• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Trainer Requiring Clients to Pay for New Footing in Arena?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trainer Requiring Clients to Pay for New Footing in Arena?

    Hello all. Sorry about the alter on this one, but necessary to protect the innocent etc.

    Here's my question, do you think it is odd, unacceptable or anything else (including fine) for a trainer to ask, nay require, clients to cover the cost of an upgrade to a training facility? For example, for new footing in the arena or new doors on stalls (where this is purely an "upgrade" and not due to damage caused by a client's horse etc)

    We currently have this situation and it just seems strange to me. Trainer wants to upgrade footing in arena, which no one will deny will be great for the horses, allow riding sooner after rain and even out the low and high spots of the arena. However, trainer is asking for an amount roughly equal to one month's training (just under $1k) from each client (per horse) as well as from ride-in clients (who are being asked to pay this amount if they ride in 4x a week, or a pro-rated amount if they ride in less than 4x per week). Trainer does not own property, but has a lease contract with the owner which states that she is responsible for footing.

    While some people at the barn are "better off" than others money-wise, this is a huge request from my point of view (as well as others who are not super well off).

    I can think of several better ways trainer could have gone about handling this, the least of which would have been to ask before simply informing clients that it would be added to their bill this month (doubling it). Trainer also could have thought of creative ways to raise funds for this, such as hosting a schooling show where the adults could volunteer time and snacks and the kids could ride and compete. Maybe this wouldn't have covered all of it, but it would have been a start. We aren't made of money (or at least I'm not).

    It seems like providing footing is a part of being a trainer, along with providing your clients with a place to ride. It's not like we are a group of people who wanted to start up a riding facility together. Does this mean we will now be shareholders of the ring?

    By the way, said ring will take 2 weeks to re-do, during which time clients will be paying for training, but there will be no arena. I'm assuming there will be no discount for this loss of training (nor would I expect one). Also, new clients are coming in all the time, no news as to whether there will be any cost to those people (I'm assuming not. Could you imagine? "Hi, welcome to the barn, just fyi, in addition to your training fee, we will be taking a $1,000 'welcome to the barn and new footing' fee. Enjoy!" That sounds ridiculous to me (although maybe it's not unheard of?) so why is it different for current clients (both boarders and ride-ins?)?

    I'm not trying to be snarky here; just curious about others' experiences in similar situations and thoughts on the present situation. Thanks!!
    Last edited by justanalternate; Mar. 26, 2012, 06:53 PM. Reason: After Appsolute's post, ETA that trainer is not owner of property just for clarity.

  • #2
    I would not find it acceptable, and I would not pay it.

    I rent my house. If it needs a new roof, does my landlord come knocking on my door and ask for me to pay it? NO, I do not see why this is any different.

    If the trainer were to sell this property, will she cut a check to each client, paying them back for the upgrade to her property, which was now worth more thanks to her customer’s investment?

    The only time I have “pitched in” for footing was a community arena on HOA property. All of us that used the arena pitched in a bit to make it better. NO ONE was profiting off of the arena, and no one was selling it. And if they DID sell it, it belonged to the HOA, and all of those who paid in would benefit from its sale.

    Anyway long answer short. NO WAY would I be ok with this. The arena is part of the trainer’s business. She should buy the footing and count it as a business expense, and perhaps increase fees as tolerated for the new and improved facility.
    APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree. My BO replaced the footing in our arenas at no extra charge to the boarders. Its kind of part of business, right? I mean technically I would think that type of stuff should be saved for/budgeted into the monthly board/training rates. Like every month, my trainer charges us a "barn supplies" fee. Its the same flat charge every month, regardless of how many supplies she actually buys. Some months its not many, others though we get a bunch including upgrades to saddle racks, cross ties, etc etc. The point being it evens out and we don't get asked for "extra" for the bigger stuff because she has budgeted it in.

      I mean really, you can ride on dirt/grass. There doesn't HAVE to be new footing. Its a perk, or like you said, an "upgrade".

      Comment


      • #4
        If someone changes barns do they get to take their share of the footing with them?
        Dawn

        Patience and Consistency are Your Friends

        Comment


        • #5
          I think that's the farm owner or trainer's financial responsibility. I expect the grounds and facility maintenance to kept up appropriately, especially if I'm paying around $1K per month.
          Personally, I'd be really put off by this. I'd probably be more willing to have my board raised $85 per month for 1 year, than to be expected to cough up $1,000 at once. I'm sure this trainer will hear his/her fair share of complaints and perhaps lose some customers over this.

          Comment


          • #6
            Wow, that trainer's got some brass ones.

            I would be quite taken aback and rather angry if something like that appeared on my bill without warning. Hell, I wouldn't be impressed if it appeared *with* warning.

            If trainer wants to redo the footing and trainer owns the property, trainer comes up with the cash up front to make that improvement. Trainer then decides whether to increase board/training fees to reflect a higher-quality facility, and Trainer's clients then decide whether they can afford the increase and/or wish to stay.

            I could perhaps see Trainer sitting down with clients and explaining that yes, the footing isn't great, but improving it is going to cost $X, and she can only pay 50 percent of $X, and would the clients as a group want to discuss whether to go ahead with improvements and how to fund those. But even at the best, most family-like barn there is, this could be problematic. Some clients are going to be able to pay more than others, while the client with the semi-retired horse who is ridden once or twice a week is going to feel shafted if she's asked to come up with the same amount of money as the client who rides his three horses every day.

