• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Proposed Rule Change for the Members Right to be Notified

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    #21
    We can certainly restrict it to felonies having to with horses.
    http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #22
      They are good thoughts and valid points.This sort of the way a Leadership Council works instead of a Board of Directors.
      http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #23
        You can print or download the form we will need to complete from the Rules Link at the USEF Web Site.

        It Requires
        Rule # Chapter # Article # Title

        Type of Rule Change - Standard or Extraordinary if the latter the reason

        Is this a change to a rule passed in the past two years? Yes No

        is this an ADD (new Rule) Delete (existing Rule)
        or Change to read

        Exact words for Rule or Change

        Proponent Contact


        Intent of the Proposal


        Effective Date:

        Signature of Proponent Date submitted.
        http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

        Comment


        • #24
          People who applied for judge, steward, course desginer used to be listed in the magazine. X amount of time was given for people to reply concerning said individual. It was stated above their names, all information would be confidential. Why not have that same thing for people who are going for reinstatement? Then the membership is actively involved.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #25
            As I understand it this is simply a Rule Change which does not change any procedures just gives the Members the right to be Notified and to submit their opinions and evidence that it is based on in writing to the Hearing Committee. And any members who wish to attend the Hearing may be heard.

            Another Rule Change can also be submitted to ban those found guilty for life.

            A third could be submitted regarding being found guilty multiple times for drug abuse through the Drug Testing procedure. For example a three times and your out.

            Lastly, we have talked about a procedure where we could put into the search engine a name to see how many violations there have been for whatever cause. This would surely help show managers who could check and see if a person who gave them a non-negotiable payment had a history of doing so. I don't know if that's a Rule Change or a procedure change that just requires the cooperation of the Technical department.

            It would include only information that was already public record having been published in Equestrian.

            I don't think any of these suggestions could lead any more "elitism" than we already have in the system.

            A totally separate issue would be "sexual offenders".

            Radio Talk I think we could suggest that and it could be included in the rule change.

            Once we get something of a consensus of opinion we can put all the issues to a poll vote. I think this is being constructive and proactive contrary to the opinion of many who disagree and like the status quo.
            http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

            Comment


            • #26
              It would nice to be able to cross check a person for previous violations. We have the technology. Maybe only posting in Equestrian is outdated? Snowbird, you may not hear it often, but I would like to say thank you for your time and effort, as well as War Admiral, and other busy people.
              http://www.petitiononline.com/valliere/petition.html

              Comment


              • #27
                Here's the USHJA trainer link...


                http://www.ushja.org/searchTrainer.cfm

                Here's the disclaimer:

                "

                Search our Trainers Database for a trainer close to you.

                TRAINERS DIRECTORY DISCLAIMER

                The USHJA Trainers Directory is compiled and published by the United States Hunter Jumper Association ("USHJA") as a reference source of demographic and professional information on member hunter/jumper/equitation trainers in the United States. The only permitted uses of this directory are for (i) the personal convenience of individual members of the general public to facilitate quick access to professional information and location about member trainers and (ii) for individual trainers to view their personal listings or those of colleagues for professional purposes such as client referrals.

                The USHJA reserves the right and hereby provides notice that it will be monitoring use of this website for compliance with the permitted use described above. Neither the USHJA Trainers Directory nor any of its data, listings or other constituent elements may be downloaded, republished, resold, duplicated or "scraped", in whole or in part, for any purpose other than the personal uses permitted above.

                Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities

                The material included in this web site is for informational purposes only. The USHJA undertakes reasonable efforts to keep the information contained in the Trainers Directory accurate and current. However, because the USHJA compiles such information from the individual trainers choosing to participate and may experience reporting and processing errors or delays, it makes no representations or warranties of any nature with respect to the information contained in this Web site including, without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose.

                The inclusion of a trainer’s professional information in this directory does not imply USHJA referral, endorsement or recommendation of that trainer, nor does the omission of any individual indicate USHJA disapproval. The USHJA shall not be liable to any individual(s) for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information obtained from this site nor for any damages, claims or actions resulting directly or indirectly from its use."
                http://www.petitiononline.com/valliere/petition.html

                Comment


                • #28
                  I'm way too tired & brain dead to contribute anything sensible here tonight other than to bump it up in hopes someone else has something smart to say!!

