• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Professionals and their Tack Choices

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Professionals and their Tack Choices

    Do you ever watch the great riders and wish you could ask why they selected the tack they did? The issue of The Chronicle with Antares F and McLain on the cover actually had a sidebar where McLain discussed why he changed Antares to his current bit. I thought it was fascinating and wish more articles had something similar!

    Most recently I'd love to know how Leslie Howard selected her bit for Lennox Lewis. I was watching this video that Spruce Meadow just posted http://youtu.be/eOAV8nWP1Lc when I noticed his unusual set up. Upon further googling of the pair, it looks like a three ring elevator bit with one rein on the big ring and then a set of gag cheek pieces threaded through the big ring and attached to a second set of reins.

    So anyone have any thoughts on why Leslie might use this particular set up and/or how she even came up with it in the first place? (Disclaimer: I would never attempt to use any of the unusual set-ups I see as I consider them to be for professionals only, but I can't help but be interested in the theory behind them and what problems they address.)

  • #2
    Well, as far as the bitting goes, the pro dreams up what a particular horse needs (a little bit of leverage to raise the head, some stopping power, etc.) and has it custom made.

    As far as the other stuff? A lot of the time it has to do with sponsorships. If a company will give a pro lots of money, or will supply their entire barn with something, (for example, I was talking to someone in the eventing world whose trainer's entire barn was supplied with boots by Profesional's Choice boots) you bet they will use the product. (This trainer then used ProChoice boots at events, so when pictues were taken and put in places like, say, Dover Saddlery's catalogs, people went, "Oh look! Big trainer X uses ProChoice boots, I should too!")

    Ever wonder how Voltaire saddles and tack rocketed up from a small startup company to being fairly mainstream? They give away LOADS of saddles and tack to trainers, so trainers show up to horseshows with this tack and people go, "Look! These new saddles must be GREAT! All these trainers are using them!"

    It's advertising.

    Of course, that's not how all tack and equipment is chosen by trainers, they obviously take horses's individual needs into account. It would be silly not to; if something makes a horse perform a lot better, it doesn't matter whether the trainer gets sponsored by the company that makes it or not, they will use it.

    But sponsorships are a big part of it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Any chance you could link to McLain talking about Andy's bit change?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by MistyPony View Post
        So anyone have any thoughts on why Leslie might use this particular set up and/or how she even came up with it in the first place? (Disclaimer: I would never attempt to use any of the unusual set-ups I see as I consider them to be for professionals only, but I can't help but be interested in the theory behind them and what problems they address.)
        Also to answer your question, maybe they use the three ring instead of a loose ring because the horse likes the stability of the top ring attached to the cheekpiece? Like a baucher basically. Other than that I can't find a clear enough picture of the bit to comment further (nor would I presume to know enough to!)

        Comment


        • #5
          Another thought is that during the warmup at the big ring at Spruce she could have decided she decided the 3 ring didn't have enough stop for the horse she was sitting on that day. Adding the insta-gag at the last minute helped. (a gag has a very similar action as a 3 ring but more torque/more lifting effect on the bit. When you pull the 3 ring rein about 2 inches you get all the gag effect you are going to.)

          IME as a one-time groom for grand prix horses it was not unusual for us to tweak the bit at the last minute, depending on how the horse is feeling in warmup and reacting to the crowd. We took a few tools that would let us make such changes to the ring, along with the rag, cooler and carrots. It is nice if you can make changes without swapping the bridle, as it is never ideal to take a fit GP horse's bridle off in a busy warmup area. Too much risk they will get away from you, no matter how careful you are.

          A bit can make all the difference when the difference between a clean round and four faults is being able to capture and direct a tiny bit of focus.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Thanks all for your thoughts!

            bluebuckets - Good point about sponsorships, I hadn't thought of that when I posed my original questions. In general I'm interested in the choices made for function reasons rather than sponsorship related reasons.

            Rel6 - I don't think there's a link available. The article quotes McLain as saying "I've never been a fan of a hackamore, but I've noticed with other people it works well on difficult-mouthed horses, and he's got a funny mouth, I knew I needed to change something. We were hitting a plateau that we couldn't seem to get past. We'd get to the last round of the World Cup Finals with a real shot and have one down because he'd get away from me. It was the same thing at the Pan American Games. I needed to make an adjustment to take that next step. I still don't love the looks of the bit, but it works very well. His jump is extraordinary, and it really allows that to come out."

            fordtraktor - I was thinking that the use of the three-ring might be to allow more choices of configurations after seeing how he warmed up, but I didn't realize that the insta-gag would be so easy to install at the last minute. I suppose I'm still not really sure how it's attached as I can't get a great picture! VERY interesting point about the 3-ring only having about two inches of gag-action, had never thought of that!

            Thanks again all!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bluebuckets View Post

              As far as the other stuff? A lot of the time it has to do with sponsorships. If a company will give a pro lots of money, or will supply their entire barn with something, (for example, I was talking to someone in the eventing world whose trainer's entire barn was supplied with boots by Profesional's Choice boots) you bet they will use the product. (This trainer then used ProChoice boots at events, so when pictues were taken and put in places like, say, Dover Saddlery's catalogs, people went, "Oh look! Big trainer X uses ProChoice boots, I should too!")

              Ever wonder how Voltaire saddles and tack rocketed up from a small startup company to being fairly mainstream? They give away LOADS of saddles and tack to trainers, so trainers show up to horseshows with this tack and people go, "Look! These new saddles must be GREAT! All these trainers are using them!"

              It's advertising.
              True, but at the highest level they get to pick between free brand X and free Y... so they still go for the one they prefer for the horses and themselves. Unless there really is sponsor money involved, which I know doesn't happen that often in our sport. Top riders do get free equipment to use, but they rarely get paid to use certain brands.
              Riding is not football, and companies don't have that kind of money to spend.

              I don't think Voltaire gives away that many saddles.
              The rep told me they got very lucky with Beezie Madden winning a Grand Prix while she was test riding the saddles for a few days. She loved the saddles and that's how they got to sponsor her. He didn't try to hide that she doesn't pay for the saddles.
              I believe someone was telling here how the same thing happened a few years ago with McLain and CWD.

              It would be a mistake to think that top riders don't make their own decisions about their equipment. After all, this is what they get to work with everyday, and just like all of us they go for what they think is more suitable.
              And also, giving away free saddles isn't enough to convince the general public to buy... Look at Prestige saddles which provides saddles to European's best riders, you still don't see that many prestige saddles out there, in Europe or in the US (I happen to know both, having moved from Italy 4 years ago).

              Comment

              Working...
              X