• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New York Times article - USEF and Humble

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Pennywell Bay View Post
    I am not disputing quieting drugs in hunters, but you are blind if you don't see drugging in jumpers.
    Ditto....
    The Equine Wellness and Nutrition FB Group - Come join us!!
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/equinewellness/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by KellyS View Post
      And that's the scary part ~ what was the pony receiving that was NOT listed? I mean, the list only had the drugs on it that are considered "legal" and that list was bad enough, but it doesn't even cover the "illegal/untestable" drugs potentially being administered...

      ETA: While Mandarino claims it was Legend in the syringe, well, we know her track record for telling the truth. If it really was Legend, I'd love to see her 9 lawyers up against Bayer's corporate lawyers.
      Why should she bother with Bayer if she settled with the insurance company? Do we know if they paid out a claim on Humble? Also, since the syringe was not seized, along with whatever was in it, there would not be a way that EM could prove that Legend was administered. No evidence, no suit..in this case it cuts both ways. Nobody knows what was administered except EM and that only benefits her claim that she did nothing wrong.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by JER View Post
        Mario Deslauriers's hard-partying horse


        Have I told you lately that I loff you?

        I pretty much agree w/ you on USEF at this point BTW. I've defended them for decades, but they threw that protester under the bus and I for one don't appreciate it none!

        One thing I did want to throw out there for consideration, in terms of bringing some pressure to bear on USEF - and I don't know HOW this could be done, but I assume that it COULD (and that the NYT article wouldn't hurt) - is how about getting word to the USOC somehow that the NGB for equestrian sport is doing absolutely-effing-nothing to effect cleanup of the sport, and in view of recent decisions, said Federation has effectively rendered its protest procedure null and void?

        I hate to play this kind of hard ball, I'd far rather USEF stood up for itself and did the right thing - but if we could push USEF to the point where they believed their standing as the official NGB was affected, THEN we might see some change.
        "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JER View Post
          Yes, vineyridge, but that's due to this lawsuit. The vet was found negligent and liable for malpractice, and the case was then taken to the state agency in charge of professional licensing.

          I referred to this case earlier as I made a public records request on it. The horse's vet records are in the file, and if this horse's injection regimen is anything approaching SOP for a show hunter, h/j land is not a place of evidence-based veterinary care.

          About time somebody stepped up to the plate. Vet named is, frankly, not a surprise at all. Whatever else, owner (who has had one great and many very nice ones) should be congratulated for having the guts to openly proceed with it against a very busy and well known show vet. One there have always been some whispers about. Actually used him once for a minor procedure when horse was on the road for 3 weeks-bill was 3 times what it would have cost at home.

          IMO there is a worse problem with overmedicating and using multiple drug combinations on sore horses in any discipline then quieting them and Jumpers would be just as much, or more, likely to need a little "help" as any Hunter.
          When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

          The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by violethorse View Post
            Why should she bother with Bayer if she settled with the insurance company? Do we know if they paid out a claim on Humble? Also, since the syringe was not seized, along with whatever was in it, there would not be a way that EM could prove that Legend was administered. No evidence, no suit..in this case it cuts both ways. Nobody knows what was administered except EM and that only benefits her claim that she did nothing wrong.

            She claims the last injection she gave Humble was Legend....and then Humble dropped dead. As a horse owner who has had the vet give my horse Legend, after surgery as part of his recovery, I want to know why a seemingly healthy horse dropped dead after getting Legend. Since Elizabeth Mandarino seems so enthusiastic to bring forth lawsuits, why isn't she suing Bayer, the manufacturer of Legend??

            Is Bayer covering something up about Legend? Does the product need to be taken off the market after the sudden death of Humble after, according to Elizabeth Mandarino of Amber Hill Farm, and be investigated?? Is their product dangerous?? Will my horse drop dead just like Humble did??

            We should all be contacting Bayer and demanding answers from them regarding the allegations as put forth by Elizabeth Mandarino.

