• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USEF Hasn't Changed...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by skydy View Post
    The one marked DECEASED is the horse that tested positive for romifidine. Same name, same owner. I can only assume that "Deceased" indicates that the horse is, in fact, deceased.
    Ohhhh that's a shame 8 year old horse, though it might not have anything to do w/ drug violation..

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #22
      Originally posted by gottagrey View Post
      Ohhhh that's a shame 8 year old horse, though it might not have anything to do w/ drug violation..
      I didn't imply that it did. I noticed , that's all..
      I was curious about the horse, his show record, and if he had been sold.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by mvp View Post
        So, friend at home, should I be surprised, unsurprised or not care if a trainer I like/respect and doesn't drug did work for someone who did? I have run into this problem more than once. Sadly, these "clean" pros IME never got to the BNT status (and wealth) of their mentors.
        I would say unsurprised. It is very very easy for an aspiring trainer, groom, or any other variety of pro to end up in a nasty situation and not find out about it until the ink is dry on the contract (and s/he has moved all her horses, personal belongings, etc.).

        I remember I got *shredded* on this forum by trainers a few years back when I suggested that during a job interview with a pro barn it's not the world's worst idea to seize any opportunity to explore the trainer's meds cabinet that may drift your way. Even that won't necessarily ensure ending up at a drug-free barn, but I stand by it and would do it again.

        As far as your own trainer is concerned, just be sure it's not a situation where everything is nice and clean and hunky-dory until you get busy at work and turn your back for a week. Whenever I'm exploring a prospective trainer relationship, I pretty much tell the trainer right up front that they can EXPECT me to show up with a random vet to pull blood a couple times a year. If they have a problem with that, sayonara. My horse, my rules.
        "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by skydy View Post
          I suppose we should be grateful that the pedophile is suspended indefinitely...
          THAT pedophile, you mean. The others however are still roaming around as far as I'm aware.

          So wait, this "B"NT had to TQ a horse to ride himself???!!! That in itself is lolworthy.
          "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

          Comment


          • #25
            The trainers get fined if they are the one signing the form as having the horse in their care/custody it doesn't necessarily mean they rode /showed the horse. My trainer absolutely will not sign an entry blank for any horse that is not stabled/boarded with her.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by War Admiral View Post
              I would say unsurprised. It is very very easy for an aspiring trainer, groom, or any other variety of pro to end up in a nasty situation and not find out about it until the ink is dry on the contract (and s/he has moved all her horses, personal belongings, etc.).

              I remember I got *shredded* on this forum by trainers a few years back when I suggested that during a job interview with a pro barn it's not the world's worst idea to seize any opportunity to explore the trainer's meds cabinet that may drift your way. Even that won't necessarily ensure ending up at a drug-free barn, but I stand by it and would do it again.

              As far as your own trainer is concerned, just be sure it's not a situation where everything is nice and clean and hunky-dory until you get busy at work and turn your back for a week. Whenever I'm exploring a prospective trainer relationship, I pretty much tell the trainer right up front that they can EXPECT me to show up with a random vet to pull blood a couple times a year. If they have a problem with that, sayonara. My horse, my rules.
              I was thinking mainly about the assistant trainer or WS perspective, not that of a client.

              I know so many good LNTs who learned a lot from BNTs who have been set down for D&M infractions a time or two.

              I think these LNTs keep their own conscience about this stuff. They know, they come to their own conclusions and don't discuss what they see, except perhaps with a few trusted friends. It would be a hard part of their job. I'm sure *no one* gets into the horse training biz with a plan to drug as necessary.
              The armchair saddler
              Politically Pro-Cat

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #27
                Originally posted by gottagrey View Post
                The trainers get fined if they are the one signing the form as having the horse in their care/custody it doesn't necessarily mean they rode /showed the horse. My trainer absolutely will not sign an entry blank for any horse that is not stabled/boarded with her.
                This person was riding the horse wasn't he?

                ETA Since the horse was owned by a pro barn and this person apparently sells horses, it would seem likely that he was riding. I can't find any records from the show so I don't know.
                I don't know any of these people, only what is available on their websites.
                Last edited by skydy; May. 10, 2013, 09:24 PM.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #28
                  Originally posted by War Admiral View Post
                  THAT pedophile, you mean. The others however are still roaming around as far as I'm aware
                  No. I meant THE pedophile named on the USEF page.

                  Obviously there are many pedophiles out there...

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by skydy View Post
                    This person was riding the horse wasn't he?

