• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Pessoa Showing Despite FEI ban

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pessoa Showing Despite FEI ban

    Looks like RP has had enough of the FEI ban ---

    http://equisearch.com/equiwire%5Fnew...pete%5F101508/

  • #2
    Listen, rules are rules. If he does not agree with the FEI rules then he should work within the org. to get them changed. Not thumb his nose at the FEI.

    He appears to be acting like a spoiled brat and I have lost some respect for Rodrigo Pessoa.
    Last edited by pds; Oct. 16, 2008, 03:29 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I concur with pds. Rules are rules.

      I also think it's extremely poor sportsmanship to make a scene about the matter, especially if there is conspicuous evidence of the drugs in your feed, your ice machine, etc...

      If the case is true where Pessoa is stating that he had nothing to do with these illegal drugs, and there was cross contamination from his grooms possibly, then I think he better employ some new grooms or teach his current grooms about sterlization. The panel has a legitimate statement in explicating that it was "poor stable management for this level event", which does make Pessoa's counter argument seem questionable.

      Don't get me wrong, I adore watching Pessoa ride and have always admired his horses and his style of riding. And yes, usually Pessoa is very clean, as noted in the article, but my conjecture is that there was evidence of drugs in and around his horses, which to the FEI, is illegal. Just irks me.

      I strongly suggest Pessoa should disavow his actions, while continuing to discuss with the board about the clarity of the rules, since Pessoa seems to be confused about what is allowed in and what isn't.
      www.justworldinternational.org

      Comment


      • #4
        Can the FEI do anything or take further action againist him for competing?
        Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

        Comment


        • #5
          Who's a silly boy then?

          FEI slams Rodrigo Pessoa for side-stepping suspension


          Abigail Butcher, H&H news editor
          15 October, 2008

          The International Equestrian Federation (FEI) has branded top show jumper Rodrigo Pessoa "unsportsmanlike" for obtaining an injunction allowing him to ride at the Global Champions Tour next week.


          Pessoa was recently banned from competing for 135 days</U> — 4.5 months — after his horse tested positive in a random drug test during the 2008 Olympic Games.

          In a statement released this afternoon, FEI boss Alexander McLin said: "We understand [Pessoa] has obtained an injunction from a national court compelling the Brazillian National Federation to enter him in the event.

          "That he should take such action is highly disappointing and inappropriate for a sportsman of his position."

          The FEI said in order to lift his suspension, Pessoa must apply to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) — which he has not yet done. The Global Champions Tour Final takes place in Sao Paolo in Pessoa's home country of Brazil, from 15-19 October.

          Mr McLin added: "We will take all necessary further disciplinary action should local court orders or circumstances allow him to take part in the competition.
          "Any result obtained by him in an international competition while under suspension would be void."
          ... _. ._ .._. .._

          Comment


          • #6
            Now THIS will be entertaining.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by IsolaBella09 View Post
              I concur with pds. Rules are rules.

              I also think it's extremely poor sportsmanship to make a scene about the matter, especially if there is conspicuous evidence of the drugs in your feed, your ice machine, etc...

              If the case is true where Pessoa is stating that he had nothing to do with these illegal drugs, and there was cross contamination from his grooms possibly, then I think he better employ some new grooms or teach his current grooms about sterlization. The panel has a legitimate statement in explicating that it was "poor stable management for this level event", which does make Pessoa's counter argument seem questionable.

              Don't get me wrong, I adore watching Pessoa ride and have always admired his horses and his style of riding. And yes, usually Pessoa is very clean, as noted in the article, but my conjecture is that there was evidence of drugs in and around his horses, which to the FEI, is illegal. Just irks me.

              I strongly suggest Pessoa should disavow his actions, while continuing to discuss with the board about the clarity of the rules, since Pessoa seems to be confused about what is allowed in and what isn't.
              You stole the words right out of my mouth.
              Theater Majors only: Lead swap, lead swap, wherefore art thou, lead swap?
              http://www.youtube.com/user/CraziiPonii

              Comment


              • #8
                In Pessoa's defense, I found this aspect of the article to be a pretty compelling argument:

                "We need to have a clean sport. The riders are for the doping regulations," he said, noting they pay for the testing.

                At the same time, Pessoa added, "We need to have clear rules and clear decisions. You can see clearly there was no intention of performance enhancing (in his case), but they still punish you like there is."

                The FEI has a zero-tolerance rule that many feel should be amended to have a low "threshold" levels for drugs that are present in such a small amount that they cannot affect performance or soundness.

                *******
                Rules may be rules, but I am a believer in the "spirit" of the law over the "letter" of the law. I think the rules should be changed immediately to reflect the spirit of the intention : no performance enhancement. And to let people off the hook who were clearly not attempting to enhance the horse's performance. Someone who used magic cushion could be disqualified, I mean come on.

