• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

George Morris view of Modern Hunter Class

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • George Morris view of Modern Hunter Class

    Hello, All,

    I'm new to the forum so I apologize if this has been discussed in another thread.

    During the George Morris HorseMastery Clinic last week, he made a comment to the effect that the Hunter class used to be an important foundation for the jumpers, and then he went on to emphasize the fact that it used to be. The implication is that it isn't anymore.

    Has anybody heard or read what he thinks of the modern hunter classes? I would really be interested to hear what his criticisms are as I am confident that they are well founded.

    Thanks.

  • #2
    I've left the hunter ring years ago so I'm not up to date on recent fads but at shows I've noticed the average hunter is way too dead quiet, very flat jumping style, and judging is way too biased. I also find hunter ring has a course that does not challenge the rider and horse enough, almost every line is straight, wide corners, and almost the exact same jump for the whole course.

    I left Hunters because all of my horses are either OTTBs or OTSTBs and I was at a show and had a clean round and got placed beneath another rider who had a rail down. I asked the judge (I wanted honest feedback on what I needed to work on) and she told me that she will never place a Standardbred with "ugly white brands and dots" over another breed. My OTTBs may put in a little hop or show some personality and we get marked down for it so I am not a huge glutton for punishment so I changed classes.

    Comment


    • #3
      There didn't used to be jumper classes at rated shows under 4ft. If you wanted to bring a young horse along you did local shows, then you did the hinyer ring for a year or so, then you moved up to the jumper ring.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Thanks, Trotters. I've seen and been part of a little bit of this, particularly in the non-rated schooling shows. My horse is a very big, very black horse (almost 18 hands) but is very fluid and light on his feet. When we compete against smaller horses, some judges will always drop us down. That said, I just mark it up to one of those things I can't help, make a note of the judge and switch classes, rings, divisions, whatever.

        I know that the USHJA has made a push lately to get judges to acknowledge spirited horses so there is less dead-calm hunters. I'm hoping this catches on, but someone pointed out to me that a significant number of hunter riders don't want a spirited horse because then they would be more difficult to ride. I don't know if that's necessarily true, but we'll see.

        Anyway, I figured George Morris would have a perspective from all levels, so I'm wondering if his views are the result of things like what you've seen, or the tendency to reward dead-calm riding, or something totally different.

        Comment


        • #5
          In as few words as possible.....He does not think much of the modern hunter but holds some hope that hunter derbies will bring back the old hunter style. One could probably google some of his thoughts on this as I have seen several printed things on his opinion and reasons. They are very valid.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            I tried googling it with no luck ... if anyone has links to articles where he has voiced his opinion, please post.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not going to hold my breath that hunter derbies will bring back the old hunter style, particularly now that show producers are now holding and promoting 2'6" "hunter derbies." The hunter derby concept was intended to be the equivalent of a Grand Prix. Now that concept has been bastardized by the horse show organizers and instead of helping hunters they are driving it deeper into the abyss of mediocrity.

              Comment


              • #8
                He also really likes the hunter courses that encourage galloping and a forward horse. One of the big changes is the related distances. I believe it has been commented on by him that he likes to see unrelated distances and riders riding off their eye rather than counting.

                Comment


                • #9
                  This one thing I found of George's thoughts on the hunter derbies, before they were dumbed down.

                  One of the original supporters of high performance hunter classes, Morris is passionate about the evolving hunter derby program. Having hunter derbies allows the discipline to be in touch with its roots as it encourages riders to pick up a gallop and navigate an open field of natural, solid obstacles resembling those once found in fox hunting fields. As one of the Franktown Meadows Hunter Derby judges, Morris will be looking for the horse that best portrays the ideal hunter; a forward moving horse that moves well, jumps well, and wears a good expression around the course.”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Not finding much so I must be asking the wrong way. I know I have seen print and probably an interview maybe. He was pretty blunt in that he thinks todays hunters are hothouse plants and that a real hunter needs to go with more pace, be bolder and that courses need to be more complicated and not use such perscribed distances. He seemed to have some thoughts on how jumps are now built in that they are not natural enough and are shaped in such a rounded way that does not ask varied questions of the hunter. He thinks they are too ded and expressionless. Please do not for a minute think I am talking for "The George" but these are the things I seem to remember and I hope I am presenting them as he intended. I think there may be some of his comments in regard to hunter derbies as he was active in this and I think was pretty excited that this would turn the hunters around.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I have to say, I am very excited for the recent "calling out" of the hunter industry. I have heard several influential horseman, including George, speak against the faults of the en vogue hunter circuit. I have a lot of hope for the future and the return of the true hunter horse.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Here's a link to a thread in which people discussed a COTH article by GM which is on the topic you are looking for. The thread contains a link to the issue; the article begins on p. 37. Enjoy.