            Comment


            • Umm......have you seen the medication schedule that the pony was on?? Me thinks that Legend was the least of his problems....
              The Equine Wellness and Nutrition FB Group - Come join us!!
              https://www.facebook.com/groups/equinewellness/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Freebird! View Post
                Umm......have you seen the medication schedule that the pony was on?? Me thinks that Legend was the least of his problems....
                Freebird, I think if you read it again you'll conclude that the poster does not actually believe that an injection of Legend caused the pony's death. However, with EM saying it did, if she is correct, then that leads down some, ahem, interesting paths.
                If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                Comment


                • Originally posted by findeight View Post
                  Who needs RateMyHorsePro? Just read what EM puts up, nobody to sue on that one.
                  I agree. Everyone should read the transcript. It's more damning than anything that's been posted on any forum I continue to bang my head in sympathy for the 9 attorneys who are bleeding this woman dry.

                  Comment


                  • I will be interested to see whether this very significant article gets discussed during the GM Horsemastership Clinic that begins tomorrow. The biggest challenge is that everyone there will probably think that Ms. Mandarino is perpetually self-medicated with whatever "wasn't" in the syringe (the one they never recovered from Humble). They may easily dismiss her as a deviant. But, if they really explore the subject with the vets during the portions of the clinic that address horse care, they may get some very interesting observations/thoughts from the kids that came up through the pony and hunter ranks. Hope they broadcast that part!

                    Comment


                    • @ Findeight, since you read the transcript too, am I correct that on page 77 (or thereabouts) it says that Gabby, the groom who may or may not have been the one who actually gave the shot, is "presumed illegal," has disappeared, and has never provided an affidavit or been deposed?
                      Last edited by Jeito; Jan. 1, 2013, 08:17 PM.

                      Comment


                      • Don't suppose there is a live feed of the vet symposium on that???? They need to discuss the subject in general, even if they leave EM and her hoards of lawyers out of it. After all, one of their own just went down in a lawsuit referenced a couple opf pages ago.

                        I'd LOVE to sit in on that.
                        When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                        The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by War Admiral View Post

                          One thing I did want to throw out there for consideration, in terms of bringing some pressure to bear on USEF - and I don't know HOW this could be done, but I assume that it COULD (and that the NYT article wouldn't hurt) - is how about getting word to the USOC somehow that the NGB for equestrian sport is doing absolutely-effing-nothing to effect cleanup of the sport, and in view of recent decisions, said Federation has effectively rendered its protest procedure null and void?

                          I hate to play this kind of hard ball, I'd far rather USEF stood up for itself and did the right thing - but if we could push USEF to the point where they believed their standing as the official NGB was affected, THEN we might see some change.
                          Oh, trust me. I've already started that process. A perk of not only living where the USOC and Anti-Doping Agency are located, but having military Reserve coworkers who are full-time employees/coaches/trainers various sports within the USOC community. I don't know how far it will go, but it definitely piqued the interest of one Paralympic trainer/coach in particular.
                          "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Discobold View Post
                            @ Findeight, since you read to transcript too, am I correct that on page 77 (or thereabouts) it says that Gabby, the groom who may or may not have been the one who actually gave the shot, is "presumed illegal," has disappeared, and has never provided an affidavit or been deposed?
                            I quit after page 10 and the late necropsy complicating any toxicology findings. I have been sipping the last of the bubbly and can't follow the gibberish of hearing procedures at the moment. Besides the format is wierd.

                            Wouldn't surprise me a bit tho. That very subject was referenced either here or on my Humble Initiative thread, expecting the "help" to do the deeds then blaming them for being "illegals" and vanishing. Crap, any groom regardless of status who was directed to give a shot and had the animal drop dead would probably split too.
                            When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                            The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                            Comment


                            • EM has posted letters from her vets in New Jersey, Florida, and Juan Gamboa (NC and Classic Company's show vet) on her amber hill farm Facebook page and many other documents. In their letters to the USEF they all praise EM for her horse's care etc. Of course Gamboa spends most of the space in his letter stating that he never sold any Carolina Gold to EM. If he did, would he have stated that in a letter to the USEF? Of course not given the banning of it. Also attached to her Facebook page are letters from her landlord, a customer leasing one of her ponies, her husband, etc.
                              At the end of the day we will never know all the details..but the outcome of all this publicity is that going forward more people will be more sensitive as to who they do business with..trainers, vets, etc...and that somehow the USEF will find a way to be aggressive and severe where they can prove drug issues. Civil cases do not have the same guidelines as criminal matters but it seems as though the USEF in it's hearings wants ironclad proof (tox reports, pictures, video or an admission of guilt) that an infraction has taken place. Black and White. Their current punishment for infractions are a joke and the recent USHJA cover photo is a testament to broken oversight. Can you search for all of SS's disciplinary actions over the years on the USEF site? NO....you would have to look at every month's "for the record" pages over the years. So the actions just fade away as each month comes and goes.....washed away with the most recent turmoil.
                              Again, only EM knows what took place and to debate anything else is futile.
                              We need to get the USEF to be a real governing body with some serious teeth or see the demise of hunters..it may already be tooooo late for a new generation of youngsters whose parents read the NYT and are walking away from the child's dream of owning a pony.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by findeight View Post
                                Don't suppose there is a live feed of the vet symposium on that???? They need to discuss the subject in general, even if they leave EM and her hoards of lawyers out of it. After all, one of their own just went down in a lawsuit referenced a couple opf pages ago.

