• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

RF Amber Eyes/Commentary

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • And the moral of the story is, if you want to erase a horse's past record and change its age, then perhaps you should not agree to an interview with a national magazine about the horse in question. Funny thing about publicity is that it gets people interested in the subject and then they go off and do their own research and come back and talk about it. Darn us amateurs.
    "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
    Rainy
    Stash

    Comment


    • Frankly i wouldn't know off hand how to find a european eventing FEI record because i never had to do it and i have been involved in the horse show biz since 1964. If the seller who was an eventer told me it should be eligible for the second years, i would believe it. If I found out otherwise, then i would stop showing in the second year, which i will assume will be what they do. I do think that ignorance is understandable in this case and if you want to say that is no excuse have at it. This is hardly a heinous crime, happend frequently.Nobody died.
      I have personally shown a horse in the wrong division based on information the seller gave me. When I found out otherwise I took it out of the division.Nobody had a coronary.
      Incase you haven't noticed vf, I often disagree with many of the posters on here. Again usually because of their love of the witch hunt and tar and feathers and the inability to see other viewpoints.
      www.midatlanticeq.com
      Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
      November 11-13, 2016

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Janet View Post
        Yes, if the horse isn't a stakes winner, or something, the JC does free up the name after a certain number of years.
        Interesting. That does explains how there could be two 'Smokin' Joe's, in difference parts of the country, one chesnut, and one bay, both registered with the Jockey Club! LOL. No wonder the JC names (while awful) aren't as bad as the QH or APHA names! Who knew?

        Also, thanks for the explination on where 'Smokin' Joe' came from. I had that horse for 10 years and never knew that. Just thought it was a terrible name for a hunter, although racehorse people told me they loved it for a horse on the track.
        The truth is always in the middle.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
          But it gets tiresome reading all the comments on these boards about the lying , cheating trainers made by the amateurs and people that haven't been to the ring in 30 years. Its always the bad trainers fault. Sometimes its that they get bad information. And this time it may have come from an event person, heaven forbid.
          Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
          Please identify for me where I accused ANYONE on this thread of either "lying" or "cheating." Please.

          I can't tell if you're intentionally strawmanning or not reading for comprehension but there's a real disconnect between what most all the other posters are saying on this thread and your responses.
          VXF: YOU, personally, might not have said someone is lying or cheating, etc...but you cannot dismiss chunkymunky's point that many threads go that way...and this one has plenty of it. I, too, get a little tired of the immediate accusations of lying, cheating, drugging, etc.

          CM does have a valid point but there is also wrong-doing here that can't be argued away.

          Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
          Agree. And the point is that whether you like, love, hate, or want to crucify the person registering the horse... IGNORANCE IS NOT AN EXCUSE. Motive is also irrelevant.
          Agreed. Things were done improperly, no matter motive or intent. The people involved are being called out because the horse is getting a lot of attention, but in normal channels, the infractions would've gone unnoticed by all be a small minority.
          Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
          Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

          Comment


          • Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
            Frankly i wouldn't know off hand how to find a european eventing FEI record because i never had to do it and i have been involved in the horse show biz since 1964. If the seller who was an eventer told me it should be eligible for the second years, i would believe it. If I found out otherwise, then i would stop showing in the second year, which i will assume will be what they do. I do think that ignorance is understandable in this case and if you want to say that is no excuse have at it. This is hardly a heinous crime, happend frequently.Nobody died.
            I have personally shown a horse in the wrong division based on information the seller gave me. When I found out otherwise I took it out of the division.Nobody had a coronary.
            Incase you haven't noticed vf, I often disagree with many of the posters on here. Again usually because of their love of the witch hunt and tar and feathers and the inability to see other viewpoints.
            Are you implying that Karen provided erroneous information regarding the horse's eligibility? That's rather ballsy. Considering that KOC certainly knew about the horse's past eventing record.
            "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
            Rainy
            Stash

