• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Some Little CANTER Cuties! (Or the "Help Me Learn About Conformation" Thread)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some Little CANTER Cuties! (Or the "Help Me Learn About Conformation" Thread)

    Hi all,

    I've ridden for most of my life, but have recently taken a short sabbatical from horses. I'm starting to ride again and get back into the whole horse thing, and I've recently become absolutely enamored with some (ok, ok...you got me, it's actual so many) of the CANTER cuties. I've decided that when I'm in a position to have another horse, I'd definitely like it to be an OTTB.

    Unfortunately, I won't be in such a position for quite a while. So, for now, I can mostly look and drool and ooh and aah and send wistful pictures to friends and family declaring my affection for these lovely horses.

    However, my sifting through the horses has also revealed to me that I don't really have that great of an eye for conformation. Sure...I'll see horses that I think look like nice, solid horses, but it is more of a hunch. In other words, I can't really articulate exactly what it is that draws me to the horse. I can see things like balance, good proportion, etc. But I'm afraid I don't see the finer things, or know exactly what the implications are (ie: shoulder angle, pastern angle, etc.)

    So, if anyone would be so kind as to help educate me, I would greatly appreciate it. Below are 2 of the most recent little CANTER cuties that I've found. To me, both of them look like they have a decent conformation and really just look very kind and darling, to boot.

    What are your opinions of their conformation? Do they seem like they would make good hunter/jumper horses? If so (or not), what conformational attributes offer hints?

    And...on top of that, maybe someone will agree with me that these 2 are just adorable and will scoop them up before my self control dissipates and I end up going to get them myself

    Chaotic Bull
    ^ This guy is a 3 year old, and I think he just looks so kind.

    Early Again

  • #2
    I'm the same way as you. I have learned a little about conformation thanks to COTH but still feel very uneducated when I'm looking at horses. So I will be interested to hear what others have to say.

    But can I just say that I LOVE Early Again?! He looks like a smaller version of my horse. So cute!

    Comment


    • #3
      Depending what you're looking to do, the OTTB is meant to be an athlete and therefore most who are sound have a chance of being pretty decent for local circuits.

      On top of that, listing photos are notoriously bad, because the volunteers out there taking the photos 1) are volunteers not pro photographers 2) are asking for time from busy folks who don't have long to stand there to take photos 3) are often taking pics of a very fit, very active horse who doesn't want to stand and pose 4) don't have the backgrounds and lighting setups you see for fancy stables. For those reasons, even the best at conformation can easily completely misjudge a horse from its listing without anyone being at fault. Therefore, my opinions below could be totally inaccurate if someone goes to see the horses.

      Both are cute with appealing things about them, but I prefer Early Again. Chaotic Bull has a neck which appears to tie in low. Right now it is built up improperly, but that just tells you something about his racing form, and muscle re-shapes with proper riding. It could be the neck ties in just fine after reconditioning. What bothers me more is his hind legs look longer than his front legs. Notice, he is posed with the camera more toward his front end - that makes the back end of almost any horse look shorter hipped than it really is and pointy. His hind end doesn't really bother me because of the camera angle - it wouldn't keep me from wanting to check him out if I were looking in the area. As for the length of the back legs - well, it could be positioning and an effect caused by the camera, or a real problem which affects his movement and suitability for showing. Only an in-person visit will really answer that. I do like his shoulder as a dressage rider, though the angle of the humerus makes me think it's possible he will have too much knee action to be great in the hunter ring. It can be deceptive, so that's another reason to check him out in person and see. Overall, he's not bad, and if I had other horses to check out in the same place I'd totally check him out.

      Early Again has more going for him from that picture. The pic is taken just slightly more toward his hindquarters, and the result is a horse who looks far more balanced. He has a gorgeous coat and great alert expression which just make him look prettier. Size-wise, though, he's unlikely to be able to make the stride as competition gets tougher, so again it would depend on purpose. His hind leg is straighter, and that actually signals more of a dressage or jumper to me than hunter. I like how his neck ties in better, but again it could have more to do with shape of his muscling than shape of his neck. He also seems to have more even length legs - which means more likelihood of a good self-carriage. His shoulder is nice and more neutral, so that's more likely to result in huntery movement.