                                I'd LOVE to sit in on that.
                                Who is that vet?

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by violethorse View Post
                                  Why should she bother with Bayer if she settled with the insurance company? Do we know if they paid out a claim on Humble? Also, since the syringe was not seized, along with whatever was in it, there would not be a way that EM could prove that Legend was administered. No evidence, no suit..in this case it cuts both ways. Nobody knows what was administered except EM and that only benefits her claim that she did nothing wrong.
                                  I was being a bit facetious! Of course we know it wasn't Legend that killed Humble. But EM's claim that Legend what was in the syringe makes it sound likes she's saying Legend is the culprit.

                                  Big Pharma frowns on those types of accusations but I'm sure Bayer would figure out, as have the rest of us, that very few people are taking her claims seriously.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                                    Freebird, I think if you read it again you'll conclude that the poster does not actually believe that an injection of Legend caused the pony's death. However, with EM saying it did, if she is correct, then that leads down some, ahem, interesting paths.

                                    Indeed. I would think that Bayer may be very interested in what Elizabeth Mandarino is saying about their product.

                                    Comment


                                    • So I read the Chronicle of the Horse, is it as bad as all the big names I see there...on the cover as you said...I have loved the emergence of the Hunter Classics and Derbies...is it everyone that is drugging? I breed sport horses but I want nothing to do with risking selling drugged horses sent to be sold by trainers and fooling customers or selling to homes that use horses like that. Who is honest...I can see how you can risk legal action if you out the dishonest...is it naive to out the honest? I suppose so. How sad.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by findeight View Post

                                        Wouldn't surprise me a bit tho. That very subject was referenced either here or on my Humble Initiative thread, expecting the "help" to do the deeds then blaming them for being "illegals" and vanishing. Crap, any groom regardless of status who was directed to give a shot and had the animal drop dead would probably split too.
                                        Back in my younger days, I was a working student/groom at a nationally winning barn in that breed's equivalent of the A circuit during a similar type of reprehensible systemic abuse -that is still occurring these twenty years later.

                                        I am second-generation mexican-american. My great-grandparents were migrant farmworkers. My BS degree is in the social sciences. I'm saying that because I don't want this to come out wrong: If you really want to know what is happening at the big shows and in the big barns, take someone with you who speaks Spanish and go talk to the stable hands. They see everything and know exactly who is doing what to whom.

                                        Because the stable hands tend are sometimes here in the US without legal immigration papers, they are afraid to speak for fear of deportation. My experience was that the BNTs had their "illegals" or "Mexicans" do the actual doping/soreing/whatever, so that if it was ever exposed, the BNT could then publicly profess innocence and blame everything on the now-fired or deported "illegal."

                                        Humans are an invasive species. Thank you all for sharing your expertise.
                                        Regards,
                                        Amber
                                        PA Hi-Ly Visible [PA Hi-Noon (by Magnum Psyche) x Takara Padrona (by *Padron)]

                                        Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Carolinadreamin' View Post
                                          Indeed. I would think that Bayer may be very interested in what Elizabeth Mandarino is saying about their product.
                                          Bayer's got very, very deep pockets. I have trouble believing that if it was one of their products in the syringe that killed poor Humble, EM wouldn't have been putting that thing on dry ice, sending it off to a lab, and having it put in cold storage to provide evidence in a suit against Bayer. As lawsuit happy as she seems to be, its hard to believe she wouldn't go after such a big payday.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X