                  I'll sleep on it overnight & hopefully be more sensible on the morrow.
                  "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Well War Admiral I don't know if what I have to say is smart but I definately have an opinion

                    I would be thrilled to have something in place to help others in the future. And with all do respect Saddlebag I understand your concerns but feel there could be some sort of rule(?) regarding matters related to horses. I do not care if someone has smoked pot in college or whether they inhaled or not. It does not have to be a witch hunt, blackballing or the parking lot reserved for lawyers. There is a common ground that can work and it's time to put horsemanship back into this sport.

                    I feel strongly about this because I HAVE been a victim in a Federal Fraud case regarding horses. I hope no one EVER has to go through 6+ years of what myself and others went through. There were dozens of victims in 7 states.....everyone called the AHSA/USEF, state associations and other horse organizations....not one group would help, provide guidance or even offer information. If something had been in place then there is no doubt there would have been fewer victims. No system is full proof but there has to be a better way to deal with these issues. I have stated it before and will state it here again that everyone in the Dept of Justice who was involved in this case has been in disbelief regarding the fact there is no horse association or governing body that addresses these issues and/or trys to protect its members.

                    I will not pretend to say I have an exact answer to correct the problems that obviously exist but am thrilled to know there are others who feel the same and I will be more than happy to do whatever I can to make the horse industry a better, safer enviroment for our future equestrians. They deserve as much.
                    Debbie Hanson
                    www.ratemyhorsepro.com


                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I think notification wouldn't be too burdensome if it were limited to those convicted specifically of cruelty to animals AND whose suspension was directly related to cruelty (spelled out as specifically as possible so that using prohibited drugs would not trigger the process, but excessive use of the whip or use of soring agents--like ginger under the tail--would).

                      Employers do background checks all the time--there are agencies which specialize in the service and I suspect they aren't that expensive. Nor would this occurance be that common (at least I would hope not).

                      Moreover, doing at least SOMETHING might actually be very good PR for the organization, given the third element in its Mission Statement:

                      (3) Protect and support the welfare of horses by inspecting, monitoring and testing to deter use of forbidden substances and other cruel, unsafe and/or unsportsmanlike practices and by adopting and enforcing rules to prohibit such practices.
                      In fact, the last line of The Sportman's Charter is a pretty intriguing statement in light of this discussion:

                      That the qualities of frankness, courage, and sincerity which mark the good sportsman in private life shall mark the discussions of his interests at a competition.
                      And then there's also this clause in the Vision Statement:

                      ...promoting the pursuit of excellence from the grass roots to the Olympic Games, based on a foundation of fair, safe competition and the welfare of its human and equine athletes...
                      At the very least, I'd suggest including in your proposal language that connects these statements to your own goals.
                      Sportponies Unlimited
                      Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by radio talk Aefvue Farms RCA:
                        People who applied for judge, steward, course desginer used to be listed in the magazine. X amount of time was given for people to reply concerning said individual. It was stated above their names, all information would be confidential. Why not have that same thing for people who are going for reinstatement? Then the membership is actively involved.
                        I agree that this is the most straightforward, easy method. Why not list everyone applying for reinstatement? Then each member could decide how he/she feels about each case, rather than assuming folks will want to only know about certain types of offenses.
                        Old age means realizing you will never own all the dogs you wanted to.--Joe Gores

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          my apologies if I missed it - is there a proposal in there that would cover the fraud case - that someone convicted of fraud in the purchase or sale of horse would be suspended?
                          Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                          The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            I suspect that the organization would have to institute rules regarding having trainers/coaches certified and in-good-standing before they could really enforce anything to do with who we train with and given the track record thus far of usdf trainer certification (the only one I'm familiar with) I would be opposed to that
                            Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                            The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #34
                              No there isn't as yet. It seems to me that unless the USEF itself chooses to enforce some rules it just doesn't happen.

