• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Romney's Horse

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Romney's Horse

    So the Romneys are now called selfish for keeping a horse?

    And employing a groom with a family to support.
    And paying for feed that’s sold by someone with a family to support
    and transported in trucks by someone with a family to support
    and manufactured in a factory by people with families to support
    from stuff that’s grown by farmers with families to support.
    And having a barn built by construction workers with families to support
    with materials trucked by drivers with families to support
    from factories with workers with families to support.

    Sounds to me like that one horse has done more to put Americans to work than the horse’s ass in the White House
    Aefvue Farm Ft.Lauderdale

  • #2
    ...
    The Little Red Mare: French Curve

    and my non-horse blog: oh, rebecca!

    Comment


    • #3
      My husband made the same comment the other day in relation to our horses. No mention of tack companies, the man who delivers shavings, the chiropractor and vet... the list goes on and on!

      Comment


      • #4
        I think the Romneys are being called selfish for declaring a $77,000 "business loss" for their horse on their 2010 taxes, and then talking about their horse like it's Ann Romney's therapy animal whenever someone asks him about it.

        Has anyone here declared a near six-figure business loss on their horse recently?
        Here today, gone tomorrow...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by FrenchFrytheEqHorse View Post
          I think the Romneys are being called selfish for declaring a $77,000 "business loss" for their horse on their 2010 taxes, and then talking about their horse like it's Ann Romney's therapy animal whenever someone asks him about it.
          ^ Yeah I think it has to do with this OP....
          Originally posted by rustbreeches
          [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

          Comment


          • #6
            OMG did Rafalca learn to jump!? No? Oh.

            What are we talking about?
            "Are you yawning? You don't ride well enough to yawn. I can yawn, because I ride better than you. Meredith Michael Beerbaum can yawn. But you? Not so much..."
            -George Morris

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SaturdayNightLive View Post
              OMG did Rafalca learn to jump!? No? Oh.

              What are we talking about?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SaturdayNightLive View Post
                OMG did Rafalca learn to jump!? No? Oh.

                What are we talking about?
                Love this.
                ~ Citizens for a Kinder, Gentler COTH...our mantra: Be nice. ~

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is it Off Topic Day where we can post whatever comes out of our mouths, errhh fingers ?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SaturdayNightLive View Post
                    OMG did Rafalca learn to jump!? No? Oh.

                    What are we talking about?
                    Originally posted by rustbreeches
                    [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Andrew View Post

                      Sounds to me like that one horse has done more to put Americans to work than the horse’s ass in the White House
                      By all means, if you want to put into power the party represented by Todd Akin, the one that would like to take us back to the Dark Ages, to a place that rejects science and where superstition reigns supreme, then go ahead and vote for Romney/Ryan.

                      Obama might have his faults, but the Republican ticket is downright scary.

                      Oh yeah, this is supposed to be about horses. Sorry.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by EAY View Post
                        By all means, if you want to put into power the party represented by Todd Akin, the one that would like to take us back to the Dark Ages, to a place that rejects science and where superstition reigns supreme, then go ahead and vote for Romney/Ryan.

                        Obama might have his faults, but the Republican ticket is downright scary.

                        Oh yeah, this is supposed to be about horses. Sorry.
                        But legitimate rape!!!11!!11111!11!!1!
                        Mendokuse

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          "By all means, if you want to put into power the party represented by Todd Akin, the one that would like to take us back to the Dark Ages, to a place that rejects science and where superstition reigns supreme, then go ahead and vote for Romney/Ryan.

                          Obama might have his faults, but the Republican ticket is downright scary.

                          Oh yeah, this is supposed to be about horses. Sorry.
                          Reply With Quote"


                          Akin doesn't represent the republican party. Read a little and you see that other people in the GOP are denouncing him for what he said. Since when did Akin ever represent the GOP? It's disgusting that you feel the need to use one thing like that to denounce an entire group of people...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Pretty over giving a damn about the romneys horse, it has nothing too with anything.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
                              Akin doesn't represent the republican party. Read a little and you see that other people in the GOP are denouncing him for what he said. Since when did Akin ever represent the GOP? It's disgusting that you feel the need to use one thing like that to denounce an entire group of people...
                              I was not in any way trying to imply that all Republicans agree with Akin's position, just that the position he gave voice to is pretty well in line with that espoused by the people who are in control of the party at this point in time.

