• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

RF Amber Eyes/Commentary

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I didn't think so either, but perhaps one of the spellings was goofy enough to throw off the JC reviewer?
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

    Comment


    • Smokin' Joe was actually the nickname given the boxer Joe Frazier, kinda like nicnames today for ball players.
      www.midatlanticeq.com
      Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
      November 11-13, 2016

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Thoroughbred1201 View Post
        I still have his papers soomewhere around. It might have been spelled differently, or without the apostrophe, or something, but it was definately his jockey club name. He passed away in 2000, so I don't know if something could have been reissued after a certain time period. Not sure how that works.
        Yes, if the horse isn't a stakes winner, or something, the JC does free up the name after a certain number of years.
        Janet

        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

        Comment


        • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
          But what are the odds of two such random names? I mean, what's a Smoking Joe anyway?!
          Smokin' Joe. Joe Frazier. The boxer. From Philadelphia. He was pretty famous.

          ETA chunky munky you beat me to it. I went to elementary school with his kids.

          Comment


          • LOL. Not a boxing fan, I totally didn't make the connection!
            ~Veronica
            "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
            http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

            Comment


            • It's kind of funny, if I told some hunter friends that some people on COTH think that hunter judging was so shallow that they would allow the name of the horse to affect that horses placing they would swear it must be some disrespectful eventer with a chip on their shoulder making that claim.

              Doesn't the very idea that subjective judging might take in to account a horse's name even bother anyone?

              Comment


              • Hmmm. Where is a good list of emoticons when you need one???
                www.midatlanticeq.com
                Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                November 11-13, 2016

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  Originally posted by subk View Post
                  It's kind of funny, if I told some hunter friends that some people on COTH think that hunter judging was so shallow that they would allow the name of the horse to affect that horses placing they would swear it must be some disrespectful eventer with a chip on their shoulder making that claim.

                  Doesn't the very idea that subjective judging might take in to account a horse's name even bother anyone?
                  My horse's name is First Date. One time someone who had heard my horse's name announced asked me what prompted me to name my horse "First Aid".

                  That must be why I didn't pin in that stake class. Better go start a thread on re-naming my hunter.

                  Comment


                  • Years ago I had a friend that had a horse named Rock Sound. I am certain if I had named one that it would immediately start limping.
                    www.midatlanticeq.com
                    Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                    November 11-13, 2016

                    Comment


                    • What's funny is that the damned horse is undoubtedly microchipped. And was before she left Germany. So she is carrying her own identity under her skin. AND she has both an FEI and a German Passport.

                      I too think the USEF should do something to the new owners; if this gets by, is there anything that won't?
                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                      Comment


                      • I'm with you Vineyridge...and why does my gut tell me nothing will be done?

                        So we will now have one more warmblood of unknown breeding in the hunter ring with no previous competition history before this past week and, being a mare, no information for a potential future breeder to use in determining the best breeding decisions to make.

                        And we wonder why the Europeans kick our butts on an international level on a regular basis. While we're busy arguing over what to name a horse, they are spending their time continuing to fine tune breeding programs that consistently produce top performers.

                        I give a lot of kudos to American breeders who are working so hard to produce top horses with little recognition outside of breed societies or young horse evaluation/classes.

                        Comment


                        • I wouldn't worry too much about losing the breeding/performance on this one. It will most likely stay pretty high profile, has a passport, the breeder and European seller will have congratulatory ads and will use it all to get more Americans to come to buy horses....etc....etc
                          But obviously it would be nice if there was a better system of tracking breedg/performance records here.
                          www.midatlanticeq.com
                          Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                          November 11-13, 2016

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by subk View Post
                            It's kind of funny, if I told some hunter friends that some people on COTH think that hunter judging was so shallow that they would allow the name of the horse to affect that horses placing they would swear it must be some disrespectful eventer with a chip on their shoulder making that claim.

                            Doesn't the very idea that subjective judging might take in to account a horse's name even bother anyone?
                            Not as much as the fact that no one can wrap their brain around the fact that subjective judging depends slightly on creating a receptive mindset with a good first impression. You want concrete evidence of "placings affected" and "points off" so you can point to how shallow we are that minor details trump performance, when human nature is not that simple. Because of course none of us who read the article first were watching this horse more closely through the turns to see if the career change would hold, right?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by CBoylen View Post
                              Not as much as the fact that no one can wrap their brain around the fact that subjective judging depends slightly on creating a receptive mindset with a good first impression. You want concrete evidence of "placings affected" and "points off" so you can point to how shallow we are that minor details trump performance, when human nature is not that simple. Because of course none of us who read the article first were watching this horse more closely through the turns to see if the career change would hold, right?
                              Exactly. It has nothing to do with shallow judging. Let me put it into a different perspective so someone might be able to see around the chip...

                              A friend asks you to go see the new Quentin Tarantino movie. You haven't heard anything about it, but know of his other movies and agree. The movie turns out to be more Nicholas Sparks than Tarantino, enough so that you have to check to make sure that it actually is Tarantino.

                              Now, if you had an image of a Tarantino movie and a Nicholas Sparks movie...well, you could be guilty of being shallow.

                              When you are being judged subjectively, you do everything you can to make the right impression. Think of hunters like a job interview and eventing like taking a skills test. One is highly ssubjective and the tiniest little thing can play a role in the decision, whereas a skills test is very objective and it doesn't matter how you hold your pen, what you wear, how you come up witht eh answers, just as long as you do. If a horse's past has the possibility of leaving the wrong impression when being judged subjectively, don't point it out.

