• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Re: Carolina Gold and How to Change

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Carolina Gold and How to Change

    I am so thrilled to read that this new drug is being questioned and that others are noticing the stullifying effects it is having on the horses. But the perameters of the hunter division require that horses behave like automatons with no allowable expression. And it is a moot point which came first, the chicken or the egg. So I say, lets start at the top.....let's educate the judges to learn to pin "Real" performances.....most of today's judges have come up through the industry on/with/around altered horses. So naturally they are looking for them in the ring. Can we do as the AQHA is doing and come back up that path we have stumbled down in order to return to a more natural appearing winner?? I don't know how this could be done....I have ideas....like maybe the required "clinics" for recognized judges could address this issue.
    I think, what the judges PIN, the trainers will PRODUCE. The current trend is requiring trainers to go to extreme measures like Carolina Gold , Dex, Depo, LTD and all the rest. So can we change what the judges PIN????
    "Over the Hill?? What Hill, Where?? I don't remember any hill!!!" Favorite Tee Shirt

  • #2
    Originally posted by Claudius View Post
    I am so thrilled to read that this new drug is being questioned and that others are noticing the stullifying effects it is having on the horses. But the perameters of the hunter division require that horses behave like automatons with no allowable expression. And it is a moot point which came first, the chicken or the egg. So I say, lets start at the top.....let's educate the judges to learn to pin "Real" performances.....most of today's judges have come up through the industry on/with/around altered horses. So naturally they are looking for them in the ring. Can we do as the AQHA is doing and come back up that path we have stumbled down in order to return to a more natural appearing winner?? I don't know how this could be done....I have ideas....like maybe the required "clinics" for recognized judges could address this issue.
    I think, what the judges PIN, the trainers will PRODUCE. The current trend is requiring trainers to go to extreme measures like Carolina Gold , Dex, Depo, LTD and all the rest. So can we change what the judges PIN????
    Judges have to attend clinics every X years.
    At those clinics they are being told that comatose is what they should be looking for.
    There was a recent thread about fake tails and a statement about not pinning any horses without fakes was attributed to a well known judge.
    This is the type of nonsense that is pervasive in USEF's approvals for judges and their clinics.

    The rules need to change then the rest will fall into place.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Can't we find a way to make a difference??

      Even those of us on COTH. Can we see if we have a consensus about the hunter division? If we can, and we can get enought USEF members to sign something to that effect, can't we make a difference? Can't we atleast TRY??? Where are you LH when I need you????
      "Over the Hill?? What Hill, Where?? I don't remember any hill!!!" Favorite Tee Shirt

      Comment


      • #4
        Hunter Judges

        It's time for most of you to take note and reform and revise what you look for in the the hunter rings...and the USEF and Hunter/Jumper board members as well.....really? Rewarding horses that have been "calmed" and go like zombies. Fake tails? Can anyone provide a supporting argument that requires needles and various potions in order to have a top hunter horse?

        Comment


        • #5
          I may be mistaken but i believe that comment being referred to about fake tails was made by a trainer ( not a judge) in an article about turnout, not about judging.
          I have been attending judges clinics from the time they began. Not once have I heard discussion in regard to fake tails affecting opinion.
          Not once have I heard it said that the best horse has to be the quietest one. It certainly can't be the one acting like a jackass, but I don't think that most judges want the deadest one. They want the one that jumps up and gets round and looks through the bridle with interest. Unfortunately we do not see that horse very often
          www.midatlanticeq.com
          Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
          November 11-13, 2016

          Comment


          • #6
            Ok, I agree with you on everything except your dislike for Depo. I am currently at a barn that has quite a few mares that are on it. The reason is because regumate is so dangerous. Really, its not all that different except you inject it instead of leaving it in the fridge and putting it in your mares food.

            Just wanted to state my point, carry on.
            I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.

            Comment


            • #7
              http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/s...usage-of-none/

              petition for this
              ~~Member of the TB's Rule Clique ~~
              http://www.off-breed-dressage.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • #8
                Just signed the above Petition and "Liked" it on facebook.... let's keep this going!

