• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USEF Response to NYT article...is it time for The Humble Initiative

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USEF Response to NYT article...is it time for The Humble Initiative

    Over on the right in the light green square, just came on COTH, click to view.

    Seems Mr Long feels the USEF has had it's hands tied in investigating anything in anyway beside voluntary cooperation and "that policy has to change". Thats a quote.

    Perhaps some good might come from this situation and our participation on this and the other related threads, and you bet they read them.

    As a life member of USEF, may I suggest policy changes be called Humbles Law? Or similar? Like an Amber alert?
    Last edited by findeight; Jan. 1, 2013, 09:47 AM.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

  • #2
    Originally posted by findeight View Post
    As a life member of USEF, may I suggest policy changes be called Humbles Law? Or similar? Like an Amber alert?
    In this case, it would be an Amber Hill alert.

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh, JER, that was almost too good.

      Comment


      • #4
        http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...-times-article

        That's the link.

        The Humble Rule would be a good one.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by JER View Post
          In this case, it would be an Amber Hill alert.
          OMG, I didn't think of that...

          But Humbles Rule would be appropriate. It should also give some protection to those who come forward to protest so they don't get sued for speaking up.
          When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

          The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

          Comment


          • #6
            This situation has showed that USEF needs many things. A lot of people have a lot of different ideas about drugging, zero tolerance, etc. And that will take lots of discussions to decide.

            But we HAVE to have some kind of protection for those who protest anything under USEF. I can't believe that there isn't sufficient protection for those who protest.

            This is a very nasty situation, and I can only hope that the USEF leaders learn something from it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by lrp1106 View Post
              This situation has showed that USEF needs many things. A lot of people have a lot of different ideas about drugging, zero tolerance, etc. And that will take lots of discussions to decide.

              But we HAVE to have some kind of protection for those who protest anything under USEF. I can't believe that there isn't sufficient protection for those who protest.

              This is a very nasty situation, and I can only hope that the USEF leaders learn something from it.

              Forget that! I suggest somebody such as findeight along with mrhoades and others in this bb, step in with their own rule proposals. There are plenty of insanely intelligent and knowledgable people here with extensive backgrounds that surpass those of the USEF leaders in the pertinent areas.

              It is time to get off our collective asses and fix this crap now. It is time to push the USHJA/USEF etc. and to NOT accept what is given. Yes, there are very good folks there who are very busy. Now is the time for the membership to pull some of the load.

              I and others do/did this with the USEA/USEF and there have been some major changes based on fact driven rules to make the sport better.

              Reed

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                Forget that! I suggest somebody such as findeight along with mrhoades and others in this bb, step in with their own rule proposals. There are plenty of insanely intelligent and knowledgable people here with extensive backgrounds that surpass those of the USEF leaders in the pertinent areas.

                It is time to get off our collective asses and fix this crap now. It is time to push the USHJA/USEF etc. and to NOT accept what is given. Yes, there are very good folks there who are very busy. Now is the time for the membership to pull some of the load.

                I and others do/did this with the USEA/USEF and there have been some major changes based on fact driven rules to make the sport better.

                Reed
                Well said....

                How about starting with a waiver on entry blanks ... Easily added to the one already there.

                All competitors, owners, riders, trainers, and others associated with a horse competing at this event agreed to comply with the USEF's request for information regarding the horse entered here. Such requests may include but not be limited to testing, vet records, medications administered and the like. (Not well crafted but you get the idea)

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't know what the solution is, but I do know that medicating practices such as this are not just common, they are the norm. The majority of participants at big shows inject their horses with at least a few things. (From racing, to breed shows, to barrel racing, to hunter/jumper, to damn near anything where it is big business/big competition and there is a LOT at stake.)

                  EM is just the person who got caught with a big screw up. Crucifying her is convenient, but also cowardly.

                  You wanna see what's really going on? Have the USEF do an unannounced run through of every feed and tack stall on the show grounds of a BIG horse show one day. Nail down every head groom/trainer and tell them they WILL tell you exactly what each horse is getting. (Yes I'm fantasizing here, but it would require something equally dramatic....)

                  That will be one HECK of an eye opener for everyone.

                  You could execute EM by firing squad tomorrow, and it wouldn't change a damned thing. The 'machine' that is upper level horse showing will chug along just fine. Removing one part will not slow it down in the least.
                  "Friend" me !

                  http://www.facebook.com/isabeau.solace

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    While I love that I am becoming famous enough on COTH to be invited to be a game changer, could you guys PLEASE spell my name correctly? It's not like its not my screen name.

                    I personally think protections for protesters is a good idea, but if you really want to know whats going on, give the braiders immunity (and 5 years pay) and then all hell would break loose.
                    "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
                    carolprudm

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by mroades View Post
                      I personally think protections for protesters is a good idea, but if you really want to know whats going on, give the braiders immunity (and 5 years pay) and then all hell would break loose.
                      mroades for the win!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        They would all have to expatriate I believe....maybe we could turn braiding into a trend in Europe (our braids, not those sausage things!)
                        "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
                        carolprudm

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Actually...nailing EM to the wall seems to be at least shining light on just HOW bad the cokcroaches have gotten. If the USEF has pulled it's enabling head out of it's ignorant arse long enough to make public statements like admitting there was a screw up and they couldn't fix it due to their hands being tied...and that it MAY lead to policy changes...then I say a hearty thanks to the obnoxious, bombastic, self congratulating, litigation-happy EM for screwing up in SUCH a loud, grating and dumbass way. Apparently even the USEF had to respond.