            Comment


            • Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
              Frankly i wouldn't know off hand how to find a european eventing FEI record because i never had to do it and i have been involved in the horse show biz since 1964. If the seller who was an eventer told me it should be eligible for the second years, i would believe it. If I found out otherwise, then i would stop showing in the second year, which i will assume will be what they do. I do think that ignorance is understandable in this case and if you want to say that is no excuse have at it. This is hardly a heinous crime, happend frequently.Nobody died.
              Strawman argument. This discussion is not about the IMPACT of showing the horse in the wrong division. No one is even saying it was intentional! No one is saying it was done for a competitive advantage. The discussion is about whether or not the horse is eligible. You're responding to a discussion no one is having and making an argument that is wholly irrelevant. The rule has no provision for which the IMPACT of being in the wrong division affects whether or not the rule was violated.

              Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
              Incase you haven't noticed vf, I often disagree with many of the posters on here. Again usually because of their love of the witch hunt and tar and feathers and the inability to see other viewpoints.
              Please point out the posts that area "witch hunt" or where anyone is being "tarred and feathered." Please.

              And I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you RugBug that this thread has taken an inappropriate turn. I think things have been civil and about rules/issues and not personal attacks.

              What other view point is there to see? The rule says "you cannot do X." If someone is doing X, the view point/intent doesn't matter. That's what you're missing!
              ~Veronica
              "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
              http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

              Comment


              • Believe it or not, Chunky, I don't actually even necessarily want to see anyone set down for it. I'd be fine with it if USEF quietly took the ribbons away and simply merged the database entries, so that the horse gets to keep her identity and prior show record. THAT is the priority for me.

                However, it is most definitely within the Federation's purview to issue fines/suspensions, because whether deliberately or inadvertently, two USEF rules were broken.

                And of course, if nobody gets fined or set down, the classy thing for the owners to do would certainly be to return the 2nd Year Green ribbons and ask that the points be stricken. But you certainly cannot legislate good manners.
                "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                Comment


                • Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
                  If the seller who was an eventer told me it should be eligible for the second years, i would believe it. If I found out otherwise, then i would stop showing in the second year, which i will assume will be what they do. I do think that ignorance is understandable in this case and if you want to say that is no excuse have at it.
                  I'm going to say it's no excuse.

                  The hunters in question should maybe do a follow up question, such as:

                  "Oh hey Karen O'Connor, you're an eventer and you say this horse is eligible second year green?"

                  KOC (I want this sale, and that sounds right... what's second year green again? I haven't shown hunters in years...): "Yes."

                  Follow-up by hunters: "So, she hasn't shown at 3'6 or over except in 2012?"

                  Pretty simple actually.

                  ETA: plus the new USEF registration really makes me think it was done on purpose, and you can't blame "bad eventer information" for that.
                  Blugal

                  You never know what kind of obsessive compulsive crazy person you are until another person imitates your behaviour at a three-day. --Gry2Yng

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
                    Frankly i wouldn't know off hand how to find a european eventing FEI record because i never had to do it and i have been involved in the horse show biz since 1964..


                    Honestly...it isn't hard. You pick up the phone and call the USEF. They have great staffers who can help you find out all the information and walk you through what the horse is and isn't qualified for...and if the person you call can't, they find some one who can. Our fees pay for all of this and it is one of the things the USEF is very good about.

                    There is really no excuse. It just takes someone who wants to do things right and cares about the rules.

                    It takes seconds to find out a horse's existing USEF number if you know their name. And the time it takes to file a change of owner or name change is also really easy.

                    I don't really want to see sanctions either....I'd rather see the mistake corrected and let them carry on. But these are not hard things to do correctly in the first place....and I don't understand why someone would get a new USEF number on a horse that clearly already has a life time number (you have to have that to have a passport).
                    Last edited by bornfreenowexpensive; Jun. 7, 2013, 11:59 AM.
                    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                    Comment


                    • This whole Brouhaha is why the USEF needs to mandate Microchipping as the FEI does now. With chips, horses can't lose their identities and show records.