                              If we can't define it and have the authority to enforce the rules there are pages of them that are useless. Just window dressing to make everyone feel good.

                              We're still working on those convicted in a Court for the death of a horse. If we can define a system for that then we can consider what to do about Members in Good Standing who are sitting in jail for fraud.

                              It seems to me if we have no way to prove that any rules have been broken or wiggled some anything we propose has to have a broad brush.
                              http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                I cannot understand why, under any circumstances, if someone was suspended for the crimes that we are all speaking of here, were convicted in and/or plead guilty in a criminal court, that these people are permitted to EVER apply for reinstatement. Let the USEF take a page from major league baseball, Pete Rose ain't ever gettin' back in and all he did was gamble on baseball. (actually his big sin was lying about it). Why instead of the membership trying to find a one size fits the people that piss us off because they do something so abborhent that it defies definition, do we not just say if anyone at anytime conspires to or assists in killing or injuring an equine for no other reason than profit, add insurance fraud and whatever else legalese you wish to throw in there, they can never ever apply for reinstatement, be on a recognized show ground, etc, ad nauseum? We are not, unlike the criminal justice system, bound in a way to consider this person rehabilitated, we are a private, member funded organization that may refuse or expell members for violations of not only rules, but moral violations as well. why on earth does this organization even need to consider this? Was it that the rules when written could not imagine a crime this awful? How we know, why we can only imagine (after all, are not these kind of greed crimes often committed by people who least need the money) who is apparent as well. Just as I believe that there are some people so evil that they should not get out of prison, there are some people so evil that they should be excluded from the club. Let them go work at a slaughterhouse, lable them as the executioners they are, but reinstate them as if they had committed a crime that involved killing horses in a brutal fashion for nothing more than money to go on to the next victim? Well, hell, lets just forget excesive use of the whip, do away with the vet box at three days and forget about police-ing the warm up arena to look for horses that are "lunged to death", sort of brings all that into a new perspective. So forget notifying the membership, seems we already know. Change the rule that allows that person to ever apply for reinstatement. A convicted felon (and it doesn't matter what the felony was) can never vote or carry a firearm. Ever. So if a person was 21, and got convicted of writing a bad check for $450, when they are a far wiser 40 yr old, they cannot vote, or protect their family or their home.. And the USEF wonders why they have trouble attracting members. They can justify the mileage rule, they can justify the helmet rule, but I can see nothing but a negative impact on our sport from reinstating vile, heartless individuals with no morals or concience.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #36
                                  2ndyrgal I couldn't agree with you more.Our problem is how to convince the powers that be that money is not who we all are?
                                  http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #37
                                    Yo! Where are my idealists and my rebels. Where are the youngsters learning about law nd order?
                                    Have we already given up this quest to write Rule Changes that satisfy the needs of the "grassroots" members or should I just start selling ribbons on Ebay?
                                    http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      You guys!!! There already IS a rule about reciprocity in cases of people convicted in a court of law on an animal cruelty charge. It has been there for YEARS, and is enforced when an appropriate case comes up. I don't have my rulebook handy, but the gist of the rule is...Any person who is convicted of an act toward a horse that would likely be deemed abuse, should it have occured at a USEF show, is automatically called before the Hearing Committee, and that case is reviewed. If the Hearing Panel feels that the respondant's actions would be a violation of USEF rules, then, the Hearing Committe imposes such penalties and/or suspensions as it deems fit.

                                      I was on the Hearing Committee for quite a few years, and sat on such a case...and a fairly high profile one at that.

                                      Now, I guess all you folks think that I am soft on crime, pro-horse abuse, and consider fraud to be an industry standard, but really guys...that ain't the case at all. What I object to is vigilante emotional uprisings on the COTH BB threads that violate the civil rights of persons who you folks decide are "the bad guys". In most cases, they ARE the "bad guys", but that doesn't make it right for the general membership of USEF to usurp the power and legality of the USEF hearing process. Especially, when you do not have all the facts of a case at your disposal. Making a judgement about a person's actions, and then demanding that the Federation act on your version of justice is, IMO, wrong, and violates the whole notion of fairness.

