• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

KUDOS to Chris Kappler (COTH Op-Ed 21 Jan 2013)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by grandprixjump View Post
    Instead of capping or doing away with the money (which you know show organizers are not going to do) putting restrictions on who can be in the classics. Cap amount of money on horse rider combinations and Especially if your riding at the GP level, you can't step down to that level on the same horse. No horses capable and showing at 1.4m and above cross entered into 1.0m classics. And make the no cross entries viable for 30 days before and after the class. That way they are either ammies or not, none of this switch hitting and screwing up the classics for REAL ammies...
    I like this idea. Maybe horse/rider combination can only compete 1 level higher than a classic they enter within 30 days. Horse can do 2 levels higher with a professional rider but no stakes. That would allow for the "move up" practice classes but take away financial incentives to cross enter.

    Instead of capping prize money at a hard dollar figure- what about using a multiple of stall fees & fence height to come up with caps for amateur classes? Classic winner gets enough for a "free" show plus a few $ for the must have new piece of tack. I know its a bit complicated but it would make "shamateur" status less attractive, offer more $ for moving up and allow true amateurs to stretch their show budgets further.

    Comment


    • #82
      [QUOTE=Pennywell Bay;6798956]
      Originally posted by GingerJumper View Post
      I'm looking at the prize $$ I'll be trying to win as a pro, and looking at the money I can win now in junior classes, and wondering why anyone would want to show as a pro.
      QUOTE]

      Not being snarky, but show as a pro to get one's name out,gain clients and getting paid for all that showing a clients horse entails, without footing the bill for the vast majority. Ammys pay their own way and for all their expenses. Just saying. No dog in this fight.
      I do know what shows involve for pros, I was saying that because I own my own horse and paying his way won't be too fun as a young pro with such low prize money in return. I also understand that ammies pay all their own expenses because I'm currently a junior, paying my own expenses.

      Honestly, I wasn't trying to offend anyone, and the idea of eliminating ammy/pro status was NOT my idea originally, it was another poster's idea that I found thought provoking, and posted over here... I really meant no harm by saying it and I'm very sorry that I've clearly offended several people.
      Trying a life outside of FEI tents and hotel rooms.

      Comment


      • #83
        I found his argument devoid of any real understanding of the business/economics of horses as well as he tends to make massive logical jumps in how the competitors would respond if his assertions were implemented.

        Let's consider the cost of upper level horses. Does anybody here think that the majority of amateurs and juniors could afford them today? It is not like the past where we made our own upper level jumpers. The costs involved with amateur competition are so high, prize money is a nice kudo for the work and in most cases comes no where near offsetting the costs of an upper level trainer, upper level horse, etc.

        The argument that prize money keeps folks in the amateur ranks is false and a weak attempt at creating a strawman to change the rules.

        Incentive to progress is not the domain of the competition or governing body. It is the domain of the TRAINER/TEACHER. How many of his junior and amateur riders consistently move up the levels?

        The only justification he has for his assertion is to help him make more money. He is hoisting a false argument seen on PRO. The justification is a red herring in an attempt to make it seem like he cares about the sport and the lower level riders.

        Yes, I like eventing where the amateur designation is weak. The divisions are Open and Restricted. Pro/non-pro. I ride in the Open simply because I have competed at the upper levels and it would be inappropriate for me to go restricted.

        Comment


        • #84
          The incentive to ride in the amateur only classes should be that you are doing it for the love of the sport NOT to win money. It is quite amazing that our sport allows amateurs to accept ANY kind of prize money- many other sports do not allow this. And this is why we have so many people refusing to give up their amateur status or blatantly cheating. We need to find ways to make showing less expensive- like bringing back B rated shows, and create a culture of horsemanship NOT the current of culture of "I'll do anything to win that prize money such as [lie about my amateur status, drug my horse, show every weekend without a break, etc]".

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by hntrjmprpro45 View Post
            The incentive to ride in the amateur only classes should be that you are doing it for the love of the sport NOT to win money. It is quite amazing that our sport allows amateurs to accept ANY kind of prize money- many other sports do not allow this. And this is why we have so many people refusing to give up their amateur status or blatantly cheating. We need to find ways to make showing less expensive- like bringing back B rated shows, and create a culture of horsemanship NOT the current of culture of "I'll do anything to win that prize money such as [lie about my amateur status, drug my horse, show every weekend without a break, etc]".
            I just don't agree that there are tons of people out there who would be pros if only we eliminated the prize money in the amateur division.
            **********
            We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
            -PaulaEdwina

            Comment


            • #86
              I find laughable the assertion that Adult Jumper riders are staying at low levels so they can walk away with all sorts of prize money. Not one Adult Jumper rider on this thread, even very successful ones like Anticipation, has made money horse showing at this level. In fact, they've all spent a great deal of money -- just a little bit less than they otherwise would have.