                      And buyers and sellers can't plead ignorance, which is normally no excuse anyway.
                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                      Comment


                      • @ War Admiral, actually i blocked you from my FB page :-) But its fun to see all your indignity here. You are absolutely wrong that i don't believe in enforcing the rules. But i do have an opinion that I think would be agreed with by most stewards in the US. If someone has information that a horse is in the wrong division its best to have a chat with the exhibitor and let them know about its record. Then they can make the effort to check to see if they have been misinformed. If so, they can stop showing in that division. If they don't and you know for a fact about its ineligibility, go to the show steward. Then the steward will talk to the exhibitor. The exhibitor will either stop showing in that division or the informant may choose to file a protest. That is the usual and civil way to handle that type of complaintThat is how most normal people enforce rules of this nature, and how i believe in enforcing the rules. Not with crucifiction on the internet by people who are not showing at that show and have no entitlement to protest.

                        And @ War, after you kept posting about some of the best child riders that" know" they are riding drugged horses and aren't any good if their trainers ride their horses, it was time to block you on FB. That stuff is just downright offensive. By the way, you friended me. i didn't know who you were. I asked a mutual friend of ours and i can't say you would want to see what she wrote
                        .
                        So do not say i don't believe in enforcing rules. I do, but in the proper channels. I am not condoning that a horse shoud ever be shown in the divivion for which it is not qualified. Just because you don't like me is no reason to put words in my mouth.
                        This is horse showing folks, not solving world hunger.To get your panties in a wad over a mistake of a horse in the wrong division that can easily be fixed is the sign of needing something better to do.
                        Last edited by chunky munky; Jun. 7, 2013, 11:53 AM.
                        www.midatlanticeq.com
                        Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                        November 11-13, 2016

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                          This whole Brouhaha is why the USEF needs to mandate Microchipping as the FEI does now. With chips, horses can't lose their identities and show records.

                          And I bet this mare already has a microchip.
                          ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                          Comment


                          • And, guess what. The USEF charges $200 for a competitor protest, when it should be the steward's job to act on its behalf.

                            Another argument in favor of chipping. Scanners cost less than $200 these days.
                            They could be required equipment for Stewards. Actually they should be required equipment for shows as well.


                            It would seem that many owners/trainers just don't do well on an honor system.
                            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                            Thread killer Extraordinaire

                            Comment


                            • The solution is rather simple. Put your 200 bucks down and file a protest if the horse is showing in a division for which you believe it is ineligible. Do your homework and show up for the hearing. The horse's record is available - you likely won't lose your money. It will probably end up a wrist lap and forfeiture of all prize money and points earned in that division. If you want to see this practice end (and I know its not the first time an experienced horse from Europe "lost" its identity) then you're going to have to do something about it. Not just kvetch on COTH.
                              "Horsemanship is not merely a matter of bodily skills, but is based on scholarship and, therefore, is a matter of the mind and intellect." Charles de Kunffy

                              http://www.equiimages.com

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                Strawman argument. This discussion is not about the IMPACT of showing the horse in the wrong division. No one is even saying it was intentional! No one is saying it was done for a competitive advantage. The discussion is about whether or not the horse is eligible. You're responding to a discussion no one is having and making an argument that is wholly irrelevant. The rule has no provision for which the IMPACT of being in the wrong division affects whether or not the rule was violated.



                                Please point out the posts that area "witch hunt" or where anyone is being "tarred and feathered." Please.

                                What other view point is there to see? The rule says "you cannot do X." If someone is doing X, the view point/intent doesn't matter. That's what you're missing!
                                So, I'm all about facts. But if threads on this board had to stick to facts...well, there would be little discussion. We have some facts: horse isn't eligible for classes it competed in, horse has a brand new record with the USEF. Most the rest of this thread is speculation. If CM is putting forth ideas as to why, well, that is not out of the norm for COTH....and this thread in particular.

                                CM's comments about witch hunts are tar and feathering are not confined to this thread (and it looks like not even COTH, but expands to other social media) I feel like you are intentionally overlooking that so you can dismiss CM. I don't always agree with CM and I often find her abrassive and even rude. But that doesn't mean that everything she types is wrong. I find other posters to be obnoxious and klassy (calling someone out for FB posts. REAllY? Why is this person even your "friend.") but that doesn't mean everything that person types is wrong either.