                                      The USEF is not a co-op organization, ruled by popular opinion. We members don't get to "vote" on who we like or don't like, and decide if someone should be in our "club". Now...just suppose this rule passed to let members influence who can or cannot be let back in "our club". How on earth is a Hearing panel going to know if that flurry of letters or that petition is anything other than a hate campaign generated by a few "disgruntled" folks with an ax to grind? The Hearing process relys on facts and proof in making their decisions. Vigilante justice is fueled by emotion and gossip. I just choose to support the estalished legal hearing process...even if it means that a few "bad guys" slip through the cracks.

                                      And BTW...even though I am one of those evil, abusive, dishonest, money grubbing "trainers" you love to flay on these threads, I do agree that the issue of fraud in horse sales is a very serious one, and needs to be addressed. Fortunately, as we speak, people within the USHJA are working on this issue, and also on the issue of trainer certification, which also has become extremely important. It may take a bit of time, but I believe that we will shortly be seeing rules and policies that will offer protection to both consumers (clients and buyers) and trainers/agents alike. I am not going to spend the next hour writing about my feelings on this topic, but if any of you would like to talk to me about this, feel free to PT or email me, and I will be happy to pontificate!

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        A convicted felon (and it doesn't matter what the felony was) can never vote or carry a firearm. Ever.

                                        Actually, this is not true. A convicted felon may apply to have their voting rights and firearm rights re-instated, and such rights may be granted by the Governor.
                                        ------------------------------
                                        \"I ride because the partnership with horses fills my mind with perfections of cadence and rhythmic excitement and intensities of communion.\" Dick Francis

                                        Comment

                                        • Original Poster

                                          #40
                                          saddlebag I have no doubt that those few involved directly with the USEF are all individually very good people with very good intentions. You dedicate a lot of your personal time to be useful which is gratefully appreciated. It is that collectively you all seem to forget that there is a big world out here that feels disenfranchised.

                                          [quote]The USEF is not a co-op organization, ruled by popular opinion. We members don't get to "vote" on who we like or don't like,[/quote

                                          Exactly, and that is the pity of it. The total lack of communication in advance of decisions and the process of making decision is kept secret until it is finally announced as a done deal.
                                          and decide if someone should be in our "club". Now...just suppose this rule passed to let members influence who can or cannot be let back in "our club".
                                          I don't think I would ever be a convicted felon convicted by a court; and I trust the vast majority would also never do such a thing. The point saddlebag is that we are working on a definition that will carefully exclude only those.

                                          As for the private club, it is that now. The thing the rest of us are needed for, is our money and our opions are ignored. Edits are passed from on high for rules about which we know nothing. The Staff at USEF get's more opportunity to modify and propose rules than we as members get the opportunity to discuss.

                                          [quote]How on earth is a Hearing panel going to know if that flurry of letters or that petition is anything other than a hate campaign generated by a few "disgruntled" folks with an ax to grind?[quote]

                                          That's there job as a quasi-legal group. Especially since there is no appeal to their decisions.How the Hearing Committee will know is by utilizing the methods of evidence as the courts.(Zoning Boards-Planning Boards). Ask for copies of entry forms from every show the past three years attended by these persons recognozed as students and boarders. The name of the students are the property of USEF. Ask for financial disclosure analyzed by a furensic accountant.The Hearing Committee has a lot of tools they choose not to use for some people and which are used to penalize other people.

                                          I think those that have been penalized with punitive fines would feel much better if they saw others treated equally harshly or else then treat everyone with equal leniency.

                                          The Hearing process relys on facts and proof in making their decisions. Vigilante justice is fueled by emotion and gossip. I just choose to support the estalished legal hearing process...even if it means that a few "bad guys" slip through the cracks.
                                          This action is not vigilatism it is activism against those whose crimes are official have been tried in a court of law and which many thousands feel equally are so heinous and self serving they should be made an example of as do other sports.

                                          Cases in point "Tanya Harding" she didn't do the deed hereself. "Pete Rose" and just look at the superb effort by the IOC against a banned trainer at this winter's Olympics.
                                          http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X