                This is a personal opinion and I realize it might not be shared by everyone, or even anyone. But people who are mindlessly, numbly bound by rules with no capacity for discernment frustrate me...
                **************
                http://img.skitch.com/20100717-q91i7...u2ub8k6b15.jpg

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KristieBee View Post
                  Rules may be rules, but I am a believer in the "spirit" of the law over the "letter" of the law. . . But people who are mindlessly, numbly bound by rules with no capacity for discernment frustrate me...
                  That's true, and I agree, but I also believe in honoring your world. By competing in events under the governance of an organization, like the FEI, you are agreeing to be bound by its rules. Contest them, challenge them, complain about them, whatever, but do not BREAK them. Or, if you do, suffer the consequences honorably (and contest the rules in the meantime, if you feel so inclined).

                  You can't wait to say you disagree with the rules until after you've been accused/convicted of breaking them.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by KristieBee View Post
                    In Pessoa's defense, I found this aspect of the article to be a pretty compelling argument:

                    "We need to have a clean sport. The riders are for the doping regulations," he said, noting they pay for the testing.

                    At the same time, Pessoa added, "We need to have clear rules and clear decisions. You can see clearly there was no intention of performance enhancing (in his case), but they still punish you like there is."

                    The FEI has a zero-tolerance rule that many feel should be amended to have a low "threshold" levels for drugs that are present in such a small amount that they cannot affect performance or soundness.

                    *******
                    Rules may be rules, but I am a believer in the "spirit" of the law over the "letter" of the law. I think the rules should be changed immediately to reflect the spirit of the intention : no performance enhancement. And to let people off the hook who were clearly not attempting to enhance the horse's performance. Someone who used magic cushion could be disqualified, I mean come on.

                    This is a personal opinion and I realize it might not be shared by everyone, or even anyone. But people who are mindlessly, numbly bound by rules with no capacity for discernment frustrate me...

                    I understand what you are saying, but until the rules are changed, one needs to follow them. If an international rider such as himself feels that it is ok to bend the rules, then what kind of message does that send to kids coming up in the sport. I feel for his father who made the Pessoa name, and now due to Rodrigo being selfish, it is tarnished.
                    "Riding is not a gentle hobby, to be picked up and laid down, like a game of solitaire. It's a great passion." Ralph Waldo Emerson

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Can't read spanish

                      10/14/2008 - COMUNICADO OFICIAL
                      A Confederação Brasileira de Hipismo comunica que foi intimada pela justiça em acão movida pelo cavaleiro Rodrigo Pessoa, a autorizar sua participação no CSI5* (Athina Onassis International Horse Show 2008).
                      A entidade já comunicou o fato a Federação Eqüestre Internacional, que estuda providencias.

                      Imprensa CBH
                      Presscom Comunicação
                      Responsável pela nota: Imprensa CBH

                      This is from the Brazilian Eq Federation, thought you guys that can read spanish might want to read it....
                      " iCOTH " window/bumper stickers. Wood Routed Stall and Farm Signs
                      http://www.bluemooncustomsigns.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Rodrigo said that while his appeal is pending, time was running out and he had to enter the competition in Brazil, despite the FEI sanction against him.

                        Sadly what he failed to grasp is that in the long run, his decision to defy his supension will do more harm to his reputation, career and the Pessoa name than any medal, title, or prize money he may win in Sao Paulo.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It's Portugese, not Spanish....

                          Here's the translation:

                          "10/14/2008 - OFFICIAL NOTICE THE Brazilian Confederation of Equestrianism communicates that was suggested by the justice in acão moved by the rider Rodrigo Person, it authorizes his participation in the CSI5* (Athina Onassis International Horse Show 2008). The entity already communicated the fact to the International Equestrian Federation, that studies you provide."

                          CBH Press
                          Presscom Communication
                          Responsible for note: CBH Press"

                          So basicially it's what we already know, the court told the Brazilian Federation to let him show.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            GrandPrixJumper - LOL! It's in Portuguese, not Spanish... But basically, it says that the Brazilians are letting Rodrigo compete. This competition offers some incredible prize money - apparently total costs to put the thing on is around $10 million, so it's no surprise Rodrigo wants to be there.

                            BTW - his father just did a 3 day clinic in Brasilia, where he charged (and got) $1000 per horse/rider. No joke. $1k. The cousin of one of my clients here attended & I am waiting to hear how it went. It would appear that the Pessoa name is so far not suffering in their home country.
                            "Socrates was a very wise man who went around giving good advice. They poisoned him." Anonymous...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Mardi - you beat me to it!

                              I just happen to have a Brazilian client & have picked up a little Portuguese as a result.