                                There are plenty of legitmate reasons why things could've been done...but it doesn't excuse the action at all. Discussing ways the situation could be rectified is a valid topic of discussion...and par for the course on COTH. If we could only stick to facts, there would be about 5 posts on the entire forum, it's much more fun to read invoices and put forth ideas what each line item is for or why a certain thing was done a certain way, etc....and that is what makes COTH tick.
                                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                Comment


                                • Thing is, though, this type of issue impacts many MORE members than just those competing against the horse.

                                  It impacts BREEDERS b/c every time another horse loses its identity and show record, that's one more horse that the breeder will never be able to find again once it leaves their hands, and one more horse (in this case a truly spectacular one) that a breeder who would like to breed something similar will never be able to do pedigree and show record research on, and a TRAINER who is interested in acquiring something similar will never be able to go back to the breeder and ask whether they "have anything else like that".

                                  It impacts MEMBERS who may sympathize w/ the BREEDERS about not having a mechanism to track their horses' performance records, but who also think it is extremely important to preserve the right of owners to change a horse's name.

                                  Among all those issues it probably impacts at least HALF of the USEF membership.
                                  "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                  Comment


                                  • I don't read all the threads CM posts on and actually, aside from 2-3 threads that are active that I do post on-- I don't really read most other threads on this board. I use the control panel and really only go back and read threads I've already posted on. I don't generally scroll through the boards and open threads. I read a couple (mainly about Devon), posted on them, and go back to them. I don't read other threads. So I don't really have any input on what's happening on threads I don't read. What's happening on other threads really isn't directly relevant to this thread either. If CM wants to call someone out for a "witch hunt" on the boards, maybe she should do it on the threads where that's actually happening?!

                                    She called ME out for having some sort of animus against Kelley Farmer. Which is why I kept asking for CM to point out where I called anyone a liar/cheat. I think, if CM pulls up my old posts, she'll find some where I had very complimentary things to say about Kelley Farmer, ironically enough. I don't have anything for/against her as I've never met her!

                                    I'm all for discussion too. The point I am making about facts is that when a rule is a strict liability rule, the intent is irrelevant. So we can talk about the intent until we're blue in the face, it doesn't really matter. There are other situations where intent might be relevant (like, for example, a discussion of the Heritage lawsuit where there have been allegations of fraud) but going on and on about how the re-recording and showing in 2nd year greens could have been an accident is irrelevant because the intent has nothing to do with whether the rule was violated.
                                    ~Veronica
                                    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      And to think I was naive enough to assume that this thread would be a happy little one-pager when I started it...

                                      Comment


                                      • If your protest is upheld you get your 200 bucks back, IIRC. That $200 is there to help prevent people from filing a protest because they hate you. Or you beat Dobbin. That sort of thing. If you want hang, ya gotta stop just saying "This sucks."
                                        "Horsemanship is not merely a matter of bodily skills, but is based on scholarship and, therefore, is a matter of the mind and intellect." Charles de Kunffy

                                        http://www.equiimages.com

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                          If CM wants to call someone out for a "witch hunt" on the boards, maybe she should do it on the threads where that's actually happening?!
                                          There has been a little of it on this thread.

                                          She called ME out for having some sort of animus against Kelley Farmer. Which is why I kept asking for CM to point out where I called anyone a liar/cheat. I think, if CM pulls up my old posts, she'll find some where I had very complimentary things to say about Kelley Farmer, ironically enough. I don't have anything for/against her as I've never met her!
                                          See, I didn't think she was calling you specifically, out. Just making a general statement that there is a general quickness these days to jump on the liar/cheat/drugger bandwagon. And sadly, it's true and even legitimate as people lose more and more faith in the upper echelons of this sport.

                                          I'm all for discussion too. The point I am making about facts is that when a rule is a strict liability rule, the intent is irrelevant. So we can talk about the intent until we're blue in the face, it doesn't really matter.
                                          Yep. But while intent does not matter one iota in this situation...it is what 11 or more pages of this thread are full of. Why might that have done this, why that, etc.
                                          Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                          Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X