• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doping Takes Center Stage At USEF Convention

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by DMK View Post
    Dex is bad when used to the legal limits on an ongoing basis.
    ACTH is bad
    Dex+ACTH is really really really bad.

    Guess which one is less likely to get abused in Canada?
    Agreed. I am just not sure I like the trade off of increased use of something else we can't limit or test for. ACTH use became so widespread in Canada I have to assume as a direct result of the Dex ban. I don't think it's nearly as common here, either alone or (dangerously) with Dex. Dex we can control to some extent. I'm not certain which rule has the widest benefit of safer practices for more horses.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      Where have you heard that this ACTH is widely used in Canada? Because honestly, I've never even heard of the stuff.

      And what does it do? What's the benefit?

      Comment


      • Gumshoe-- ACTH is a naturally-produced hormone that causes the adrenals to make glucocorticosteroids. Thats the same class that Dex is in. You're just going "through the back door" to get there.

        Comment


        • Just ducked into my office to check the progress of this thread. Who is familiar with the old past time- Bear Baiting? Kinda reminds me of that.
          http://patchworkfarmga.com

          Comment


          • I think there are individuals who stoop to combining dex/ACTH (poor horse doesn't know whether he's coming or going, cortisol-wise). ACTH is tougher to detect (as far as I know) since it is a substance the body naturally produces to control gluco-corticosteroid production (did I get that right?) but it is probably testable at some level, just not sure how well... Still this is an issue that the FEI has no doubt dealt with. I wonder if they do have testing for it, or it's just everyone's deep dark little secret?

            So there is a point to be made when we talk about the testability of something, but to my mind, it's never the best approach to defend something because "this is bad but that would be worse." It's admitting defeat before you even start. Personally, I don't understand why we continue to allow a drug that really is not used for ... hives... in the vast majority of instances. It's used because people believe it acts "like a benadryl" and it also is a potent anti-inflammatory that can be stacked on top of an NSAID legally. (As an aside, I would be interested to know if use of dex has gone up since stacking NSAIDs is no longer allowed).

            So everyone will say with a remarkably straight face that it is used for "skin conditions" and "allergies" and I do give them full credit for not laughing hysterically when they say it... but really, we all know that isn't what it is used for in the vast majority of cases.
            Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              I saw a horse at an A show this past summer with TERRIBLE hives. Rider fully intended to give him dex AFTER the show. He did just fine, hives and all, thank you very much.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by gumshoe View Post
                I saw a horse at an A show this past summer with TERRIBLE hives. Rider fully intended to give him dex AFTER the show. He did just fine, hives and all, thank you very much.
                Probably because that horse really had hives

                as DMK pointed out, Dex isn't always used for "real" allergies, and in which case needs to be given to the horse during the show to "help" it compete.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  I absolutely understand that, my point is just that there is no need for dex. Why allow it at all? A horse can show with bloody hives. That's just not a good enough reason to allow its use. And probable misuse.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Eventer13 View Post
                    As a non-attorney, is it illegal for someone who works in law to give their legal opinion publicly? Just not sure why its a big deal whether 1) a poster is a lawyer 2) how that is relevant to whether they can post their own legal opinions (or advice).

                    But maybe once you enter law, you are held to a higher standard? On a related note- could a vet post proposed treatment and get sued if it killed the horse? I don't wish to derail the (already-derailed) thread, just trying to understand.
                    A long time ago, right here in Virginia, I was an attorney. I believe my license is currently suspended; I'd love to tell you all that's due to a raging affair I had with a sexy judge hearing a case I was arguing; but sadly it's just due to the fact that when I quit practicing, I quit paying dues to the Virginia Bar Association.

                    Having issued that mea culpa:

                    1. Someone who happens to be a lawyer, but is not acting in a professional capacity on behalf of a client, is free to speak on any topic just as much, or as little, as any other person;

                    2. He or she has no ethical obligation, in that "not acting in a professional capacity," to identify self as an attorney;

                    3. Also, another poster suggested that lawyers were barred from commenting on this board, and could only comment directly to her attorney. This is not true. A lawyer representing a client in an active case, who knows that the other party in the case has their own lawyer, is required to communicate only with the other party's lawyer. But that is not the situation here (yet?);

                    3. The precept "innocent until proven guilty" is shorthand for our cherished legal tradition that the State must prove an accused criminal guilty of every element of a crime, beyond a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors or judge hearing the case. It may or may not apply in other settings. It does not apply in civil cases (hence, OJ Simpson acquitted of murder in criminal court, yet found liable for the deaths in the civil case). I do not know what standard of proof applies in the Olympic-athlete regulations that were being discussed. But the attorney commenting earlier was correct that an athletic tribunal is not the same as a criminal court;

                    4. And whether she was correct or not, seems healthy to take with reasonable skepticism any opinions you see posted here. Including this one. Wait, what?

