• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USEF - is this really true?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USEF - is this really true?

    In a recent conversation with a USEF Jumper judge, who was told that they had failed the jumper exam, I was appalled to learn that the USEF refused the judge's request for a copy of their corrected jumper test. The reason stated was, "Because the exam material was reviewed with you prior to the administration and the correct answers were reviewed with you following completion of the exam, the test writing committee did not want to send back graded copies of the exam".
    Knowing how extremely expensive it is to attend these mandatory clinics, I would certainly think that the attendees would be entitled to a copy of their corrected test, particularly if they were notified that they had failed.
    I think the "test writing committee" should be aware that from time immemorial, tests have always been returned to those being examined to use as a guide and for future reference.
    How can one learn by their mistakes if they don't know what their mistakes were?
    If this is a current USEF policy of the Continuing Education Committee, then it should be reviewed by the Executive Director and the CEO in the best interest of the Federation.

  • #2
    Actually I can completely understand thier reasoning for not wanting to return the graded test. It is quite common for tests to be controlled material. The graded copy would be an answer key that could be studied by another individual who wanted to take that same test. By controlling the graded copies of the test they limit test compromise and cheating. Making it more likely that the test results are an accurate reflection of the individual's knowledge.
    For the horse color genetics junky

    Comment


    • #3
      USEF has a control need

      like everything the USEF has done since it came out from the dust of the clash of the titans, the AHSA and the USET, it has shown a strong need to control all content, decisions, opinion, thought, etc. of its members. If you think of it as Iraq under Saddam, you won't be as troubled by their position on test scores. if they want to fail a person because they don't want a particular individual to have a judges card, they can just tell you that you failed. no proof is necessary. it is the way they do everything else.

      the only thing I can't figure out, is where you cut the head off?
      Discipline is the Bridge between Dreams and Accomplishments

      Comment


      • #4
        I can understand NOT passing out the tests....

        The DMV doesn't pass out their tests either. But I would think maybe the USEF would issue a letter to the people stating the questions they missed pertained to SO AND SO rules, please study JP 102, 156, and 225 before retaking the test.
        " iCOTH " window/bumper stickers. Wood Routed Stall and Farm Signs
        http://www.bluemooncustomsigns.com

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Jumper Judge's test

          From what I understand the exam was "open book" so under these circumstances, I really can't buy Twisting's response.
          And, to the best of my knowlege, the DMV doesn't give "open book" exams, so I have trouble accepting Grand Prix Jumper's response.
          In the past, I myself had a jumper card, and always had my exams returned with a score.
          I am now beginning to wonder about the recent Steward's test which was due back to USEF March 20th. It's now been over five weeks since then and there has been no word from the Federation on the results.

          Comment


          • #6
            Well it is an open book test, which is gone over at the end of the test/clinic. Everyone is told that and everyone I know, writes down their answers prior to handing it.

            That way you know when you got one wrong and can make note of the correct rule.

            You are also told prior to the test that you will not get a copy back. Nothing sneaky about it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Doubleez, they did return the tests when it was an open book and they rewrote the ENTIRE test each time.

              They now reuse some of the questions. Hence the reason to not return the test.

              Comment


              • #8
                As far back as I can remember during all of my school years, Kindergarten, Grade, High School & College followed by many years of teaching at NYU in both the Undergraduate & Master's Programs; exams were always returned to the students. It has always been a tool for teachers to help students in visually understanding where they erred.
                It is a foolish and misquided policy to do otherwise.
                To not tell the student what the question was that was wrong and what the correct answer should have been helps no one.
                In all the years of teaching I have never found it necessary to use the same exam twice. My exams were always based on the subject matter which rarely changed; not unlike a Jumper Judge's test which has to change regualarly simply because the rules are always being changed. A question and answer used last year propably wouldn't hold true the following year.
                The USEF has no concept of how a proper clinic should be organized therefore how could anyone expect that it would know how to proplerly test it's Judges.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by its me View Post
                  As far back as I can remember during all of my school years, Kindergarten, Grade, High School & College followed by many years of teaching at NYU in both the Undergraduate & Master's Programs; exams were always returned to the students. It has always been a tool for teachers to help students in visually understanding where they erred.
                  It is a foolish and misquided policy to do otherwise.
                  To not tell the student what the question was that was wrong and what the correct answer should have been helps no one.
                  In all the years of teaching I have never found it necessary to use the same exam twice. My exams were always based on the subject matter which rarely changed; not unlike a Jumper Judge's test which has to change regualarly simply because the rules are always being changed. A question and answer used last year propably wouldn't hold true the following year.
                  The USEF has no concept of how a proper clinic should be organized therefore how could anyone expect that it would know how to proplerly test it's Judges.
                  I have to disagree. The jumper clinics are probably the best run of all the USEF clinics. Those judges send a lot of time organizing their presentations to share new rules, rule clarifications and to deal with questions from their fellow judges.