              So we should pay out the nose with no chance to win anything because we love the sport? I, and others, have just as much love of the sport when we come back home having spent $500 instead of $1,500 that week because we did well in our classes. I promise.

              In fact, I love the sport more when I can play. I personally have started dabbling in other horse sports because this one has gotten prohibitively expensive. Taking prize money from the Adults and giving it to the pros is not going to lower the costs appreciably.

              Comment


              • #87
                Yeah no kidding. I am there to compete, not to braid my horse and put on hoof polish. If I could move to a higher division would I ever, but time in the saddle and horse power prevent that. Why should I subsidise every other division? Why should the lower divisions be charged just as much but have no chance at any money? I can enjoy the sport of riding very much at home for 'free'. I would be happy to not receive any prize money if I were not paying several thousand dollars in entries that are subsidizing the marquee divisions. That's what sponsers are for.

                I don't see why I, as an amateur deserve no reward for doing well in my lowly division, in relation to my entry fees. When I go to my local 'A' show and pay $150 to enter a single stake class, and win $75 for first in that class with 10 or 15 entries, something is wrong. Charge me $20/class and give me a halter or at least give me the chance to recoup my entry fees. If it weren't for people like me you wouldn't be having a horse show and a lot of us are fed up of being charged out the nose to show when there's no reward for doing well.
                If there were any alterntive whatsoever to our local A show, I would be doing it, but alas they know they have a monopoly and because we love the sport we put up with it, just to have something to gauge the hard work we put in every night after our day job.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by wildlifer View Post
                  Sorry, this eventer is still stuck back where YOU WIN MONEY AT SHOWS? Hahahahahhahahhahahaha. (Laughter of incredulity) I get....oh wait, nothing. I just love my sport and the journey. I often ride against pros, we never have amateur classes where I am and I hope they never do -- of course, our sport is much more objective than the hunters. So I lost to Michael Plumb, so what? He could have a bad day and I could beat him too, gives me incentive to keep working! But I guess I am not a ribbon chaser. You can still chase ammy points for end of year awards, but.....wait, you get money at a show???
                  Unfortunately the Child/Adult Jumpers are not nationally recognized divisions, so if you show out of zone and state, you don't qualify for a year end award. The Junior/Amateurs are recognized nationally, so they have a shot at year end awards regardless of where they show.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Here's one of my thoughts about the whole concept. I think that what has happened with the whole Ch/Ad and Jr/AO prize money situation is that people are accustomed to winning it. If these divisions NEVER paid, who would care? No one. The horse show managers etc have created a false motivation to drive up entries in divisions and classes. When I started riding and showing, I never wanted to go to a horse show because I could win money or was intending on covering my entries with the cash I might win. Sure, having open add back classes, and Classics that pay out for the divisions are good motivators. At the end of the day, aren't Juniors, and Ammys showing for the love of the Horse, and the Sport? I know that's why I ride and work with horses (cause lord knows, there are many more professions where I would be making a whole lot more money, and I'd have a lot more leisure time). I've got to agree with Mr. Kappler here, if you want to win money, then put yourself out there with the big fish.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by hntrjmprpro45 View Post
                      The incentive to ride in the amateur only classes should be that you are doing it for the love of the sport NOT to win money. It is quite amazing that our sport allows amateurs to accept ANY kind of prize money- many other sports do not allow this. And this is why we have so many people refusing to give up their amateur status or blatantly cheating. We need to find ways to make showing less expensive- like bringing back B rated shows, and create a culture of horsemanship NOT the current of culture of "I'll do anything to win that prize money such as [lie about my amateur status, drug my horse, show every weekend without a break, etc]".
                      I'm trying to come up with a single sport with which I'm familiar comparable to horseback riding where amateurs are still 'pure' am with no compensation allowed. (And for the thousandth time, no, not skating. They stopped that at least twenty years ago so the Olympic side would quit bleeding athletes.) Even NDCA fudged their own rules to allow "scholarships" for pro-am dancers, as I've mentioned, that are comparable to h/j ammy prizes--not enough to offset the entire cost of your entry, usually, not everyone gets paid out, but it at least offsets a little cost to the people making up the bread and butter of the sport and makes them feel a little less like cash cows. I VERY much doubt there are a lot of adult amateur riders who are making such a killing in prize money they're not moving up. I CAN believe there are plenty who cannot devote the kind of time and money required to move up--they're comfortable at that fence height, they had a horse who can't go higher and they don't plan to sell him just to satisfy someone else's idea of 'moving on'. We have people blatantly cheating in part because they want the perks of being a pro without having to go into the Open classes (being able to make money while still working on their riding) and because the rules are so stringent for what constitutes 'payment' some people end up 'cheating' through sheer confusion.

