• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Are you kidden ME!!! RE - Examine show jumpings prize money.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by PNWjumper View Post
    So if you get to the 1.10m and decide to sit there that's your choice driven by your circumstances. There's certainly nothing wrong with it if it makes you happy. If you're only willing to make time 3 days a week to ride then that's your choice. I have no problem with all of that, but why should a show strive to get more money increasingly to the people who are unwilling or unable to make the horses and the sport a top priority?
    So, are you seriously suggesting that the folks who are jumping 1.10 meters are unwilling or unable to make horses and the sport a top priority? I can think of many valid reasons for stopping at 1.10 meters; 1) your horse isn't capable of safely competing at higher levels 2) the rider doesn't have the talent to compete at higher levels, 3) the horse isn't sound enough to compete at higher levels 4) the horse is too green to compete at higher levels

    All of these reasons are legitimate reasons for not moving up and none of these reasons support your half-assed theory that if you're not showing at higher levels you "aren't willing to make the horses or the sport a top priority".


    • #22
      Perhaps if you're showing at lower levels, you are not at a point to be winning money. If entry fees were lower, or if money had never been given at those levels, or both, this discussion wouldn't even be happening...

      As an example, let's say that I am a fabulous canoe dancing prodigy. If I were to start competing in canoe dancing at the beginner and even intermediate levels, I would not have an expectation to be winning back money. Rather, should I choose to compete in canoe dancing at a lower level, I would be aiming to improve my skills and further my passion and ability for more difficult moves while competing against my peers. Perhaps when I was at the point of doing high level canoe dancing (whatever that may be), I would be looking into winning money, but certainly not at the beginner and intermediate levels. Granted, I would hope that the entry fees for beginner canoe dancing were lower than those of Prix St. George canoe dancing, but..

      As has been said on the other thread, the disconnect is between the business/economic perspective and the sport perspective when it comes to prize money.
      Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!


      • #23
        Originally posted by PNWjumper View Post

        If you're capable of riding a 1.40m jumper course you *should* be good enough to bring along your own horse (and if the only thing that's keep you out of the 1.40m is the cost of the horse that's the implication)...with or without help is a moot point because you pay for that help either way. The alternative is finding a horse who can take a joke. Well, those are out there and they're not *that* hard to find in the younger age ranges if you have a good eye or good help (I'm in the latter camp and am very lucky to have a great trainer and a great vet I rely heavily on to give the once over to my choices). The bigger problem, in my opinion, is that very few trainers these days (on the h/j circuit) know how to spot a good prospect and the how to develop it into an upper level jumper. But that's a whole other topic.
        I agreed with everything, especially the last part of this paragraph. And why aren't more trainers capable of recognizing and bringing along these upper level horses? Because our show systems don't promote high level riding. After being in Europe and seeing the depth of talent of riders and their ability to bring along young horses, it's pretty apparent that we aren't up to par. We've become so accustomed to mediocre training that it is just what we all expect now.


        • #24
          Supershorty, I'm so glad you used canoe dancing as your example! That term always makes me laugh for some reason!


          • #25

            Originally posted by hntrjmprpro45 View Post
            ... We've become so accustomed to mediocre training that it is just what we all expect now.
            Don't sound like no problem with prize money! Sounds more like it is a trainer/professional issue. Like I said before, it is the RESPONSIBILITY of trainers to push the students.

            Do you force your good ammies to move up and out?

            I hope Kapler and other pros recognize that for every finger they point there are three pointing right back at them.


            • #26
              Well said, Supershorty! I would happily join you in the art of canoe dancing

              h/jpro45 - completely agree. This is a very circular discussion and I think you can't ignore the fact that if you drive more people to the lower levels (or make them easier to stay at) it impacts the circuit as a whole because you start losing those folks who are good at moving horses and riders up. This may have no relevance to the individual who doesn't want to move up, but it has had an effect on who calls themselves a pro and how they conduct their business.

              PTR - no, I'm not suggesting that someone who stops at that level (which was picked arbitrarily, call it 0.85m if that makes the point more clearly) is not worthy to own horses or call themselves a horseman And FTR I ride in the 1.10m classes myself with some regularity on my older coming-down-the-ranks mare and my moving-up-the-ranks baby.

              There are absolutely reasons to be in the 1.10m. But this discussion was about who should be winning prize money. And to your examples:
              1) you end up with a horse that can't do it - you have the option of selling the horse and finding a more appropriate mount. Again, this all goes back to if you want to move up in the name of pursuing prize money, not all riders do and THAT'S FINE. If you love your horse and don't want to sell it....FINE! But why should the horseshow be monetarily supporting that decision?
              2) You, as the rider don't have the talent - I don't believe that anyone is truly restricted at an arbitrary height for starters. So that means I don't believe that the average rider is incapable of surmounting the obstacles to becoming a better rider if they want to. FTR, I have many friends who are perfectly happy to stay at 1.10m with no desire to go higher. This doesn't mean that they're lesser humans or horsemen. But IMO they also aren't the ones that should be getting the majority of the prize money (if you recall, that was what my argument was about, not about who should be allowed to breathe as your post implies).
              3) Same as point one.
              4) This is a moot point. Every horse is at this point at some point and, like the rider, must progress up the levels.

              At no point did I say that "1.10m classes have no place and shouldn't exist." Simply that there's this overriding sense of entitlement in these discussions about how the horseshows seem to OWE everyone money since they're so graciously participating. As SS pointed out, there's a disconnect between the economics of running a show and the idea that everyone should get prize money!