                        http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...hunter+article
                        I heard a neigh. Oh, such a brisk and melodious neigh as that was! My very heart leaped with delight at the sound. --Nathaniel Hawthorne

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thank you Dewey

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I was at one of his clinics this fall and he was decidedly not complimentary towards the modern hunters and hunter riders. I forget what he said specifically, but it was definitely my impression that he felt we'd lost our way.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Back in the day even hunters started at 3'6"!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                There is an article ( in the Chronicle?) from about a year and a half ago in which GM states his opinion of the derbys and the high performance hunter divisions.

                                Initially, he was very excited about both programs but was disappointed with the way they actually devolved from showcasing the best of the best to including many options at lower levels.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  What is the problem with the lower levels if it gets more people out to the shows to learn what hunters theoretically should be? (at leat in GM's mind)

                                  Is he afraid that by having many options at lower levels that people will not aspire to move up? If that is the case, I hope he realizes that not everyone has the money , or wants to spend the money on a 3'6" or 4' hunter that will be successful at those types of shows.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
                                    What is the problem with the lower levels if it gets more people out to the shows to learn what hunters theoretically should be? (at leat in GM's mind)

                                    Is he afraid that by having many options at lower levels that people will not aspire to move up? If that is the case, I hope he realizes that not everyone has the money , or wants to spend the money on a 3'6" or 4' hunter that will be successful at those types of shows.
                                    I was wondering the same thing ... Wouldn't it be a good thing for amateurs and those that aren't the "best of the best" to have an opportunity to show in a class with a more varied course, that rewards bolder riding and a horse that doesn't look like it's falling asleep over the fences? Maybe these same riders would eventually move up to compete in the "real" hunter derbies...

                                    I don't show in hunters so I have no personal experience with lower level hunter derbies ... Is the problem that they end up with a course that is too straightforward and the judges reward sleepy, dead quiet horses just like in the regular hunter classes?

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I'm guessing that the reason for not offering very low might be because not so very long ago hunters for adults was over 3' and it didn't take even casual riders years to get there. Most riders went from starting lessons to jumping 3' within 2 years. Now many riders seem to ride for 5+ years and now get out of what used to be children's crossrail heights.

                                      And that's definitely *not* a slam on today's riders at all. It's more of a tweak to the judging and training circle of keeping riders from advancing. Trainers aren't training, instructors aren't instructing and all because the judges pin the dead-head horses. It's actually easier money to keep pinning zombie horses with riders over small heights...no need to train past the basics, dead look comes through the pharmacy, teach rider to count strides, collect income. Tons more people at lower beginner heights, brings more people in and more money in. Might be more money as the heights go up, but takes more time, horse can't be too dead at 4' and fewer people with that kind of income. So keep them low and keep volume income. Trainers make a buttload more for a buttload less work on a low hunter/beginner rider.

                                      They're keeping so many people from progressing...I'd be pissed. It's not rocket surgery to move up in height. And if the folks don't show every single weekend and all winter long...the horses don't wear out so fast and that drops their prices by a bit. And if the animal doesn't have to look like someone exhumed it for the class, there's a LOT more higher level horses out there than the people making money off of them want you to know about. For heavens sake, so many try to convince riders that 3'-3'6" is epic in effort and cost and 4' is Holy Grail worthy and that's simply not the case. They SHOULD be encouraging and moving everyone up, calming nerves in some and more people would realize it's actually easier to jump a 3'6" course than they ever thought. (distances are easier when the horse isn't stepping over the jumps too)

                                      And frankly I simply can't believe that the massive amoung of riders that stick to 2'6" and below are there because they lack the ability to go any higher. Of COURSE you can. If you can jump 2'6" then you can jump 3'...and so on. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Don't let them tell you that a mere 6" is HUGE.

                                      Another issue is that trainers incapable of moving the riders up in heights keep their students and don't move them on to those who can move them up to the next level. It's not supposed to be the norm to stay with one person forever.

                                      I think it's sad that so many people think they can't move up. That it's too costly or too hard. The judging and the training system in this country has screwed over too many riders in hunters.
                                      You jump in the saddle,
                                      Hold onto the bridle!
                                      Jump in the line!
                                      ...Belefonte

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Misty blue I agree 100%. I think the hunter derbies will be no more to hunters than ranch classes are for AQHA pleasure horse classes.
                                        Hillary Rodham Clinton - the peoples choice for president.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X