that maybe people get horses "high" so they can come down and are "low" by the time they show? Wouldn't that be something that a vet school or some other entity could actually do an experiment on?

                            And what would the dose be? Wouldn't it get pretty expensive? And dangerous?
                            Sportponies Unlimited
                            Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Correct me if I'm wrong, but P. Valliere NEVER pled guilty to killing horses.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Eventually this article will make its way to the internet I would think. I feel I could not make a valid comment until I read it....except for the following........I do believe Barney Ward will cry "foul" until his dying day. And, if the comment about McLain saying he wants to ride for himself and not his country is true, I do hope the USET gets wind of that. That type of demeanor surely would not bode well for team unity/comraderie........
                                Bethe Mounce
                                Head Trainer, AmeriCan Romance Equestrian
                                https://www.facebook.com/AmericanRomanceEquestrian
                                Brentwood CA

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  EXCUSE ME?????

                                  "haven't read the article yet, but I think I would have to weigh in on the side of the Ward's regardless. The only reason, it seems to me, that they are getting so much bashing is because they, more or less, got caught--and maybe because, for some reason (like just maybe because they didn't come from a line of silver-spoons-in-mouths?)"

                                  Yeah, Barney got caught---arranging for the execution of multiple horses. And he deserves more bashing than this board can ever deliver. I'm not a silver spooner, but I've never killed an animal as an indulgence for a client either. Come on, this is ludicrous. How can you feel any level of empathy for this creature?

                                  And while I'm not a proponent of the canonization of Valliere, at least he's accepted his punishment and gone on with his life. True, he continues to make a (very)good living on the fringes, but he has never, to the best of my knowledge, attempted to defy the conditions of the plea bargain he struck. And, God help us, he is not a whiner.

                                  P. Wynn, gotta say it--cannot believe you would stand up for this skank.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Goodmudder. P Valliere admitted to his part in this scandal. I don't recall if he plea bargined or what to get less of a sentence than Barney but he did Exactly what Barney and many others did. He just took a different approach to the situation in his letter to the chronicle and "apologized". And in the eyes of "some" that makes him a better person.

                                    [This message has been edited by MB Stark (edited 04-01-2000).]

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      MB Stark, I will check the facts tomorrow, but I guarantee he did NOT do "exactly what Barney" did. I believe he pled to wire fraud, but NOT to killing horses!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        If memory serves, P.V. passed the name of the horse killer to a client, who then contracted with T. Burns to have his horse murdered. Ward, on the other hand, arranged directly for the slaughter of at least 3 horses. Both accepted plea bargains...Ward's more severe punishment (i.e., imprisonment) was due to the "hands on" nature of his involvement in multiple killings.

                                        [This message has been edited by LucianCephus (edited 04-01-2000).]

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X