                              Here's another one for you: you are a recruiter for a conservative company. Someone applies online with the email imamajorsexybeast@aol.com. When this person comes in ffor an interview, do you have any preconceived thoughts about them? At the very least you have to be thinking the person should've signed up for a conservative email to apply for jobs with.
                              Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                              Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                                Exactly. It has nothing to do with shallow judging. Let me put it into a different perspective so someone might be able to see around the chip...
                                ....
                                A friend asks you to go see the new Quentin Tarantino movie. You haven't heard anything about it, but know of his other movies and agree. The movie turns out to be more Nicholas Sparks than Tarantino, enough so that you have to check to make sure that it actually is Tarantino.

                                Now, if you had an image of a Tarantino movie and a Nicholas Sparks movie...well, you could be guilty of being shallow.

                                When you are being judged subjectively, you do everything you can to make the right impression. Think of hunters like a job interview and eventing like taking a skills test. One is highly ssubjective and the tiniest little thing can play a role in the decision, .....

                                Here's another one for you: you are a recruiter for a conservative company. Someone applies online with the email imamajorsexybeast@aol.com. When this person comes in ffor an interview, do you have any preconceived thoughts about them? At the very least you have to be thinking the person should've signed up for a conservative email to apply for jobs with.
                                Seriously... Comparing Amber Eyes -which is not offensive in any way- with using imamajorsexybeast as an email is hardly a comparison that is on all fours.... It isn't even close. As to setting the right subjective tone... Yes we all do that, an impeccably turned out horse, a skilled cprider, that walk into the ring with an air of confidence and then deliver -that makes me stand up and take notice.... Frankly, a judge who is thinking about the horse's name is not doing the job and unless the name is plain offensive, it should not make a wink of difference.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by juststartingout View Post
                                  Seriously... Comparing Amber Eyes -which is not offensive in any way- with using imamajorsexybeast as an email is hardly a comparison that is on all fours.... It isn't even close. As to setting the right subjective tone... Yes we all do that, an impeccably turned out horse, a skilled cprider, that walk into the ring with an air of confidence and then deliver -that makes me stand up and take notice.... Frankly, a judge who is thinking about the horse's name is not doing the job and unless the name is plain offensive, it should not make a wink of difference.
                                  It's not the name that is the problem (although, I personally find it "blah" at best), it's the link to her past that someone might want to avoid. Instead of having a judge go "alright llet's see what this eventer can do in the hunter ring," you have them saying "let's see how this hunter goes."

                                  And honestly? I was using examples to assist some in understanding 1)that we all have preconceived notions about things, and 2)when you will be subjectively judged, you do everything in your power to stack the deck in your favor. My exxample was a bit exagerated, but so is subks'. the name change was most likely done becuse the new OWNERS did not like the old name, Not because of any fear that the judge is not goingto like Amber Eye, as stated. Moreover,, if they didn't want the horse's past known, they wouldn't have discussed it with COTH.

                                  BTW -there is nothing "offensive" about imasexybeast...it's just gives a certtain impression. I suppose if you think being sexy is offensive, though...
                                  Last edited by RugBug; Jun. 7, 2013, 01:45 AM. Reason: sorry about all the doubled letters. My ipad is misbehaving. Grrrr....
                                  Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                  Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                  Comment


                                  • Argument doesn't hold water. Jumpers or former jumpers enter derbies all the time, and no one says that they have to be renamed to compete. Some of them even win.

                                    Look, no one cares what name a horse shows under, but making it year younger and losing its history is not only a USEF rule violation but it's dishonest as well.

                                    Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                                    It's not the name that is the problem (although, I personally find it "blah" at best), it's the link to her past that someone might want to avoid. Instead of having a judge go "alright llet's see what this eventer can do in the hunter ring," you have them saying "let's see how this hunter goes."

                                    And honestly? I was using examples to assist some in understanding 1)that we all have preconceived notions about things, and 2)when you will be subjectively judged, you do everything in your power to stack the deck in your favor. My exxample was a bit exagerated, but so was hers.
                                    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                    Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                      Argument doesn't hold water. Jumpers or former jumpers enter derbies all the time, and no one says that they have to be renamed to compete. Some of them even win.
                                      IT was not an argument, it was a theory positted by another poster. I agreed that it has some validity, which it does. Do you have stereotypes of eventers? Then the theory holds water.

                                      Look, no one cares what name a horse shows under, but making it year younger and losing its history is not only a USEF rule violation but it's dishonest as well.
                                      Your point? If you read all the posts you would know that I am not on board with the changes made.


                                      (I was editting my post while you were posting yours. Please note I added my theory as to why I think the horse changed names: the new owners didn't like the old name. I suppose aafter seeing the changes they made to her record, there could be more complex, and even dishonest, reasons for the change. )
                                      Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                      Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                      Comment


                                      • What is the USEF going to do....I would hope they hold the line regarding the rule, and maybe try to gain back the waning confidence of its members.
                                        Come to the dark side, we have cookies

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Pennywell Bay View Post
                                          What is the USEF going to do....I would hope they hold the line regarding the rule, and maybe try to gain back the waning confidence of its members.
                                          Has anyone actually contacted USEF and alerted them?

                                          I know we all *think* they lurk here all the time, but this is rather a long thread to trawl through. A screen grab and an e-mail or several might not go amiss.
                                          "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X