• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Humble Initiative: Sham Attempt by USEF to a Meeting

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by leyla25
    Well this person also reported a pony death the previous year. If I can remember correctly the pony died in the paddock of a "freak" accident. Coincidently the pony was in the market for 300K or to lease and although it had a good record it had no takers, and the daughter was out of the smalls.
    If you think Mandarino has defrauded an insurance company, please nail her to the wall.

    But appreciate, too, that that's a separate issue from the several we have been discussing: What the USEF owes her, or vice versa. What USEF members demand from their governing body. Mandarino as an unattractive tip of an even uglier iceberg of drugging in the hunter divisions.
    Last edited by mvp; Feb. 13, 2013, 01:21 PM.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat

    Comment


    • Hey mvp,

      I think your quoting got all messed up. I think you wanted leyla25's post. She also messed up the quoting so that my post (first two paragraphs) looks like it is her post.

      I have said nothing about EM defrauding insurance companies.
      Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
      Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
        Hey mvp,

        I think your quoting got all messed up. I think you wanted leyla25's post. She also messed up the quoting so that my post (first two paragraphs) looks like it is her post.

        I have said nothing about EM defrauding insurance companies.
        Yeah, the quoting was fubar. I was speaking to leyla and I'll fix it.
        The armchair saddler
        Politically Pro-Cat

        Comment


        • Originally posted by leyla25 View Post
          There is nothing fair about judging most of the time. Why do you think people pay hefty fees to have a so called BNT stand at the ingate?
          Wow! Good information. And, all this time I thought my trainer stood at the in gate watching my round(s) so we could discuss it later while sipping a nice libation back at the stalls.

          However, sometimes he just can't wait and will give me whatfor the instant I clear the gate. I'm sure, in some instances, the judge is getting a big laugh at my expense.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
            Um...people ride with BNTs because those BNTs usually know how to train to that level. They understand that details that many little, to no-name trainers do not.

            For example: I ride with a lovely trainer. She's kind. She's honest, She's fair. She's in my budget. She, however, could not train me to be competitive in the AA hunter ring. She knows this. It has nothing to do with her not being a big enough name to stand at the ingate to get me ribbons. It has to do with her not having the skill set and knowledge base to train me to that level.

            IMO, most people who insist that the ingate BNT is responsible for success of their clients, really don't understand the details involved with training/rider to that level.
            Please do not confuse training with with the term BNT's, If all it took was GOOD training we wouldn't need all those meds , now would we.

            Everyone complains but know one has answers because after all what can any of us little people do??? and so it goes , on and on and on.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Go Fish View Post
              Wow! Good information. And, all this time I thought my trainer stood at the in gate watching my round(s) so we could discuss it later while sipping a nice libation back at the stalls.

              However, sometimes he just can't wait and will give me whatfor the instant I clear the gate. I'm sure, in some instances, the judge is getting a big laugh at my expense.
              Whether or not it is true, my old trainers thought it was.

              Years ago, the husband of the husband and wife team I trained with flew back to SF for the Grand National Horse Show (aka Cow Palace) just to stand at the back gate. The show had hired a judge from the East, and it was his first time judging in California. While his wife did all the training, the husband stood there as his people went into the ring. He wanted to make sure that the judge knew who his clients were.

              I thought it was crazy at the time, but since then I have come to believe that it matters, even if only a little bit.

              There is a reason for the distinctive WHOOPS! that trainers use.

              Sort of like a male dog marketing his territory.
              "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

              Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

              Comment


              • Originally posted by MIKES MCS View Post
                Please do not confuse training with with the term BNT's, If all it took was GOOD training we wouldn't need all those meds , now would we.
                Please do not confuse the chip on your shoulder with any sort of critical thinking. It certainly is easier to determine that all BNTs are only that because they use "all those med", then to realize that some are subverting real training with needles and some actually know what they are doing.
                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                  Please do not confuse the chip on your shoulder with any sort of critical thinking. It certainly is easier to determine that all BNTs are only that because they use "all those med", then to realize that some are subverting real training with needles and some actually know what they are doing.
                  I think I might love you (in an entirely non-creepy way haha).
                  http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                  Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                    Please do not confuse the chip on your shoulder with any sort of critical thinking. It certainly is easier to determine that all BNTs are only that because they use "all those med", then to realize that some are subverting real training with needles and some actually know what they are doing.
                    Meh, MIKES MCS has a point.

                    I don't think BNTs are immune from using drugs for performance enhancement. Typically, they have a great deal of skill, clients who will buy great horses and good working relationships with vets who can supply the rest.

                    And remember that this particular pony died at Devon, no backyard horse show. If we only saw horses dying at B shows and below.... if we only saw the rank, fugly, lame or clearly outclassed horses collapsing at these big shows, you could arguable rescue the top trainers from suspicion. But that's not what happened in this case. It's also what we should worry about. After all, if the very nice hunter needs pharmaceutical help, where does that leave the pretty good hunter? What happens at the top and how that raises the judging bar so high that the lesser horses who are well trained still can't be competitive is one of the reasons everyone but the uber-rich should worry.
                    The armchair saddler
                    Politically Pro-Cat

                    Comment


                    • RugBug, please don't confuse reality with a chip , I have no Chip .. And I don't believe all BNT's owe their success solely to a needle, but I do believe it is a major part of the training routine for a majortiy of them, just as it's a major part of a race horse trainers regime . You can disagree or bury your head in the sand all you want but the reality lies in the needle boxes in every shed row at every rated show. red shot , hunter round, call it whatever you like , many trainers call it vitamins , it's performance enhancing drugs, it exsists , it's common , and it's not going away any time soon.