                    ETA Since the horse was owned by a pro barn and this person apparently sells horses, it would seem likely that he was riding. I can't find any records from the show so I don't know.
                    I don't know any of these people, only what is available on their websites.
                    It doesn't say who rode the horse/ just the trainer and owner.The horse Balik was listed as owned by Redfield Farm/E.Spadone and it was D. Raposa that got the fine and suspension so there could be a couple of scenarios - horse could have been at that barn to sell or leased to a client there. There's no use in speculating. Both the owner and the trainer are pro riders & trainers..

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #30
                      Originally posted by gottagrey View Post
                      It doesn't say who rode the horse/ just the trainer and owner.The horse Balik was listed as owned by Redfield Farm/E.Spadone and it was D. Raposa that got the fine and suspension so there could be a couple of scenarios - horse could have been at that barn to sell or leased to a client there. There's no use in speculating. Both the owner and the trainer are pro riders & trainers..
                      Yes, I understand. I did read the entire content of the link that I posted here. "There's no use in speculating" . So, since no one is willing to spell it out for us, we'll just let it slide..
                      Last edited by skydy; May. 11, 2013, 03:56 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Walt Bogdanich ,The New York Times,Walt Bogdanich, The United States Equestrian Federation, The United States Hunter Jumper Association and the United States Olympic Committee Turning a Blind Eye on Drugging at USEF Sanctioned Shows

                        http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Walt-B...eratio-1049949
                        Elizabeth Mandarino
                        www.amberhillponies.com
                        cell 908.397.0977

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                          the judges who are pinning horses under the influence of tranquilizers.
                          Oh for Pete's sake! You do realize, despite all the insisting by BB commandos, that there is no way to tell by looking if a a horse is sedated or not? With all the complaining about subjectiveness in judging, you want them to guess about this, too??
                          *****
                          You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/walt-b...eratio-1049949

                            Did anyone see this?
                            Anthony 'Tony' Soprano Sr.: If you can quote the rules, then you can obey them

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by jonesy View Post
                              You know, I wonder if everyone stops calling attention to her bizarre behavior, if maybe she'll go away...
                              http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                              Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by jonesy View Post

                                OMG, cant we stay on this particular topic without derailing it into yet another train wreck with this woman?

                                On the topic, not surprised it's business as usual. We need serious rule changes but those need to be proposed by well known persons with some standing or they just get swept away as anything inconvenient that most of the "little "people" come up with.

                                Of course those well known persons would suffer an unfortunate backlash for upsetting the proverbial apple cart from those insiders who want to continue manipulating the system to keep the status quo as it always has been to serve their needs.

                                Bottom line is the welfare of the horse is the absolute last thing that seems to have any importance at all and we don't seem to be able to do anything about it. Horses are just collateral damage in the war to win.
                                When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Findeight:
                                  This is absolutely right on point and directly on topic. Her missive is about, and fueled by, this thread. Why shouldn't she be given an opportunity to speak her mind as you are doing here. I am just uncertain why she doesn't come to chronicle and post her comments. I understand people don't like her but the points she makes are clear. I would just like to ask her to admit that she is part of the problem given she witnessed and knows of all these examples and made no effort to alert the appropriate stewards at shows, USEF, the police. You mean she couldn't call the local police when the pony is being drained of blood?
                                  Anthony 'Tony' Soprano Sr.: If you can quote the rules, then you can obey them

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    findeight ... what would pass for "some standing" on this ? That's a serious question.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      I am known for my outspoken nature... i have had continuing conversations with high ranking members of the USEF about the events I have witnessed and none of them are truly willing to stand up for these beautiful creatures. They are more concerned with remaining in good favor with the Trifecta.
                                      Elizabeth Mandarino
                                      www.amberhillponies.com
                                      cell 908.397.0977

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by BaroquePony View Post
                                        findeight ... what would pass for "some standing" on this ? That's a serious question.
                                        Well known trainers, standing committee members, respected judges, those with easily recognizable names in the business for a long time. Not anybody who could be labled a "wannabe, newbie" or "outsider" or sit and listen to the "you just don't understand the way things are run" BS.

                                        But they don't want to risk their careers to the backlash so turn a blind eye and deaf ear. Can't blame them, some of those people scare me when seen in the early AM or late evenings...ask the braiders.
                                        When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                        The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Some data guru should compile the USEF's record of light punishments for D&M infractions. A short, conveniently-timed "vacation," plus ways to have someone else sign as "trainer," and a fine of just $2K looks like not enough to me. It seems, rather, that input from trainers on D&M punishments has made these just an inconvenience and not a real deterrent. But the USEF needs to know that the general membership sees what's happening and doesn't dig it.
                                          The armchair saddler
                                          Politically Pro-Cat

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X