• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

When is it OK for Horse Show Owners to Compete at Their Own Shows

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • When is it OK for Horse Show Owners to Compete at Their Own Shows

    When is it ok for a horse show owner to compete in his/her own shows? When is it ok for them to show their international horses in classes that are FAR lower than international or even grand prix level?
    Is it ok for them to show as long as the money goes back to the show? Or only if they show hors concours?
    Last edited by The Alternate; Jan. 10, 2014, 08:32 PM.

  • #2
    Would you have an issue with it if he didn't own the horse show but still showed his 1.60m horse in the 1.20m? You don't know why he did it.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
    Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

    Comment


    • #3
      I have an inkling that I may know who this is...as far as I know he was having some issues with said horse and it was barely going around the 1.20s confidently at the last show I saw it at.

      Could be way off here as I don't know for sure, but there's only a few Canadian pros that fit that bill...

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        I also asked WHEN it was ok for a horse show owner to compete at one of his own shows, this includes ANY showing of ANY horse at ANY level competing by owner at owner shows.
        Last edited by The Alternate; Jan. 10, 2014, 08:32 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Anytime they care to, within the rules.

          Comment


          • #6
            I read it as him not competing in the GPs at the same show that he took said horse in the 1.20s.

            Whether or not it's the same professional, I know of a pro from Canada that was on the Canadian team that does have a 1.60 horse that showed at the International level that either injured itself last year or has had some confidence issues. I think in this instance, it's okay.

            Also, if said hunter derby was an open class, I also don't have an issue. I have competed against many a GP horse in many hunter derbies. The last show I went to was chock full of people straight out of the high level jumpers trying their hand at a derby. IF there was a bigger derby offered (height-wise), then yes, he should have done that. If not, I say fair game.

            As per the "at your own show" thing...meh. Doesn't really bug me too much. You still have to jump all the fences and leave them all up. You don't have THAT much of an advantage just because you're on home turf.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not quite as opposed to the show owner appearing in the jumper ring as I am in the hunters, but almost so; in the hunters, to compete in a subjective discipline in front of the judge that you are paying, is just unseemly. And even in the jumpers; to the extent the show owner places in a class, the competitor who finished just out of the ribbons thinks "he took my spot; I paid to come here and enter the class, I rented a stall, I paid administrative fees to that guy, and he got a ribbon?". Bad for business, if you ask me. It's not about whether he's got an advantage; it's about courtesy. If you are putting the show on, that's your job for the day. Let your "customers" have their day.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The Alternate View Post
                Again, read the questions. I also said he competed in the grand prix's at his shows with said horse. I also asked WHEN it was ok for a horse show owner to compete at one of his own shows, this includes ANY showing of ANY horse at ANY level competing by owner at owner shows.
                Not that I think you deserve a response due to this post (rude, much?) I don't have a problem with an owner of the shows competing in any classes the qualify to compete in.

                I also don't have a problem with ANYONE competing in classes lower than their "normal" classes as long as they qualify. I have no idea what might be going on with the rider or the horse or even the showing schedule that might having them making that decision. Sounds like sour grapes from the complainers to me.
                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                Comment


                • #9
                  I do not think there are any rules against it, so I would likely be grateful that they are holding the show as they are a lot of work.

                  I could see it being a bit of a thrill to get to compete against a high level horse/rider...students can say they competed against so and so!
                  Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As long as he plays by the rules of the class, I don't really see a problem with it. If you don't like it, don't compete at his shows. As others have mentioned, it's possible his GP horse was coming back from an injury, and putting the money back into the show is not the same as pocketing it. I can see how someone might see this as a ethically gray area, but as long as it was an open class, it was fair game. As for people complaining that he ribboned, that seems a bit crybabyish to me. If you don't win a class, you should take that as an opportunity to improve your riding skill so you can win decisively in the future, not look for excuses as to why the other rider unfairly beat you.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As long as no rules are being broken, I see no problem with it. It's not like he's also judging the class.
                      Last edited by AdrenalineJunky; Oct. 10, 2012, 12:34 AM. Reason: Spelling fail

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by MHM View Post
                        Anytime they care to, within the rules.
                        This.

                        Really, how is it any different in the grand scheme of things than the trainer running the show being at the gate while their people compete? You could say that the judge sees the rider is riding for the person who owns the place.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I too have an inkling as to who this is. I guess this is the reason we have Jr/Am classes. Assuming your are either or….it shouldn't affect you that much. Apart from the Hunter Derby idea…which in a case of its own is judged(we can pick on the judges in another thread!) I get the feeling that the big issue to you is the fact that he is a CET rider, with his CET horse competing in a 120cm. To which I say, he is probably in this division for a good reason (lack of time spent in saddle because she/he organizes these great shows ) and should look to other things to occupy your time.

                          Sure you can find issue if secretly at night he is taking his horse out and schooling the jumps or looking at the course maps (oh no!). But really not going to happen. I also know of a few additional show organizers who show at their own venues, and it hasn't caused any friction. Its unfortunate to see you so disgruntled... as great show organizers (who understand what its like to be a rider) are really few and far between!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm inclined to disagree with you just because you were inexcusably rude for no reason. People frequently misread posts and ask dumb questions, and this was NOT one of those times.