                    4. In complete seriousness, I would so love to be able to answer my office phone, "This is Ms. V F, Esquire." I edited the name of the earlier attorney posting because I see it has been edited by the Mods; but it is an excellent name. My own name is rather boring *sighs*

                    5. With all the references to Tammy sounds like Tanya Tucker, does anyone else just want to start belting out "Delta Dawn?"


                    AND, in all seriousness, I will look forward to hearing more reports on actions taken by the USEF throughout this meeting.
                    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Easy-K...22998204542511
                    http://www.easykeeperfarm.com

                    I can ride my horses without a sharps container.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Martha Drum View Post
                      5. With all the references to Tammy sounds like Tanya Tucker, does anyone else just want to start belting out "Delta Dawn?"
                      Well, now we will! Thanks a lot for that torture.

                      And the other information as well.

                      Comment


                      • Oh. My. Goodness. Martha Drum, I am taking you out for a drink. Shall we meet somewhere around Lake Anna?

                        Originally posted by Martha Drum View Post
                        A long time ago, right here in Virginia, I was an attorney. I believe my license is currently suspended; I'd love to tell you all that's due to a raging affair I had with a sexy judge hearing a case I was arguing; but sadly it's just due to the fact that when I quit practicing, I quit paying dues to the Virginia Bar Association.

                        Having issued that mea culpa:

                        1. Someone who happens to be a lawyer, but is not acting in a professional capacity on behalf of a client, is free to speak on any topic just as much, or as little, as any other person;

                        2. He or she has no ethical obligation, in that "not acting in a professional capacity," to identify self as an attorney;

                        3. Also, another poster suggested that lawyers were barred from commenting on this board, and could only comment directly to her attorney. This is not true. A lawyer representing a client in an active case, who knows that the other party in the case has their own lawyer, is required to communicate only with the other party's lawyer. But that is not the situation here (yet?);

                        3. The precept "innocent until proven guilty" is shorthand for our cherished legal tradition that the State must prove an accused criminal guilty of every element of a crime, beyond a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors or judge hearing the case. It may or may not apply in other settings. It does not apply in civil cases (hence, OJ Simpson acquitted of murder in criminal court, yet found liable for the deaths in the civil case). I do not know what standard of proof applies in the Olympic-athlete regulations that were being discussed. But the attorney commenting earlier was correct that an athletic tribunal is not the same as a criminal court;

                        4. And whether she was correct or not, seems healthy to take with reasonable skepticism any opinions you see posted here. Including this one. Wait, what?

                        4. In complete seriousness, I would so love to be able to answer my office phone, "This is Ms. V F, Esquire." I edited the name of the earlier attorney posting because I see it has been edited by the Mods; but it is an excellent name. My own name is rather boring *sighs*

                        5. With all the references to Tammy sounds like Tanya Tucker, does anyone else just want to start belting out "Delta Dawn?"


                        AND, in all seriousness, I will look forward to hearing more reports on actions taken by the USEF throughout this meeting.
                        "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
                        Rainy
                        Stash

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MHM View Post
                          Mondays they might get hand walked, or turned out if there are paddocks available, or whatever. But if you're at a show like WEF or Hits or Kentucky for multiple weeks, you don't ship your horses hundreds of miles home on Sunday and drag them back to the show the next day. You keep them on the showgrounds, which means you need to have their weekly medications like Adequan or Legend on the showgrounds as well. Which you might give on a Monday.
                          That would be fine. I didn't say "not at the showgrounds," I said, "not on the same day they're competing." Or at the very least, at the end of the day after the last class.
                          If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                            That would be fine. I didn't say "not at the showgrounds," I said, "not on the same day they're competing." Or at the very least, at the end of the day after the last class.
                            True, but others have suggested a showgrounds ban on all needles, syringes, medications, etc. That's not practical for the scenario I described, where horses might not go home for a few weeks at a time, but are on a weekly schedule for a legal medication.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by amberhill View Post
                              An online petition has been created at Change.org to demand the USEF remove the Temporary Suspension Rule GR609 which is in direct conflict to USOC NGB Rules and Regulations and the Ted Stevens Act.

                              https://www.change.org/petitions/uni...are_after_sign

                              Please support this cause and show the USEF that members demand CHANGE and our rights to Due Process.
                              You're kidding, right?

                              The problem many of us are having with the USEF is that we feel they are not punishing people who violate D/M rules.

                              I think most of us have no problem with someone being temporarily suspended when the pony they are injecting drops dead at a show. It allows time for investigation etc...

                              Comment


                              • GEE. EM, i still haven't been served by your legions of lawyers!!!!! and while i use a screen name it is AS YOU WELL KNOW commonly known. sarah hochschwender. please try to spell it correctly.

                                i understand that Tucker has other viable (and genuinely BNT) equine oriented clients who value her services. you must be paying that woman a fortune to deal with the (dis)likes of yourself.

