• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

WWYD? Hunter Eq Judging question.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WWYD? Hunter Eq Judging question.

    Posting using an alter because I do not want to compromise the rider's privacy.

    Background: Small schooling show. Beginner equitation class. Going one way, the rider looked super. Solid base of support, good hands, very nice position. Reversed and it was a different picture. Her leg on this side was totally different. Stirrup barely stayed on her foot, no weight in her heel. I was so surprised given how strong her leg was on the other side?

    How would you judge that?

  • #2
    I wonder if she possibly had a problem with the weaker leg. I knew someone that lost her lower leg as a child and continued to show very successfully with a prosthesis. She was an excellent rider, but that leg appeared as you have described. However, in a Eq class, I think, you have to weigh that position flaw in.

    Comment


    • #3
      Not a judge.....

      But I would think it would depend on how the other riders rode. I mean I would hope that most judges would pin the more consistant rider. Unless this rider was better both ways then the rest of the class (you never know with those beginner eq classes at schooling shows ). My thought process for this would be that she either got tired and couldnt keep riding that strong the whole class or she is more developed on one side - neither of which I would think should be rewarded by being placed over a rider who may have been "less super" then her the first way, but was better then her the second way (showing consistancy in position).

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by luckeys71 View Post
        I wonder if she possibly had a problem with the weaker leg. I knew someone that lost her lower leg as a child and continued to show very successfully with a prosthesis. She was an excellent rider, but that leg appeared as you have described. However, in a Eq class, I think, you have to weigh that position flaw in.
        Wow. You nailed it in one! It did turn out that she has a prosthesis.

        Knowing that she has a prothesis, do you make accommodations for that? I.e., not penalize the floppy stirrup on that side as much as you would for another rider?

        The parent asked if there was anything they could do. Would you recommend trying one of the stirrups that clicks in with magnets or something like that?

        Comment


        • #5
          This is a difficult call! Because it was Beginner Eq at a Schooling show, I think i would probably accommodate her. In addition, from your description, she was probably still the strongest rider in the class despite those flaws.

          One time I judged a confirmation class at a 4H horse show, and there was a LOVELY mare with almost perfect confirmation.... which then turned around and was missing an eye.

          Comment


          • #6
            I have judged a couple of times and am interested in doing more. I was taught that judges must have a system of placing and recording their line up. Accordingly, the judge may have written down her order of placings during the first direction in this flat class and then made any necessary adjustments during the second direction. Even though the second direction wasn't as strong for this particular rider, the judge must have had her reasons for leaving her in 1st when comparing her to the rest of the class.

            After judging a bit, I also think that judging of flat classes is far more subjective that O/F classes. There is a lot more to scrutinize and score on in O/F classes and it's much more black and white.

            I think that the challenge of judging physically handicapped riders against "able bodied" ones in the eq divisions is interesting. I don't know of any rules that address this type of issue, so it probably falls to individual judges to make decisions. I competed against a rider with physical disabilities that would have been obvious to the judge while I lived in New England. She was good, and got decent ribbons in unrated equitation classes. I had a lot of respect for her because I think it must have taken a lot of extra work and dedication on her part to successfully ride in those classes.
            http://www.hunterjumperconnection.com/hjc-blog.html

            A blog featuring the musings of a semi-neurotic adult amateur rider on riding, training, showing, life.

            Comment


            • #7
              I usually pretty much have my placings before I have the class change direction. If I had her at the very top one way, and her hands/seat were the same in the second direction, and it was only the one leg that was off, she would probably still be top 3. Again, I don't know anything about the rest of the class so...

              kudos for her for entering an eq class with a prosthesis!
              I WAS a proud member of the *I'm In My 20's and Hope to Be a Good Rider Someday* clique..but now I am 30!!!!!!!!!!!
              My new blog about my Finger Lakes Finest:
              She Ain't No Small Potato!

              Comment


              • #8
                I wouldn't know what to do, but kudos to the girl for not letting her prosthetic leg stop her from riding and showing horses!

                Also, I did short stirrup with a pony who only had one eye (I don't remember how I did it was like 12 years ago) but what if a pony who was missing an eye showed in pony hunters (at A-AA shows) and had almost perfect courses. Would he be penalized because of the missing eye?

                Comment


                • #9
                  We do have a wonderful sport, where our horses can provide riders who are physically challenged with a great equalizer. I think anyone who was at WEG and noticed the many 'Para' riders at the venue, whether they were just casually moving about the place, or actually competing came away with a new appreciation for how special our sport is in that regard.

                  As to the 'off side' problem mentioned by the OP, I would say as a judge and a trainer that what was described is not all that unusual a problem, and is not limited to those riders who face extraordinary challenges.

                  Without unnecessarily stretching the parameters of good riding practices, it would depend for me on the rider's control of the horse and ability to be an effective rider, in comparison to the others in the class. I would hesitate to make any recommendations to a parent of such a rider--leave that to a trainer who is highly qualified to assess each of these situations based on the rider's capabilities and the horse's suitability. The beauty of this sport is that it allows riders of differing abilities to compete head to head, on equal footing. But generally, it's best to limit one's comments about judging to the particulars of that rider's performance in the class under discussion, and not extrapolate beyond this.