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  i DID TOO. Come on everyone...maybe we can make a difference!!! Someone commented, " You guys are just ganging up on the pros!!" NOT! We are making a statement to the hunter participants that says , " you are involved in a sport that does not allow drugs." plain and simple. the obvious seguey (sp) to this is, "now you will have to learn to ride better in order to be competitive."
                  "Over the Hill?? What Hill, Where?? I don't remember any hill!!!" Favorite Tee Shirt

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Claudius View Post
                    the obvious seguey (sp) to this is, "now you will have to learn to ride better in order to be competitive."
                    You've hit on something there.

                    I think it's easier for a lesser rider to be competitive on a horse that is overprepared rather than underprepared. Whether it's because people want to show before they're really ready, or they only ride a couple of days a week, or whatever, they have a better chance at a good trip if Dobbin is very, very quiet. One way or another.

                    I, too, have attended many judges' clinics, and I've never heard the panelists say, "The slowest one wins."
                    Last edited by MHM; Feb. 25, 2012, 10:36 AM. Reason: Typo

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It is just as often that the trainer wants the client to show before they are ready. When they go off to a show they need to fill the trailer. Especially at the more local level I see riders in the 2'6" hunteres that really don't even know how to canter and are staying on by mere law of gravity. And you wonder why the horses need drugs? ( Not that i am condoning administration of illegal drugs or premature showing practices)
                      www.midatlanticeq.com
                      Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                      November 11-13, 2016

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The system is FUBAR.
                        Gone are the days when hunters actually hunted, and the purpose of a show was to see who had the nicest hunter.
                        Shows, even A rated, were more often than not charity fundraisers, largely put on by volunteers.
                        Now they're cash cow for profit franchises.

                        Showing is now a business. Not simply riding and enjoying the horse.
                        Riders want to show before they can ride well enough, trainers want all their clients on the showgrounds with them in order to keep collecting training and coaching fees, so we end up with people bragging about going to AA shows who are actually competing in unrated divisions.

                        It's beyond the point where anyone can even realistically assign blame--there's a real chicken and egg conundrum.

                        Perhaps at some point, the wider economic mess will cause a crash and burn of the entire "industry".
                        "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                        ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Referencing AQHA again:
                          They have done something really clever this year; the new 'Ranch Horse Pleasure' class at AQHA shows. Recognizing that Western Pleasure (like hunters) was FUBAR, and beyond redemption, a new WP division class has been started requiring moving out at all gaits, and penalizing silver tack and blinged outfits. First shows report around 40 entries in this class versus 6-10 in the regular WP. No cross entering - you have to choose, heh heh.
                          Comprehensive Equestrian Site Planning and Facility Design
                          www.lynnlongplanninganddesign.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I love watching a beautiful hunter go. Don't like showing hunters because winning is not as cut and dry as jumpers. You are relying on one persons (generally) opinion on how your horse stacked up to their idea of a great hunter. The horses way of going, jumping style, mannerisms etc. all subjective.
                            Who doesn't want to ride a scopey quite going horse?
                            Want to end the drugging for this effect if not natural? Stop the hunter divisions. Before you tar and feather me I know this will not happen for too many reasons to list here.

                            The question that has come to my mind is: Is there more drugging done to win or is it just to get the client in the ring and around the course?

                            I would like to think that a pro could ride a horse and be competitive without chemical help.

                            I had thought that with the influx of all the quite warmbloods compared to you know those crazy TB's that it would have eliminated the need to chemically quite one or LTD for that matter.

                            People seem to have no patience or work ethic anymore. I could be wrong in this general statement.

                            When I show in the hunters I take it with a grain of salt. I have had the best rounds of my life on the best horse and gone home empty handed. Then again I have put in some of the worst rounds and for what ever reason the judge that day thought my horse could do no wrong and we went home with the championship ribbon. Most of the time it is somewhere in the middle. I also think it would have gone this way even if I had drugged my horse.

                            I don't know how you make the judging any less subjective than it all ready is.
                            Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from behind, or a fool from any direction

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              A couple of easy things to do which might raise awareness:

                              1. Do not use euphemisms. A horse is not "over-prepared", it is either drugged or LTD or both. Call a spade a spade.

                              2. Exhibitors, Make yourself part of the solution --- ASK your trainer what drugs your horse has in his system on show day. Do not allow trainers to give your horse anything that you haven't approved of. Educate yourself; know what each drug does. Not just the approved use, but the side effects (which are probably the reason the drug is being administered.) If your trainer is defensive and less than forthcoming, tell him that you are willing to put yourself down as trainer and him/her as coach. If drugs are found in a horse's system, the owner and trainer are liable.