                          Everyone knows it's SOP for the majority of trainers/barns/top animals to be drug/injection happy and to constantly come up with new, untestable ways to cheat their way through all of their classes. it's been known for ages, by everyone including the USEF...nudge nudge wink wink.

                          It's about time someone without the long-standing good ol' trainers club behind them...someone disliked enough by everyone to get thrown uder the bus....got caught in such a flagrant way. And THEN wasn't smart enough to shut up and pretend nothing happened. Kinda forced the USEF into daylight, against their will but it'll do.
                          You jump in the saddle,
                          Hold onto the bridle!
                          Jump in the line!
                          ...Belefonte

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by mroades View Post
                            While I love that I am becoming famous enough on COTH to be invited to be a game changer, could you guys PLEASE spell my name correctly? It's not like its not my screen name.

                            I personally think protections for protesters is a good idea, but if you really want to know whats going on, give the braiders immunity (and 5 years pay) and then all hell would break loose.
                            My apologies, mroades.

                            Reed

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just picking at you a bit Reed. Apology accepted.
                              I only wish I was a big enough player to effect some change. I have seen things that make my stomach churn, all in the pursuit of a ribbon or points, but I am a believer in therapeutic medications.
                              I am afraid the lynch mob may have unintended consequences, sort of like PETA is well intentioned, but letting lab animals loose on the highway for their "freedom", well you know.
                              "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
                              carolprudm

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by mroades View Post
                                Just picking at you a bit Reed. Apology accepted.
                                I only wish I was a big enough player to effect some change. I have seen things that make my stomach churn, all in the pursuit of a ribbon or points, but I am a believer in therapeutic medications.
                                I am afraid the lynch mob may have unintended consequences, sort of like PETA is well intentioned, but letting lab animals loose on the highway for their "freedom", well you know.
                                But this is where I disagree with you and any person who feels they are "not big enough" to effect change.

                                With the spate of horse deaths in eventing a few years ago, my trainer and I started using a radar gun and GPS watches on riders to see what the real speeds were out on cross country. What we found has resulted in a whole new way XC courses are designed internationally. What if we never tried?

                                Now I am part of the Equestrian Medical Safety Association looking at all safety gear for all disciplines. It is not time intensive but it is a way I can help ensure the integrity of the sport.

                                I agree with the judicious use of meds. I work in orthopaedics so I know the benefits. But there is more than just the drugs. There is the PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY the we must bring into the sport. The membership must step up and enforce the expectations, force the USEF/USHJA to not turn a blind eye, and must become active participants in the sport, regardless of level.

                                You don't have to change the world, just your part of it.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by mroades View Post
                                  Just picking at you a bit Reed. Apology accepted.
                                  I only wish I was a big enough player to effect some change. I have seen things that make my stomach churn, all in the pursuit of a ribbon or points, but I am a believer in therapeutic medications.
                                  I am afraid the lynch mob may have unintended consequences, sort of like PETA is well intentioned, but letting lab animals loose on the highway for their "freedom", well you know.
                                  I agree with the use of therapeutic medications. I have see the FEI zero-med rule not always be in the best interest of the horses. And at the USEF level, we are covering not just elite athletes - who should be running without any pain meds - but also 30 year old schoolmasters toting beginners around their first competitions.

                                  I agree with Reed: someone like you, in the thick of it now, in the know about the abuses, is in an excellent position to posit some rules and changes that would truly benefit the sport and the horses.

                                  To me, the way to weigh the ethics is, "Would I do this to my human child or ward?"

                                  I posted in the other thread that if we heard of a mom giving all four of her children injections of muscle relaxants, painkillers, and antihistamines before every big test at school "so they would do their best" we would be calling CPS.

                                  And yet, none of us would have any problem with giving one of those meds in response with a prescription and/or in response to a particular health issue.
                                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    RAyers...you said it...personal responsibility. My friend and I had an in depth discussion About this very topic yesterday. The problem I see goes beyond drugging. It has become the norm for (as an example) hunters to be loping around so dead quiet that they have to launch themselves over the jump once they get to the base. Change had to come from the judges. They have to start rewarding the more forward ride. We, as a community, have to teach (or learn) how to ride more than the 'push ride'... I get it, though...amateurs who foot the bills for the pros have to be able to ride, so they can win...And keep footing the bills. Will they stay with the trainer if they have to put more time in, in order to learn how to ride the Un drugged horse? I know these are generalizations. But until something in the sportsmanship of our sport changes, changing the drug policies won't make a difference. It never does. Until people stop buying ponies for unethical types like the person in the ny times article, nothing will change.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      It is so not that simple. The trainers that bring 40 (or more) to the show would have to change how they do things as well, because can I tell you, if you try to "change the way we judge" you do not get asked back by management. Or a steward that does more than just be there....you piss off the BNT they take their dollies and dishes and go elsewhere.
                                      It is just not that simple......it is now an industry and very little "sport" remains.
                                      "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
                                      carolprudm

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by mroades View Post
                                        It is so not that simple. The trainers that bring 40 (or more) to the show would have to change how they do things as well, because can I tell you, if you try to "change the way we judge" you do not get asked back by management. Or a steward that does more than just be there....you piss off the BNT they take their dollies and dishes and go elsewhere.
                                        It is just not that simple......it is now an industry and very little "sport" remains.

                                        C'mon. While you bring up good pragmatic points, at some point we have to stand up for what's right. Period. We can hide behind the BS of "it's too hard, or too complicated" but like I said, it is time for the membership to change the status quo even at the risk of losing everything.

                                        Remember, horses are a luxury and nobody would really miss them if the equestrian sports all went away. This it is up to us to keep our house in order or just let it slide into disrepair and subsequently into complete irrelevance.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X