• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

A "Clean Trainer" Accreditation?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A "Clean Trainer" Accreditation?

    The recent drug abuse threads made me wonder if a public reward for clean barns could be an welcome addition to our show world? I was thinking of something along the lines of the "Green" or LEED Certification businesses achieve with a horse world twist. Essentially it would be a reward programs where trainers / barn owners show either drug-free or an extremely limited basis, don't LTD, and offer a down-time program for show horses, amongst other things.

    This could be a voluntary program where trainers / barn owners would have to submit their program and be accessible for both planned and spot inspections / drug testings. There could be levels similar to the LEED programs (silver, gold, platinum) that are annually awarded. A trainer / barn owner could then tout this accreditation to prospective clients and buyers - and the public.

    Perhaps with an annual awards program through the USEF (ahem)? Funded by a $1 per rider show donation plus ...?

    This type of program would further reward the "good" trainers who deserve recognition as horsemen and women.

    Thoughts?
    "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you are right." -Henry Ford

  • #2
    I think this is an interesting idea, but maybe instead they could initially start by making drug violating trainers more public. Maybe a link on the main page, separated by discipline?

    Plus I don't think a monetary incentive would work at the higher levels. It just won't compete with the potential reward of winning a big money class like a hunter derby. Plus I only see that meaning higher member fees since the money has to come from somewhere.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      If it's modeled after LEED there really isn't a monetary incentive other than future business. It's more of a good citizen effort that companies are flocking to right and left. It's work for a business to achieve an environmental LEED award yet it's hard to find a prominent company not pursuing at some level.

      This would be a positive spin on a dark issue - reward those who really do have a clean program vs. constantly witch hunting those who don't.
      "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you are right." -Henry Ford

      Comment


      • #4
        I like the idea of a positive award for those who do good. Rather then always focusing on those doing wrong.

        Comment


        • #5
          I do not think we have reached the point where we have to reward trainers or any other member of the organization for adhering to the rules.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Addison View Post
            I do not think we have reached the point where we have to reward trainers or any other member of the organization for adhering to the rules.
            Given the current state of the world .... The widespread concern about and use of drugs etc..... Having a certificatupion like this is an interesting option. It's not mandatory, it's public, it's promotable. It's not a reward for doing the right, it's an acknowledgment. Why not?

            Comment


            • #7
              It would be incredibly difficult to differentiate between clean and undetected!!

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Of course, but someone who goes through a process like this has publicly stated that he or she has nothing to hide. It says, check my tack trunks and my trailer, interview my staff, test my horses, I'm following my clean program (as stated in written format). Watch me, I have nothing to hide.
                "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you are right." -Henry Ford

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Tiramit View Post
                  Of course, but someone who goes through a process like this has publicly stated that he or she has nothing to hide. It says, check my tack trunks and my trailer, interview my staff, test my horses, I'm following my clean program (as stated in written format). Watch me, I have nothing to hide.
                  Define 'clean'
                  No drug vioations or do you want to include medication violations? To me either one is a problem.
                  What does 'test my horses' mean? All horses stabled with a trainer at a show? All horses that list the trainer as 'trainer' on the entry blank.
                  As an owner I'm not sure I'd allow anybody to go through my tack trunks or trailer or allow testing unless it was an official USEF tester.
                  Who is administering the test program? What happens if your program gets a positive test? USEF won't care unless it's their supervised testers and their official lab.

                  It's an interesting concept,just not sure if it is practical or has any 'teeth'
                  Fan of Sea Accounts

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Logistically? Not going to happen. Who would run it? Who would pay for the vet techs to go out, run the samples? Who wants strangers given free access to their tackrooms and all those french saddles or poking around clients private tack trunks? And if they are background checked, bonded and insured? Who's paying for that across all the states and counties in the USA?

                    Plus that, some of these trainers are expert in clandestine operation and manage to load the horse with god knows what in broad daylight at show with 2500 horses and as many or more people on the grounds. Evading an announced inspection on their own property would be childs play.

