• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Spinoff - California Drugs & Meds Rules - Robaxin, Dex and Equioxx forbidden?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spinoff - California Drugs & Meds Rules - Robaxin, Dex and Equioxx forbidden?

    Thanks to Poltroon, I went and investigated the CA website for equine drugs - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/ahfss/Animal_...onsignors.html

    In their downloadable document, "Differences between USEF and California Equine Medication Rule," it clearly states that Equioxx, Surpass, Robaxin and Dexamethasone and PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES and require a 24 hour withdrawal prior to competition.

    The website also states the following:
    A Drug Declaration Form is a legal document that an exhibitor or consignor must complete and file with an event manager for any horse at an event that has received a prohibited substance or an NSAID that a licensed veterinarian has deemed therapeutically necessary for the treatment of an illness or injury. Drug Declarations must be completed for drugs and medications administered three (3) days prior to the show/competition or five (5) days prior to the sale. The owner/exhibitor/trainer is to submit the completed drug declaration form to the event manager within one (1) hour of administration of the product(s) at the event. If the product administration occurs at a time other than during show or sale hours, the owner or trainer should submit the completed form within one (1) hour after an event manager returns to duty.

    So, according to this website, ALL horses who receive bute or other therapeutic substances must file a Drug Declaration form. In addition, no Equioxx, Surpass, Robaxin or Dex may be given AT ALL at a show.

    To be honest, I never realized the drug rules were different between USEF and CA. I've also given bute at multi-day shows but never even thought to file a report.

    I've been tested a couple of times, but I think it was the USEF doing the testing and not the State of CA. Do they have separate testers or do the results go to both entities? Am I the only one who didn't realize there was a different set of standards?

  • #2
    That's very interesting. I think if everyone declared bute, there would be a lot of paper in the show manager's office - not to mention the hassle of getting it there three days before the event. I had heard that drug rules were different between CA and USEF (someone mentioned the other day that Equioxx wasn't allowed by CA but I haven't looked into it further since I don't use it). The rules as it stands seem sort of excessive.

    Perhaps contact USEF and see what this really entails?

    Comment


    • #3
      Honestly, I do not know the correct answer to the following question: If a horse travels from California to a show somewhere else, say The National Horse Show in Kentucky - would that horse have an advantage over other horses since it would legally be able to receive the banned California drugs not previously in it's system therefore having a stronger effect?
      Last edited by STA; Jan. 21, 2013, 07:35 PM. Reason: sp
      http://STA551.com
      845-363-1875

      Comment


      • #4
        No.... because if everyone wanted that advantage, they would also refrain from using the drug up until the National Horse Show....
        Erin and
        Instant Karma "Sunny", ShineDown "Liam"

        "You can't control the wind, but you can adjust the sails."

        Comment


        • #5
          Very interesting.... I wonder if the USEF rules supersede the CA rules? This is how it works in government. You can have rules on the books but if challenged the Fed Government would supersede the smaller entities in many cases.

          There are so many variables on the books but there are cases where this takes place. Interested to know what is what on this one.
          Live in the sunshine.
          Swim in the sea.
          Drink the wild air.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by doublesstable View Post
            Very interesting.... I wonder if the USEF rules supersede the CA rules? This is how it works in government. You can have rules on the books but if challenged the Fed Government would supersede the smaller entities in many cases.
            California regulations trump USEF. Furthermore, California is a governmental entity whereas USEF is a private entity.

            Comment


            • #7
              If I am interpreting the handout correctly, CA rules (the more stringent) would trump USEF drug rules.

              Handout attached.

              (and I typed the above before refreshing and seeing paint hunter's response above--were we separated at birth or something)
              Attached Files
              The Evil Chem Prof

              Comment


              • #8
                Didn't someone post on here a few years back about a California drug tester who was trying to test a horse on the horse trailer at a show without the owner/rider/trainer around? Or some story like that?

                If so, they must have very different protocol guidelines from the USEF testers.

                Comment


                • #9
                  USEF and the State of California merged their drug testing arrangements several years back so we Californians only have to pay one drug fee. (For years, we had to pay two.)

                  I am hazy on the details... I think the state picks some shows to test and USEF picks other shows. I am not sure if all the labs are done at Davis or if some are done at the USEF labs.

                  You are bound to the most stringent rules. That is, take the California rules + whatever association recognizes it, and you must be in compliance with both for that particular occasion. California, for example, allows NSAID stacking, but you cannot do it at a California USEF recognized show.
                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by MHM View Post
                    Didn't someone post on here a few years back about a California drug tester who was trying to test a horse on the horse trailer at a show without the owner/rider/trainer around? Or some story like that?

