• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Can't find it in the rule book, are these stirrups legal?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can't find it in the rule book, are these stirrups legal?

    I have a junior rider who do to physical therapy is finding these stirrups the best to help her with getting more weight in her heels http://www.horseloverz.com/KMSS-Toes...pr-652565.html I don't know if they are the exact ones, just ones I had lying around. But same use etc. I can't find if it is legal for her to show at anything other then schooling shows in them in the short stirrup classes.

    TIA, and these are just to help her tendons stretch, not for her to be in for the rest of her life for the people that are going to say they are a cheat etc......

  • #2
    I know the "bendy" stirrups are acceptable in anything but equitation, and I'd assume that would be the case with these as well.
    "It's hard to wait for something you know might not happen, but it's even harder to give up when you know it's everything you want."
    Blog | YouTube


    • #3
      There aren't rules but it's more of the judges decision. They could be considered unconventional tack. Most likely only would effect her in Equitation but it would depend on how noticeable they are when she is in the ring.

      I do know some (at least all the ones I have personally asked) hate the black stirrups. The reason is the stirrup blends in with the boot and makes it hard to see if the foot is properly placed in the stirrup and if the ankle, toe and heel are properly positioned. (I think that was the gist of it)
      Discover the Delgrange Difference


      • #4
        I am a USEF judge and an instructor....there are good reasons to avoid flexible stirrups in the early stages of a rider's education.

        In my opinion (which is in agreement with widely recognized experts, including George Morris, and others), flexible stirrups impede rather than enhance the development of a secure base of support.

        In particular, I've noticed that as an elementary level rider is in the process of establishing a good leg position, flexible stirrups are very difficult to work with.

        For one thing, most flex both ways, which can easily result in the stirrup sliding too far onto the foot, and even cause it to become stuck that way--and none are offered in a 'safety style' that would allow for the automatic release of the rider's foot should they become unbalanced or unseated.

        A correct and secure position is sometimes not very natural feeling to many beginners, and it doesn't help to provide them with an unstable surface, that actually pivots, to place their weight on...I know some of you are thinking "WHAT?"

        You are thinking that "weight belongs in our heels!" But only PART of a rider's weight sinks down into the heels, while a significant portion of a rider's weight remains on the stirrup--this is especially so when a rider works in two point, posts, or jumps. If ALL the rider's weight went only to the heel, the rider's leg would shoot forward all the time, causing extreme instability, and making it impossible to develop an independent hand and arm.

        Some people, of course, have better natural balance than others, and many can eventually develop a good position IN SPITE of their safety stirrups, but the majority will be able to develop a good position much more quickly without them, because a solid "floor" beneath their feet offers more support for a correctly placed leg.

        Unless a physical therapist has specifically indicated the necessity of using flex stirrups (and this needs to be established on a case-by-case basis), I would not assume that a rider who faces physical challenges would benefit from using them. Just as with horses, a soft surface is more prone to result in discomfort and injury than a hard one.

        I don't object to an adult rider who has already learned to ride making the decision to use a flexible stirrup--and many good riders use them. But I think they are better used by advanced riders with well-established good habits, and in children that are still growing, I would think that if asked, an orthopedist might have reservations about the extra stresses flex stirrups place on growth plates and ligaments (are there any orthopedists in the house?).

        As far as competing with them, if there is any weakness in a rider's overall balance and position, it will be revealed during the course of a performance or subsequent test--if the stirrup (or anything else) is causing a weak or compromised base of support, the rider will have to regain any lost balance through other means. The result of this will be that the judge has many opportunities to place negative comments on a scorecard.

        Just because "the winner" uses flexible stirrups, one should not assume an automatic association--they are rather prevalent in the show ring, along with poor balance and a lack of independent hand and arms. (Looking at it this way, using traditional stirrups might be a pretty cheap way to gain an edge over the wobblers out there... )

        As for black stirrups, they are definitely less formal in appearance; while they might make it hard in some conditions to see a rider's foot clearly, this is seldom an issue for me--again, if there is a weak link anywhere it will normally reveal itself in other ways somewhere in the rider's performance during the course of a class.
        Inner Bay Equestrian


        • #5
          Although they are clearly the devil and are therefore responsible for the downfall of equitation they are certainly not against the rules in any hunter classes, where it is supposed to be the horse that is being judged, or jumpers. I would try to avoid them in the eq.

          Sometimes when we're coming back from an injury, we have to work with what makes it possible to ride. I know that when I hurt my knees, the flexible stirrup was a godsend. Is it 100% ideal? No, but neither was my body at the time. If the choice is between being in pain/not riding versus using a crutch, thank you, I'll take the crutch.

          I'm sure my equitation is now ruined and I've destroyed society.
          They're small hearts.


          • #6
            I'm sure they're legal, but I think they're tacky.
            "A horse gallops with his lungs, perseveres with his heart, and wins with his character." - Tesio


            • #7
              So, should those of us who use them because riding with regular stirrups hurts aggravate our injuries in the hopes that we won't look tacky?

              Just seems like an odd thing to say.
              They're small hearts.


              • #8
                At home, no problem. I don't think they have any place in the show ring. Just MHO.
                "A horse gallops with his lungs, perseveres with his heart, and wins with his character." - Tesio


                • #9
                  They are legal. At short stirrup level, I'm willing the bet the judge cares more about the kid staying on, getting leads, and the correct strides then 'unconventional tack'


                  • #10
                    They are legal, but not ideal, and I provided my line of reasoning for drawing my conclusions.