                            I think that you should be welcome to ride in any jumper class you qualify for, and that people who question why you are dropping your horse in a lower division should MTOB. I, personally, would not compete in a subjective competition that I was running, but I would have to see the size and scope of the show to comment on someone else's integrity. If it was a big old 5 ring circus, I find that more acceptable than a little local show, because the quality of the competition would be much higher and I believe the judges would be more secure in their ability to score fairly. I still don't think it's a great idea.

                            I just remembered as I was typing that I once competed in an extremely small breed show on someone's farm, whose children were in nearly every class. If anything, I placed higher than I should have that weekend and saw no favoritism whatsoever, but that was just my one experience.
                            Holy crap, how does Darwin keep missing you? ~Lauruffian

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by The Alternate View Post
                              What does everyone think of situations like this? When is it ok for a horse show owner to compete in his/her own shows? When is it ok for them to show their international horses in classes that are FAR lower than international or even grand prix level?
                              Is it ok for them to show as long as the money goes back to the show? Or only if they show hors concours?
                              I can think of a couple of small A shows near me that may not be "owned" by the resident trainer, but for sure many of his horses/riders compete in it. The only advantage I see is that once they are done they get to go home...which is a leisurely walk across the parking lot I don't have a problem with the fact that they live there and show there. I can see why you may think there is a potential conflict of interest, but honestly there is opportunity for conflict of interest no matter where the show is held.

                              And as far as doing a lower level class....who knows why he is doing it. There could be a very good reason that you are not privy to regarding his horse's current capabilities.

                              Now me...I can't be bothered to stress over that type of scenario too much...I have my own issues to worry about when showing so I don't usually pay these things much mind

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                So long as the horse and/or rider are eligible for the class, I see no problem whatsoever with this. Jumpers is totally subjective. The fastest horse with the fewest faults wins. And in hunters, it would be the JUDGE who was being unfair by allowing the show operator to win. Most judges are more ethical than this.

                                I have shown at quite a few horse show facilities (everything from C to A rated and local shows, FYI) where the farm owner competes in the show, sometimes on his/her own horses and sometimes on clients' horses. The farm owner/show operator always placed fairly according to his/her round. This happens all the time as far as I can tell and it never even occurred to me that it was unfair for the show operator to compete.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by The Alternate View Post
                                  Again, read the questions. I also said he competed in the grand prix's at his shows with said horse. I also asked WHEN it was ok for a horse show owner to compete at one of his own shows, this includes ANY showing of ANY horse at ANY level competing by owner at owner shows.
                                  I'm ignoring the main part of your question because, frankly, you've gotten your answer from plenty of other people.

                                  I still don't get the issue with said rider doing the GP and the 1.20m at the same show on the same horse. It's probably a warm up class for him. Or it's a confidence booster for the horse. Either way, it's jumpers, so whether he owns the show or not does not matter. You sound bitter... did he beat you?

                                  RugBug, I showed my mare in a class of the low junior/amateurs at Ox Ridge last year because she got a little freaked by the footing in the big classes (and there weren't any open classes left in the schedule), and you should have heard the stink that some people kicked up! I didn't even win, I just placed well enough to cover my entry fee, but you would have thought I was taking lollipops from children with some of the nasty remarks I got.
                                  http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                                  Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by goodlife View Post
                                    I read it as him not competing in the GPs at the same show that he took said horse in the 1.20s.

                                    Whether or not it's the same professional, I know of a pro from Canada that was on the Canadian team that does have a 1.60 horse that showed at the International level that either injured itself last year or has had some confidence issues. I think in this instance, it's okay.

                                    Also, if said hunter derby was an open class, I also don't have an issue. I have competed against many a GP horse in many hunter derbies. The last show I went to was chock full of people straight out of the high level jumpers trying their hand at a derby. IF there was a bigger derby offered (height-wise), then yes, he should have done that. If not, I say fair game.

                                    As per the "at your own show" thing...meh. Doesn't really bug me too much. You still have to jump all the fences and leave them all up. You don't have THAT much of an advantage just because you're on home turf.
                                    I totally agree with this, and also have an inkling of who it is! If the hunter derby is the one I'm thinking of he wasn't the only one in the class with a 1.20 (and bigger) horse! (so why just pick on this rider). Everything was to spec, it's an open class........ie: ANYONE can ride in it if they wish!

                                    As for the Grand Prix...depends on the height! Remember you can go UP 2 levels and down 1 at a show! (although I'm thinking it was at a different show)
                                    Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don't Do It!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Most people are unhappy with the show owner/manager (or whatever the name) openly entertaining judges and then showing in judged classes but otherwise what is the issue?

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Even 1.60m horses need a break every once in awhile. Fortunately, this is allowed within the rules.

                                        Plenty of GP jumpers would flail in a Hunter Derby. Being able to jump big sticks does not automatically mean they will be a hands down winner in a 4' Derby.

                                        Perhaps think less of the human and more of the horse. Being resigned to jump 1.40m-1.60m for the rest of his career, just because he was once successful at it, is kind of sad.
                                        EHJ | FB | #140 | watch | #insta

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X