• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Lillie Keenan No Stirrups Question

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lillie Keenan No Stirrups Question

    There's a photo here of Lillie Keenan going over a big jump with no stirrups, saying it was for the "test." I assume she did an entire course like that? Did her competitors also have to go stirrup-less?

    I don't know much about that level of showing; can someone explain the "test" to me?

    I am mightily impressed!
    I realize that I'm generalizing here, but as is often the case when I generalize, I don't care. ~ Dave Barry

  • #2
    She and Victoria Colvin were within two points of each other at the conclusion of the second round. The class requires a test in this situation so both were asked to remove their stirrups and enter the ring to test. For the first and second round she had stirrups (and rode beautifully, WOW)

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Cool! Does a showdown like that always end in a no-stirrups round? Or are there other things the judges can ask for to determine first and second?

      Edit: Is there a video of her ride somewhere? I would like to watch and drool.
      I realize that I'm generalizing here, but as is often the case when I generalize, I don't care. ~ Dave Barry

      Comment


      • #4
        Heck I wanna see the picture!
        COTH's official mini-donk enabler

        "I am all for reaching out, but in some situations it needs to be done with a rolled up news paper." Alagirl

        Comment


        • #5
          For some equitation classes, the judge must call back a certain number of competitors for further testing, usually the top four riders. All the riders who come back are asked to perform the same course, which is comprised of tests from a list of 19 options in the rule book. The rule is EQ 114.

          Comment


          • #6
            There are other things they can do in the testing round aside from no stirrups. Another common one is switching horses.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by knh39 View Post
              Another common one is switching horses.
              I wouldn't say that's a "common" test. It's pretty rare to see it used anywhere other than a finals situation.

              Comment


              • #8
                It can also be a combination of multiple tests from 1-19 in the rulebook. You often see things like this: "Canter directly from the line to fence 5, counter-canter fence 2, trot fence 9, hand gallop fence 10, return to the lineup in the sitting trot."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by joiedevie99 View Post
                  It can also be a combination of multiple tests from 1-19 in the rulebook. You often see things like this: "Canter directly from the line to fence 5, counter-canter fence 2, trot fence 9, hand gallop fence 10, return to the lineup in the sitting trot."
                  That is pretty simmilar to what Lillie and Victoria had to do - except without stirrups! I saw both go and they were really really good - Lillie was just a bit smoother. I was pretty impressed at how little their positions changed riding the course without stirrups.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TheJenners View Post
                    Heck I wanna see the picture!
                    It is currently one of the rotating ones just to the right of post 1.---->>>
                    We don't get less brave; we get a bigger sense of self-preservation........

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Janeway View Post
                      I was pretty impressed at how little their positions changed riding the course without stirrups.
                      Safe to say those kids practice a bit.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Jenners - the photo should be directly to your right at the top of the page here. Otherwise, here's the link,.


                        http://www.chronofhorse.com/photos_v...id=39057#39091
                        I realize that I'm generalizing here, but as is often the case when I generalize, I don't care. ~ Dave Barry

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Again, if anyone can link to a video, that would be great!
                          I realize that I'm generalizing here, but as is often the case when I generalize, I don't care. ~ Dave Barry

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I looked at all the photos and was considerably surprised at how many of the competitors never really released over jumps. I'm not talking about a following hand; I'm talking about a death grip on the head. It may look like a crest release, but there is really NO release.

                            But I do admit I have no idea what is considered good equitation these days.
                            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                            Thread killer Extraordinaire

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                              I looked at all the photos and was considerably surprised at how many of the competitors never really released over jumps. I'm not talking about a following hand; I'm talking about a death grip on the head. It may look like a crest release, but there is really NO release.

                              But I do admit I have no idea what is considered good equitation these days.
                              "Death grip" is quite dramatic as far as I'm concerned - and I watched the entire class. I did not see one horse who looked the least bit unhappy about the rider on its back.

                              These poor kids are damned if they do and damned if they don't. They give a generous release on their big-jumping hunters and get slammed for it, they give a more conservative release on their flat-jumping equitation horses and get slammed for it.

                              I was impressed with both Lillie Keenan and Victoria Colvin for their performances in the test. Apparently the judges were too, because if I remember correctly, their scores were a single point (or maybe less) apart. They are a real pleasure to watch. I wish I had a fraction of their talent.

