• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USHJA incoming President Babick - Moroney

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by JustJump View Post
    So what about this? An email from USHJA saying the deadline for nominations was 9/15?

    http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...-deadline-9-15

    Does anyone else have a copy of this email? I can't find one in my old mail. But I do remember getting it.

    How is it that additional names were accepted?
    That is an excellent observation. Perhaps he was nominated as a farewell gesture, or it could be that the incumbent doesn't have to be nominated?

    Comment


    • #42
      So who wants to call up and ask how his name was added after the fact, in the middle of the night?

      Comment


      • #43
        http://www.ushja.org/content/news/pr.aspx?id=908

        Just Jump, is this what you are looking for? It was under the news/media section of the website.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by JustJump View Post
          So who wants to call up and ask how his name was added after the fact, in the middle of the night?
          Here is the explanation from the USHJA website http://www.ushja.org/content/news/pr.aspx?id=924

          Comment


          • #45
            Speaks volumes that the only response I got to my email to all members of the board came from Mary. Class act all the way!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Tackpud View Post
              Speaks volumes that the only response I got to my email to all members of the board came from Mary. Class act all the way!
              That was my experience as well.
              **********
              We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
              -PaulaEdwina

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Tackpud View Post
                Speaks volumes that the only response I got to my email to all members of the board came from Mary. Class act all the way!

                Same here. Really, a very definite eye-opener. I am pretty disappointed. I guess I won't be forking over for a USHJA membership unless she wins.
                Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                Comment


                • #48
                  I was shocked when I read that Moroney was back in the race, not only is it bad form of him to divide the USHJA like that but its not in the best interest of the sport. Based on his last two terms, who in their right mind would want him back? Mary Babick is a much better choice IMO.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Tackpud View Post
                    Speaks volumes that the only response I got to my email to all members of the board came from Mary. Class act all the way!
                    I just sent off an email to all the addresses you supplied, including Shelby French, and received an immediate "thanks for the imput" from Streett Moore.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by BAC View Post
                      I just sent off an email to all the addresses you supplied, including Shelby French, and received an immediate "thanks for the imput" from Streett Moore.
                      Great to hear this. Maybe all these emails are working and the board is realizing they'd better listen and answer the members! I am still waiting for any response from the other members myself.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Just wanted to update that I got a similar "thanks for your input" message from Streett Moore as well.
                        **********
                        We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
                        -PaulaEdwina

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Do you (collectively) think it might be helpful to include a link to this thread in emails to the USHJA board, so they can see which way the wind is blowing?

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Just received a reply from Bob Bell and Susan Harding, both talking about the need to look forward. Fingers crossed...

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Wondering when we will know the outcome of this and curious who is supporting BM??

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by Ponytoes View Post
                                Wondering when we will know the outcome of this and curious who is supporting BM??
                                The vote is Dec.4th.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #56
                                  I received many positive responses from the Board. Regardless of which direction you lean, letting your voice known to the Board will certainly assist them in their decisions.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Tackpud View Post
                                    Speaks volumes that the only response I got to my email to all members of the board came from Mary. Class act all the way!
                                    I got replies from Mary and from Susan Harding.
                                    friend of bar.ka

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      I'm starting to get emails from others.
                                      Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by MyssMyst View Post
                                        I'm starting to get emails from others.
                                        I'm sure a lot of the members did not reply immediately due to the fact that they may have felt they were unable to respond in a way that they wanted (example, voicing their personal opinions or accidentally speaking for the entire Board). As many people are now getting responses, it looks like someone may have given them the OK to respond to emails.
                                        I know Bell is looking forward to "a new era", and I hope others are as well. If we can get a lot of people to send emails that are heartfelt and talk about why we want Babick, I do believe we will make a change

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          To be fair, the day or two before Thanksgiving may not be the prime time for people to be checking and responding to their USHJA email.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X