• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doping Takes Center Stage At USEF Convention

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by supershorty628 View Post
    What about the horses who get Adequan and Legend? I'm sorry, I just don't see people who choose to use those as nefarious or scheming.. or bad horsemen.
    But they don't need it the same day they're competing.

    If we want to let people use dex ... then there needs to be a limit like 'once a year per horse'. I'd rather give it up entirely.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by AllOverFarm View Post
      Quick question:
      Since Usef is not to concerned with making med changes....Would individual shows have that right?
      Say...if HITS made their own rules...if a horse dies at their show mandatory necropsy. If your horse is drug tested and it comes back positive....baned from hits shows for 6 months. Could they ban certain drugs? Dex for example?
      If I knew that a show had high standards to keep things honest, and the horses best interest at heart, I would think it would be a good selling point.
      In California, there are some different rules imposed via the state that are independent of USEF recognition. The state and USEF work together, though.
      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by poltroon View Post
        But they don't need it the same day they're competing.
        No, but if they're on the very common once-a-week schedule for those medications such as Adequan and Legend, the horses still need to get it if they're away from home for more than a week. So the meds and needles and syringes need to travel with them.

        Comment


        • #84
          I have a question about the Ted Stevens Act and how it relates to the USEF ability to impose temporary suspensions.

          The intent is to keep an NGB from keeping an athlete out of elite, olympic-selection competition, without due process.

          However, the person who is citing it is *not* an athlete. She is an owner and a trainer. I believe the Ted Stevens Act provision applies only to riders. If I am correct, the USEF rules can be adapted somewhat to show this distinction.
          If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by MHM View Post
            No, but if they're on the very common once-a-week schedule for those medications such as Adequan and Legend, the horses still need to get it if they're away from home for more than a week. So the meds and needles and syringes need to travel with them.
            Are you guys competing these horses 7 days a week? What happened to Mondays?
            If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #86
              Monday is a fine day to schedule those once a week injections. Yep.

              Comment


              • #87
                ACTH is a natural hormone that tells the adrenals to release corticosteroids. I would imagine its effect, like Dex, would depend on how much was given, and how often.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                  Are you guys competing these horses 7 days a week? What happened to Mondays?
                  Mondays they might get hand walked, or turned out if there are paddocks available, or whatever. But if you're at a show like WEF or Hits or Kentucky for multiple weeks, you don't ship your horses hundreds of miles home on Sunday and drag them back to the show the next day. You keep them on the showgrounds, which means you need to have their weekly medications like Adequan or Legend on the showgrounds as well. Which you might give on a Monday.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Moderator 3 View Post
                    I will remind everyone to desist from personal attacks back and forth and concentrate on the original topic at hand, or the thread will be closed pronto.

                    Mod 3
                    Is COTH guaranteeing its users anonymity? I was merely stating a fact not attacking, if you consider that attacking then please remove the threads concerning criminal liability by a governmental employee who works in the attorney general's office which are utterly false.

                    To make things perfectly clear, their was no criminal wrongdoing even though I was falsely accused by individuals of doing so and there is no open criminal investigation into the death of Humble as has been falsely reported.

                    Humble was brought up by your [COTHs] article and I have a first amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

                    Please let the record stand that this is the second attorney COTH has given immunity to on its forum.
                    Elizabeth Mandarino
                    www.amberhillponies.com
                    cell 908.397.0977

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                      I have a question about the Ted Stevens Act and how it relates to the USEF ability to impose temporary suspensions.

                      The intent is to keep an NGB from keeping an athlete out of elite, olympic-selection competition, without due process.

                      However, the person who is citing it is *not* an athlete. She is an owner and a trainer. I believe the Ted Stevens Act provision applies only to riders. If I am correct, the USEF rules can be adapted somewhat to show this distinction.
                      No you are not correct. Please read http://amberhillponies.com/Amber_Hil...Directors.html
                      Elizabeth Mandarino
                      www.amberhillponies.com
                      cell 908.397.0977

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                        I have a question about the Ted Stevens Act and how it relates to the USEF ability to impose temporary suspensions.

                        The intent is to keep an NGB from keeping an athlete out of elite, olympic-selection competition, without due process.

                        However, the person who is citing it is *not* an athlete. She is an owner and a trainer. I believe the Ted Stevens Act provision applies only to riders. If I am correct, the USEF rules can be adapted somewhat to show this distinction.
                        The Act applies to coaches and trainers as well as athletes. However, it is worth noting that the Act primarily outlines the role and responsibilities of an NGB, which are fairly extensive. The USEF's mission statement details those roles and responsibilities, which include protecting the welfare of the horses involved in the sport, as well as developing and enforcing the rules that govern it.

