• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Equitation Rule?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    What exactly do the flexible stirrups do?
    Come to the dark side, we have cookies

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by mroades View Post
      As a judge I very much dislike them. We didnt have them when I was showing in the equ and we all managed.
      Really now, perhaps you would also advocate turning back the clock on other technical advances such as real safety helmets as opposed to the decorative velvet ones worn back in your day or heavy wool coats, boots that don't fit like a glove, etc.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #43
        Originally posted by mroades View Post
        As a judge I very much dislike them. We didnt have them when I was showing in the equ and we all managed.
        Well yes I could manage, but I probably wouldn't be able to walk after. Or make it around the course without my knee giving out, which I'm sure you don't want to see happen. Before my knee injury happened I rode in fillis irons. But it is simply not possible anymore, and as a young rider I would like to still be walking for a long time without having a knee replacement at 30.

        Comment


        • #44
          You guys are so ridiculous. I happen to be a traditionalist. It certainly doesnt change the placings if you ride the best, but really, one does have to have preferences, or we can all just get our participation certificates that we all tied because we don't want to offend anyone, and go home!

          If you need jointed stirrups by all means use them, I do not have to like them! And I certainly don't support making it a rule either, I was just handing over my opinion, which many judges do not do.

          It is almost not worth posting on here anymore....sheesh
          "You can't really debate with someone who has a prescient invisible friend"
          carolprudm

          Comment


          • #45
            My trainer was one of the ones who pushed for this... she did specifically because of the color (although she has made it abundantly clear to those of us who ride with her that she does not care for the cheese grater stirrups!) and the fact that it makes seeing the position of the stirrup on the foot more difficult.
            http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
            Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by mroades View Post
              If you need jointed stirrups by all means use them, I do not have to like them! And I certainly don't support making it a rule either, I was just handing over my opinion, which many judges do not do.
              I don't like them either, so don't worry—you're not alone. I don't see how it's possible to have a solid base of support in them, and they exacerbate my ankle pain much more than they relieve it.

              I do very much like these though: http://www.smartpakequine.com/mdc-hu...up-10325p.aspx

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Tha Ridge View Post
                I don't like them either, so don't worry—you're not alone. I don't see how it's possible to have a solid base of support in them, and they exacerbate my ankle pain much more than they relieve it.

                I do very much like these though: http://www.smartpakequine.com/mdc-hu...up-10325p.aspx
                I feel the same way about jointed stirrups for my ankle. I rode in them for years and years and my ankle killed me after riding. Why it took me so long to put two and two together, I have no idea. I switched to the MDC hunter stirrups a few months ago and my ankle feels so much better. Still gets a little sore after a long ride but it no longer keeps me up at night.

                Comment


                • #48
                  If judges want to be able to see the rider's foot better, it follows they might also want to see the riders' hands too. I expect to see a call for white or at least brown gloves so judges can see the excess movement of the riders' hands.
                  ~Kryswyn~ Always look on the bright side of life, de doo, de doo de doo de doo
                  Check out my Kryswyn JRTs on Facebook

                  "Life is merrier with a terrier!"

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by supershorty628 View Post
                    (although she has made it abundantly clear to those of us who ride with her that she does not care for the cheese grater stirrups!)
                    Just out of curiosity, why no on the cheese graters?
                    Originally posted by rustbreeches
                    [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Kryswyn View Post
                      If judges want to be able to see the rider's foot better, it follows they might also want to see the riders' hands too. I expect to see a call for white or at least brown gloves so judges can see the excess movement of the riders' hands.
                      It's easy to see the hands with or without gloves. And the more they move, the easier they are to see.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        IMHO it's easier to see black gloved hands than black boots in black stirrups, especially against a dark horse. So, I can see the reason for the rule. I figure the black bendy stirrup company has almost a year to come up with an alternative if the rule passes.
                        The Evil Chem Prof

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Peggy View Post
                          IMHO it's easier to see black gloved hands than black boots in black stirrups, especially against a dark horse. So, I can see the reason for the rule. I figure the black bendy stirrup company has almost a year to come up with an alternative if the rule passes.
                          I believe there are even bendy stirrups with grey "tubing" on the side. Not sure if they are the 4-way ones like Sprenger, but I see many ppl with them.

