• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Recurring hind end suspensory injury

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Recurring hind end suspensory injury

    Below is a link to a previous thread from 2009. I was wondering if anyone else has done a neurectomy & fascitomy (or knows someone who has done this procedure) since then. This is what my vet is recommending for my gelding with a hind leg high suspensory injury. He tore his suspensory many years ago and somehow he has done it again despite all efforts to wrap him in bubble wrap. I've googled it and seen some really positive personal experiences and satisfactory clinical results.

    Any info would be helpful! thanks!

    http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=225589

  • #2
    We currently have two horses at my trainer's barn that have had bilateral faciotomies/neurectomies. Both are sound and returned to their original level of work. I will say that these were "original" injuries and was told by my vet that the prognosis is not as good if the suspensory doesn't heal well the first time. Best of luck.
    Originally posted by EquineImagined
    My subconscious is a wretched insufferable beotch.

    Comment


    • #3
      My older horse strained his front suspensory, did shockwave therapy. It healed and we slowly brought him back into work. A year later he strained it again, more shockwave therapy, healed and brought back to work. We never went back to what we were doing before (used to do 3'6, after he strained his suspensory a second time we did 3'3) but he stayed completely sound from then on. 2.5 years later and I just sold him. The vet who did the prepurchase (who knows my horse) could not feel ANYTHING on that suspensory and when he flexed him he took one step lame then was fully sound (and my horse is 13 years old so that was quite a good flex for a horse that age)
      Have you tried shockwave?

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        thanks for the responses!

        I have not tried shockwave. My vet recommended this over shockwave since its the second go-around. I have heard that the prognosis is lower if its a re-injury.
        Last edited by Shadbelly; Nov. 28, 2011, 03:18 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Lots of experiences, mostly positive, including my own, described on this thread in the Eventing forum:
          http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=271451

          Also feel free to join the thread if you go ahead with the surgery.
          You have to have experiences to gain experience.

          1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia "More Valley Girl Than Girl Scout!"

          Comment


          • #6
            My vet always had me do the labor intensive 3 days of sweat wraps followed by 3 days of alcohol wraps and keep alternating until your horse shows improvement. I think I've done it for as long as 2 weeks, maybe longer.
            It's an old fashioned cure, but it works!

            Comment


            • #7
              I have an 13 year old warmblood gelding that had these procedures last year by Dr. White at Leesburg. They did the fasciotomy first (that is what Dr. White believes in), horse went sound and a few months later was lame again (it was bilateral high hinds). He then needed the neurectomy, so that was done and after a few months of rehab horse is now sound. I do give him previcox every day for his overall comfort. Have not shown him again but probably could (he was a 3' hunter). Whether to do the procedures or not depends on the extent of the suspensory injury. Interestingly I had a mare around the same time that also had a high hind suspensory that healed with multiple shockwave treatments and gentle rehab under saddle, but her injury was more mild - just swelling of the suspensory, no core lesions like the gelding had. In a recurrent injury, the recommendation for surgery is probably a good one. If you decide on surgery, I would do both the fasciotomy and neurectomy at the same time, I wish they had recommended that for me and it would have saved me another surgery. Apparently the nerve that goes to the hind suspensory is in a very narrow channel in the leg and it tends to get inflamed and causes the soreness, so many vets do it at the same time as the fasciotomy. I am happy I had the surgery done for him because otherwise you can spend months up to a year trying more conservative approaches and end up back to square one, horse still lame. They gave me a success rate of 80%. I feel pretty good that both my horses came back. I've been very happy with Kent Allen's evaluations too, they've always been spot on for me so you could get an opinion there if you haven't already.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cmcrill View Post
                I have an 13 year old warmblood gelding that had these procedures last year by Dr. White at Leesburg. They did the fasciotomy first (that is what Dr. White believes in), horse went sound and a few months later was lame again (it was bilateral high hinds). He then needed the neurectomy, so that was done and after a few months of rehab horse is now sound. I do give him previcox every day for his overall comfort. Have not shown him again but probably could (he was a 3' hunter). Whether to do the procedures or not depends on the extent of the suspensory injury. Interestingly I had a mare around the same time that also had a high hind suspensory that healed with multiple shockwave treatments and gentle rehab under saddle, but her injury was more mild - just swelling of the suspensory, no core lesions like the gelding had. In a recurrent injury, the recommendation for surgery is probably a good one. If you decide on surgery, I would do both the fasciotomy and neurectomy at the same time, I wish they had recommended that for me and it would have saved me another surgery. Apparently the nerve that goes to the hind suspensory is in a very narrow channel in the leg and it tends to get inflamed and causes the soreness, so many vets do it at the same time as the fasciotomy. I am happy I had the surgery done for him because otherwise you can spend months up to a year trying more conservative approaches and end up back to square one, horse still lame. They gave me a success rate of 80%. I feel pretty good that both my horses came back. I've been very happy with Kent Allen's evaluations too, they've always been spot on for me so you could get an opinion there if you haven't already.
                We are actually going through this same situation with a horse at my farm. He had a faciotomy only (per the recommendation of his old vet) last September and came to me for rehab. Unfortunately he did not stay sound very long despite doing every bit of the rehab by the books. The vets feel that even though the lesion has healed that scar tissue near the nerve is causing the lameness--we will be repeating the surgery with a neurectomy this winter.

                cmcrill did Dr. White do your horse's neurectomy? I was under the impression that he did not like to do them. But my vets have always told me that the nerves are so close to where they make the "cuts" for the faciotomy that you might hit some of them in the process--so you might as well take care to them all while your horse is on the table. Apparently it's a controvertial procedure. Glad to hear your outcome was positive.
                Originally posted by EquineImagined
                My subconscious is a wretched insufferable beotch.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Herbie19, Dr. Norrie Adams did the neurectomy at Leesburg. You're right, apparently Dr. White does not believe in doing them - I think Dr. White is a great vet, but I wish he had told me about this potentially being an issue down the road. If I had not done the neurectomy, I would not have a useful horse at this point. I can only assume it is controversial because if there is no sensation in that area (after the neurectomy), the horse may not feel pain if there is a recurrent suspensory injury. But obviously if the horse is lame and the suspensory is healed after the first procedure, you have no choice.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by cmcrill View Post
                    Herbie19, Dr. Norrie Adams did the neurectomy at Leesburg. You're right, apparently Dr. White does not believe in doing them - I think Dr. White is a great vet, but I wish he had told me about this potentially being an issue down the road. If I had not done the neurectomy, I would not have a useful horse at this point. I can only assume it is controversial because if there is no sensation in that area (after the neurectomy), the horse may not feel pain if there is a recurrent suspensory injury. But obviously if the horse is lame and the suspensory is healed after the first procedure, you have no choice.
                    Our horse is definitely healed and is still lame--blocks to proximal suspensory

                    Dr. Adams will be doing the neurectomy on the horse we have too--I only wish I had been involved pre-op on this horse because I would have made the owners aware of this and then let them make the decision. I just hope that's it's not too late for this horse Glad to hear that you had a successful second go round!

                    Dr. White is an amazing surgeon--I waited two months for him to remove a chip from my horse's ankle when he broke in Florida one winter--he only deserved the best
                    Originally posted by EquineImagined
                    My subconscious is a wretched insufferable beotch.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X