• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

How to get banned from COTH?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I have been on here since the beginning and can count on one hand how may people have been banned that used to post often in the H/J section. To answer the OP, People are generally banned when they continually cause chaos, stir the pot, name calling, and what have you on COTH.

    Findeight-has been on here a long time too, so she may something else to add.

    Comment


    • #22
      Now don't drag Nancy Grace into this. At least you can turn off the TV when Nancy is embellishing Arias' sexual acts. Nancy has never been interested in horses. And we worked in the same office in Atlanta. No turning her off there, except when I'd be called to help her in court. TV cameras actually left her courtroom due to the arguing and fighting...........no not witnesses, but Nancy and defense lawyers. Oh wait, Nancy is rich and I'm not. so her method of trying cases by ranting was obviously better that mine.

      I've seen a few people lose it and get banned. Like Thomas1. But then I'd told him a year before the rescue thread blowup about that rescue. And he'd ignored me and sent her more money. Then he lost it a year later when the blowup happened.
      And hmm who was it on the driving thread who argued with Thomas1 a lot? She lost it and got banned. And came back as an alter and got banned again.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #23
        Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
        Now don't drag Nancy Grace into this. At least you can turn off the TV when Nancy is embellishing Arias' sexual acts. Nancy has never been interested in horses. And we worked in the same office in Atlanta. No turning her off there, except when I'd be called to help her in court. TV cameras actually left her courtroom due to the arguing and fighting...........no not witnesses, but Nancy and defense lawyers. Oh wait, Nancy is rich and I'm not. so her method of trying cases by ranting was obviously better that mine.

        I've seen a few people lose it and get banned. Like Thomas1. But then I'd told him a year before the rescue thread blowup about that rescue. And he'd ignored me and sent her more money. Then he lost it a year later when the blowup happened.
        And hmm who was it on the driving thread who argued with Thomas1 a lot? She lost it and got banned. And came back as an alter and got banned again.
        LOL re: poor Nancy Grace.... DH will sit and listen to her rant...drives me crazy! Then again he will also watch those whacky public access tv preacher people and want to then have a convo about how whacked they are.

        Apologies to Nancy...carry on, carry on....

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by AlexS View Post
          I appreciate that the rants yesterday were permitted for a while.

          We just heard that it was someone else that killed the pony, or a vicious spider. Either of which only took effect immediately after the pony was given a needle by the owner.
          Wasn't there also some reference to an "infamous carrot incident"? The possibilities are endless.
          "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
          Rainy
          Stash

          Comment


          • #25
            reconcidered my reply.
            Last edited by Ambitious Kate; Mar. 19, 2013, 02:14 AM.
            My warmbloods have actually drunk mulled wine in the past. Not today though. A drunk warmblood is a surly warmblood. - WildandWickedWarmbloods

            Comment


            • #26
              "The difference between common-sense and paranoia is that common-sense is thinking everyone is out to get you. That's normal - they are. Paranoia is thinking they're conspiring.
              -J. Kegler"

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Blinky View Post
                I have been on here since the beginning and can count on one hand how may people have been banned that used to post often in the H/J section. To answer the OP, People are generally banned when they continually cause chaos, stir the pot, name calling, and what have you on COTH.

                Findeight-has been on here a long time too, so she may something else to add.
                Not much to add. Overt advertising has gotten quite a few banned(and that forum closed down for a weekend. Personal name calling and accusations not public record-which these 3 threads have certainly danced with-get some too. Oh, and repeated house guests/alters can result in a smack down.

                I have a gut feeling COTH does not want to defend a nuisance censorship lawsuit, if they have not been threatened with one already, so they let her prattle on so as not to be seen as blocking or censoring.

                Think the best thing for us is to just shun her unless she wants rational discussion. No asterisks either, that just keeps it at the top of the page. Don't feed it.
                When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                Comment


                • #28
                  I honestly don't think it would be an ordeal for COTH to defend itself against a lawsuit by a banned poster. One poster's lawsuit against RatemyhorsePro was thrown out early on and I think it would be the same for COTH.

