• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Obeying USEF Amateur rules

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obeying USEF Amateur rules

    After reading the helpful hints thread, it got me thinking. How many people follow the amateur rules to a T? If they don't, do they typically get away with it?

  • #2
    I'm an ammy & I follow the rules. If I have questions, I ask before doing it.

    Some people do get away with it. It depends how big a fish you are sometimes. If you are a nobody riding a nothing horse & not a threat, your odds of not being reported are probably better than a good rider riding a really nice horse that is winning. I notice in many instances people don't complain until it affects them directly (they are losing to the fake ammy rider).
    "I'm not crazy...my mother had me tested"

    Comment


    • #3
      I follow them.
      Besides, Who would come on here and post that they didn't?

      Comment


      • #4
        Well said, Blinky...

        Comment


        • #5
          Or just rules in general....

          I can say I do follow the Am rule to a T... always have. As far as any other rule goes, I follow them to a T as well. I will admit there was one time I got busted for breaking a rule (a few years ago).... and while I do realize I broke the rule, at the time I was totally unaware I was doing it. I apologized and all was fine.
          They call it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already taken...

          Comment


          • #6
            Although I agree that no one is going to come on here and say "I do it! I knowingly break the ammy rules!" But I also think that I know what you're asking.

            A previous poster said it as well, but I want to restate that if someone isn't winning (i.e. beating someone else who cares) they probably won't get protested no matter what on earth they are doing.

            Sometimes I wish that we could have something other than a rule, more of an "I know it when I see it" approach to professional status. I understand WHY we can't, but it does seem a shame that ammys are excluded from certain activities that would in no way make them "better" than other ammys. There can be no loopholes because people have taken advantage of them.

            Personally, I would have no problem with Amy Ammy teaching some Saturday up-downers at her barn to knock a few hundred off her board. But I do have a problem with Alice Ammy who teaches ALL the lessons. Getting paid $20 to hack out some juniors horse while the kid is studying for finals? Okay by me. Getting paid to put training rides on everything in the barn? Not so much.

            But where do I draw the line between those things? I can't define it, but I would know it if I saw it.

            But that's not really the question, that's just a sad commentary on the fact that the rule needs to be so all-encompassing because it has been abused in the past.

            As far as your specific question, I will propose a situation that I think 50% of ammys have been in that would compromise their ammy status.

            Many of us help out around the barn for a few bucks off board or lessons. We feed once a week, we clean a few stalls on the weekend. I'd guess probably half of us do something like this every once in a while. (And I'm not talking about enough work that it would be feasible to "sell our services" to the barn down the road -- I'm talking about a couple of hours a week.)

            I'd also guess that more of us -- practically all of us -- have hacked someone else's horse around or taken a lesson on a horse other than ours. Your friend goes to Bermuda and you hack her horse twice. You're not getting paid to do it, but you do swing a leg over it. Your horse has an abscess so you get a lesson on a sale horse or your friends horse.

            So if EVER these two groups of people coincide, you are breaking the rules. If I get paid $20 a week for feeding on Sunday mornings, and I hack my friends horse ONCE for her because she is busy and I am not, I am no longer an ammy. And THAT is where the rule is idocy. However, that is also why my trainer only had juniors work weekends at the barn.
            Originally posted by tidy rabbit
            Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Blinky View Post
              I follow them.
              Besides, Who would come on here and post that they didn't?
              You would be surprised how many people will come out and admit that they violate the letter of the rules.

              It is particularly interesting when the COTH "Amateur Issue" comes out. Very often the amateur describes - IN THE INTERVIEW- doing things which are aganst the rules (e.g., being paid by their trainer in another capacity)
              Janet

              chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Janet View Post
                You would be surprised how many people will come out and admit that they violate the letter of the rules.

                It is particularly interesting when the COTH "Amateur Issue" comes out. Very often the amateur describes - IN THE INTERVIEW- doing things which are aganst the rules (e.g., being paid by their trainer in another capacity)
                Yeah... That's always amusing! You'd think the Chronicle would edit that if only to protect their own credibility!
                Originally posted by tidy rabbit
                Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I've read the Ammy rule time and time again and I'm still not sure I understand it to a T. I'm an Ammy, 21 years old. I generally ride/show 2-3 horses a week. I own a large pony hunter (silly i know, resale project). I don't get paid to ride the horses but i'm always asked to get on and fix problem horses etc. I do it for fun. I showed in the A/O Jumpers on a horse that was not mine, but I was leasing him. The steward at the show saw a copy of the lease agreement and copies of the checks and was fine with it. Afterwards I went home and read the rules, specifically says no leasing. No one protested, thank goodness. I don't understand that rule either, some of us can't afford horses that can competently jump around the 4'6 or beautiful hunters that can dominate the A/O hunters. Why can the juniors do it on any horse but now i'm 21 and can't do it at all because I don't own my own horse? I have to show against BNR's in the level 6,7,8 and Adequans and Greens? This isn't pertaining purely to the amateur rule, but kind of. I can't grasp what i can and cannot do purely from reading that legal mumble jumble haha, can someone explain it to me?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have to agree with exJumper- though I do my very best to follow the rules it is so all encompassing that I really wish they would change it. Wouldn't it make more sense to have professional versus amateur status based on level of performance and ability rather than whether or not you got paid to hack somebody's horse while they were on vacation? Even if that isn't the spirit of the rule, it is written in such a way that if my endurance rider friend who gets paid $35 to ride some random person's horse on trails for hours on end were to ride in a hunter jumper show he would be a professional- despite the fact that he really can't ride to that level. It makes very little sense to me. I think it also means that raw beginners have fewer inexpensive ways to get good instruction if people who might otherwise be willing to teach basic begginer lessons for half the price of a BNT won't because they don't want to lose their amateur status. It really would be a win-win in many ways to update the rule, but I can only assume that there are some really good reasons that it is the way it is.
                    My blog:

                    RAWR

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I would love an answer to that one to Scheibyee as I am in a similar age and financial situation...
                      My blog:

                      RAWR

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The REAL answer (to "Why are the rules that way???") is that, at the time the Amateur Owner divisions were started, the intended/expected participants were the non working wifes of men who could afford to support thier horse habit.