              Now someone can quote me and say that I want everything to stay the same. That's not true either. I agree that changes need to be made. Entries are exorbitant and getting worse (I started a thread 3 or 4 years ago about how bad it was then and now it's 50% more expensive than it was then!), and there's certainly a balancing point between paying for the shows from the organizer's perspective while still drawing enough people to drive the entries up. I think we've tipped too far in the direction of paying for the shows and need to cant back towards the "driving entries."

              But my whole point was really just that I think you should get more prize money as you show at more difficult (in h/j that typically means larger) levels. I seem to have gotten a bit off track....
              Flying F Sport Horses
              Horses in the NW


              • #27
                what would be the incentive...

                For show managers to lower the price for entries in 30 or so classes by getting rid of or shifting 4 classes?

                I personally can't think of a single reason. Look at the price of level classes, with no money. NOT CHEAPER BY ANY MEANS.

                So doing away with one class at some shows are supposed to make better riders of ammies...

                He made a funny...
                " iCOTH " window/bumper stickers. Wood Routed Stall and Farm Signs


                • #28
                  Originally posted by RAyers View Post

                  Don't sound like no problem with prize money! Sounds more like it is a trainer/professional issue. Like I said before, it is the RESPONSIBILITY of trainers to push the students.

                  Do you force your good ammies to move up and out?
                  I'll be honest, I've not yet been put into a position where I've needed to force any of my riders to move up. Thus far, everyone has been eager to move forward when ready.

                  Ironically, today I had a talk with one of my jr riders. She was asking what happens after she becomes successful at the 3'6" hunters where the jr/AO divisions top out. I told her you keep going up to high performance or you can switch to jumpers and continue up in height/difficulty. It didn't really occur to her that she could live at 3'6" the rest of her life but she is also a motivated rider. Now maybe she'll change her mind (she's only jumping 3' right now) or maybe she will keep progressing- who knows! Trainers do have a responsibility to push their students but shouldn't our show system reflect that? It may become hard to convince even an eager student that they should show in the $500 open 1.20m class vs the $5k 1.10m ch/AA jumper (where they will need to run like hell to ribbon). By the way- high dollar low level jumper classes really encourage some frighteningly fast rounds which is not what we want to teach young riders or young horses who are ultimately wanting to move up.


                  • #29
                    since most of the points have been made and argued over and over, and much of this no longer applies since i currently have no horse show budget, i only have one minor contribution/gripe.

                    back when i was showing, prizes weren't my main goal, and i was certainly happy enough with a ribbon or a little placard if i felt i had earned it. i mostly stuck to doing a hunter division per show, because that was what i could afford (even though i'd use the term 'afford' loosely). i'd love to have done the cool handy hunter classes, classics, or medal classes because they sounded fun and challenging. however, they were out of my reach because the single class entry was as much as, if not more, than an entire division for me. so, from that standpoint, i'd sacrifice some prize money to take less of a hit when it came to entering those classes to be able to try my hand at them. albeit, most of them are open to all riders, so there's probably no changing them!


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by PNWjumper View Post
                      I have no problem with all of that, but why should a show strive to get more money increasingly to the people who are unwilling or unable to make the horses and the sport a top priority?
                      Because doing so generates more profit for the show.

                      I'm not within spitting distance of winning money at any level, so I don't particularly care how the prize money is divvied up. But, as long as the shows are for-profit entities, they're going to offer the divisions and prize money that earn them the greatest profit. That's the whole idea behind a free market.

                      If the USEF and top riders think that the primary goal of horse shows should be talent development, then they need to run the shows themselves. Or, they need to figure out how independent show management companies can make equal if not greater profits under a scheme the prize money scheme Chris Kappler is proposing than they can with the status quo. Otherwise, what's the incentive for them to change?


                      • #31
                        This is a topic that I have been thinking about a lot since I saw the article. I am an amateur jumper rider who owns one horse. I ride (hopefully!) 3x per week for about 45 min. I have a full time job and the barn is at least 45 min (one way) from my home. I started riding as an adult, and over the years I have (very slowly) improved my riding to the point where I am now competitive at the 1.20m height and I would like to go higher. It remains to be seen if I can handle it. I may need a new horse to get there. I can afford roughly 5/6 local A shows a year.

                        When I go to a show, I can enter the Modifieds (1.20m) or the open 1.20m classes, and at most there will be a $1000 classic on Sunday, but often there is no money. If there is a low Jr/Am class at 1.30 where the jumps are a little soft and/or the course is not too technical, I might consider moving up to it, but the division won't have enough of us (in general) to even pay whatever prize money they offer. I am talking a local small A show, for reference. The Ch/AA jumper class (1.10m) will not only fill, but there will be a number of riders. The prize money is always better than at the 1.20m or 1.30m level -- a lot better. My trainer asked why I didn't just enter those classes, and I told her I was looking for a different challenge.

                        It would be great to be able to have the opportunity to win at least as much (if not more) prize money at the higher levels than at the 1.10m level. I agree with PNWJumper that this just seems wrong. I can also understand why the show managers do it, and unfortunately the more they do it, the more people will be incented to stay at the lower levels, making the upper level classes have even fewer riders, so the shows will have even less incentive to add prize money there and take it away from the lower levels. I don't know how you fix this. Plus I agree that because of this situation, there are lots of riders in the 1.10m classes who should have moved up, they are riding very capable horses who could be doing 1.40m and they literally RUN around at the 1.10m. Not fun when you've just gotten competitive at that level, and it just doesn't seem right to me -- I mean, what's the sport in that?