• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

AHSA / USET END TALKS

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Nancey: organizational charts AND job descriptions AND proposed budgets and salaries.

    Sportponies Unlimited
    Specializing in fancy, athletic, 3/4-TB ponies.
    Shameless signature plugplugplug.
    Sportponies Unlimited
    Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

    Comment


    • #62
      from the parties involved.

      You might get meaningful financial information from an audit.

      As always, my favorite word.

      Comment


      • #63
        via conference call slated for Mon. at 4:00 p.m. to discuss the actions taken by the USET.

        Interesting that they mention it will be a conference call therefore difficult to open to the public but, media is welcome.

        I certainly hope some of the media does the necessary scrambling to attend the conference call, even on such short notice.

        Comment


        • #64
          At least the AHSA makes the effort to allow the meeting to be open, and invites the media to attend. I take that to be a very good sign.
          "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

          Comment


          • #65
            Love those words too Woodbern...Putting all the cards on the table allows us some insite. And IlonaE, you said it right. Don't think there are any clear cut winners. We need real facts.

            Comment


            • #66
              Yes, at least the AHSA is listening and has shown some care about us.

              By the way in Nancy Jaffer's column today she says that what Finn Casperson said was the USET has an easement for 128 acres, which will be signed next week

              Portia does an easement mean anything permanent? Can't the new owners say forget about it you can't stay unless you pay rent or something. It doesn't say they have a lease or for how long the easement will last.
              http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

              Comment


              • #67
                An easement? Interesting, and somewhat puzzling. Do you have a link to Nancy's column?

                An easement is essentially a license to use a piece of land owned by someone else for a particular purpose. The most common type are utilities easements by which utility companies have the right to use certain designated areas of land for a use to serve the general public good, such as laying utility cable, or running telephone poles, or laying pipelines, etc. Such easments may be acquired with, and in most circumstances without, the consent of the landowner.

                Private individuals can also acquire easements against the will of the landowner when it is necessary because there is no other alternative. The classic law school example is when your land is surrounded by somebody else's land and there's only one road leading in for access to your property, you can get an easement to use that road. Or if there's a privately owned path that everyone uses and it's the only way to reach a certain public destination, that kind of thing.

                How long an easement lasts depends on what the easement is for and the terms of the grant. An easement can be perpetual for as long as the designated use continues, or it can be temporary.

                In this case, it sounds like a voluntary easement is being granted to continue a certain use (presumably the team preparing for horse sports). Its terms will be defined by the specific agreement rather than by statute or common law principles, so the terms can be basically anything. We would have to see the agreement to know the extent of the grant and the terms of use.

                The reason I say it is somewhat puzzling is that it is an unusual choice for a big piece of land subject to a potentially wide variety of uses, horse related though they may be. A lease would be more typical to can virtually complete control over the property, at least for the lease term. An easement, to me at least, implies non-exclusive use -- meaning that the land will not be reserved exclusively for the use of the team but may be used by the grantor (landowner) for its own purposes. This is just speculation on my part, so take it for what it is worth. I could be entirely wrong.
                "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                Comment


                • #68
                  Sorry Portia, when my drive crashed I lost the bookmark for Nany Jaffer's web site for her articles. However, the paper says she can be reached at nancyjaffer@compuserve.com.

                  The article says:

                  <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>USET Director Bob Standish explained an easement will be signed this week giving the team use of approximately 128 acres that includes the historic stables, Pine Meadow area and North Field.

                  "The team is protected no matter what happens," said Casperson, who said he had made an offer himself for the property with which Lucent is involved. He does not think the use of the rest of the acreage will change, no matter who buys it.

                  "You can't ignore 36 holes of golf," he pointed out.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                  I wondered Portia, because it seemed to me that such an easement cannot bind the next owner. I know I was involved in a case with adverse possession and we were granted a 99 year easement because we had used it "without" the permission of the owner. From what I remember if they close it for one day a year it prevents any possibility of proving adverse possession. And, as you said that was for use and not possession or any permanent buildings. I think there is another problem because the buildings are probably "historical" and if the land is given to Green Acres with the buildings that surely restricts use.

                  We gave up applying for a historical rating just for that reason on our farm, and we haven't signed on for Farmland preservation for the same reason.

                  I think there may be some very serious trouble coming on that land.

                  I would say as a land owner, that while I might give permission to someone while I own it, it would not continue indefinitely with a new owner unless it was a lease for compensation. At $250,000 an acre land value, who would give away 128 acres for nothing?

                  I cannot imagine any circumstances for an easement of let's say 99 years on property that is so very expensive. We granted the previous owner of our farm use of a house and the Middle Barn for a while after purchase but it was renewable every year. They also have a serious problem with the Township which was very reluctant to approve the project in the first place. Neighbors there do not want a high traffic operation. It would destroy the area. I think the USET is standing on a "quicksand pit", they won't be able to run all the fundraisers they need to make it all work.

                  Interestingly, we received applications to renew memberships we don't have to join the USET. My daughter got one and she hasn't belonged since she was 17 and that was over 15 years ago. Methinks they are in deep trouble.

                  [This message was edited by Snowbird on Jan. 28, 2001 at 11:35 PM.]
                  http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Here's the link Portia..

                    http://www.nj.com/columns/jaffer/

                    Very interesting to hear all these different sides of what happened. Thank you Snowbird and Pwynn for doing all you did.