                        http://www.usef.org/_IFrames/AboutUs...t/Default.aspx
                        **********
                        We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
                        -PaulaEdwina

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Originally posted by Moderator 3 View Post
                          I will remind everyone to desist from personal attacks back and forth and concentrate on the original topic at hand, or the thread will be closed pronto.

                          Mod 3
                          Why not simply ban posters who cannot follow forum rules?

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            It is clear to me USEF could not care less about the drugging problem (other than the fact that it has been brought to light in the mainstream media).

                            Quizzes about the rules? A voluntary medication log book? Really??

                            No mention of increasing the penalties for D/M violations? That would be a (glaringly obvious) place to start. Having read that article I have no faith whatsoever that this situation will be addressed in any meaningful manner.

                            Great, make necropsy mandatory for the dead ponies and horses.

                            How about enacting rules that will keep them from dying in the first place?

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              Originally posted by amberhill View Post
                              Is COTH guaranteeing its users anonymity? I was merely stating a fact not attacking, if you consider that attacking then please remove the threads concerning criminal liability by a governmental employee who works in the attorney general's office which are utterly false.

                              To make things perfectly clear, their was no criminal wrongdoing even though I was falsely accused by individuals of doing so and there is no open criminal investigation into the death of Humble as has been falsely reported.

                              Humble was brought up by your [COTHs] article and I have a first amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

                              Please let the record stand that this is the second attorney COTH has given immunity to on its forum.

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Excellent, and with a snow storm moving in!
                                <><

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  As a non-attorney, is it illegal for someone who works in law to give their legal opinion publicly? Just not sure why its a big deal whether 1) a poster is a lawyer 2) how that is relevant to whether they can post their own legal opinions (or advice).

                                  But maybe once you enter law, you are held to a higher standard? On a related note- could a vet post proposed treatment and get sued if it killed the horse? I don't wish to derail the (already-derailed) thread, just trying to understand.

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Originally posted by amberhill View Post
                                    Is COTH guaranteeing its users anonymity? I was merely stating a fact not attacking, if you consider that attacking then please remove the threads concerning criminal liability by a governmental employee who works in the attorney general's office which are utterly false.

                                    Humble was brought up by your [COTHs] article and I have a first amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

                                    Please let the record stand that this is the second attorney COTH has given immunity to on its forum.
                                    Freedom of speech does not apply here, you are not allowed to use profanity and your topics must be related to the forum's parameters. Freedom of speech means that you could state publicly that COTH is full of hate mongering homosexuals with a horse agenda and not get arrested for it, but you could still get kicked off this board. (pardon my satirical license here)
                                    "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
                                    Rainy
                                    Stash

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      and if an attorney retires from practice then do they no longer need "immunity" from coth
                                      Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                                      The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #99
                                        COTH doesn't have to "guarantee its users' anonymity". COTH doesn't KNOW its users' identities. If you choose to let everyone know who you are, great. But it isn't up to you to decide for another user.

                                        Originally posted by amberhill View Post
                                        Is COTH guaranteeing its users anonymity? I was merely stating a fact not attacking, if you consider that attacking then please remove the threads concerning criminal liability by a governmental employee who works in the attorney general's office which are utterly false.

                                        To make things perfectly clear, their was no criminal wrongdoing even though I was falsely accused by individuals of doing so and there is no open criminal investigation into the death of Humble as has been falsely reported.

                                        Humble was brought up by your [COTHs] article and I have a first amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

                                        Please let the record stand that this is the second attorney COTH has given immunity to on its forum.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Eventer13 View Post
                                          As a non-attorney, is it illegal for someone who works in law to give their legal opinion publicly? Just not sure why its a big deal whether 1) a poster is a lawyer 2) how that is relevant to whether they can post their own legal opinions (or advice).

                                          But maybe once you enter law, you are held to a higher standard? On a related note- could a vet post proposed treatment and get sued if it killed the horse? I don't wish to derail the (already-derailed) thread, just trying to understand.
                                          An attorney can say whatever they please on this forum as long as they aren't giving legal advice which is specific.
                                          An attorney has just as much right to a personal opinion as anyone else.

                                          From what I've seen, the attorneys who post on COTH are not dummies and are well aware of where the boundaries lie.

                                          Ms. mandarino? Not so much.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X