                    There are always exceptions, and there is no reason to take offense at anyone's well reasoned opinions.

                    Trixie, did you learn in them, or simply begin to use them because they made you more comfortable?

                    I find that riders who already have an established position that is basically correct can normally use them with no ill effects. For those who haven't reached that milestone, I find it hinders development of correct balance.

                    That's just my opinion, but it is shared by quite a few others who also evaluate various levels of riders on a regular basis.

                    I don't recall insinuating that society is decaying because of it, though.

                    Big Grey, in SS I would expect to see safety stirrups; the flex stirrups don't even come in sizes appropriate for small children, so I'd hope not to see any in that ring.
                    Inner Bay Equestrian


                    • #11
                      You could always wrap the sides in black vetwrap to make them look like the jointed stirrups.
                      I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Donkerbruin View Post
                        At home, no problem. I don't think they have any place in the show ring. Just MHO.
                        I'd guess you think accomodations for disabled riders are tacky or don't belong in the show ring either?


                        • #13
                          Wow. Did people get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? For a simple, honest question with a specific reason included, and a thoughtful, knowledgeable response, there's a lot of snark here.

                          Equine Photography in the Northeast


                          • #14
                            Boy, lots of piss in the Cheerios this morning.

                            Back to the OP, no they are not "illegal".

                            There are pros and cons like with anything else.

                            I doubt it would be much of an issue unless it was a competitive class at high levels where every detail matters. But you could have a judge that did not care for the black ones or the bendy ones along the line and they are allowed to factor that into their scores. And they CAN create new position flaws replacing the ones they are supposed to fix.

                            I used the bendy ones for awhile. They did help with stretching out BUT I learned a strong and correct position in plain old fillis irons kept the pressure off my lower back and allowed a proper heel better then the bendy ones did.

                            I also never did feel much shock relief as I never really jumped high enough often enough to create any.
                            When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                            The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


                            • #15
                              Gee whiz, people. I dislike the jointed stirrups. I think that they create more problems than they fix, and no, I don't think they belong in the show ring. They screw up stability. Traditional fillis irons always are best for showing. I'm traditional, so sue me!
                              "A horse gallops with his lungs, perseveres with his heart, and wins with his character." - Tesio


                              • #16
                                IMO, those particular irons look dangerous. I haven't ridden in them (and I dislike riding in any kind of jointed iron. Yes, they're great on my old knees. But even with an independent position, I feel like they don't offer the correct support. I live with the sore knees because I'd rather feel secure and correct in the saddle) but the way they flex looks like a fall waiting to happen.

                                This is what I see happening with these (and again, haven't used them, maybe it doesn't): Rider in two-point, stretching heels down. Iron rotates forward. Heels sink down more. Iron rotates forward more. In order to keep the support of the iron, rider pushes leg forward in an attempt to "keep up" with the rotation of the iron. Rider ends up in a chair seat and has no support from the irons at a critical time on course, and being severely off-balance, is much more susceptible to having a spill. They just look like you'd end up in a vicious cycle of chasing the stirrup for support. As M. said, this would be even more difficult for a beginner, as many beginners already have a tendency toward a slight chair seat.

                                While I prefer the look of a traditional iron in the show ring, I understand that some people may need to ride with something different to accommodate pain or injury, but I also don't think pain or injury is the cause for the rampant use of jointed irons.


                                • #17
                                  I thought M O'Connor's response was very thoughtful and detailed and well-reasoned.

                                  I use the flex stirrups for jumping, but I'm an adult and using a short stirrup for cross-country. The flex stirrups solve a problem for me where I was having some numbness in my right foot. I think her rationale for not supporting their use for juniors without a specific physical reason is quite thoughtful.

                                  OP might consider that there are some other irons that might also serve if there is a specific physical issue.
                                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket


                                  • #18
                                    Donkerbruin, my orthopedist would disagree with you.

                                    I’m not inherently disagreeing with some of the ideas here - but I will say that it might be best if we suggest that the OP consult the child's physician or physical therapist to make sure she understands what will and won’t exacerbate the injury, unless she herself has qualifications in sports medicine. Sometimes it’s just not as simple as “soft surface = more likely to cause injury.” I would hope that she’s done that, since the question was rule-specific, not about the mechanics of the stirrups themselves.

                                    (this is, of course, going on the theory that “do to physical therapy” means that the child has a therapist and is using the stirrups for a reason and under supervision)

                                    FWIW, the ones in the ad above are 4 ¼”, if I remember right, the safety stirrups start at 4” and go to 4 ½”. I could see a kid being able to use 4 ¼”, though I don’t know if these stirrups in particular are the best bet.
                                    They're small hearts.


                                    • #19
                                      What about traditional irons with something like these? I'm not sure of the nature of the injury, but if she just needs more help flexing, these might be a discrete way to encourage that. I've never tried them myself, but knew a QH trainer who swore by them (which may or may not be in their favor).
                                      "Je suis Pony Owner."


                                      • #20
                                        I wouldn't show in the stirrups linked to in the OP. I have ridden in stirrups like that while playing polo in which they are very helpful for all the crazy positions you do and help you from loosing a stirrup.

                                        If you want a flexible iron then I would go with a sprenger or a knock of them. That what I ride in. I tried to go back to the fillis, but my toes go numb when I ride in them.
                                        I love cats, I love every single cat....
                                        So anyway I am a cat lover
                                        And I love to run.