• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USHJA Certified Trainer Profiles and Search

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by MHM View Post
    It may be technically on the public record, but it is not easy to find. Probably close to impossible for somebody relatively new to horses who didn't know how or where to look. When this subject came up on a previous thread, I did a Google search on somebody who has a bit of a history of USEF penalties. The most recent suspension popped up from a few years ago, but not the multiple penalties before that, at least not in the first 10-12 pages of results. How many newbies will look harder than that?



    That doesn't surprise me if his situation involves things outside the jurisdiction of the USEF. I'm not familiar with his story, but it might be asking a lot to expect USEF to check the financial or criminal or civil records of hundreds of people across the country.
    I agree with you, and that begs the question , what use is the "certified trainers list" to anyone but trainers and the USHJA? I suppose you could check to see if someone was lying about their show record , but that's about the extent of it. As I mentioned, I think a really big disclaimer at the bottom of the "list" by the USHJA would be in order.

    Something on the order of " We do not guarantee the certified trainers are not involved in civil or criminal actions in court ".

    If you claim to background check , then you better do it. Google works wonders really. Not that hard, COTH posters do it all the time...

    However a "newbie" may reasonably be expected to believe that a "USHJA Certified Trainer" is ENDORSED by the the USHJA, or, at LEAST, has not been involved in (and lost) civil or criminal proceedings against them regarding their horse business/activities , or has outstanding judgements and/or past suspensions by the governing bodies of the sport.

    They have been "background checked" after all..
    Last edited by skydy; Jan. 23, 2013, 12:05 AM. Reason: To add..

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by NumberTenOx View Post
      I’m pretty sure suspended trainers are supposed to be removed from the list. I know they do background checks every year.
      I was guessing based on the first sentence above that the "background checks" were referring to checking to see if the trainers were suspended by USEF when the "background check" was being performed (apparently once a year?), not that it was a criminal background check. And that any trainer that was indeed under suspension at the time of the yearly check would be omitted from the list. So if a trainer was officially suspended anytime after the day of the yearly check, he or she would remain on the list (which is not acceptable if this is the case - and I don't even think that suspended trainers should be REMOVED from the list; their profiles should remain available and should be clearly marked with a summary of the offense and the time frame of the suspension, and that summary should remain on the profile even after reinstatement). But I could have misinterpreted.

      I really don't think it's fair to expect USEF or USHJA to perform criminal background checks on its members (or financially feasible - I'm pretty sure they aren't free). They aren't the police - their purpose is to track results, and they are providing a system to report those results to the public. Expecting them to provide data that they don't keep track of is a little much. But since they do keep track of suspensions, that information should be up to date and available in the reports at all times.

      Comment


      • #43
        Really? They are "CERTIFYING" people.
        I wouldn't want to put out a list of people certified by my "association" and have criminals and con artists found to be on the list.

        Would rather diminish the importance of your list and the credibility of your organization, wouldn't it?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by skydy View Post
          Really? They are "CERTIFYING" people.
          I wouldn't want to put out a list of people certified by my "association" and have criminals and con artists found to be on the list.

          Would rather diminish the importance of your list and the credibility of your organization, wouldn't it?
          Yes, really. If I have concerns about someone's potential criminal activity, I can pay out of my own pocket to have the appropriate party run a background check (although if I felt even the slightest need to do so, I would probably just scratch that trainer off my list and not spend the money). I wouldn't expect a results-centered organization to pay for it for me. That's not what they do. Expecting them to do that will only result in higher membership fees, and I don't want to pay for criminal background checks on every certified trainer in the US.

          Comment


          • #45
            But you aren't a "newbie".
            I did ask who this list was supposed to benefit. If it is the "newbie", then, as I wrote in previous posts, a big disclaimer is in order.

            Comment


            • #46
              We can agree to disagree! I just don't think that USEF and USHJA should be expected to be a personal nanny to everyone who ever sat on a horse's back.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #47
                Originally posted by ynl063w View Post
                I was guessing based on the first sentence above that the "background checks" were referring to checking to see if the trainers were suspended by USEF when the "background check" was being performed (apparently once a year?), not that it was a criminal background check.
                Sorry, I was unclear. I'm not involved in this aspect of the TCP, so I can't be authoritative on this, but my understanding is they do criminal background checks. Clearly anyone who is suspended should be removed immediately (although your idea of leaving them but marking them worth some consideration). I believe there is some ongoing discussion about how often the criminal checks occur. I don't know if they checks will pick up civil suits, I'm guessing yes but I really don't know.

                Comment


                • #48
                  ynl063w, this was in response to your last post , but answers the next one as well.