                                our business is being taken over by vile and unprincipled individuals. we cannot rely on the organization to fix this. until the cheaters, the posers and the genuinely incompetent have NO paying clients this will not stop. you cannot legislate fair mindedness. the governing body cannot create a structure that will allow individuals to act in varying situations and be responsive to the day to day needs of their horses. look at the discussion about DEX. there is nothing inherently wrong with that drug, but the MISUSE of it is an abomination.

                                now, elizabeth, you have my address. have at it.

                                Comment


                                • Rich white people are funny. So funny.

                                  The USEF wants certified trainers to know how to find the rules -- which shouldn't be confused with actually learning and knowing the rules -- so David O'Connor, in all his wisdom as departing president, floated the idea of an open book quiz.

                                  My friends, the proverbial bar is now a ground pole. It couldn't possibly be set any lower.

                                  Oh, scratch that, it could. John Long (if you remember back to 2010, he was the man who didn't realize that WEG prices were extortionate because he was vacationing in Europe) has this to say about the maelstrom of negative national-news publicity: "I see this as an opportunity."

                                  The proverbial bar, like John Long's head, is now buried in the sand.

                                  The USEF is not going to change on its own. There's the Humble incident, then there's hard-partying Urico, then there's two ponies dropping at the business end of a needle at Pony Finals, and the December 1 casualty in Ohio. This is the hunter/jumper world, but it's starting to sound a bit like a Mexican rodeo, at least from the horses' perspective.

                                  In response to public outcry over the deaths and injuries to horses at Mexican rodeos, nine states have enacted legislation banning those activities. In California, a first-time offender is charged with a misdemeanor if he/she "intentionally trips or fells an equine by the legs by any means whatsoever for the purposes of entertainment or sport." In Arizona, you're prohibited from "knowingly or intentionally [tripping] an equine for entertainment or sport", and you can be fined $1000 and spend two days in jail for it.

                                  Injecting hunter ponies with magnesium shortly before a class is only done for either entertainment or sport. It's not done for veterinary purposes.

                                  The USEF doping nexus -- the unethical trainers, owners and riders as well as the officers, administrators, and committees who make the rules to protect themselves and their system -- needs to be held to the same standards as other less savory, less wealthy, less well-connected animal abusers.

                                  If John Long sees an 'opportunity' in the current crisis, just think of the potential for greater 'opportunity' when he gets the first knock on his door from a law enforcement investigative team with subpoena powers.

                                  That's what it's going to take to make any real changes.

                                  Comment


                                  • In case anyone is interested, here is the FEI list of drugs that are either banned or controlled:
                                    http://www.feicleansport.org/2013%20...ted%20List.pdf

                                    Here are the FEI rules on both doping and controlled medication violations:
                                    http://www.feicleansport.org/EADCMRs...f_1Jan2013.pdf

                                    They make for very interesting reading and should be compared to the USEF Rules. The controlled medication rules start after page 23.

                                    The vet rules are also interesting and can be found on the FEI website under Clean Sport.
                                    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                    Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                    Comment


                                    • Using FEI rules would put a stop to much of this behavior, however it won't happen.
                                      USEF doesn't have the balls to enforce the rules it already has.
                                      Go to their website and look at the penalties given to rule breakers.

                                      Are you suspended?

                                      Going to show anyway?

                                      Get caught?

                                      You could be "censured" and fined. Ooh, that'll teach you!

                                      JER, The bar is set incredibly low and you described it well.

                                      Comment


                                      • I feel like there is a really easy way to fix this: You get caught using drugs first time, year long suspension and HEFTY fine. No being on the show grounds at ALL for that year. Any sort of USHJA or USEF titles revoked. Names publicized monthly. At AA shows least 1 horse from each rated division is tested and the horses to be tested are drawn at random on the day of testing which will also be drawn at random on the first day of the show. No one except the appointed drug tester and steward is allowed to know the day and horses to be tested.
                                        Second time caught, 5 year suspension. Larger fine. Barred from all show grounds. All USEF and USHJA titles revoked.
                                        Third time you get caught, Life-long suspension. Very hefty fine. Don't even think about stepping on show grounds or we're suing you. Any and all titles revoked. Names publicized as they occur.

                                        Person signing in the trainer blank on all forms must be the riders primary coach for the weekend and the person responsible for any and all feed, supplements, or medication. If you are caught using a groom or barn managers name on a form in the blank, then both the trainer is suspended for 1 year and fined heavily. Banned from show grounds for the remainder of the show and any shows for the subsequent 1 year suspension.

                                        No trainer wants to lose their entire show business.

                                        Sometimes I think I may do a better job of writing rules for USEF than USEF does.
                                        Mendokuse

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by amberhill View Post
                                          Actually, I have been silent for way too long.
                                          I heartily disagree.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X