                          I think the issue is with those of us who have composite stirrups. I am not complaining; I understand where they are coming from (black on black), but I will have to change my stirrups for the one eq class I do.

                          ETA: I have heard these are a great alternative to the RR composite stirrups. They are made of aluminum and have a wide stirrup bed (they are light and have a wide base of support), and also come with regular stirrup pads to change out if you don't like the cheese graters. I won't give up my RR for jumpers, but I might get these to swap out for eq: http://www.onestopequineshop.com/Equ...s_p_11004.html
                          *It says that these weigh 16oz, only 6oz more than the RR composite
                          Originally posted by rustbreeches
                          [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by jlphilli View Post
                            Just out of curiosity, why no on the cheese graters?
                            She thinks you shouldn't need them if you have a proper leg and foot position. She's not one of those people who says you can't use tack just because she doesn't like it, but she's not a fan of them. I know I've used them before and actually preferred my plain Filis irons (although I have special pads on them because I wear down the rubber ones in about a month).

                            She's also not a fan of the bright blue Jin stirrups that I am coveting
                            http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                            Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by supershorty628 View Post
                              She's also not a fan of the bright blue Jin stirrups that I am coveting
                              I've seen a link in the past to stirrup irons with a very pretty floral pattern on them. They are cute, and no doubt coveted by many people, but I hate to think of the reaction they would get from the more "traditional" judges. Or from GM.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by supershorty628 View Post
                                She thinks you shouldn't need them if you have a proper leg and foot position.
                                I see--that's what I had thought. The main reason I "can't live without them" is because they have saved by butt (or should I say my foot?) so many times from the rush into the show ring with a slick or wet boot bottom! lol
                                Originally posted by rustbreeches
                                [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by PaintedHunter View Post
                                  I'm an adult using these, and I freaking love them. I have an autoimmune disease, and my joint pain while riding has been greatly lessened since I started using these.
                                  Just curious but how would the non bendy black stirrups in question help with joint pain?
                                  I've used the bendy ones for about 10 years. Without them I can't ride for more than 10 minutes. Bad ankle fracture, pins, plates, screws.
                                  The bendy stirrups are not the ones being targeted. It's the black composite ones.
                                  Link to rule change proposal.

                                  http://www.usef.org/documents/ruleChanges/174-12.pdf

                                  And yeah, it has to be voted on, it hasn't passed yet.
                                  Fan of Sea Accounts

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by PINE TREE FARM SC View Post
                                    Just curious but how would the non bendy black stirrups in question help with joint pain?
                                    The non-bendy black stirrups (the Royal Riders) have a wider tread. That makes a huge difference for me, both because of a Morton's neuroma in my left foot and a ton of past ankle trauma. Luckily, companies like MDC make a traditional stainless version. As I said above, the jointed bendy stirrups wreak havoc on my ankles and knees.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      I would say the rule change as presented could use clarification - would bendy stirrups with black rubber on the sides count? What about black fillis pads?
                                      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by Tha Ridge View Post
                                        The non-bendy black stirrups (the Royal Riders) have a wider tread. That makes a huge difference for me, both because of a Morton's neuroma in my left foot and a ton of past ankle trauma. Luckily, companies like MDC make a traditional stainless version. As I said above, the jointed bendy stirrups wreak havoc on my ankles and knees.



                                        And I'm sure the lighter material helps too - shock absorption or some such. But the wider tread is most definitely helpful.
                                        Blog chronicling our new eventing adventures: Riding With Scissors

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by mroades View Post
                                          As a judge I very much dislike them. We didnt have them when I was showing in the equ and we all managed.
                                          As a judge, can you also understand that there may be situations which warrant their use? I have a completely reconstructed left ankle and foot. Cadaver grafts, hardware, bones broken and reset, grooves carved into my malleolus and calcaneus...the works. I have decreased sensation and my ankle doesn't flex much beyond 100 degrees. Those stirrups make it possible for me to put enough weight in my heels to ride like anyone else. I don't agree that I should be penalized for an otherwise lovely round (great distances, good, solid equitation on a suitable mount) because of a pair of flexible stirrups that I cannot ride without. This, of course, is not the case for everyone who uses them, but most I know who have jointed irons need them for a true physiological reason.
                                          Nine out of ten times, you'll get it wrong...but it's that tenth time that you get it right that makes all the difference.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X