• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Stirrup Rule?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    spray paint your shock absorbers--how about white? how about white stirrup leathers? how about white riding boots to match your white pants? then they will want to forbid all that white stuff on a white horse. where does it stop?
    Discipline is the Bridge between Dreams and Accomplishments

    Comment


    • #42
      I was watching a video where Victoria Colvin riding World time was using peacock irons... those rubber bands were black... would those be considered black stirrups? I wonder if they would prohibit those? I think it would be really bad if they did..... I like the everything white idea... LOL....
      Live in the sunshine.
      Swim in the sea.
      Drink the wild air.

      Comment


      • #43
        This is one of the "best" slippery slope arguments I've seen in a long time.

        Originally posted by feather river View Post
        spray paint your shock absorbers--how about white? how about white stirrup leathers? how about white riding boots to match your white pants? then they will want to forbid all that white stuff on a white horse. where does it stop?

        Comment


        • #44
          The prestige silk stirrups come in graphite (dark grey). I'm not sure how different they look from black though. You can also get aluminum stirrups with the wider footbed, but they are more expensive. Such as the Wildkart Jin.

          http://equestrianimports.com/shop/ne...rons/1026.html

          Comment


          • #45
            Here's a picture of the graphite.

            http://www.dragonflysaddlery.co.uk/l...e-irons.2L.jpg

            Originally posted by akhunterrider View Post
            The prestige silk stirrups come in graphite (dark grey). I'm not sure how different they look from black though. You can also get aluminum stirrups with the wider footbed, but they are more expensive. Such as the Wildkart Jin.

            http://equestrianimports.com/shop/ne...rons/1026.html

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by doublesstable View Post
              I was watching a video where Victoria Colvin riding World time was using peacock irons... those rubber bands were black... would those be considered black stirrups? I wonder if they would prohibit those? I think it would be really bad if they did..... I like the everything white idea... LOL....
              The rule is for equitation. In hunters you can still wear black if you want to.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by PonyPenny View Post
                The rule is for equitation. In hunters you can still wear black if you want to.
                Yeah, Victoria rides hunters but what about those that ride Eq in peacock stirrups? Like in the pony classes etc. I have actually thought about riding in them for safety reasons... so how could they prohibit those? Just sayin.
                Live in the sunshine.
                Swim in the sea.
                Drink the wild air.

                Comment


                • #48
                  It seems a bit extreme to be automatic elimination. I think they should have left the judges some discretion, especially if a class wouldn't fill without the eliminated riders. Better to knock their scores down than to penalize the entire class.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by GaMare View Post
                    It seems a bit extreme to be automatic elimination. I think they should have left the judges some discretion, especially if a class wouldn't fill without the eliminated riders. Better to knock their scores down than to penalize the entire class.
                    The rule was approved in January. It doesn't become effective until December 1st. Riders who show in the equitation have plenty of time to get their stirrup irons in compliance. I am sure it will be discussed more come Fall & as the Dec 1st deadline approaches.
                    "I'm not crazy...my mother had me tested"

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by doublesstable View Post
                      Yeah, Victoria rides hunters but what about those that ride Eq in peacock stirrups? Like in the pony classes etc. I have actually thought about riding in them for safety reasons... so how could they prohibit those? Just sayin.
                      What about them?
                      The Peacock stirrups I've seen are not black.
                      The rubber band may or may not be black. I've seen the band in brown and black.
                      I doubt the color of the rubber band is an issue but if black rubber bands turns out to be a problem then use brown.
                      Or is there another issue that you have in mind concerning peacocks?
                      Fan of Sea Accounts

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        The brown bands certainly aren't difficult to find.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by PINE TREE FARM SC View Post
                          What about them?
                          The Peacock stirrups I've seen are not black.
                          The rubber band may or may not be black. I've seen the band in brown and black.
                          I doubt the color of the rubber band is an issue but if black rubber bands turns out to be a problem then use brown.
                          Or is there another issue that you have in mind concerning peacocks?
                          Doesn't look much different to me than a black stirrup.... especially from a distance you cannot see the stirrup - the REASON for the rule change.......

                          http://greenhawk.com/wdItemList.asp?...tType=ItemList
                          Live in the sunshine.
                          Swim in the sea.
                          Drink the wild air.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            The footbed is not black.

                            The rest of the stirrup is not black.

                            Buy brown bands if you are worried about it.

                            Originally posted by doublesstable View Post
                            Doesn't look much different to me than a black stirrup.... especially from a distance you cannot see the stirrup - the REASON for the rule change.......

                            http://greenhawk.com/wdItemList.asp?...tType=ItemList

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              New Royal Rider Gray Stirrups pic.twitter.com/B1AUKSyjAc

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by Elkie View Post
                                New Royal Rider Gray Stirrups pic.twitter.com/B1AUKSyjAc
                                Nice stirrups and all but what a ridiculous little mini-ad... they just look weird propped up on top of a Porsche. Maybe next time they should put them on, I don't know, a saddle?

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  As it turn out - this actually really is the Royal Rider of Italy owner's Porsche and he picked the new Gray color to match. He is just trying to supply you what is being asked for.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Elkie View Post
                                    As it turn out - this actually really is the Royal Rider of Italy owner's Porsche and he picked the new Gray color to match. He is just trying to supply you what is being asked for.
                                    OOOhhhh cool.... I'll take an order of the stirrups and the car to match
                                    Live in the sunshine.
                                    Swim in the sea.
                                    Drink the wild air.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      I've seen the jointed stirrups in grey.

                                      And, I'm pretty sure that if this rule passes, Herm Sprenger will be debuting the new grey line about a minute later. Probably at a slightly higher cost :P

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Rule Enforcement

                                        In reading all of these posts, I would like to bring a few items up for thought in how this rule is worded and enforcement is going to be difficult. This is one of the many rules which USEF believes is a good thing, but does not think it clear through.

                                        The rule reads: The use of black stirrups is not permitted in any Equitation class. The use of black stirrups will automatically result in elimination

                                        Now it could be argued that a stirrup which is jointed (with the joint being covered in black) which is silver on top is not a black stirrup. Read the rule as it reads, do not add your words to it or your impressions. It states "black stirrups" - it does not say all black or the stirrup cannot not have any black on it. From a TD standpoint, a stirrup with silver and black is not a black stirrup.

                                        Next, the reason for the request of the rule additions is: Black stirrups are not part of traditional attire and hide rider position flaws, making it difficult for the judges to clearly see the
                                        rider’s leg position. (copied from www.usef.org/documents/ruleChanges/174-12.pdf)

                                        Black stirrups are not part of traditional attire? Really? At one point wearing rust colored breeches were "traditional", they are no longer.

                                        Hide rider position flaws, making it difficult for the judges to clearly see the rider's leg position. Hmmm... how often do our trainers make us ride without stirrups to get our leg where it is suppose to be?

                                        It does not state a THING in the justifications about the foot which is where the entire debate is over. Seeing the foot in the stirrup - black boot, black stirrup, dark horse.

                                        So, this could be one of the many other useless rules which has been put in the rule book which cannot be well enforced due to poor wording.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          New Gray Royal Rider Sport Non-Flex/ available in "T3" model - Flex due in June 1.800.800.4261 http://www.royalriderstirrup.com pic.twitter.com/yVVKSyIgBc

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X