                  Since you ARE given the answers to the test at the clinic, there is no need for you to have a copy sent to you.

                  I also tend to think that the majority of the questions asked ARE relevant from year to year. The jumper rules do not change that frequently.

                  I never said they used the same exam, but they do reuse questions, which as a former teacher, I did quite often. There are good questions for material that are used time and time again.

                  Would I use the exact same test over and over, no, but there is nothing wrong with reusing good questions.

                  And I have no problem with not receiving a copy of the test back since they go over the answers at the clinic.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    On a very different level, bar examiners never provide corrected or graded copies of bar exams back to those who have taken them. This is primarily because they frequently reuse the questions and do not want to have to rewrite the entire exam every year. (Bar review courses and prep programs still manage to get old versions and approximations of the questions). You eventually get a copy of your score, and that's it.

                    Actually, now that I think about it, that's true throughout law school. Professors rarely if ever give you a corrected exam back, because they reuse them as well. You get a posted score and that's it. You can then go in and discuss the exam with the professor, usually, but that's about it.

                    Not to be disparaging, but how does one fail an open book exam? Especially for jumper judging, which ought to be pretty straightforward, at least compared to some of the other disciplines? And if it is open book, shouldn't you have a fairly good idea of what questions you were able to answer and those for which you were unable to find the answers?
                    "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      To those who return tests, kudos. Obviously you have time to re-write exams every few weeks.

                      Ever since I found previous years' copies of some of my exams on the floor of the lecture hall, I NEVER return exams any more.

                      I feel an exam is a tool for the professor to judge how well they teach. Homework is the tool for the student to learn where they err. Thus, the students do not NEED to have an exam returned. I also noted that cheating has diminished quite a bit as well and the exams are giving me a better measure of how well I am conveying topic material.

                      I totally agree with the USEF. As stated, the bar association does not return tests as do most licensing boards. In this way, especially in open book tests, you reduce the amount of cheating and get a better reflection of material knowledge in licensing.

                      Reed

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've taken and administered tests ranging from state assessments to ACT to the Jeopardy exam, and it is not a norm to get the graded test back on any kind of test along these lines. Test writing is a huge undertaking and they are usually very secure.
                        A proud friend of bar.ka.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I can see logic on both sides.
                          I've taken exams that weren't returned, and exams that were.

                          I tend to return exams to my students, but have colleagues who do not.

                          One of my professors (principles of radiology) handed us a sheet at the beginning of his course.
                          Had about 100 questions on it.
                          He said, "These are my exam questions. If you can answer them, you know what you should know at the end of this course. I don't care if you come to class and learn the answers, hole up in the library, or stay in bed."

                          Not everyone passed the course...
                          "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                          ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I can't remember how/why it came up just this past weekend, but I was telling a friend about my first EMT test. I was informed I had gotten one question wrong. I really wanted to KNOW what I'd gotten wrong and the test administrators wouldn't tell me, saying it was a test, not a class.

                            I was just concerned that I'd missed something critical and that I might deliver incorrect care or whatever to a human being because of it! (I thought it rather ridiculous that someone couldn't just tell me that. I didn't want the entire exam back - just wanted to know the one damn question I'd answered incorrectly. )

                            So, instead, I went BACK through the entire textbook and reviewed yet again after the exam.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              DuffyAgain, I'm the same way. I guess I'm a nerd or something but I can't stand not knowing which questions I've missed and how/why I missed them.

                              When I took the CPA exam (back when the earth's crust was still cooling and you couldn't use calculators), I knew in advance that you wouldn't get your tests returned or know which questions you'd missed. Even so, it bugged me. I really wanted to know if I'd messed up a concept or just made a bonehead goof. I think it's valuable to know if you've got a fundamental misunderstanding of something important or if you simply flubbed reading comprehension, etc.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                So the incorrect answers were personally reviewed with the candidate/applicant for renewal at the time the test was graded and this is a problem because...

                                I don't get it.
                                When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  You do not get a corrected copy back of the SAT's, GRE's, PRAXIS, or any other standardized ETS test I have ever taken. You rarely even find out exactly how many you got wrong!
                                  Do not take anything to heart. Do not hanker after signs of progress. Founder of the Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X