• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

PETITION to USEF for harsher penalties. UPDATE POST #59

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Exactly, right now its a minimum fine and the old "wrong bucket, new employee, honest mistake or "they said it wouldn't test"" excuses from the trainer whether s/he signed as trainer or had a groom or van driver do it.

    Slap a bigger fine and longer suspension on the owner of record who signs the checks...or fine and suspend the LLC, partnership or syndicate who likewise provide the funding for dishonest trainers to continue cheating.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Midge View Post
      I think the owner is an excellent choice. Not having care, custody or control should not absolve one from being the ultimate person responsible for the well being of their own horse. The owner decides who is going to train their horse. The trainer also has a good bit of incentive. At the very least a set down owner, and their horses, can't show. At the worst, the trainer has lost a customer and everyone will know why.
      I'm surprised so many of you want to give the trainer a free pass to violate the rules. Maybe a lot of the posters ARE trainers. LOL.

      Losing one client isn't going to hurt a trainer but a trainer being suspended for 6 months or so puts a dent in their pocketbook. At least for showing fees.

      If you suspend an owner for somethig they have no control over it's going to make a bunch of great court cases against USEF. Leaving the trainer out of the equation means no more notices on USEF's website. I fnd those notices handy to avoid dealing with trainers with a drug or medication violation history.

      Owners if suspended will simply transfer ownership of their horses to another individual and life goes on.

      Comment


      • #23
        Suspend them all. The owner, the trainer, the rider (excluding Juniors, because they don't really get to have a say in the matter). All of them.

        Shoot, slap a suspension on the HORSE while you're at it, too! Take a horse out of commission for a month, and see how that turns out for the trainer/owner/guilty party who doped it. Suspended horse = horse not showing = horse decreases in value = trainer's stock declines = ........
        Adversity is the stone on which I sharpen my blade.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
          I'm surprised so many of you want to give the trainer a free pass to violate the rules. Maybe a lot of the posters ARE trainers. LOL.

          Losing one client isn't going to hurt a trainer but a trainer being suspended for 6 months or so puts a dent in their pocketbook. At least for showing fees.

          If you suspend an owner for somethig they have no control over it's going to make a bunch of great court cases against USEF. Leaving the trainer out of the equation means no more notices on USEF's website. I fnd those notices handy to avoid dealing with trainers with a drug or medication violation history.

          Owners if suspended will simply transfer ownership of their horses to another individual and life goes on.
          I think the idea is that penalizing the owner allows the whole "who is signing for trainer" on entry blanks issue go away.

          And it will penalize them, indirectly. Owner's aren't going to play with trainers who drug. Too much risk. They'll move to a different barn (hopefully) and the trainer will lose a significant part of their program unless they clean it up.

          In some cases, it's not black and white that the trainer should be responsible, particularly with the USEF definition of trainer that says it's the person responsible for the care of the horse that is held responsible.

          That's what's tricky....it's not always the same person at fault. One could make a case for the Trainer, the barn manager, the owner, the rider, and the groom being responsible, and depending on the situation, any of them could be!

          At the end of the day, though, it's the owner's responsibility to have the horse in the care of a professional that plays by the rules. Obviously, the owner may be unaware of what is going on initially, but how many owners have left the big barns that are drugging? Not enough! Clearly the owners out there don't care or aren't knowledgeable or involved enough to make sure this isn't happening.

          I think it makes sense to penalize the owner or suspend the horse, or both. Owners need to become engaged and responsible and stop playing the ignorant card to avoid making hard decisions! It's the Owner's ultimate responsibility to make sure their horse is being cared for and is playing by the rules, and that means patronizing ethical trainers. Which are hard to find. I know for a fact that one of the biggest and successful barns in the country uses Mag as a matter of course. This is a change that has to be influential enough to change everything, everywhere.

          The horse doesn't get hurt from not showing for a few months, and neither the trainer or the owner want a horse to be benched, so maybe that's a good direction to go.
          It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. (Aristotle)

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by ybiaw View Post
            Shoot, slap a suspension on the HORSE while you're at it, too! Take a horse out of commission for a month, and see how that turns out for the trainer/owner/guilty party who doped it. Suspended horse = horse not showing = horse decreases in value = trainer's stock declines = ........
            'trainer's stock declines'?
            Why would you think that would happen.
            Look at current events.
            Trainer can get 3 over the limit med violations within a year and still grace the cover of the USHJA magazine.