                              If your trainer knows that you could be brought up on charges (the owner is usually fined a low amount and told to give the ribbons back, it is the trainer who is the responsible party if drugs show up on a drug test), then your trainer will be more likely to be honest.

                              3. Fight for a zero tolerance policy. The FEI has one. TB racing is moving in that direction. This zero tolerance policy is enforced by: 1. The FEI: Having all horses quarantined off into a separate stabling area 24 hours before the competition. 2. At the track, NO ONE except licensed vets are allowed to have any drugs or drug associated paraphernalia in his possession. Trainers can be set down for having a syringe in their office. Plus horses are moved into a holding barn X hours before their race.

                              ~~~If customers do not take responsibility for their horses' performance, then why should other people? Is the customer intimidated by the trainer? Bad excuse. Does the customer not want to know what Dobbin has been given? Is winning is more important than putting each horse on a level playing field?

                              Trainers can and will find ways around medication rules as long as their customers expect and want to ride drugged horses. If we, as exhibitors, want the status quo changed, then we must be willing to look in the mirror to find the root cause of it.
                              "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                              Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by chunky munky View Post
                                I may be mistaken but i believe that comment being referred to about fake tails was made by a trainer ( not a judge) in an article about turnout, not about judging.
                                I have been attending judges clinics from the time they began. Not once have I heard discussion in regard to fake tails affecting opinion.
                                Not once have I heard it said that the best horse has to be the quietest one. It certainly can't be the one acting like a jackass, but I don't think that most judges want the deadest one. They want the one that jumps up and gets round and looks through the bridle with interest. Unfortunately we do not see that horse very often
                                http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...highlight=fake

                                please re-read the thread.
                                A poster who admits to being a judge stated that she/he uses it as a tie breaker.

                                I'm sure you are thinking of Dignelli's remarks about a fake tail being traditional.LMAO. Quote from the thread below.
                                And by the way,fake tails are hardly traditional, unless you are doing AQHA of course.

                                "Interesting article, though I had to laugh when A. Dignelli said that hunters without a fake tail should be included in the nontraditional category of fashion. I don't recall seeing too many fake tails years ago in the hunter classes.

                                Here's the statement: Andre Dignelli, a top hunter, jumper and equitation trainer in Katonah, N.Y., admitted that if he notices a rider and horse in the ring who are not (both) dressed to the nines, it would be enough to “take something away from even a perfect round.”

                                “When a horse walks in and doesn’t have the right tack on, is wearing a saddle pad that’s inappropriate, doesn’t have a fake tail, is not beautifully braided or isn’t wearing well-oiled tack,” he listed off, “it doesn’t look well turned-out. And the rider needs to have well-fitting boots, the right breeches. I like it to look like traditional hunter classes.”

                                Bolded for emphasis.

                                And Chunky, according to the rules 'playing' is a major or minor fault ( depending on the judge, who is being judged, if the horse exhibits 'quality' which is not mentioned in the rule book, who owns it,who sold it, etc.)

                                So admit it, if the best jumper and mover in the class even thinks about playing you'll knock it out of the ribbons won't you? After all, that's what the rules say. and you judge by the rules right?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Simple answer, no. There are degrees of everything. If a small pony bucks, out. If a pregreen gets a little proud of himself in the corner and shakes his head, not a big issue. And though I know you seem to have an attitude about any opinion I have, I am very confident that I judge by the rules.
                                  Incidently the text regarding fake tails has nothing to do with what is shared at clinics regarding judging. This is an opinion of an individual that is obviously an accomplished horseman, but alas, not a licensed official. And again, that is about turn out, not judging although you may wish to interpret it support your claims.By the way I may be incorrect but I don't think that the AQHA allows fake tails. I have been told about their hair extensions, and hence all the tail bags.
                                  There are hundreds and hundreds of judges these days. Not all agree on the degree of what is a disobedience, or if a horse would look better with a fake tail or many other things for that matter. How close to a jump is too close? How fast is too fast? How hard was that rub? Many things in the hunter ring are not as black and white as you may wish them to be. We all have pet peeves and things we give brownie points for.
                                  This is why there is a different judge every week. Cocolate and vanilla.
                                  And the judges are printed in the prizelist. If an exhibitor doesn't feel that they will be judged effectively or fairly, then don't show in front of them
                                  www.midatlanticeq.com
                                  Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
                                  November 11-13, 2016