                              Vineyridge, I'm curious: in which decade did you ride at the level that the kids in the class to which you are referring are riding, and do you have videos you could post so that we can all see how it SHOULD be done? Think about it - you could be the one who can save kids like Lillie Keenan and Victoria Colvin from ruining the world with their horrible riding. You'll be a HERO!!!!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by ynl063w View Post
                                Vineyridge, I'm curious: in which decade did you ride at the level that the kids in the class to which you are referring are riding, and do you have videos you could post so that we can all see how it SHOULD be done? Think about it - you could be the one who can save kids like Lillie Keenan and Victoria Colvin from ruining the world with their horrible riding. You'll be a HERO!!!!
                                Hostility, much? I didn't take her comment as terribly disparaging, just passing commentary. I do agree that some of the releases pictured are hardly releases, but those such as Lillie released fairly, if conservatively.

                                Anyway, I think both Lillie's and Victoria's rounds were gorgeous. I would love to be able to look that good going around a course stirrupless.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
                                  Hostility, much? I didn't take her comment as terribly disparaging, just passing commentary. I do agree that some of the releases pictured are hardly releases, but those such as Lillie released fairly, if conservatively.

                                  Anyway, I think both Lillie's and Victoria's rounds were gorgeous. I would love to be able to look that good going around a course stirrupless.
                                  No, I'm not hostile; I just get so tired of the four billion threads/week about how bad hunter/equitation riders are today, when they all come from people who aren't able to provide evidence that they are doing/have ever done things the "right" way. If someone thinks those at the top of the discipline are doing everything wrong, that's fine, but that person should be prepared to provide evidence that he/she is in fact qualified to judge those at the top today, and can show all of us the RIGHT way to do it. Otherwise, why bother posting here?

                                  I do realize that there is a lot to be improved upon, but I also understand that I am not a professional, I do not ride at the top level of the sport (and never will), and therefore I am not qualified to berate those who are in fact winning at the top levels for their shortcomings, whatever those might be. I prefer to watch those who ride better than I do and find things to learn from them.

                                  I would love it if one of the resident dinosaurs on this forum would actually post videos of the perfect old days so we can all see what perfection looks like. Because, according to the dinosaurs here, we will never see it in person.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by MHM View Post
                                    Safe to say those kids practice a bit.
                                    For sure! I saw a post on Facebook from Lillie that said something along the lines of "you know it's finals season when you're black and blue from riding without stirrups"!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by ynl063w View Post
                                      No, I'm not hostile; I just get so tired of the four billion threads/week about how bad hunter/equitation riders are today, when they all come from people who aren't able to provide evidence that they are doing/have ever done things the "right" way. If someone thinks those at the top of the discipline are doing everything wrong, that's fine, but that person should be prepared to provide evidence that he/she is in fact qualified to judge those at the top today, and can show all of us the RIGHT way to do it. Otherwise, why bother posting here?

                                      I do realize that there is a lot to be improved upon, but I also understand that I am not a professional, I do not ride at the top level of the sport (and never will), and therefore I am not qualified to berate those who are in fact winning at the top levels for their shortcomings, whatever those might be. I prefer to watch those who ride better than I do and find things to learn from them.

                                      I would love it if one of the resident dinosaurs on this forum would actually post videos of the perfect old days so we can all see what perfection looks like. Because, according to the dinosaurs here, we will never see it in person.
                                      Ahhhhh the good ole days: Where the jumps were solid and the horses/riders fearless.


                                      http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...g?t=1274327325
                                      "Common sense is so rare nowadays, it should be classified as a super power."-Craig Bear Laubscher

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Nikki^ View Post
                                        Ahhhhh the good ole days: Where the jumps were solid and the horses/riders fearless.


                                        http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...g?t=1274327325
                                        This is certainly pretty but I asked for videos. Still pictures just don't tell the whole story, regardless of the decade.

                                        Edited to add: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I also don't think the picture linked above is of someone who regularly posts here complaining about how awful hunters/hunter riders/equitation riders are today, which was the point of my last two posts here.
                                        Last edited by ynl063w; Oct. 2, 2012, 10:17 PM. Reason: ETA: added text

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X