            And no, horses who have been involved in drug or med violations do not decrease in value. If their show record is good that's all that matters.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by S A McKee View Post

              Owners if suspended will simply transfer ownership of their horses to another individual and life goes on.
              Originally posted by Midge
              At the very least a set down owner, and their horses,
              If the horses can't show, no one will want them. I have no problem suspending the trainer, too. But, if you want to make a difference, hit the owner. How many owners will have to get suspended before it hits the trainer's bottom line? I bet two, and all the other customers will be looking around for trainers with no suspended customers.

              If the USEF would be more pro-horse and less pro-horse show, owners would also have an easy time of determining who's a good guy and who's not.
              *****
              You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Mac123 View Post
                .

                And it will penalize them, indirectly. Owner's aren't going to play with trainers who drug. Too much risk. They'll move to a different barn (hopefully) and the trainer will lose a significant part of their program unless they clean it up.

                In some cases, it's not black and white that the trainer should be responsible, particularly with the USEF definition of trainer that says it's the person responsible for the care of the horse that is held responsible.
                .
                /B] It's the Owner's ultimate responsibility to make sure their horse is being cared for and is playing by the rules, and that means patronizing ethical trainers. Which are hard to find. I know for a fact that one of the biggest and successful barns in the country uses Mag as a matter of course. This is a change that has to be influential enough to change everything, everywhere.

                The horse doesn't get hurt from not showing for a few months, and neither the trainer or the owner want a horse to be benched, so maybe that's a good direction to go.
                If you think owners will avoid trainers who drug I'm sure there are several people who will be glad to sell you a bridge or two. It's all about who is winning. Owners aren't avoiding those trainers now because they win regardless of drug/med history.

                Under USEF rules it is black and white. Whoever signs as trainer takes the fall. How is that not clear?

                Mag is not illegal. What's your point?

                The trainer could care less if the horse is benched. There is always another client just around the corner.

                Under your suggestions this would be a great time to be a trainer. Drug, over medicate whatever and have no responsibility. I'm sure a lot of trainers would vote for this approach too !!

                Comment


                • #28
                  When I suggest going after the owner with something more then a wrist slap? I don't mean instead of the trainer, I mean along WITH the trainer.

                  It's the only way to get the cheating trainers out of business- ethical owners will no longer fall for the "everybody does it" or various excuses or allow the trainer to intimidate them into allowing it or defy owner instructions and use it anyway if it stings the owner enough. They will not stay in that barn despite trainer BS.
                  When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                  The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Midge View Post
                    If the horses can't show, no one will want them. I have no problem suspending the trainer, too. But, if you want to make a difference, hit the owner. How many owners will have to get suspended before it hits the trainer's bottom line? I bet two, and all the other customers will be looking around for trainers with no suspended customers.

                    If the USEF would be more pro-horse and less pro-horse show, owners would also have an easy time of determining who's a good guy and who's not.
                    Many BNT's have upwards of 25 customers. Dump two. Makes no difference, they just acquire two more off their waiting list.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                      Many BNT's have upwards of 25 customers. Dump two. Makes no difference, they just acquire two more off their waiting list.
                      Many with 25 owners? No.
                      *****
                      You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                        Many BNT's have upwards of 25 customers. Dump two. Makes no difference, they just acquire two more off their waiting list.
                        If the owner AND the trainer are both suspended for months (plural) on end, the trainer's waiting list might shrink a bit. There is not much point switching to a new trainer who can't go to shows for months if you're looking for a successful show trainer in the first place.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          'trainer's stock declines'?
                          Why would you think that would happen.
                          Look at current events.
                          Trainer can get 3 over the limit med violations within a year and still grace the cover of the USHJA magazine.