                  Inner Bay Equestrian
                  Facebook
                  KERx

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by M. O'Connor View Post
                    As to the 'off side' problem mentioned by the OP, I would say as a judge and a trainer that what was described is not all that unusual a problem, and is not limited to those riders who face extraordinary challenges.

                    Without unnecessarily stretching the parameters of good riding practices, it would depend for me on the rider's control of the horse and ability to be an effective rider, in comparison to the others in the class. I would hesitate to make any recommendations to a parent of such a rider--leave that to a trainer who is highly qualified to assess each of these situations based on the rider's capabilities and the horse's suitability. The beauty of this sport is that it allows riders of differing abilities to compete head to head, on equal footing. But generally, it's best to limit one's comments about judging to the particulars of that rider's performance in the class under discussion, and not extrapolate beyond this.
                    It certainly is not an unusual problem at all. Had the parent not approached me, I wouldn't have thought twice about it because many riders often have a stronger and weaker side.

                    I did recommend that the parent ask the coach but was curious myself.

                    Thank you for putting this so succintly:

                    Without unnecessarily stretching the parameters of good riding practices, it would depend for me on the rider's control of the horse and ability to be an effective rider, in comparison to the others in the class.

                    While my initial reaction was to think that there should be some accommodation made for this young lady, upon further reflection and feedback, the bottom line is that her control of the horse and her ability to be an effective rider are what is being judged. If she is choosing to compete against 'able-bodied' riders, then the playing field must be level. If she has a position flaw, then that is something that needs to be addressed with her coach. Just like anyone else.

                    Thank you all for the thoughtful and constructive discussion.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Equitation is actually effective riding and a judge's job is to pin the most effective riders based solely on what they see in front of them.

                      It is not the judge's place to assume anything about background or physical limitations or use these in determining who places where.

                      Many, many Beginner riders have a noticeably weaker side or a heel that is not as flexible/leg that is looser and so forth without any kind of physical limitation so it is a huge mistake to assume there may be one. Even if there is-a judge has to place the class according to the effectiveness and position of the riders, not any misperceived notions and sympathy. Seen this happen and it was not fair to anybody.

                      In this case, if the kid was say, 70%effective? She'd place accordingly when compared to the other kids in the class at a Beginner level.
                      When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                      The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Just a question , is it legal for a junior to ride side saddle in an Eq class?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Good question in theory but it is asking if apples can be compared to oranges in reality.
                          When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                          The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I remember once when I was little (in th e 60's) asking my coach about that after seeing a girl ride side saddle in a Eq class, He said if you can do it well, do it, but you won't be given any exceptions so you better really be great at it. I sooo wanted to try, but after my first and last lesson side saddle I gave up the idea after being told " Dear, Ladies do not cluck like chickens, use your stick"! I was certain maintaining a lady like demenor just wasn't my forte. PS: The Mikes is my business name I am a female for those going UH?????

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I don't know the rider's ability, but what if she just removed the stirrup and leather from that side. Assuming she doesn't really use it that is.
                              Southern Cross Guest Ranch
                              An All Inclusive Guest Ranch Vacation - Georgia

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by MIKES MCS View Post
                                PS: The Mikes is my business name I am a female for those going UH?????
                                Totally off-topic but NO WAY! I always assumed you were Mike. Was my mental image ever wrong.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by OveroHunter View Post
                                  I don't know the rider's ability, but what if she just removed the stirrup and leather from that side. Assuming she doesn't really use it that is.

                                  Then she cannot be fairly compared to the rest of the class that is using (or trying to) both irons.
                                  When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                  The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Come Shine View Post
                                    Totally off-topic but NO WAY! I always assumed you were Mike. Was my mental image ever wrong.
                                    LOL , sorry to disappoint , I know how few Men are in this game. I have in the past identified myself as a female .. Maybe I need to find a new Screen name so it's not so strange when I answer topics regarding the "Best Riding Bra"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by arghhalter View Post
                                      Thank you for putting this so succintly:

                                      Without unnecessarily stretching the parameters of good riding practices, it would depend for me on the rider's control of the horse and ability to be an effective rider, in comparison to the others in the class.

                                      While my initial reaction was to think that there should be some accommodation made for this young lady, upon further reflection and feedback, the bottom line is that her control of the horse and her ability to be an effective rider are what is being judged. If she is choosing to compete against 'able-bodied' riders, then the playing field must be level. If she has a position flaw, then that is something that needs to be addressed with her coach. Just like anyone else.

                                      Thank you all for the thoughtful and constructive discussion.
                                      Well, on the other hand... for a fully able-bodied rider, if one leg is flopping like that there's a huge chance they are sitting crooked, causing crookedness in their horse, and far less effective. Was this rider still sitting straight and not causing crookedness? To me that would be a big effect in placings. One looser leg *without* the very typical body unevennesses wuold place higher than a less effective rider or a rider with one solid and one loose leg who has a horse more crooked. Regardless of reason for the leg movement.
                                      Originally posted by Silverbridge
                                      If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X