                    If so, they must have very different protocol guidelines from the USEF testers.
                    They're not supposed to do that. Having been tested by both, the protocols seemed about the same except that the CA testers are less likely to be a vet and thus less likely to be able to pull blood.
                    The Evil Chem Prof

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by sp56 View Post
                      That's very interesting. I think if everyone declared bute, there would be a lot of paper in the show manager's office - not to mention the hassle of getting it there three days before the event.
                      You don't have to get it there three days before the event. The day of the show, you declare any meds given in the past three days. NBD.

                      As far as a lot of paper... :-) compared to all the membership cards and registration papers and measurement cards and the like that already has to go with every entry, it's not exactly the tipping point.
                      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Peggy View Post
                        If I am interpreting the handout correctly, CA rules (the more stringent) would trump USEF drug rules.
                        Yes, this looks to be the case. I guess the real question is, are these rules just not widely known or just known not to be enforced? I know I had no idea I had to file a report for bute or other "therapeutic" substances. I also know that people ARE using CA's "forbidden" substances while showing.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by TuxWink View Post
                          Yes, this looks to be the case. I guess the real question is, are these rules just not widely known or just known not to be enforced? I know I had no idea I had to file a report for bute or other "therapeutic" substances. I also know that people ARE using CA's "forbidden" substances while showing.
                          I send a question to the email at the bottom of the handout to verify that the handout was current. I definitely didn't realize about the robaxin, dex, and previcox being forbidden. And people are definitely using CA-forbidden substances. Which makes me also wonder if there is some sort of a "gentlemen's" agreement about not applying the CA rules at USEF shows or something. Because if they were to hold to the CA standards, the AZ circuit would be a lot more popular.
                          The Evil Chem Prof

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I am kind of curious about how violations are handled when a positive is found, both in instances where it is only the California rules that were violated and instances where both are violated.
                            If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Peggy View Post
                              I send a question to the email at the bottom of the handout to verify that the handout was current. I definitely didn't realize about the robaxin, dex, and previcox being forbidden. And people are definitely using CA-forbidden substances. Which makes me also wonder if there is some sort of a "gentlemen's" agreement about not applying the CA rules at USEF shows or something. Because if they were to hold to the CA standards, the AZ circuit would be a lot more popular.
                              Great question to send to the show managers at HITS Thermal, Blenheim Equisports for Oaks and Showpark shows, and Langer Equestrian for LAEC Shows. I wonder what their answer would be?

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                                USEF and the State of California merged their drug testing arrangements several years back so we Californians only have to pay one drug fee. (For years, we had to pay two.)
                                Not merged. We pay a fee to both CA and USEF. I am currently looking at the premium list for the Northern Winter Classic series at Rancho Murrieta next month. USEF fees include a "USEF Drug Fee" of $8 and there is a separate "CA Drug Fee" of $3 as part of the Miscellaneous Fees (PCHA $3, NorCal $3, CA Drug $5; totaling $11).

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by PonyPenny View Post
                                  Great question to send to the show managers at HITS Thermal, Blenheim Equisports for Oaks and Showpark shows, and Langer Equestrian for LAEC Shows. I wonder what their answer would be?
                                  Anyone up for a stealth mission out to Thermal to plaster flyers?
                                  The Evil Chem Prof

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by paint hunter View Post
                                    Not merged. We pay a fee to both CA and USEF. I am currently looking at the premium list for the Northern Winter Classic series at Rancho Murrieta next month. USEF fees include a "USEF Drug Fee" of $8 and there is a separate "CA Drug Fee" of $3 as part of the Miscellaneous Fees (PCHA $3, NorCal $3, CA Drug $5; totaling $11).
                                    Innnnteresting. In Dressage, I'll have you know we're paying only one fee now, and although I can't remember when it changed, I know the new fee was less than fee1 + fee2.
                                    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Thermal is $8 USEF drug fee and $5 CDFA drug fee. I too thought there was some sort of agreement.
                                      The Evil Chem Prof

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        What is the penalty for failing the CA test?

                                        At USEF shows it might be treated a bit like getting an out of state parking violation (especially if you only show at USEF rated shows). Mostly not relevant if you don't live in the state or pay the fine and go about your business if you do (assuming the fine is not prohibitive).
                                        Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X