                              The GOP is only denouncing him for bringing to light and attracting unwanted attention to something that is basically enshrined in their platform (the so-called "human life amendment"). And it was after all the Republican leadership in the House that picked Akin to be on the Committee on Science and Technology.

                              Come on, this isn't the first time the man has gone off half-cock.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                There is no longer a mortgage industry feeding a housing bubble to generate copious quantities of cash for people to spend thriftlessly.

                                Some in this country want to continue that lifestyle because they are addicted to it, and will endeavor to find ways to fund their addiction.

                                But like many other kinds of addicts, they only live for the next fix, and concepts of future repercussions for their actions over themselves and others don't often factor into living for immediate gratification of fulfilling momentary whims.

                                I think that the Romney's horse may be representitive for many of a consept of self indulgents that is often associated with individuals who charish luxury.

                                The world is quickly changing. The excesses consumed by yesterdays indulgences are becoming the essential resources needed for the people of tomorrow to simply maintain life.

                                The quality of a leader for the present, will be found in their desire to provide hope for the unborn children of the distant future.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by EAY View Post
                                  I was not in any way trying to imply that all Republicans agree with Akin's position, just that the position he gave voice to is pretty well in line with that espoused by the people who are in control of the party at this point in time.

                                  What you said above isn't in agreement with the way your post comes across.


                                  The GOP is only denouncing him for bringing to light and attracting unwanted attention to something that is basically enshrined in their platform (the so-called "human life amendment"). And it was after all the Republican leadership in the House that picked Akin to be on the Committee on Science and Technology.

                                  I don't think there is anyone in the GOP who would condone rape, so your statements about the "only reason" that guy is being denounced is a broad sweeping over-generlization. If you prescribe to the tenets of another political party, that's perfectly fine, but don't make sweeping generalization of that magnitude about your "opponents...



                                  Come on, this isn't the first time the man has gone off half-cock.


                                  -----

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Just over two more months of this? Really?! I don't know if I can stand it. Nothing is safe, not even the hunter jumper forum?

                                    Counting the days until my arena is rideable and I will have no time for COTH...

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      From the NY Times

                                      "5:35 p.m. | Updated Even as the Republican establishment continued to call for Representative Todd Akin of Missouri to drop out of his Senate race because of his comments on rape and abortion, Republicans approved platform language on Tuesday calling for a constitutional amendment outlawing abortion with no explicit exceptions for cases of rape or incest.

                                      The anti-abortion plank, approved by the Republican platform committee Tuesday morning in Tampa, Fla., was similar to the planks Republicans have included in their recent party platforms, which also called for a constitutional ban on abortions. The full convention is set to vote on the party’s platform on Monday.

                                      While Republican officials stressed that the plank did not go into granular details, saying that they were better left to the states, the language of the plank seems to leave little room for exceptions to the abortion ban. It states that “the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.”

                                      “Faithful to the ‘self-evident’ truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed,” said the draft platform language approved Tuesday, which was first reported by CNN. “We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”

                                      The timing of the approval of the Republican anti-abortion plank was awkward for Mitt Romney, who has denounced Mr. Akin’s comments about rape and abortion and who has said that he supports exceptions to allow abortions in cases of rape. And it comes as his selection of his running mate, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, was already drawing scrutiny for his support for a more absolute ban on abortions, even in cases of rape or incest."
                                      2012 goal: learn to ride like a Barn Rat

                                      A helmet saved my life.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by SaturdayNightLive View Post
                                        OMG did Rafalca learn to jump!? No? Oh.

                                        What are we talking about?


                                        Now, don't go and try to confuse Andrew with either facts or logic.....




                                        As for him calling that intelligent, articulate, gracious and hardworking man in the White House - the President - "a horse's ass"? well, I rest my case.

                                        A Fine Romance. April 1991 - June 2016. Loved forever.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X