• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Another Pony Lawsuit....

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I don't see how anyone can form an opinion based on the amount of information at hand. From the Post. And the Daily News.

    Really? The two articles even disagree on the amount of the lawsuit. And not by a small margin.

    Comment


    • #42
      Just imagine my surprise when I woke up this morning and saw my trainer quoted in the Post! That doesn't happen every day.

      Comment


      • #43
        ..I'm going to go make myself feel better and clean the pee stains off my horse's coat...


        Sheesh, 175k for a pony. Wow.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
          The plan was to START at $175,000, pay a minimum of $1,000 a week in expenses, and then flip or lease for a profit???

          Do we need a power point presentation on why this was unlikely to work?

          When math meets reality, it gets ugly.

          Actually, could be done if all went well. Young pony and lease prices for the really good ones are 100k+ for a year. So not crazy to think you could pay 175k, show for a year, and lease for many years and make a profit.

          Comment


          • #45
            isn't it relatively easy to see how old the founder event is? I thought they could make a pretty educated guess based on xrays and the hoof lines etc. Maybe that is what leads them to argue that this is something that the old trainers/brokers had prior knowledge of? I have got to think they are not stupid enough to risk a very visible lawsuit if there is a possibility that the pony foundered more recently...I could be wrong of course

            Comment


            • #46
              I suspect they bought and campaigned a pony who was a latent IR candidate. Somewhere along the line someone, overfed, or underworked said candidate, who ceased to be a candidate and graduated into the miserable group of foundered equines.

              It can happen in the blink of an eye, or something can precipitate it.

              It is a pony!!! Shetlands used to be notorious for this.
              Some riders change their horse, they change their saddle, they change their teacher; they never change themselves.

              Remember the horse does all the work, we just sit there and look pretty.

              Comment


              • #47
                It can happen in the blink of an eye, or something can precipitate it.

                Sure it can founder in a blink but founder means the lamina is damaged, wall separating and coffin bone rotating down, all immediately very painful, animal is dead lame.....however the pony could have had 'laminitic' episodes where minor damage happens and with meds on board they continue to work but often the cycle repeats and damage continues, more meds are used, pads, wedges are added till nothing helps and oh my, everyone is surprised and shocked when they see x-rays.

                It is a pony!!! Shetlands used to be notorious for this.[/QUOTE]

                I don't know how tall the girl is but that pony is a duplicate of my hackney pony who was marketed (unsuccessfully) as a hunter/jumper by a trainer, little bugger could really jump but was wound too tight for a child and ended up in a rescue.
                Also it doesn't say when that picture was taken but those feet look healthy other than excessively tall for a jumper.

                Comment


                • #48
                  "But Tincher-Dildabanian said she was clearly victimized by a sale-hungry group and that the pony world is infested with shady characters. “There is incredible fraud in this business,” she insisted."

                  Wha?!?! Really???!?!
                  A helmet saved my life.

                  2017 goal: learn to ride like TheHorseProblem, er, a barn rat!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by keepthelegend View Post
                    Actually, could be done if all went well. Young pony and lease prices for the really good ones are 100k+ for a year. So not crazy to think you could pay 175k, show for a year, and lease for many years and make a profit.
                    Sure, and when you have zero contacts in the industry you have to make an extra 20% just to break even after commissions.

                    It's not crazy, but it's also not very likely.
                    The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
                    Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
                    Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
                    The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by keepthelegend View Post
                      Actually, could be done if all went well.
                      I have never met any horse person (including myself) who ever who actually thought all would go well. Usually because, in their experience, it never does.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by MonterStables View Post
                        I'm seriously beginning to wonder how much of an understanding concerning ETHICS these BNTs have. Drugging is as much of an MO in this sport as the non-disclosure of a horse or pony's issues is. As much as I have respect for Andre and Heritage Farm, I'm seriously beginning to wonder how many of their actively competing horses have the same said issues that this pony had that were not disclosed to this lady. I mean, think about this for a moment REALLY hard. Lillie Keenan is one of his riders. Granted Parkland is a lease for her, but that horse is currently stabled with him because of that fact. That horse dropped at the ring at WEF. Last year, Lillie had that incident with Bases Loaded in the ring. They've had more recent incidents than we've ever heard about and quite frankly, that's scary to me.

