• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Disturbing info on New Jersey Trainer- Is this true?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Once you realize the horse is too dangerous for a trainer, why would you not just put him down?
    I have a Fjord! Life With Oden

    Comment


    • #82
      Oh yeah, the mark of a compassionate trainer is one who sells on an allegedly incurable flipper so some other unsuspecting person can be paralyzed. Competition for Mother Theresa right there!
      ~Veronica
      "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
      http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

      Comment


      • #83
        I have only read through p2, so my post may be repetitive. Sorry, if so.
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        Yes, lying to get a horse which is advertised as "free to a good home" IS against the law.

        The tort is "Fraud In The Inducement". Since no consideration changed hands, there was no contract, but there was fraud.

        'But for" the lie the seller would never have given her horse to this trainer.

        The problem here is the issue of damages. Seller has already proven that the horse has no monetary value. So she cannot get damages for the fraud. However, the judge is free to award punitive damages against the trainer, both for fraud and pain and suffering.

        I am not sure if punitive damages are available in small claims court, though.

        I sure would have sued the trainer in small claims court. If nothing else, you get a judgment against him which will show up for 5? 7? years if anyone checks.
        "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

        Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
          Once you realize the horse is too dangerous for a trainer, why would you not just put him down?
          ^^^^^ This.

          No ethical horseman would/should get rid of a horse who might seriously injure the new owner. Even if the flipping problem is the real story, this trainer is still grossly unethical/negligent in selling a horse "to a private home" without full disclosure.

          And, if he fully disclosed the "problem" there is no chance that the horse would be sold to an individual.

          This trainer is a sleeze bag no matter which story is true.
          "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

          Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

          Comment


          • #85
            As someone who rode with him I can say he is extremely unethical and this news does not surprise me at all. I saw several things in that barn that would make me run far away. This one only makes me want to run faster

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
              I saw that post on my FB page too. It made me ill. Thank the Internet for being able to spread the word about people like this. I am glad the story had a happy outcome.
              I would say quite the opposite. The internet, Facebook especially is what assists in spreading the word, the words that are often untrue.


              Originally posted by mbm View Post
              why would someone take a free horse and then dump it at an auction? esp if they are a well known trainer? must be far more to this story.....

              also, i find it disturbing (but wish i had thought of it sooner!) that someone can take a private/friends only FB post and do a screen shot and then post it publicly.

              <shudder> well there goes the last amount of FB posting i will ever do!
              I agree with every bit of this, two sides to every story and this person's side sounds highly unlikely. The reposting or screen shot availability is so intrusive and shouldn't be allowed.

              Comment


              • #87
                You can screen shot anything. It's no big secret and no one should post anything that's private and expect it to stay that way.

                The post that was circulated was not private.
                Equine Ink - My soapbox for equestrian writings & reviews.
                EquestrianHow2 - Operating instructions for your horse.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by strides View Post
                  I would say quite the opposite. The internet, Facebook especially is what assists in spreading the word, the words that are often untrue.




                  I agree with every bit of this, two sides to every story and this person's side sounds highly unlikely. The reposting or screen shot availability is so intrusive and shouldn't be allowed.


                  You know what I find SUPER weird...

                  There are a number of long-time posters with sufficient post history that it's not hard to figure out who they are and that they are who they appear to be. Many of them have first-hand experience with the trainer at issue. All of them, some more politely than others, but ALL of them seem to question the trainer's ethics/business practices.

                  The only "defenders" of this trainer are a poster with 35 posts who hasn't revealed any bias but perhaps might have some to reveal? And another one who seems to have been created exclusively to respond to this thread.

                  One's reputation in the community speaks volumes, IMHO. And it's spoken not only on public BBs but elsewhere too.
                  ~Veronica
                  "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                  http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Well this took a turn, eh?

                    I suspected it might, but it took longer than I guessed.
                    "Aye God, Woodrow..."

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Long Spot View Post
                      Well this took a turn, eh?

                      I suspected it might, but it took longer than I guessed.
                      HUH? not sure I get what you are saying here??
                      Adriane
                      Happily retired but used to be:
                      www.ParrotNutz.com

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        He really isn't a well known trainer though. He has a bad reputation and next to no clients. He got lucky and into a few nice, big barns without trainers but he quickly lost good graces there.

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Originally posted by strides View Post
                          I would say quite the opposite. The internet, Facebook especially is what assists in spreading the word, the words that are often untrue.



                          I agree with every bit of this, two sides to every story and this person's side sounds highly unlikely. The reposting or screen shot availability is so intrusive and shouldn't be allowed.
                          Well I have heard his side of the story and it wasn't much different than what was posted. Just slightly twisted but even his version didn't make him sound innocent or in the right.
                          Celtic Charisma (R.I.P) ~ http://flickr.com/photos/rockandracehorses/2387275281
                          Proud owner of "The Intoxicated Moose!"
                          "Hope is not an executable plan" ~ My Mom
                          I love my Dublin-ator

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            Originally posted by Showjumper28 View Post
                            Well I have heard his side of the story and it wasn't much different than what was posted. Just slightly twisted but even his version didn't make him sound innocent or in the right.
                            That's the problem with people who lack ethics, they tend to not understand why people are mad and end up defending themselves against the completely wrong point. As someone who was going to spend money on this trainer, I am so thankful for Facebook, the Internet, and COTH. I would have hated to find out after the fact or the hard way.