                      Comment


                      • 'K, you guys, I'm doing a spin-off on who does the drugging.
                        The armchair saddler
                        Politically Pro-Cat

                        Comment


                        • MVP , thanks , when a twitch of the ear or a squeal through a corner, a flip of a tail gets you elimanted from a prize when your round was otherwise perfect , the only recourse is take away a horses natural expression and you can't do that with training ,

                          Comment


                          • Or maybe just have a horse with the right temperament to do the hunters? I have to tell you, I've shown a lot of horses who were well-behaved in that scenario and gosh, none of them had any chemical assistance... remarkable.
                            http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                            Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                            Comment


                            • I demand that the USEF give me several million dollars and allow me to go back in time, so that I can start riding career as a child, rather than as an adult. (I promise the money will be used solely to fund my riding.)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by mvp View Post
                                I don't think BNTs are immune from using drugs for performance enhancement.
                                Um. I didn't say they were. Please read again. I will even sum up for those that missed it: Some do, some don't.

                                I agree with MIKES MCS that hunter judging standards need to change to allow for expression, brilliance, a bit of play here or there, whatever you want to call it. But just because some horses don't ever feel the need to play, doesn't mean they've been stuck or the trainer is a pusher.

                                I've read post after post after post of MIKES MCS that would lead ME to believe there is a large chip on his shoulder. Maybe there's not, but it's the impression he's left on me.

                                Back to the thread at hand: th particular "trainer" in questions seems to fall into the "pusher" category, with little to no doubt.
                                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                Comment


                                • I respect all opinions and if you want to believe that only good training is the reason why you get more ribbons with the BNTs that is alright. But from what I observe, and heard at the shows I have a different opinion. I've heard trainers telling judges which kids need a win to qualify for the George Morris class by the end of week ten. And I've seen the results. That is no chip. It's reallity. Maybe that trainer is done a big favor to that judge, like buying some of his horses. Not implying every judge does it, but definetely goes on. And same for the drugs not everyone does it but we can all tell the look on those horse eyes.

                                  Comment


                                  • I ride with a BNT and have for more than half my life.. I know what goes on in our barn and I can tell you it's nothing more nefarious than Adequan or Legend for some of the older horses or a legal amount of an NSAID at the appropriate time. Egads!

                                    I don't know, I'm just hesitant, due to my experiences, to believe that BNTs got that way not by being good at what they do, but by being good pharmacologists. Some? Maybe... but I'm not so sure.
                                    http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                                    Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                                      Now, the logic on this does not follow. If anyone else but EM accidentally causes the death of their horse, they are "reducing the death to a business transaction" if they seek any insurance money?

                                      I know it's hard to separate the emotion from this, but there are plenty of legitimate accidental deaths at the hands of owners and they are not automatically bad people for "actively pursue any compensation."

                                      If you meant that EM shouldn't seek compensation because she "accidentally" killed the pony while illegally drugging it...then I agree.
                                      Exactly what are all the legitimate accidental deaths caused by owners? I'm not talking about a pony who gets into the feed room, pigs out, founders and has to be put down. Outside of administering a med IV without knowing your horses allergic response, I can't think of any. Please enlighten me with several examples so I can avoid accidentally putting any of my equines down. Thanks.
                                      PS. I realize horses/ponies have fatal or potentially fatal accidents from time to time...getting cast, colicking, running into something, or just tangling with another horse. I'm only referring to 'legitimate accidental deaths caused by owner.

                                      Comment


                                      • The best BNT's know what they're doing. While they may be at WEF or HITS for several months, their horses get time off, they get turn out, they are wrapped and protected and when the series is over, the horses get a month off, while the trainer may take a break or start some of their babies in local venues. They don't need to campaign 52 weeks a year. They get their horses qualified for indoors or for Zones without wearing the horse out. Their clients can afford nice horses and they do their job by making up or finding nice horses for those clients. Do they medicate? I'm sure they do, when appropriate, but as has been said before, most BNTs didn't just appear from nowhere. They worked hard, usually for decades, to attain that level. Some have undoubtedly slipped and decided that medicating to win is easier than training, but I'd bet that they're the minority. A lot of those trainers compete actively. I can't easily believe they'd put their career on the line by riding horses that could collapse beneath them.
                                        I guess what Im really saying is that a real trainer doesn't (as an amateur) buy a bunch of successful equines and the following year, let their 'trainer' go and assume that title themselves because they own so many winners. That trainers only hope is likely to be found in the medicine cabinet because their actual knowledge is limited primarily to observation. I know I'd hate to be a passenger in a plane where the pilot had never flown but had watched pilots on TV a lot. Lol

                                        Comment


                                        • You can argue that "the best" BNTs don't use performance-enhancing drugs....but I've seen those names (yes, the BIG BNTs) in the back of the USEF magazine on plenty of occasions over the years.

                                          Must be a lot of mixed-up buckets at those shows.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X