• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Equitation Rule?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Punkie View Post
    As a judge, can you also understand that there may be situations which warrant their use? I have a completely reconstructed left ankle and foot. Cadaver grafts, hardware, bones broken and reset, grooves carved into my malleolus and calcaneus...the works. I have decreased sensation and my ankle doesn't flex much beyond 100 degrees. Those stirrups make it possible for me to put enough weight in my heels to ride like anyone else. I don't agree that I should be penalized for an otherwise lovely round (great distances, good, solid equitation on a suitable mount) because of a pair of flexible stirrups that I cannot ride without. This, of course, is not the case for everyone who uses them, but most I know who have jointed irons need them for a true physiological reason.
    And if you have ever shown under me, you would know I strive to be fair!! I have already said it will not get a low score automatically (and I have sat with some who will do that) I have to use SOMETHING as a tiebreaker. For me that can be an element of breaking a tie.
    One of the things the powers that be stress in the judges clinics is to HAVE AN OPINION. I shared mine with you, which frankly most judges will not do. And how on earth am I supposed to know which rider has medical issues and which ones are just being trendy"? If you ride the best under me, you will win, black bendy or whatever stirrups. But it does not meanI have to like them!!
    "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
    carolprudm

    Comment


    • #62
      I know one judge that used to note which riders carried crops and he used that as a tiebreaker. If I was showing in front of that judge and was riding a horse in a situation where I felt that the crop wasn't necessary, I didn't carry one. I suppose that this gave an advantage to people on the more forward, braver horses?
      The Evil Chem Prof

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Peggy View Post
        I know one judge that used to note which riders carried crops and he used that as a tiebreaker. If I was showing in front of that judge and was riding a horse in a situation where I felt that the crop wasn't necessary, I didn't carry one. I suppose that this gave an advantage to people on the more forward, braver horses?
        Actually, it gave an advantage to people who knew that judge's preferences.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by MHM View Post
          Actually, it gave an advantage to people who knew that judge's preferences.
          Yup. That was back in the day when I kept a card file on judges. I had a bit of an advantage there as my mom was the horse show manager/back gate person/announcer/show office at various times and would give me tips.
          The Evil Chem Prof

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by mroades View Post
            You guys are so ridiculous. I happen to be a traditionalist. It certainly doesnt change the placings if you ride the best, but really, one does have to have preferences, or we can all just get our participation certificates that we all tied because we don't want to offend anyone, and go home!
            So how about the plastic fillis style stirrups? Not jointed, but still black.

            Comment


            • #66
              More to the point, does anyone know if the rule change actually was passed at the convention? If not, the whole discussion is moot.

              Comment


              • #67
                Just looked at the proposed rule change & saw the committee submitted a revision- so instead of automatic elimination it gives the judge discretion to use as elimination or factor into scoring. Good to see some degree of common sense applied in drafting. Hopefully judges will be reasonable in application!

                http://www.usef.org/documents/ruleChanges/174-12.pdf

                Comment


                • #68
                  If you manage to lose a stirrup, and NOT have anything else compromised, to the point where the judge misses the error all together, kudos to you for good riding and pulling one over on them. Stirrup type should be irrevelant.
                  There's coffee in that nebula.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Did anyone figure out if its all black stirrups they are judging down against/outlawing or any stirrup with black on it? Example I have a brand SIMILIAR to these but with black instead of white/grey on the sides http://www.statelinetack.com/item/md...rrups/E003052/

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by MHM View Post
                      More to the point, does anyone know if the rule change actually was passed at the convention? If not, the whole discussion is moot.
                      I was wondering the same thing. Anyone?
                      The Evil Chem Prof

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        So I purchased these finally after this thread
                        http://www.horseloverz.com/Irons/280...num---475.html
                        I had the black ones but I like theses better. Just a little more weight and same great wide track.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          I have something like these and I like them because I like to drop my irons for flatwork and they don't hit me in the leg. I did have a clinician comment on them (Jeff Cook)- he noticed they were similar to black ones but at least not black. He did pick up on the fact that there were unconventional.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            So was it determined that is was the COLOR or the MATERIAL that is the issue? I will gladly spray my charcoal "irons" so they look more traditional, they are composite but not flexible. As they were a very well thought out present from DH back before he was my DH, and was in fact a Xmas present for our first Xmas, I'd rather not hurt his feelings by removing them. Plus I like the way they ride.
                            COTH's official mini-donk enabler

                            "I am all for reaching out, but in some situations it needs to be done with a rolled up news paper." Alagirl

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by TheJenners View Post
                              So was it determined that is was the COLOR or the MATERIAL that is the issue?
                              The issue is color. The black blends in too much with the boot or horse coat. The judges want to be able to clearly see from across the ring the placement of the stirrup on the foot or near the foot when stirrups are dropped.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                i concur that the color of the "newfangled" stirrups would certainly make them harder to judge. i never used them because i found them somehow de-stablizing to my base. as for the comments regarding gloves providing the same "cover" i recall somewhere in the deep recesses of my ancient brain that katie monahan often rode in string backed gloves. of course KMP has hands like butter. i always made certain my students with busy hands never had a big stripe of white cuff showing .

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  I would agree with the rule of non-black stirrups but I think using the material of the stirrup as a tie-breaker is ridiculous. I use bendy stirrups for bad knees not because it's "easier." In fact I would argue it's harder to use them because you have to work harder to keep your calf in a better position (not necessarily your heel). Should we eliminate other new-fangled ideas like helmets with chin straps or gel wither pads because the aren't "old fashioned?" Times change, sometimes for the better...

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by Papyruse View Post
                                    I would agree with the rule of non-black stirrups but I think using the material of the stirrup as a tie-breaker is ridiculous. I use bendy stirrups for bad knees not because it's "easier." In fact I would argue it's harder to use them because you have to work harder to keep your calf in a better position (not necessarily your heel). Should we eliminate other new-fangled ideas like helmets with chin straps or gel wither pads because the aren't "old fashioned?" Times change, sometimes for the better...
                                    the rule has nothing to do with the material, but the COLOR! The exact same model for many of the black ones come in silver and it was stated at the convention that people could comply with the rule by spray painting their black ones.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Alot of the top eq riders do not use jointed stirrups...

                                      And on the all black Royal irons, I could see the point about the black making it hard to see the postion of the stirrup, but no so much that I think they should be disallowed.

                                      I would bet that Royal will come up with a lighter colored model if this rule does take effect. Just as there are grey jointed stirrups on the market...

                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X