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              Originally posted by sammicat View Post
                              That's the problem with people who lack ethics, they tend to not understand why people are mad and end up defending themselves against the completely wrong point. As someone who was going to spend money on this trainer, I am so thankful for Facebook, the Internet, and COTH. I would have hated to find out after the fact or the hard way.
                              So true. In some way, the trainer's "defense" was MORE unethical than the original accusation. Imagine being a professional and passing along to a totally unsuspecting buyer through auction and horse you think has a pre-existing problem that could KILL a rider! That's in some ways much worse than duping someone into giving you a horse so you can flip it for financial profit. At least in the latter no one will get physically hurt?!
                              ~Veronica
                              "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                              http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                So true. In some way, the trainer's "defense" was MORE unethical than the original accusation. Imagine being a professional and passing along to a totally unsuspecting buyer through auction and horse you think has a pre-existing problem that could KILL a rider! That's in some ways much worse than duping someone into giving you a horse so you can flip it for financial profit. At least in the latter no one will get physically hurt?!
                                Exactly!

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  Originally posted by Parrotnutz View Post
                                  HUH? not sure I get what you are saying here??
                                  Nothing nefarious. Just that "someone" showed up who "knows all about it" to proclaim everyone else knows nothing about it and we should find better things to do than to discuss it.

                                  AKA...the usual kind of train wreck.

                                  The "took longer" means I was sort of expecting it since the first post, but then it died down and the thread seemed forgotten until, BAM! And insider sets everyone "straight" while at the same time, bumping up something everyone had forgotten about. Again, the usual.
                                  "Aye God, Woodrow..."

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Originally posted by Long Spot View Post
                                    Nothing nefarious. Just that "someone" showed up who "knows all about it" to proclaim everyone else knows nothing about it and we should find better things to do than to discuss it.

                                    AKA...the usual kind of train wreck.

                                    The "took longer" means I was sort of expecting it since the first post, but then it died down and the thread seemed forgotten until, BAM! And insider sets everyone "straight" while at the same time, bumping up something everyone had forgotten about. Again, the usual.
                                    HAHAHAHA I See said the Blond woman.
                                    Adriane
                                    Happily retired but used to be:
                                    www.ParrotNutz.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                      You know what I find SUPER weird...

                                      There are a number of long-time posters with sufficient post history that it's not hard to figure out who they are and that they are who they appear to be. Many of them have first-hand experience with the trainer at issue. All of them, some more politely than others, but ALL of them seem to question the trainer's ethics/business practices.

                                      The only "defenders" of this trainer are a poster with 35 posts who hasn't revealed any bias but perhaps might have some to reveal? And another one who seems to have been created exclusively to respond to this thread.

                                      One's reputation in the community speaks volumes, IMHO. And it's spoken not only on public BBs but elsewhere too.
                                      I don't have any "first-hand experience with the trainer at issue" and I do not find myself being one of the "defenders of this trainer" either. I'm stating my personal opinion, which was that "there are two sides to every story" and that "Facebook especially is what assists in spreading the word". So no, I am not defending the trainer and I have not a clue of who this person is beyond what was stated in the OT. No one is trying to hide their reputation or identity, especially considering the fact that you and I connected no more than a month ago.

                                      Facebook can be a useful tool and a weapon. I agree that it is a great method to find information, but it can also be a weapon to spread false information. Whether this information is false or true I don't know, to be honest I skimmed the thread until I came across the Facebook statement. Perhaps I should have thoroughly read all of what I was contributing to.
                                      Last edited by strides; Apr. 2, 2013, 11:01 PM. Reason: Adding last few words

                                      Comment


                                      • #99
                                        Originally posted by strides View Post
                                        I don't have any "first-hand experience with the trainer at issue" and I do not find myself being one of the "defenders of this trainer" either. I'm stating my personal opinion, which was that "there are two sides to every story" and that "Facebook especially is what assists in spreading the word". So no, I am not defending the trainer and I have not a clue of who this person is beyond what was stated in the OT. No one is trying to hide their reputation or identity, especially considering the fact that you and I connected no more than a month ago.

                                        Facebook can be a useful tool and a weapon. I agree that it is a great method to find information, but it can also be a weapon to spread false information. Whether this information is false or true I don't know, to be honest I skimmed the thread until I came across the Facebook statement. Perhaps I should have thoroughly read all of what I was contributing to.
                                        How are there "2 sides to every story" when the trainer posted his "side" on THIS VERY THREAD (posts 74-77) and it was WORSE than what he was accused of originally?! Pretty much the last 2 pages of this thread are about the trainer's "side?!"Go back and read his own "defense" of what he did and then maybe you'll see why it seemed really odd to me that someone would say "there are 2 sides to this story." The trainer's own "side" was that he sold onto some poor unsuspecting person a horse he had deemed too dangerous for a professional to ride and unfixable.

                                        If we met, I don't remember and I apologize or else you'll have to better jog my memory.
                                        ~Veronica
                                        "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                        http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                          How are there "2 sides to every story" when the trainer posted his "side" on THIS VERY THREAD (posts 74-77) and it was WORSE than what he was accused of originally?! Pretty much the last 2 pages of this thread are about the trainer's "side?!"Go back and read his own "defense" of what he did and then maybe you'll see why it seemed really odd to me that someone would say "there are 2 sides to this story." The trainer's own "side" was that he sold onto some poor unsuspecting person a horse he had deemed too dangerous for a professional to ride and unfixable.

                                          If we met, I don't remember and I apologize or else you'll have to better jog my memory.
                                          Again, like I said before I did not read the entire thread and I had no idea that the trainer herself contributed to this post. I specifically said "there are two sides to every story" clearly one is untrue. I don't know this person or her story, suppose I should go back and read the previous 4 pages. Curious to see what the trainer had to say here.
                                          Last edited by strides; Apr. 2, 2013, 11:09 PM. Reason: Correction: Himself

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X