                    Sorry can't figure out why the url won't high light, but it does work.

                    [This message was edited by Weatherford on Feb. 03, 2001 at 02:09 PM.]

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Actually the lands at Gladstone that are being used by the USET have a permanent CONSERVATION easement held by the Nature Conservancy of NJ. This information has appeared in several news paper articles. If the USET leaves the Concervancy takes over those parcels and they can never be developed.

                      The benefit to the donor is obvious - a huge tax deduction. The sale of Hamilton Farms certainly came with a huge gain to the seller. To offset the tax liability many corporations take advantage of these donations to minimize their tax liability. There is, as far as I remember a 5 year carry forward on sizable donations as well.

                      Can't follow the notation above about the problems with Historic designation. Unless your local municipality has some restrictions in law - the NJ & National Register designation actually comes with many benefits. One which our local property owners have welcomed is protection from any governmental improvements such as road widenings, etc. We have all of the hamlets and village in our township on the Registers and are now working on historic farmsteads at the request of the property owners. Another benefit is that any work you do on your buildings comes under the Rehab Building Codes and not BOCA - so they are much less restrictive.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        It appears from people involved that the papers to conserve the property are not yet filed or signed as of this date. I believe Weatherford knows more about that because she is close to the situation.

                        The problem with the historical zone is that you cannot make additions or corrections or changes without a lot of difficulty and applying to the historical committee. All repairs and expansions must be made in comformation of the history codes.

                        The loss of private privilege isn't really worth the tax benefits of being designated a Historical site. The Historical Committee can prevent any and all needed expansion or improvements.

                        On the conserved land you also cannot change any of the terrain, direction of water flow, driveways etc. Usually, there is an awarenes of wild life and their habitat cannot be disturbed.

                        This I think would make it very difficult for the USET to expand it's services and operation to include all the extras of staff and parking as an NGB.

                        However, the point is that so far there doesn't appear to be anything in writing, and no contracts that are signed which means that a new owner would be at a very big disadvantage regarding the remaining acres. Without the conservation in contract and approved the new owner may choose not to accept the prohibitions involved for the tax benefits. If it is done after the sale is in place I think it is a very wobbly situation.
                        http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Here in my part of Virginia, much of the land is in easements. We have several types, conservation, sight to name just two. In all cases, the land, after being put in easements, is LESS valuable. (Cannot subdivide). In this state, once land is in an easement, it stays with the land, no matter how many times it is sold. As it sounds to me, the purpose is the same in New Jersey. Preserve the land. I imagine the laws don't vary THAT much from state to state.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            The USET has a new item on its site under the SPI page, titled "A Letter From America's Equestrian Athtletes." It is a memo to the USET, AHSA, and "equetrian community" that says the undersigned athletes have read the USET proposal and support it, with an online form to submit for those "who wish to go on record as supporting the USET proposal for the USA equestrian." That's fine, I have no problem with that (although I personally think there should also be an option for people who want to go on record as supporting the AHSA proposal, and I hope the AHSA will provide a similar means of going on record).

                            But the title of the posting really annoys me: "A Letter from America's Equestrian Athletes," as though every equestrian athlete in the US has authorized this letter and supports the USET plan. It is signed by Leslie Howard, Chris Kappler, Wash Bishop, Mike Huber, Betsy Steiner, and Guenter Seidel, all of whom are fine athletes who at some point have competed at the international level (though some not in recent years). But do these six people really represent the entire community of American's Equestrian Athletes? Somehow I don't think people like David O'Connor, who was appointed to the SPI by the AHSA and to all appearances supports the AHSA plan, would agree.

                            For some reason that just really rubs me the wrong way. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif[/img]
                            "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              at

                              http://www.ahsa.org/cgi-bin/forumdis...=100&LastLogin=

                              (I was thinking in the Internation Disciplines forum.....)

                              that's the only place that I can think of offhand that we could initiate stating our opinions
                              Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                              The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                That board is only open X amount of hours Sgray. Or till the office closes. It's easier to speak out here.

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  wtywmn4 - Portia stated "That's fine, I have no problem with that (although I personally think there should also be an option for people who want to go on record as supporting the AHSA proposal, and I hope the AHSA will provide a similar means of going on record)." and since the Issues and Answers forum is watched and responses are usually rather quick then it is an option to express support. If Jennifer started a topic there then perhaps she could inspire the AHSA to set up a spot for opinions that was universally accessible.
                                  Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                                  The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Good point Sgray. That would make it easier for people to support the AHSA's side. Thanks... [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Good idea SGray and wtywmn. I just started such a topic on the AHSA International Disciplines board. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] Hopefully they will set up a more formal method of expressing support.
                                      "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        Thanks Portia,
                                        I posted a follow-up to your thread.

                                        Did you read the Straussburger Editorial? I am sure it was tongue in cheek but what a picture Billie Bob as a negotiator! That's all we need in this stew. Shoot he's made more war than peace.
                                        http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          I heard on my grapevine, you know I believe that plants can speak and have feelings!

                                          There was an emergency meeting of the NHJC Board of Governors before the AHSA Board Meeting.

                                          Anyone out there know what might have happened?
                                          http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X