                    We can work with what is already in place if we can get some changes made. Changes that are not that complicated, not costly and are probably permitted without a rule change.
                    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Addison View Post
                      I do not think we have reached the point where we have to reward trainers or any other member of the organization for adhering to the rules.
                      Really. A prize for simply not cheating is a sad commentary.
                      I understand the laudable intentions, but the execution needs work.
                      "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                      ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
                        Really. A prize for simply not cheating is a sad commentary.
                        I understand the laudable intentions, but the execution needs work.
                        Agreed, but how many threads on drugs and trainers who have cheated and back room pharmaceuticals have we had over the years? And we're only a percentage of the people who discuss this topic.

                        The environmental comparison is a valid one. Think about all the stories of companies dumping illegally, who blamed employees for their infractions, who cut corners and lied to make more money? It is sad. EPA has set down and fined for years, but that hasn't been enough. LEED began as a way to publicly reward companies who go the extra mile to help the environment. Who have programs and aren't afraid of letting people look at them a little more closely, planned or not.

                        It has helped and brought back more reward than people ever expected.
                        "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you are right." -Henry Ford

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I think a "clean trainer" program would be a good idea. I'm a young trainer who doesn't believe in drugging horses to win. I've always put the long hard hours into a good traing program. I would love to compete against other clease horses.

                          I'm not sure how exactly this kind of program would work but I'd be interested!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think this program is a great idea! It would need need widespread buy-in and publicity to work. I'm thinking of when my non-horsey parents were looking for a place for me to ride as a child, they didn't read the Chronicle or any horse publications, but they do read the NYT. I think making information about both the good and the bad available to the general public would be good for the sport in general and would encourage trainers and others to put their best face forward.

                            Of course these things all cost money, which makes it more difficult to implement, but I think this is a good idea to start from, at least.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              So if a trainer opts not to participate then they are automatically considered "dirty" or cheats? The reward for doing what is right is the knowledge that you as a trainer or rider are doing what is right and safe for the horse. I personally do not want or expect public accolades for playing by the rules. I just do it.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                A large number of LEED projects are government/municipal buildings of some sort. And that certification has become an industry unto itself, with third parties and consultants who advise and evaluate the projects. I don't know how many truly small businesses participate - maybe it's higher than I think - but I would guess that like most training/boarding businesses, the cost is simply prohibitive.

                                I am ALL for making this sport free of performance-enhancing drugs, (NOT the FEI no foreign substances approach) but I don't think a certification program is going to do anything but add cost. Just the oversight alone would be a huge issue, along with the other issues raised above - like allowing inspections of customers' private property.

                                I *could* see (and support) more drug testing at shows, with larger and more painful penalties for those caught cheating. The UCI has created a pretty comprehensive program for a niche sport (cycling) that could possibly provide a road map; obviously one that would need adaptation, of course, but it is a combination of testing and education that seems to work a lot better than what the H/J world has now: http://www.uci.ch/templates/UCI/UCI1...UzNDc&LangId=1
                                **********
                                We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
                                -PaulaEdwina

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I would love it it something like this was available, simply because I have a 3yo very nice homebred I am starting and going to sell this year, and I do not want to sell him into the wrong program. I would greatly appreciate any public way to help me find ethical trainers.
                                  We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                                  www.dleestudio.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    The "award" should come from the owners and riders. People who ride should be not be talked in to purchasing a horse that may be too much horse (or pony) for them; learn to ride that horse, and refuse to allow that horse to be filled w/ drugs...so while we can all criticize the trainers for doping, are the drugs on your bills? Don't pay for them. If there needs to be a change it needs to come from everyone in the industry, not just the trainers who drug and I should add the owners/competitors who go along with it are just as bad, if not worse, than the trainers.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I think it's certainly a good idea that sheds light in positive direction! I mean, it seems apparent that nothing is going to be done in regards to increasing the consequences for those who violate the rules, so why not? There's always going to be loopholes, undetectable drugs, etc. You can pick it apart all you want, but it's certainly better than the "nothing" that's going on at the moment!
                                      Originally posted by rustbreeches
                                      [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        It's a nice idea, but given that so much of the problem is misuse of "legal" medications and abuse of medications for which there is no test--such as IV magnesium (and previously GABA) I can't think how on earth anyone would be able to make this accreditation in a meaningful manner. It would be easy to drug a barn full of horses and keep the staff ignorant and the medication box hidden, and use only non-testable substances. Might be hard to hide from the braiders, but I'm not sure using them as the source of the accreditation would work.

                                        I'm sure many trainers would love to participate while continuing with business as usual

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X