                          And no, horses who have been involved in drug or med violations do not decrease in value. If their show record is good that's all that matters.
                          I think my point was that if you put the horse out of commission, it affects all parties in one fell swoop. A horse that's suspended can't show, thus can't compile a show record and/or may miss important events. Right? Pisses the owners off if their horse can't compete, which affects the trainer's reputation...

                          I'm excited to go to the Town Hall meeting on the 27th. I think it'll be really interesting to hear what people have to say for themselves and what they propose to change.
                          Adversity is the stone on which I sharpen my blade.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            I was able to sign and I"m not a USEF member - I signed with my FB account.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by ybiaw View Post

                              I'm excited to go to the Town Hall meeting on the 27th. I think it'll be really interesting to hear what people have to say for themselves and what they propose to change.
                              I really hope the Chronicle covers these meetings extensively. I am also interested to hear what people have to say, or if they say anything.

                              I believe there is a large contingent of big name trainers and owners who do not want any change at all.
                              "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
                              Rainy
                              Stash

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by S A McKee View Post


                                Mag is not illegal. What's your point?
                                GR410 1. a.
                                "Any stimulant, depressant, tranquilizer, local anesthetic, psychotropic (mood
                                and/or behavior altering) substance, or drug which might affect the performance
                                of a horse and/or pony (stimulants and/or depressants are defined as substances
                                which stimulate or depress the cardiovascular, respiratory or central nervous
                                systems), or any metabolite and/or analogue of any such substance or drug, except
                                as expressly permitted by this rule."


                                I believe that would make ANYTHING, naturally occurring in the body or not, illegal if used with intent to alter the horse.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by 2bayboys View Post
                                  I really hope the Chronicle covers these meetings extensively. I am also interested to hear what people have to say, or if they say anything.

                                  I believe there is a large contingent of big name trainers and owners who do not want any change at all.
                                  Well I'll be there taking notes (may even record it if I am permitted to do so), and will try to either post something here about it or blog somewhere about it and share the link.
                                  Adversity is the stone on which I sharpen my blade.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    The important point that no one is taking into consideration is that, despite all the testing that happens, very few people get set down. The drugs that are the real problem are the ones for which there is NO TEST. Consequently, no matter how harsh the punishments might become, nothing will change until the actual tests that are available can detect the latest and greatest drug(s) that is out there being used by "everyone".

                                    There is a huge gap between the drug testing capabilities of today and the drugs that are currently being used. Until this gap is closed, harsher penalties aren't going to have much, if any, impact.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by findeight View Post
                                      What about kids, especially little ones? And then would you have a cut off where a 14 year old would be fined and suspended because "they should know" while a 13 year old would not? What about catch riders that do not have care custody and control or short term leasers? What about owners who pay for it whether they know it or it gets hidden in creative billing?

                                      The way to change exsisting policies is to initiate rule change proposals in the specific discipline...and no, they are not going to consider suggestions from non members who very rarely or never show at their shows. No sporting club or organization does that.

                                      USEF should be ashamed of itself for sure but members have to be the ones to communicate their feelings..after all, we pay for it.

                                      First, I'll say that most kids and all teens on the show circuit, KNOW what goes on. I say why not suspend or penalize them? They want to play with the big boys, they follow the rules an accept the consequences. However we obviously can't hold them to anything legally, so I doubt they could be fined, however for the kiddos I'm sure suspension would be sufficient.


                                      Catch riders, I repeat: pull your heads out of the sand. Enforce the rules and pretty soon nobody will ride for the drug-heads. It's high time someone steps up and takes a little initiative, and the current rule clearly does not promote that. Change it.

                                      "Pat the horse; kick yourself" - Carl Hester

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        too bad we don't have yardarms anymore. Hang 'em
                                        Discipline is the Bridge between Dreams and Accomplishments

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          I'm with Angelico - horse, owner, trainer and rider should get suspended even if rider is a junior or ammy.

                                          Wish I could sign, but honestly after what I saw at the Natl. Horse Show, hell will pretty much freeze over before I'll rejoin.

                                          Honestly, I'll be very surprised if the Town Halls are anything other than a Power Point presentation by the D&M Department to make sure we all rly, rly, RLY understand Da Roolz. Not sure if it's worth driving 8 hours for that.
                                          "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X