                        But everybody knows that not disclosing the issues of a horse or pony is one of the biggest problems in this sport. That's why we have show horses like the one I leased who live on a regiment of joint injections, etc.
                        SO unless the previous owners had a crystal ball and/or God shoes it would be impossible for them to do the "ethical" thing and predict a future founder event. It is disgusting that people choose to make their money the old fashioned way, by SUING for it. As bad a rap as horse dealers might enjoy, the suing public should enjoy equal time as amoral pieces of crap.
                        The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Who knows what happened.

                          Option A: Pony was fine until it was moved to a new barn where it was overfed/underexercised, then foundered.

                          Option B: Pony was 'at-risk' for laminitis, maybe had a scare at some point. Trainer 1 knew this and managed pony accordingly, but didn't disclose to new owners and owners didn't know pony needed special management when they took it ouf of Trainer 1's care, then it foundered at new barn.

                          Option C: Pony foundered and rotated with Trainer 0. Trainer 0 sold to Trainer 1 without disclosing. Pony was sound with Trainer 1, so they never found out. Trainer 1 sold on to current owner with no knowledge of founder.

                          Option D: Pony had foundered and rotated with Trainer 1. This was not disclosed at the time of sale. [Maybe pony was sound and happy at time of sale, or the more sinister version, maybe pony was being medicated the whole time it was in Trainer 1's care.] When pony goes lame, new owner finds out by (running into old vet, running into old barn manager, people talk, etc.).

                          Depending on the state law and the sale contract, there may be a claim in Option D as there should then be vet records proving that Trainer 1 knew/treated pony for founder.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by joiedevie99 View Post
                            Who knows what happened.

                            Option A: Pony was fine until it was moved to a new barn where it was overfed/underexercised, then foundered.

                            Option B: Pony was 'at-risk' for laminitis, maybe had a scare at some point. Trainer 1 knew this and managed pony accordingly, but didn't disclose to new owners and owners didn't know pony needed special management when they took it ouf of Trainer 1's care, then it foundered at new barn.

                            Option C: Pony foundered and rotated with Trainer 0. Trainer 0 sold to Trainer 1 without disclosing. Pony was sound with Trainer 1, so they never found out. Trainer 1 sold on to current owner with no knowledge of founder.

                            Option D: Pony had foundered and rotated with Trainer 1. This was not disclosed at the time of sale. [Maybe pony was sound and happy at time of sale, or the more sinister version, maybe pony was being medicated the whole time it was in Trainer 1's care.] When pony goes lame, new owner finds out by (running into old vet, running into old barn manager, people talk, etc.).

                            Depending on the state law and the sale contract, there may be a claim in Option D as there should then be vet records proving that Trainer 1 knew/treated pony for founder.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Or a variation on Option C: Pony foundered and rotated with Trainer ) and pony was sold to Trainer 1 knowing this but they managed it and sold pony on to current owner with out disclosing.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by MHM View Post
                                I don't see how anyone can form an opinion based on the amount of information at hand. From the Post. And the Daily News.

                                Really? The two articles even disagree on the amount of the lawsuit. And not by a small margin.
                                This.

                                ("thumbs up" wasn't going to cut it on this point.)
                                EHJ | FB | #140 | watch | #insta

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Clearly many of you have not been in a similiar situation so good for you. I have and if there is indeed sketchy stuff then I say more power to the lady with the lawsuit!

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Blinky View Post
                                    Clearly many of you have not been in a similiar situation so good for you. I have and if there is indeed sketchy stuff then I say more power to the lady with the lawsuit!
                                    JMHO, but judging by the trainers involved in the sale(s) of said pony (one of whom I know very well), my money is more on the mom being naïve and not fully grasping the risks involved. Just because you pay six-figures for something, doesn't guarantee it sound for life.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Whats with the random pics in the Post article of the PM pointing to said pony on a t-shirt?!

                                      And more seriously, WHY drag a child into this mess? She may be well known in the pony world, but why does all of NY (i.e., the world) need to see her face and know her name? She's 12! So inappropriate IMO
                                      Barn rat for life

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
                                        Sure, and when you have zero contacts in the industry you have to make an extra 20% just to break even after commissions.

                                        It's not crazy, but it's also not very likely.
                                        Even if she DOES have lots of contacts, at this level there will surely be commissions die. I doubt the likes of Heritage allow their clients to arrange lease deals for ponies in their care, even when the client is the owner of said pony.

                                        Back to the originally scheduled thread on yet another wealthy pony mom complaining about life being unfair...
                                        F O.B
                                        Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
                                        Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          I'm wondering why there is nothing up on ratemyhorsepro yet... I'm betting there is more to this story than a naïve mom and a recently foundered pony but I'm awfully curious!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X