                        But they have kept them that way because, when one person is riding another person's horse, it is difficult to tell who is doing whom a "favor". So "riding someone else's horse" easily becomes a gray area where people can claim to be an amatuer, but are really riding the horse FOR the owner. You see a little of this gray area in the Adult Amateur classes.

                        Personally, I would rather see the divisions split on some other criteria (like the highest you have competed in the last 5 years), but people seem determined to keep the amateur and amateur owner divisions in spite of all the unintended consequences in the rules.
                        Janet

                        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          As much as I follow the rules to a T, there are so many folks who break them that I actually think they are a joke. This topic has been hashed and re-hashed on this board and yet the violators, some of which who have been called out ON this board, are still going strong.... So if you follow the rules, do it for yourself because the USEF has a hard time proving it and most people just continue to violate year after year. You have to live in your skin and do what you feel comfortable with and the rest will have to do the same!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I agree that the ammy rule is a bit ridiculous. I work a full time job completely outside the horse industry but still enjoy teaching a few beginner/intermediate lessons a week. Because of this I'm precluded from some of the less competitive divisions where my green bean could actually have a shot at getting both miles and ribbons. Since I maintain my integrity to not ride in ammy classes I show against the local pros who have 4, 5 or more horses in a class and get paid to ride those horses. I'm hoping to do a few A shows this year, but seriously debating whether it's even worth the cost since again, I don't want to break the rules. It's very tempting to do though since I would be a nobody on a nothing horse and probably not get caught. Perhaps a ruling within USEF that a person making no more 25% their annual income (whether monetary or reduced board) with horses would be more reasonable for denoting amateur status. Would certainly make those A shows more appealing to me.
                            "Beware the hobby that eats."
                            Benjamin Franklin

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by JumpWithPanache View Post
                              Perhaps a ruling within USEF that a person making no more 25% their annual income (whether monetary or reduced board) with horses would be more reasonable for denoting amateur status. Would certainly make those A shows more appealing to me.
                              I love that idea.

                              I've been afraid to teach lessons even WITHOUT any compensation for fear of violating the rules. One of the best ways to learn something is to teach it & I would love to be able to help out w/some of the beginners. Even if it were something like 10% of the annual income.

                              unfortunately, I'm sure there are unscrupulous people who would find a loophole there, too.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by JumpWithPanache View Post
                                Perhaps a ruling within USEF that a person making no more 25% their annual income (whether monetary or reduced board) with horses would be more reasonable for denoting amateur status. Would certainly make those A shows more appealing to me.
                                And how would you document/enforce that?

                                I have an early 60s rule book which DOES refer to the proportion of income. But that didn't last very long, probably because it was impossible to enforce.

                                For a while Eventing had a rule limiting you to $2500 in "pro-related" income, But they got rid of that rule too.
                                Janet

                                chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  I certainly wasn't expecting anyone to say I'm an amateur and I don't follow the rules, because that would be a ridiculous expectation.

                                  As I was reading the rules, I was noticing that you can't ride a horse in which your family member is receiving money for. I know of a trainer who sells horses on consignment, whose relative rides and shows them almost exclusively. Should she technically be considered a professional?

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by JumpWithPanache View Post
                                    Perhaps a ruling within USEF that a person making no more 25% their annual income (whether monetary or reduced board) with horses would be more reasonable for denoting amateur status. Would certainly make those A shows more appealing to me.
                                    So you would be ok with giving USEF your W-2s from the year showing your income? What about all the unclaimed income that is over that 25% (or whatever amount is decided upon)? Who would police that?

                                    And don't you think if USEF has that informations, show managements are going to fill out Freedom of Information requests for that info so they can adjust their horse show prices as they see fit?
                                    "I'm not crazy...my mother had me tested"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Janet View Post
                                      You would be surprised how many people will come out and admit that they violate the letter of the rules.

                                      It is particularly interesting when the COTH "Amateur Issue" comes out. Very often the amateur describes - IN THE INTERVIEW- doing things which are aganst the rules (e.g., being paid by their trainer in another capacity)
                                      this happens all the time. people talk about how they work in the barn and thanks to the trainer for providing all these opportunities to ride all these nice customer horses.
                                      its the USEF's fault. they turn a blind eye to cheating. and no one wants to spend 200 bucks and be the one who is the whistle blower.
                                      i think its very easy to break the amateur rules and get away with it. i think its very difficult to file a protest and be successful.
                                      i dont cheat, but thats because i dont have time having a full time job that is time consuming. not sure if i didnt have time constraints , if i would be tempted to cheat when i see so many others doing this time and time again. but probably not! i would feel badly for cheating!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        LetsTalk put it good. No matter if you follow the rules or not usef rarely enforces the rules anyways. Some people are blatantly braking the rules... We all have them in our local or zone shows, but they continue to do it because usef will not do anything about them. What good is it to have rules when there is no one to police them.
                                        I want to be like Barbie because that bitch has everything!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X