      Both horses appear to have relatively smooth toplines across the loin, which is a positive sign for an OTTB. And in person, both could just be amazingly fabulous horses.

      You can *try* to tell from photos, but really it takes seeing them go to have more of an idea. The best thing you can do is get someone who is experienced in retraining racehorses who knows what body changes you'll see, and can tell how they'll look with correct work.
      Originally posted by Silverbridge
      If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

      Comment


      • #4
        Chaotic Bull's hind end looks funky. Can't make any solid judgements from the photo, but he looks sickle hocked

        Early Again looks more balanced overall, but the upright pasterns and standing so far under himself in front are a concern.
        Against My Better Judgement: A blog about my new FLF OTTB
        Do not buy a Volkswagen. I did and I regret it.
        VW sucks.

        Comment


        • #5
          I like this one quite a lot.
          http://www.canterusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4232: t11-3053-07-trainer-owned-qricas-grandsteedq&catid=54:ne-trainer-listings


          This too, but not as much.
          http://www.canterusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4235: t11-3056-07-trainer-owned-gelding-qprimal-humorq&catid=54:ne-trainer-listings


          This one is a killer color!
          http://www.canterusa.org/index.php?o...ainer-listings
          What they have in common is that the front and back are in balance with each other. I like to look at Canter horses and imagine the pole of a carousel coming up from the ground, If the front part matches the back part they are going to be much more able to balance themselves over their centers. Which will make your life much easier than trying to gather up one who always wants to tip onto his forehand...

          Of your two, I like Early Again better. I like everything but his massive , coarse neck and shoulder.
          madeline
          * What you release is what you teach * Don't be distracted by unwanted behavior* Whoever waits the longest is the teacher. Van Hargis

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks for all of the responses! They've given me good food for thought. I think I also just need to invest the time, personally, in learning more about conformation. I took some time to read about shoulder slopes/angles, and it was enlightening. However, my eye has to get better at recognizing things like that.

            One of the things I have noticed is that I think my perception of balanced/downhill/uphill is a little bit off. To me, the two horses I posted look pretty balanced. Once you point it out, I could see how Chaotic Bull may be a little downhill, but it doesn't seem pronounced to me.

            However, after looking at the 3 horses that you posted, Madeline, they all look downhill to me! Especially the last one. The first one -- the grey -- looks almost balanced, but it still looks a little bit downhill to me. I've come to the conclusion that I probably prefer horses that are a tad uphill...but to me, the uphill-ed-ness looks correct. What am a missing?

            Thanks again for being patient with me. I really do want to develop an eye for this. I think I'm going to have to brave the "real world" and start making a note of what horses move well, jump well, etc., and then make a note of how they are built.

            Comment


            • #7
              On the first two?

              It is really hard to tell but, if you are loking for a possible Hunter, they need to be attractive to make a positive impression just stepping in the ring. The second horse, the bay, is. You want one that makes you want to keep looking. Nothing glaring there, might prefer a little more substance/bone and the 15h is going to limit if you are buying for resale...but...for 2k???

              The grey is a victim of a really bad picture but I would bet he is downhill with that neck and he has a bit of an unattractive head- may be parrot mouthed too. I realize he is chewing on the lead rope but looks like he has an overbite. On one with a great jump and the right kind of canter, these things are minor details...on one that is untested over fences and does not know how to do a show type canter? You have to think about it.

              Nothing replaces going to actually see them and watching them move but, of these two, the bay is the better if you don't mind the size.
              When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

              The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

              Comment


              • #8
                I actually like Chaotic Bull, and think he's the victim of a horrendous picture.

                (which happens, I've gotten used to it, but it makes it hard to really see the whole picture).

                His photo is taken too far from the front, and from a slightly high angle. It makes it hard to see the build of his rear end, and also makes him look a bit short-legged. His stance is a bit funny too, which makes it hard to judge how things are actually built (and making him look like his back legs turn out - but hard to say if they do, or if he's just standing funny).

                His neck does look to tie in a little low, but whether this makes for a downhill build or not sort of depends on the whole body (is croup higher than wither, is stifle higher than elbow) which is sort of hard to judge from this photo. He does look to have a nicely sloped shoulder, and I like how his SI/point of hip lines up. You really would have to go see this one in person to figure out how he looks, though, I think.