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Okay, I'm all for fighting doping, but I DO NOT support a zero-tolerance policy that is modeled after the FEI. The FEI tests are too sensitive to be realistic; some of the things that trigger a positive on an FEI test could not possibly have any effect in the minute amount that it takes to show up.

                                    I think there's a difference between using approved substances correctly, like an NSAID for an older horse who might be jumping around the big tracks, and going against the drug rule. I'm not at all sure that taking away that option is the way to go. I'm all for being ethical, but I don't think a gung-ho zero tolerance policy is the best way across the board.

                                    If I misinterpreted and the zero-tolerance idea was meant just for quieting substances, please correct me!

                                    Just curious, how many people reading/posting on this thread have used Perfect Prep or something like it?
                                    http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                                    Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
                                      A couple of easy things to do which might raise awareness:

                                      1. Do not use euphemisms. A horse is not "over-prepared", it is either drugged or LTD or both. Call a spade a spade.

                                      2. Exhibitors, Make yourself part of the solution --- ASK your trainer what drugs your horse has in his system on show day. Do not allow trainers to give your horse anything that you haven't approved of. Educate yourself; know what each drug does. Not just the approved use, but the side effects (which are probably the reason the drug is being administered.) If your trainer is defensive and less than forthcoming, tell him that you are willing to put yourself down as trainer and him/her as coach. If drugs are found in a horse's system, the owner and trainer are liable.

                                      If your trainer knows that you could be brought up on charges (the owner is usually fined a low amount and told to give the ribbons back, it is the trainer who is the responsible party if drugs show up on a drug test), then your trainer will be more likely to be honest.

                                      3. Fight for a zero tolerance policy. The FEI has one. TB racing is moving in that direction. This zero tolerance policy is enforced by: 1. The FEI: Having all horses quarantined off into a separate stabling area 24 hours before the competition. 2. At the track, NO ONE except licensed vets are allowed to have any drugs or drug associated paraphernalia in his possession. Trainers can be set down for having a syringe in their office. Plus horses are moved into a holding barn X hours before their race.

                                      ~~~If customers do not take responsibility for their horses' performance, then why should other people? Is the customer intimidated by the trainer? Bad excuse. Does the customer not want to know what Dobbin has been given? Is winning is more important than putting each horse on a level playing field?

                                      Trainers can and will find ways around medication rules as long as their customers expect and want to ride drugged horses. If we, as exhibitors, want the status quo changed, then we must be willing to look in the mirror to find the root cause of it.
                                      Amen.

                                      I would only add that I think that the judging does have to change too. I think that expressiveness and a good pace and a little bit of keenness should be rewarded, minor head shakes or tail swishes should be ignored, and that any dullness or an overly slow pace needs to be penalized. A horse with self carriage and balance, a good jumping pace and a beautiful jumping style should be the ideal.

                                      FLeventer, I have no problem with mares being on depo, but I think it becomes more questionable when it is given to geldings.

                                      To me what it boils down to is that unless the judging changes people will try anything that they can get away with to try to get their horses to perform in that ultra quiet zombie "hunter" manner which is currently so well rewarded at the shows.

                                      Fake tails are a totally different issue. I really don't think you can put fake tails in the same class as pharmacological interventions.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Really tough to change judging perspectives, rule books, etc. Just make it simple:
                                        If you win Champion or Reserve in any hunter division, rated or not, at an A or AA show, your horse WILL be tested. Increase drug test fees so this can happen, and only test these few horses so fees do not need to be raised very much. Meet these horses and ponies at the gate after the last class jogs and escort them to the test stall.
                                        Comprehensive Equestrian Site Planning and Facility Design
                                        www.lynnlongplanninganddesign.com

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X