                  Neither do I.

                  However if they are compiling this list of "certified" trainers , they are putting themselves in that (nanny) position whether they intend to or not.

                  A newbie, with deep pockets, who trusts that the trainers on the "certified by the USHJA" list are "background checked" and who then finds themselves burned by a "certified trainer" with a record ( horse related unpaid court judgements,suspensions by USEF (or heaven forbid criminal ) against them, may make life quite unpleasant for the USHJA.

                  Just saying, something for the USHJA to consider.
                  Last edited by skydy; Jan. 23, 2013, 01:45 AM. Reason: Spelling

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by skydy View Post
                    A newbie, with deep pockets, who trusts that the trainers on the "certified by the USHJA" list are "background checked" and who then finds themselves burned by a "certified trainer" with a record ( horse related unpaid court judgements,suspensions by USEF (or heaven forbid criminal ) against them, may make life quite unpleasant for the USHJA.

                    Just saying, something for the USHJA to consider.
                    Now that there has been clarification that the background check really is a criminal background check, I agree with you. That is definitely something that needs to be provided in the reports on a real-time basis, not just something that is checked and updated once a year. "Quite unpleasant" is likely to be a huge understatement!

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by NumberTenOx View Post
                      Sorry, I was unclear. I'm not involved in this aspect of the TCP, so I can't be authoritative on this, but my understanding is they do criminal background checks. Clearly anyone who is suspended should be removed immediately (although your idea of leaving them but marking them worth some consideration). I believe there is some ongoing discussion about how often the criminal checks occur. I don't know if they checks will pick up civil suits, I'm guessing yes but I really don't know.
                      The USHJA, if it has any desire for it's list of "certified trainers" to be credible (and to be prepared to defend it) , better find a way to track civil judgements against it's "certified" trainers. This money thing, seems to be the trouble that most folks have with "trainers" so it would be helpful to have this information available, especially if your organization is "certifying" them.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by mroades View Post
                        I struggle with trainer certification actually equalling qualification. I personally know several "certified"trainers, and frankly some of their resumes are not only lacking in actual experience, but also contain outright fabrications.
                        That said, I will probably do it because of the insurance discounts.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          And these are the requirements.. http://www.ushja.org/programs/tcp/tcp_faq.aspx Seems as if you have as many chances to fail the quiz, as most states allow you to fail the State Bar Exam , and most State Board exams for Nursing.

                          And ...YES!!!! After your suspension is over, you'll be reinstated !!!

                          Slapped back on the GOOD list!! At the "sole discretion of the USHJA"

                          Unless.. they don't like you?? , or, someone has noticed that you were suspended?? or, someone has made a public fuss about your delinquent behavior on an internet BB??, or you have run naked through the jog of a USHJA pony hunter class?? or... what?

                          Now , one of the Requirements to be a USHJ "certified" trainer is "Ethical Business Practices" http://www.ushja.org/programs/tcp/tcp_categories.aspx However to BECOME "certified" requires fees and a quiz and 3 years in the biz..

                          So, for god's sake USHJA you better be making sure your listees are what you are purporting them to be.
                          ( Hope no one was taken in by Mr. Slaughter because he was on your list).
                          Last edited by skydy; Jan. 23, 2013, 03:52 AM. Reason: Egregious spellling

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by MHM View Post
                            if the suspension/disciplinary history only showed up for certified trainers instead of all members, that would provide even less incentive to get certified. For some.
                            Not if certification were to be required for pros that are members and want to participate in USEF horse shows/events.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by pds View Post
                              Not if certification were to be required for pros that are members and want to participate in USEF horse shows/events.
                              Except for the fact that you can be a pro and participate in USEF shows and events without being a trainer. For example, working students, people who broker horse sales, etc.
                              Auventera Two:Some women would eat their own offspring if they had some dipping sauce.
                              Serious Leigh: it sounds like her drama llama should be an old schoolmaster by now.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by pds View Post
                                Not if certification were to be required for pros that are members and want to participate in USEF horse shows/events.
                                Originally posted by RockinHorse View Post
                                Except for the fact that you can be a pro and participate in USEF shows and events without being a trainer. For example, working students, people who broker horse sales, etc.
                                I am not a fan of requiring certification.

                                There are plenty of people who mostly go to smaller, unrecognized shows, and might only do a few USEF shows a year. If they had to spend money and jump through hoops to get certified, that would just make them skip the recognized shows altogether and stick with the unrated shows. The last thing this sport needs is to be even less inclusive.

                                And as RockinHorse said, there are people who would get caught in the middle.

                                Especially when the certification really doesn't prove much anyway, according to this discussion.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X