            And what happens if Trainer collects the money from clients and then a few months later the ring still hasn't been done but hmmm, someone's got a fancy new trailer ...

            Honestly, I'd be pretty surprised if Trainer doesn't lose quite a few clients with this move.
            Full-time bargain hunter.

            Comment


            • #7
              Sounds like a way of thinning out people that they do not want.....and I agree, unacceptable. This is the barns cost of doing business and they could opt to spread the cost out to the client over 2plus year rather than all at once. 50/month is easier than 1 lump some

              This is greedy and disrespectful. If you guys go with it and they get away with it, you can expect more stuff like this.

              If you are buying stall doors, you can not take them with you when you leave. This is their asset and they should buy.

              Comment


              • #8
                Wow, and I thought it was kinda pushy for us boarders to be requested to "donate" to a fund for vetting the barn cats. (Not that I don't want healthy barn cats, but at the board I pay, I'd think professional mousing would be included. )
                Ring the bells that still can ring
                Forget your perfect offering
                There is a crack in everything
                That's how the light gets in.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I agree, it is in poor taste. However, I'm surprised trainer doesn't just increase the board or start tacking on other miscellaneous fees that are tricky to dispute. So many barns where I have boarded have had rather arbitrary increases in price, with some long-winded explanation from trainer about requirements of the facility, keeping up with competitors, etc. Generally resulting in upgrades that are usually unnecessary and sometimes clearly beneficial to very specific customers, and not so much to others. It's very frustrating but I haven't found many permanent solutions aside from having your own facility.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hmmm...yeah, I own a boarding facility and we are in the process of re-footing our ring also. I would NEVER ask my boarders to pay for this. In fact, I'd be embarrassed to even consider it. The way I look at it, the quality of the footing in the ring is my responsibility, and it is part of the reason people are paying me board each month. They pay board with the expectation that the ring will be in good repair, and safe for their use. This means maintaining is up to me, not them, and even though my budget is tight, I'm making it work without a dime from them (aside from what the have always paid).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That's awesome. Tomorrow I'm going to start telling clients that I need a new car and I'm tacking $1000 onto their regular fees this month.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'd be mad and looking for a new barn.

                        If the footing is poor and needs to be redone, I can understand raising the board after the installation, after all the barn now has a better feature, manufactured footing. That does have value and it can mean a rise in price. That said, until the footing is installed I wouldn't pay a single dollar more and I certainly wouldn't want to become an investor in someone else's arena footing.
                        F O.B
                        Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
                        Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Arena footing is part of the cost of doing business. If trainer wants to raise the board that's OK. Each client then has time to decide if the improvement is worth the extra cost to them and can opt out by leaving.

                          If my barn just up and told me that I had to cough up an extra thousand dollars in a month I'd leave.
                          "Some people are born on third base and go through life thinking they hit a triple” – Barry Switzer

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Can't add too much, I agree with everybody else. You're already paying a significant amount of money and the facility upkeep should be included in that. And at the very least you should have been consulted regarding a "fee" long before a decision to purchase and installation plans were made. Give you time to find someplace else

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              BALONEY ~~~~~

                              This is BALONEY ! ( is that how you spell it ? )

                              The trainer apparentlyt hit his head too hard getting out of his bull$hit wagon ! to teach his next lesson ....
                              Zu Zu Bailey " IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE ! "

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Not acceptable. At least in the manner its being done here!

                                I can accept a BO saying "Hey boarders, in order to cover some facilities improvements, we're going to be raising board by $X per month, effective Date. Improvements will include A, B, and C, and will begin on Date." That date effective needs to be more than a few weeks notice. For instance, the barn where I board is increasing the board rate effective April 1, and we got notice of that in January.
                                A Year In the Saddle

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Where I'm at the barn owners raise the price of board whenever "updates" are made...

                                  Just not OK!!!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Zu Zu View Post
                                    This is BALONEY ! ( is that how you spell it ? )

                                    The trainer apparentlyt hit his head too hard getting out of his bull$hit wagon ! to teach his next lesson ....
                                    I love ZuZu. And, agree, you must be joking. Wow.
                                    www.Somermistfarm.com
                                    Quality Hunter Ponies

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      If the trainer rents the barn, then it's okay. You can leave if you want. He does not personally benefit from the upgrade anymore than any other user of the ring.
                                      And this doesn't ever seem to end well, because someone always resents it. But that is part of boarding, any rent increase results in some kind of backlash.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I hate to say it, but I have seen this happen once before, at a very well known barn, in fact, and the trainer didn't lose a single client. Similar deal - trainer rented (part of) the facility, and assessed her clients about the same amount to upgrade the indoor footing (which was lovely, I have to admit.) It happened right before I moved in, thankfully, as I wouldn't have welcomed an unexpected thousand dollar expense. Interestingly enough, several trainers shared that property, and shortly after the assessment...one trainer left. I'm sure her clients were thrilled at the return on their "investment" in quality footing they got to enjoy for all of two months or so.

                                        That said, I don't know if I would leave a program I otherwise really, really, REALLY liked over this issue - at least unless I had another, equally attractive alternative. It's always easy for people on the internet to say, "Leave and don't look back!" but the reality is that boarding is often all about compromise, and most of the time, the choice is about selecting the best of the available options, not about finding nirvana.
                                        **********
                                        We move pretty fast for some rabid garden snails.
                                        -PaulaEdwina

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X