                      As far as juniors, I find it bizarre anyone (on this thread or elsewhere) would argue they SHOULDN'T win money as aren't we supposed to encourage young people to stay in the sport and become pros?
                      Author Page
                      Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                      Steampunk Sweethearts

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        Originally posted by Lucassb View Post
                        I just don't agree that there are tons of people out there who would be pros if only we eliminated the prize money in the amateur division.
                        I don't think the argument is that they would be pros, but rather that they might show in open classes instead of amateur ones once their skills had improved to the point of being competitive against professionals. or not if they preferred to remain in amateur classes with less money on the line.

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          I don't understand why this proposal makes people feel that jr/amateur jumpers would be subsidizing professional classes with their entry fees. I can understand it sounds like a bad idea if prize money went down but not entry fees - but I didn't see that anywhere in the article - in fact a big point of the idea is to drive entry fees down which is something everyone on both sides of the argument seems to agree should happen. Show managers might not like that idea but thats why we need the USEF to step in.

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            And another thought- if we adjusted prize money down in amateur classes and took away the incentive for "shamateurs" to chase money in these classes, couldn't we consider getting rid of the whole "amateur owner" rule in the jumper divisions - make them all just "amateur" classes - starting at 1.00, then 1.10, 1.20, 1.30, 1.40 all with the same set of rules and all cross-enter able, with increasing prize money as you move up- none at 1.00, $1000 at 1.10, $2000 at 1.20, $2500 at 1.30 and $5000 at 1.40 . As the rules stand now, the adult jumper to low amateur owner jump is insurmountable for someone who can't afford to buy or own a horse. Why should adult jumper riders get to lease or borrow horses and show for lots of prize money, but low amateur owner riders have to buy their own horses and often compete for less. and why can low amateur riders cross enter into high amateur classes but adult riders can't cross enter into low amateur classes. It seems like this change would do much more to ease the affordability of moving up the levels for many more people than promoting prize money in amateur classes as a way to offset the expenses of owning a horse.

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              We really need to keep some prize money in the weekend Classics, if for no other reason than not to look like such fools when the family and friends come to watch us show in the Sunday class. We don't want to be running around like idiots just to win a tiny ribbon, they already don't quite understand the whole horse and showing thing. Plus, a paycheck, no matter how small makes the husbands happy. Just don't let them see the entry fees.
                              Really, somehow, even though the prize money is such a drop in the bucket compared to what is spent on the horses, it is fun to sometimes win a little.
                              Many of us amateurs never intend to go above the 1.15 level. Let us have a little fun. The entry fees for the classic usually cover the prize offered. We don't need to subsidize the pros. They will get it back from us in training fees anyway.

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Originally posted by showjumper1 View Post
                                I don't understand why this proposal makes people feel that jr/amateur jumpers would be subsidizing professional classes with their entry fees...
                                Because they are. Without large sponsors, do you think that if only pros showed shows would be profitable? Do you think they could cover the costs?

                                Figure about 75-85 percent of all competitors are amateurs and parents paying to show, yes, the amateur and junior sure as heck are subsidizing pro classes.

                                There are A shows here that clear $300,000 a week in profit (after all expenses). I don't think the pros are doing that.

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  Per the article on page 3:
                                  http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...ructure?page=3

                                  "
                                  Encourage Improvement
                                  As the system stands now, you’re not providing young riders, after their junior years, with an opportunity to make a living as professional riders. You’re not providing them any new goals. We have so many wonderful junior goals, like the equitation finals and the FEI North American Junior and Young Rider Championships.

                                  But the minute they turn 18, it’s like their life is over. They see this gap between being 18 and being a professional riding at the grand prix level. It’s not possible for them to become professional riders because they can’t support themselves........
                                  "

                                  I think He's pretty much answering His own question in the above quote.