                              It would seem that the Brazilian Federation is kind of spitting in the FEI's eye, so it will be interesting to see if the FEI censures the event as a result. But show jumping down there is second basically to soccer as a national sport so excluding Pessoa from competing might have been seen as more problem than fighting the FEI.

                              If Brazil gets away with this, in the long term, it will seriously undermine FEI's authority. Just my opinion.
                              "Socrates was a very wise man who went around giving good advice. They poisoned him." Anonymous...

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by jn1193 View Post
                                This competition offers some incredible prize money - apparently total costs to put the thing on is around $10 million, so it's no surprise Rodrigo wants to be there.
                                His EGO wants to be there.

                                "Sports do not build character; they reveal it." (John Wooden)

                                Also..I wonder how willing the Brazilian Federation is in this situation. Rodrigo had to go to court in Brazil in order to get an injunction against his suspension. Surely the Brazilian Federation knows the FEI will go after them as well as Rodrigo.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Mardi View Post
                                  His EGO wants to be there.
                                  Or his pocketbook.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by pds View Post
                                    Listen, rules are rules. If he does not agree with the FEI rules then he should work within the org. to get them changed. Not thumb his nose at the FEI.

                                    He is acting like a spoiled brat and I have lost some respect for Rodrigo Pessoa.
                                    And I totally disagree. I have GAINED some respect for him. It is time for someone IMPORTANT like RP to step up and say what really needs to be said about these bullsh#t FEI regulations. They need a major overhaul, they need some transparency and they need some serious oversight. These idiots are out of control if they can detect such tiny amounts of things that are known to have an effect at certain levels. If they can test the levels, surely they can also figure out at what level the substance would be performance enhancing and not a contamination issue. If they can't devise a test to tell the difference, then they are bigger idiots than even I thought.

                                    As for those who say he needs to learn to learn about sterilization....LMAO!!! You should talk to one of my doctors who filled me in the other day on a little study. I am particularly allergic to cats and they were urging me to get allergy shots because of it. I mentioned to her that I never touch cats, don't go near them, in houses where they are, etc. She then pointed to the examnation room chair and told me "there is cat on that chair".....You have no idea what kind of cross contamination lives on everyone's clothing, shoes, in their hair, etc etc.

                                    No way in hell are they ever going to sterilize any horse environment enough to prevent any little thing from entering the "sacred circle" or whatever. The FEI needs to get a clue and join the modern world. It is an outdated organization with outdated rules that they continue to develop into more outdated rules. They are a joke. Finally someone has decided to stand up to them. I hope it turns out in his favor.
                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                    "There is just as much horse sense as ever, but the horses have most of it"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by flshgordon View Post
                                      And I totally disagree. I have GAINED some respect for him. It is time for someone IMPORTANT like RP to step up and say what really needs to be said about these bullsh#t FEI regulations. They need a major overhaul, they need some transparency and they need some serious oversight. These idiots are out of control if they can detect such tiny amounts of things that are known to have an effect at certain levels. If they can test the levels, surely they can also figure out at what level the substance would be performance enhancing and not a contamination issue. If they can't devise a test to tell the difference, then they are bigger idiots than even I thought.

                                      As for those who say he needs to learn to learn about sterilization....LMAO!!! You should talk to one of my doctors who filled me in the other day on a little study. I am particularly allergic to cats and they were urging me to get allergy shots because of it. I mentioned to her that I never touch cats, don't go near them, in houses where they are, etc. She then pointed to the examnation room chair and told me "there is cat on that chair".....You have no idea what kind of cross contamination lives on everyone's clothing, shoes, in their hair, etc etc.

                                      No way in hell are they ever going to sterilize any horse environment enough to prevent any little thing from entering the "sacred circle" or whatever. The FEI needs to get a clue and join the modern world. It is an outdated organization with outdated rules that they continue to develop into more outdated rules. They are a joke. Finally someone has decided to stand up to them. I hope it turns out in his favor.
                                      Thank you, thank you, thank you! Well said 100%

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        When the FEI rules were written there was no testing that is a sensitive as it is today. I agree with him to challenge the rule. The minute amounts of forbidden substances coming from grooms hands makes compliance nearly impossible. Who can be sure WHAT substance will compromise compliance? I really believe the trace amounts offer no competitive benefit so why punish they guy (who makes his LIVING riding and showing) for something well beyond his ability to control? Threshold levels need to be established and changing the rule to bring it in line with the much more sophisticated testing techniques is what is needed here. Certainly not finger pointing and vitriol. I admire his willingness to challenge authority and question the purpose and efficacy of the "no forbidden substance" rule. It is only "doping" if it affects the horses' (or riders') performance. Other than that, it is simply contamination.
                                        The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X