                  That said, I will take your suggestion and not respond to posts by people, who really are making things unpleasant with their personal tirades and lawsuit threats and, whom I feel, should not be allowed to participate.

                  There is no reason to attempt to communicate with people who are either incapable of understanding what is being "said" to them (in that case, tragic) or are just not interested in anything but publicizing their own agenda (in that case, beyond annoying).

                  Whatever the problem, there is nothing to be gained by attempting to reason with the unreasonable. So, you can count me in as one who will refrain from responding again.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by skydy View Post
                    I honestly don't think it would be an ordeal for COTH to defend itself against a lawsuit by a banned poster.
                    It still costs money. And time. And energy. Resources that might be better spent on things other than lawsuits. Like covering horse sports.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by MHM View Post
                      It still costs money. And time. And energy. Resources that might be better spent on things other than lawsuits. Like covering horse sports.
                      Of course, but COTH has banned people before, and will again.

                      Why have forum rules at all, if the threat of litigation nullifies them?

                      This would then be a forum where the litigious can run amuck, while everyone else abides by the rules..

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        I have to refer to the post by Jody Jaffe. Insanity is not to be taken lightly, and inflaming it does not prove yours. I did not see the post but if this poor woman lost a child and people are jumping into a discussion with her on anything and do not take that into account, shame.on.you.
                        "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          I am pretty sure that one of the rules for this BB, as well as other BBs, is that the poster is responsible for whatever shit they post, not the BB that they post on. Internet rules generally go by that.

                          It's like two people talking in a bar ... you don't sue the bar. It's just a public place for people to talk or drink or whatever.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            The loss of a child is a tragedy, but it is also not carte blanche for egregious public behavior to the degree the poster in question is responsible for.
                            "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                            ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by 2bayboys View Post
                              Wasn't there also some reference to an "infamous carrot incident"? The possibilities are endless.

                              There was too much to sum up in one sentence. Maybe it was Phelps? Laugh.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                I don't think newer members of the COTH community realize how totally unique this situation is. If it was/is an attempt to raise site hits hence revenue? They would have caught on long ago.

                                12 years on here. Never left this kind of post up unedited or at all before. Hope they don't again either. But I give them the benefit of the doubt on this. Even see some logic to it.

                                Moderating this board used to be like herding cats, seems to have moved to lions.
                                When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  I miss Thomas1. Wasn't there some gal named Ambre that was banned as well?
                                  "Anti-intellect and marketing, pretty, pretty, who needs talent
                                  Crying eyes, we're so outnumbered, fight for the right to remain silent" Buck 65

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    I miss Colin who was always entertaining and good natured even in posts that got her booted from time to time.
                                    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by skydy View Post
                                      Of course, but COTH has banned people before, and will again.

                                      Why have forum rules at all, if the threat of litigation nullifies them?

                                      This would then be a forum where the litigious can run amuck, while everyone else abides by the rules..

                                      I remember a period of time where there was a TON of COTH banning. A bunch of posters got banned for fairly innocous reasons. That's what led, in part, to the creation of The Outside Course.

                                      In the history of COTH, posters have been banned for all sorts of transgressions, large and small. The banning continues, mostly for posters advertising on the forums. I noticed just a few weeks ago a poster banned who came on pretending to be Joe Q. public but was actually a brand rep trying to advertise a product repeatedly by posting "positive reviews by a random member of the public."

                                      It does seem that certain posters are allowed to violate the rules more flagrantly than others and aren't banned. I have my guesses why.
                                      ~Veronica
                                      "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                      http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Yes, Colin was hilarious!

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Peeking above the parapet here --

                                          I don't think it is a bad thing that she continue to post as I can imagine scenarios where nonhorsey parents might consider doing business with her; and if they google her these threads might come up and prove enlightening.

                                          I did not know she lost a child and I feel for her. I agree that merits a huge amount of slack-cutting. However, I also think killing a pony (having a pony die immediately after you inject it with something) crosses a line for me.
                                          https://www.facebook.com/SugarMapleFarm
                                          Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/peonyvodka/
                                          www.PeonyVodka.com

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X