                                  I think for many of the parents supporting junior riders, the sport is just a positive character building phase that they provide for their child, before that child moves on to collage and pursues a degree in preparation for meeting the expectations and demands of survival in our modern culture.

                                  The world needs thousands of good doctors, engineers, scientists, architects, etc.... But just how many professional riders does the world really *NEED*???

                                  See the point?

                                  So by bringing the Junior/amateur devisions closer towards resembling the professional, it brings those participants who will be pursuing an alternate career, an opportunity to fulfill this portion of their lives almost as though it was the professional levels... for them...

                                  The parents are happy, the children are happy, the show management is happy.

                                  Horseback riding is culturally after all, mostly a nostalgically glorious remnant from the past kept alive out of the esteemed association with it's historically integral elite provenance.

                                  We who love horse sports know why we do, but the current world economy has a basis in current technological innovation, and horse sports are not going to contribute integrally to building the world of the future.

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Just some ideas

                                    http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...se-show-system
                                    This is the system used in Germany! Work quite well!

                                    I believe what the main problem is, is the cost for showing. So i think there have to be some rules by the USEF about what fees a show can bill you with. It is an expensive sport but spending 1500 $ for fun on a weekend is silly! I think everybody would be okay with lesser prize money in the lower classes if you wouldn't have to spend so much money on getting there.

                                    If you would spend so much money on showing I think it would push some wheels. More people would show, more would show with out a trainer since you loose less money, more trainers would have the time to show themself because you wouldn't have to take 10 people through the small classes. some would do it without a trainer.
                                    And please get rid of the tiny courses at the big shows! It's hillarious! How good can somebody feel to say yay i won the ground poles class at that big time show where olympic riders compete and there where like three entrys in my class!

                                    Make some better rules for hosting a show. Would raise the level of the B and C shows and make the equestrians aspire to get better. Not be happy with cantering ground poles at a top show!

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      Maybe some of our resident lawyers could chime in here - can USEF dictate to show managers how much they can charge for entries, or would that be some sort of restraint of trade? I just wonder if anyone can control that basic point of doing business.

                                      Comment


                                      • #99
                                        Originally posted by Kestrel View Post
                                        Maybe some of our resident lawyers could chime in here - can USEF dictate to show managers how much they can charge for entries, or would that be some sort of restraint of trade? I just wonder if anyone can control that basic point of doing business.
                                        They already do that.
                                        There are caps on entry fees in Hunter Classics (10%) and caps in 25K + GP classes 2%. Along with that there are minimums for prize money depending on division rating.
                                        But the C rated Zone divisions are the cash cows. Other than the Classics for Hunters the amount of entry fee is unregulated no mimimum or maximum fees for classes with no prize money. In theory you could pay more in entry fees for a $2500 Adut Jumper class than you would for the $25K GP class.
                                        If USEF started regulating entry fees for these types of classes most of the shows would go unrated. Too many regional factors that impact costs to create a one size fits all approach.
                                        Fan of Sea Accounts

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
                                          How do you think the entry fees will be brought down while maintaining high prize money???

                                          See my example:
                                          Pre green stake hunter class WITH prize money = $850 entry
                                          Pre greens at Old Salem WITHOUT prize money = $250 entry

                                          Kappler's article is about REDUCING show fees, by REDUCING the prize money expense to the horse show managers.

                                          People on this thread either can't do math or want to have it both ways.
                                          You have mentioned doing the math more than once so I will oblige you. The amounts listed are approximate, but realistic.

                                          Stall and office fees: $450
                                          Nominating fee: $175
                                          Shavings, hay, coaching fees: $200
                                          Entry fee for classic with no prize money $250
                                          Cost for this week: $1075
                                          No prize money, actual cost: $1075

                                          Same week with 15K classic:
                                          Fees same except entry increases to $850
                                          Cost for the week: $1675
                                          Prize money for winning classic: $4500
                                          Actual cost: A credit of $2825 Or enough to pay for almost two additional shows.

                                          This is the math that allowed a very financially challenged but very motivated and competitive junior to show at a national level. I'm sure she isn't the only one who has made it happened this way.

                                          I find it a bit concerning that those who oppose prize money in the junior/AOs are the ones who have the financial resources to compete without it. It's certainly an excellent way to keep a segment of talent out of your sandbox. Kappler talks about supporting young pros, but this plan decreases the opportunities for many young riders to reach the professional level.

                                          As there are always classes with no/minimum money, no one needs to pay the high entry fees.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X