                Early Again makes a better first impression (whether it's because he's better, or because he's standing better and the photo is more balanced, hard for me to say). To me he looks like he has a longer shoulderblade, which may make him a slightly better hunter type.

                (heh, should have read netg's post first, haha)
                "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                My CANTER blog.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Of the ones Madeline posted--color's about all the last one has. He's EIGHT and still butt-high standing on a flat surface. I'd hate to try finding a saddle to fit him with the way his withers are.

                  First one in that post looks all right to me. A tad high behind, maybe (the background makes it hard to tell) but only four and probably not done growing entirely.

                  The second one, I hate the neck. I'd like it on a saddlebred.

                  From the OP, I think Chaotic Bull has a nice short back and solid-looking legs while my impression of Early Again is he's burly up top on little spindly legs. But also he's SHORT.

                  Going on pedigree, I would take Chaotic Bull, then (oddly) Primal Humor, the butt-high eight-year-old, or flip a coin between him and Rica's Grandsteed.
                  Author Page
                  Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                  Steampunk Sweethearts

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Larry's Forty Two!

                    Wow! Look at that color! Anybody know how to look up his race record?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rye View Post
                      Wow! Look at that color! Anybody know how to look up his race record?
                      http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbH...421&registry=T

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've liked Chaotic Bull for weeks, keep going back to the site to look at him. He has a great short back, what looks like a nice long gaskin, although it's hard to see, and a long shoulder. And I always thought Holy Bull looked like he would jump.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thanks everybody for your responses and insight! It's really helpful for me to read about everyone's opinions and the different features that pop out to different people.

                          It'll be exciting when I am actually in the market for a new horse. It's tough though -- there are so many cuties out there right now!

                          But I have to say, there is something about Chaotic Bull that I really like. I realize (more so now) that he may not have the best conformation, but there is just something about him that calls to me. Maybe it's that Holy Bull was one of my favorite racehorses... If I were in a position to have a horse at the moment, I'd probably be willing to at least take a look, and perhaps take a chance on him.

                          Either way, I hope someone snatches these guys up soon (along with all the other lovely, deserving CANTER horses).
                          Last edited by popover; Aug. 3, 2011, 09:04 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I have seen a couple of Holy Bull descendants and both turned out to be nice 3' hunter types, and probably had scope to do more.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Chaotic Bull is just plain to squatty....and looks to have a bump on the off side knee...his neck is short and if you are tall from the hip to shoulder when you ride him you may feel theres not enough horse in front of you.

                              Bay is cute but to small for re-sale and maybe stride limited. Nice type though if bigger more appealing for re-sale down the road.

                              The Suffold Downs Grey at 1st glance is very appealling but looks body large and neck small and don't like his shoulder.

                              The liver chestnut I love the whole package..theres a horse who is a victom of a bad photo..take off the neck mid way up and look at his conformation w/O distraction of twisted head.

                              Last flashy horse is just that eye candy.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                                Of the ones Madeline posted--color's about all the last one has. He's EIGHT and still butt-high standing on a flat surface. I'd hate to try finding a saddle to fit him with the way his withers are.

                                First one in that post looks all right to me. A tad high behind, maybe (the background makes it hard to tell) but only four and probably not done growing entirely.

                                The second one, I hate the neck. I'd like it on a saddlebred.

                                From the OP, I think Chaotic Bull has a nice short back and solid-looking legs while my impression of Early Again is he's burly up top on little spindly legs. But also he's SHORT.

                                Going on pedigree, I would take Chaotic Bull, then (oddly) Primal Humor, the butt-high eight-year-old, or flip a coin between him and Rica's Grandsteed.
                                It is very clear that the 8 year olds butt is closer the camera than his front. This makes a horse appear to be downhill. I would hazard a guess that he is pretty level or possibly a bit uphill. Hard to really tell anything by the picture.

                                It looks like Early Again's front is closer to the camera, which makes his shoulder look bigger than it is.

                                With Chaotic Bull, the picture is just awful.

                                You really cannot judge CANTER horses based on pictures. Most are taken quickly and by a volunteer. I would go more on feeling from the picture, then go out to see them.

                                The best thing you can do to learn about conformation is start looking at a bunch of hunters. Look at all the angles and compare. This link is for a conformation article for upper level eventers, but can give you an idea about what pieces to look at.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X