• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Black Tack - Why is it so ugly?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Black Tack - Why is it so ugly?

    A friend recently took up dressage after a lifetime of H/J/Eq and we are both curious as to why the black leather used for dressage tack is not so pretty. It just lacks the feel, luster and beauty we love in our high end English and French tack. I suppose I should post on the Dressage forum but I know we have a lot of very knowledgable people here.

  • #2
    Perhaps in this case - as in many others - beauty is in the eye of the beholder. My German black bridles are plenty gorgeous. My black saddles are lovely as well. So no surprise, my jumping saddle (brown) is great quality but just doesn't look nearly as elegant to me.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, I suspect it's just a matter of taste and what you are used to. Having been primarily in the HJ world all along myself, I do prefer brown tack, but that's just me. Many dressage folks prefer black, which is why I got my brown dressage saddle at a steal of a price .

      Comment


      • #4
        My black PJ is gorgeous. My black Wintec is not.

        My brown Smith Worthingtons is gorgeous. My cheap brown leather halter is not. It is a quality thing to me. If you think all black tack is ugly, it is just a matter of taste -- you aren't "wrong," as there is no accounting for taste.
        I do think cheap black tack looks worse because often the color bleeds. You don't notice it as much on cheap brown tack, but on black it is glaringly obvious. My good black tack never bleeds.

        Comment


        • #5
          The quality of what you're getting will also matter. If you're going cheap on the dressage stuff because you're just trying to get started that will make a difference, also if its new or used and the care that has been taken of it.

          Personally I love black tack and dislike brown tack. I think my horse looks nicer in black tack too.

          Comment


          • #6
            The quality of what you're getting will also matter. If you're going cheap on the dressage stuff because you're just trying to get started that will make a difference, also if its new or used and the care that has been taken of it.

            Personally I love black tack and dislike brown tack. I think my horse looks nicer in black tack too.

            Comment


            • #7
              hehe and I am a dressage rider who finds brown tack not as nice as black I agree with what everyone else is saying about quality and taste, though. I mean cheap leather is cheap leather, it is usually ugly no matter the color. And uncared for leather is dull and blah. Keep in mind that dressage is a very black-and-white sport in general. I find that a nicely cleaned, cared for black dressage saddle looks just fabulous with bright-white pants, shiny stiff dress boots, and a shiny bridle with a decorated browband.

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't "dislike" black tack (and could give a rat's ass what someone else rides in), but I do think that unless it is very good quality, it lacks the natural luster and softness that brown tack has, even medium quality leather. Ditto for a supple, broken in feel to it - it just feels stiffer to me unless it is really high end, whereas even a mid range brown leather feels decent.

                I've always assumed this had something to do with the effect of black dye and maybe only really exceptionally well tanned leather could do well with it, but that is just me guessing.

                Meanwhile, back at Camp Obvious, cheap leather is cheap leather be it black, brown, pink or lime green. But I'm pretty sure everybody already knew that and wouldn't waste time debating it. #buticouldbewrong
                Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DancingArabian View Post
                  The quality of what you're getting will also matter. If you're going cheap on the dressage stuff because you're just trying to get started that will make a difference, also if its new or used and the care that has been taken of it.

                  Personally I love black tack and dislike brown tack. I think my horse looks nicer in black tack too.
                  The friend in question buys nothing but the best, her dressage saddle cost more money than her Butet, Antares and Devoucoux saddles and her bridles are also excellent quality. I don't know if I dislike all black tack, but I dislike all that I have seen so far.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by DMK View Post
                    I don't "dislike" black tack (and could give a rat's ass what someone else rides in), but I do think that unless it is very good quality, it lacks the natural luster and softness that brown tack has, even medium quality leather. Ditto for a supple, broken in feel to it - it just feels stiffer to me unless it is really high end, whereas even a mid range brown leather feels decent.

                    I've always assumed this had something to do with the effect of black dye and maybe only really exceptionally well tanned leather could do well with it, but that is just me guessing.
                    I was wondering if it was the black dye that might be the culprint and while I'm not a big fan of black tack based on what I have seen so far, I think I could still recognize any that was comparable quality to the high end brown tack I find so attractive.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Part of it may be that DYED leather looks different than naturally-aged-with-time-but-undyed-color. And you either like that or don't like that look (dyed). I find dyed brown tack just as strange looking as dyed black tack. DYED tack always seems to lack a "patina" that I like, whether it's dyed black or brown.
                      ~Veronica
                      "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                      http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'll second vxf111's post. I think it's the dye.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          I think that is the answer vxf, makes perfect sense.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I am a hunter rider and actually like my black Courbette Optima. It's 7 years old and still looks great. It came with my big guy, and I just don't have the budget to get a new wide saddle. He's a grey, so I think it actually looks good on him.
                            Blog chronicling our new eventing adventures: Riding With Scissors

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                              Part of it may be that DYED leather looks different than naturally-aged-with-time-but-undyed-color. And you either like that or don't like that look (dyed). I find dyed brown tack just as strange looking as dyed black tack. DYED tack always seems to lack a "patina" that I like, whether it's dyed black or brown.
                              Yep, I think this is it. I'm an h/j person in an eventing barn, so I get to look at all kinds of different tack these days. I think the dyed leather always seems cheaper, even when it is not. And with black, I think it is much worse because black tack takes a lot more dye than even brown dyed tack would take.

                              But, yes, categorically, I think all black tack seems stiffer/less natural than brown tack.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                That's probably it (I'm not sure I've seen brown dyed leather). It's a "flatter" look - sort of like the difference between staining wood (which has depth) and painting wood (flat), I guess...
                                Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                  That's probably it (I'm not sure I've seen brown dyed leather). It's a "flatter" look - sort of like the difference between staining wood (which has depth) and painting wood (flat), I guess...
                                  The most common place to see brown dyed leather is on really cheap leather halters.

                                  But, yes, I think the black tack always does look really flat and stiff. And sometimes you can see the dye kind of wearing away, which I think looks terrible.

                                  For as much as people pay for dressage tack (especially saddles!), I always think it is a shame that the leather seems so...yes...ugly and stiff.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                    Part of it may be that DYED leather looks different than naturally-aged-with-time-but-undyed-color. And you either like that or don't like that look (dyed). I find dyed brown tack just as strange looking as dyed black tack. DYED tack always seems to lack a "patina" that I like, whether it's dyed black or brown.
                                    Also, I think you can buy coarser leather if you plan to dye it black. There is nice, fine-grained leather made into black tack out there. But historically, remember that many German/Austrian saddle and tack makers choose stouter leather that the Hunter Princess would find too stiff.

                                    So I think some black tack fans are playing catch-up to the fine-grained requirements already met in brown tack world.
                                    The armchair saddler
                                    Politically Pro-Cat

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                      That's probably it (I'm not sure I've seen brown dyed leather). It's a "flatter" look - sort of like the difference between staining wood (which has depth) and painting wood (flat), I guess...
                                      Dyed leather goes through a pretty nasty process to retain the color. Dyed shoes would be another example. It's rare to find really soft shoes that are dyed. I guess that explains why all my most comfortable shoes are in natural, undyed leather.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I've noticed that black tack doesn't supple as well or retain the same kind of "sheen" that brown tack does. I used to own a black Bates saddle and no matter how much I conditioned/polished it never looked like my brown tack.
                                        come what may

                                        Rest in peace great mare, 1987-2013

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X